Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.561
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Unram Law Review JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Veteran Law Review Sarwahita : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JUSTISI Jurnal Papatung : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Pemerintahan dan Politik JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Multicience Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Law Development Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal IIJSE Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi IPSSJ Pamulang Law Review
Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 67 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 67 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
Legal Responsibility of Marketplaces in Distributing iQIYI Digital Services and Consumer Protection in Indonesia Suci, Indah Meisyana; Nugroho, Andriyanto Adhi
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v7i2.8658

Abstract

This study concludes that the distribution of unauthorized iQIYI digital services through marketplaces creates inherent legal defects, as access remains revocable by the authorized provider, exposing consumers to the risk of unilateral account blocking and potential systematic losses. Accordingly, marketplaces should not be treated as passive intermediaries; their platform control and economic benefits justify the application of Absolute Responsibility for consumer losses arising from such transactions. This research employs a normative legal method, combining statutory and conceptual approaches, with a focus on Indonesian consumer protection law and electronic commerce regulation. The analysis demonstrates that intermediary-based liability models are inadequate to address risks inherent in non-physical and revocable digital services. To operationalize this accountability, marketplaces must ensure accurate risk disclosure, verify seller legitimacy, handle complaints effectively, and implement measurable loss-recovery mechanisms. Finally, regulatory alignment of the Government Regulation on Trade Through Electronic Systems with consumer protection principles, including enforceable algorithmic accountability, remains necessary to strengthen supervision and legal certainty in Indonesia's digital commerce ecosystem.
Kedudukan Dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Kurator Sebagai Likuidator Dalam Pengakhiran Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas Andriyan Rahardi; Diani Sadiawati; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i3.2679

Abstract

Pengakhiran kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas (PT) akibat insolvensi menimbulkan permasalahan hukum mengenai kedudukan dan tanggung jawab kurator dalam proses likuidasi badan hukum perseroan. Ketidaksinkronan antara Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas menciptakan kekosongan norma yang berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan hukum kurator dalam pengakhiran kepailitan PT berdasarkan KMA Nomor 109/KMA/SK/IV/2020 dan UU Nomor 40 Tahun 2007, serta mengkaji tanggung jawab hukum kurator dalam kapasitasnya sebagai likuidator pasca berakhirnya kepailitan. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan kurator bersifat hibrida, yaitu diakui secara fungsional sebagai pelaksana likuidasi oleh UU PT dan Nomor 109/KMA/SK/IV/2020, namun tidak memiliki kewenangan atributif yang sempurna karena ketiadaan mekanisme transisi yuridis dari rezim kepailitan ke rezim likuidasi. Tanggung jawab hukum kurator menghadapi dualisme rezim antara Pasal 72 UU Kepailitan dan PKPU dan Pasal 152 UU PT yang membuka risiko perpindahan tanggung jawab jabatan ke tanggung jawab pribadi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya harmonisasi legislatif komprehensif guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum dalam penyelesaian status badan hukum PT pasca kepailitan.
Bad Faith as the Basis for the Cancellation of Registered Trademarks in the 100% Trademark Dispute (Case Study No. 797 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022) Hilyah Az Zahra; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i2.53576

Abstract

Trademarks play a strategic role in commerce as both a product identity and a reflection of a business operator’s economic value and reputation. In Indonesia’s trademark legal system, which adheres to the “first to file” principle, trademark registration serves as the basis for the creation of exclusive rights. However, the application of this principle must be balanced with the principle of good faith to prevent abuse by parties who register trademarks in bad faith. This study aims to analyze the application of the principle of bad faith as the basis for the cancellation of registered trademarks, as well as the position of the "first to file" principle in the "100%" trademark dispute under Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The method used is normative legal analysis employing a statutory approach and a case-based approach, referencing Supreme Court Decision No. 797 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022. The research findings indicate that bad faith is evidenced by the overall similarity of the trademarks, the similarity of the goods classes, as well as the prior use and registration of the trademark by SAULE, LLC in several countries. The “first to file” principle remains recognized, but it is not absolute and may be set aside if the registration is proven to lack good faith. The legal framework governing the criteria for good faith needs to be strengthened to ensure more consistent legal certainty.
Legal Analysis Regarding The Implementation of The Indonesian Game Rating System (IGRS) in The Protection of Child Consumers in Indonesia Achmad Hanif Avicenna Setiady; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3554

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the Indonesian Game Rating System (IGRS) within Indonesia's legal framework, focusing on child consumer protection in the digital gaming industry. Indonesia's rapidly expanding gaming market indeed generated economic benefits, but on the other hand, exposing children to age-inappropriate content at the same time. The Government responded by establishing the IGRS, a classification system based on age suitability and content descriptors, most recently revised through Minister of Communication and Digital Affairs Regulation No. 2 of 2024. Employing a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes relevant legislation, ministerial regulations, legal doctrine, and documented enforcement cases through descriptive-qualitative and teleological interpretation. The findings reveal that the IGRS remains structurally incomplete: it lacks a Government Regulation establishing binding enforcement, exhibits weak harmonization with Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, and relies on a self-classification model whose reliability was exposed by the 2026 Steam controversy. Enforcement in practice remains reactive, with no dedicated complaint mechanism for child consumers or their guardians. The study concludes that the IGRS has not yet achieved optimal legal protection for child consumers and recommends a comprehensive Government Regulation, an independent supervisory body, and accessible consumer redress mechanisms to strengthen Indonesia's digital game governance framework.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP TENAGA KERJA YANG DIRUMAHKAN TERKAIT REMUNERASI DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 Dhitania Annisa; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 4 (2021): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i4.657-669

Abstract

Dengan adanya pandemi Covid-19, banyak perusahaan yang berdampak pada aturan pemerintah serta alasan kesehatan untuk melakukan kegiatan work from home, dan berdampak kepada pekerja yang dirumahkan, kebijakan ini berdampak pada pemberian remunerasi terhadap tenaga kerja. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi perlindungan hukum terhadap tenaga kerja yang dirumahkan terkait remunerasi dalam masa pandemi Covid-19.Hal ini melatarbelakangi permasalahan mengenai bagaimanakah Perlindungan Hukum terhadap tenaga kerja yang dirumahkan terkait remunerasi pada masa pandemi Covid-19 berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta konsekuensi terhadap perusahaan yang tidak memberikan remunerasi pada tenaga kerja yang dirumahkan selama pandemi Covid-19.Dari hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa berkaitan mengenai perlindungan dan pengupahan pekerja di tempat kerja, pengusaha dapat memberikan penangguhan pembayaran upah apabila pengusaha tidak dapat membayar upah sesuai dengan peraturan upah minimum, melalui persyaratan dimana harus melakukan perundingan dengan pekerja terlebih dahulu. Pengusaha melakukan penangguhan pembayaran upah minimum kepada pekerja dengan mengabaikan kewajiban para pengusaha untuk membayar selisih upah minimum penangguhan. 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS HAK CUTI TAHUNAN PEKERJA WAKTU TERTENTU YANG TIDAK TERPENUHI Nadila Devita; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 3 (2021): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i3.403-416

Abstract

Di perusahaan yang memproduksi alat rumah tangga berbahan plastik, hak pekerja waktu tertentu atas cuti tahunan tidak terpenuhi. Cuti tahunan tersebut hanya untuk karyawan tetap sedangkan pekerja waktu tertentu tidak mendapatkan hak cuti tahunan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum hak cuti tahunan pekerja waktu tertentu dan penyelesaian hukum yang dapat ditempuh pekerja jika cuti tahunannya tidak terpenuhi. Penelitian ini mengunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendakatan perundang-undangan (statue approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa perlindungan hukum atas hak cuti tahunan bagi pekerja waktu tertentu telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja mengatur bahwa pekerja waktu tertentu berhak atas cuti tahunan ketika telah bekerja di suatu perusahaan selama 1 tahun berturut-turut, namun jika cuti tahunan tidak diberikan maka salah satu hak pekerja waktu tertentu tidak terpenuhi dan perusahaan dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana atau denda serta untuk penyelesaian hukum atas tidak terpenuhinya cuti tahunan, pekerja dapat menyelesaikannya melalui jalur non-litigasi yaitu ada bipartit, mediasi, konsiliasi dan arbitrase atau melalui litigasi yaitu melalui pengadilan hubungan industrial.
PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA PADA SAAT PANDEMI COVID-19 DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN Khalda Fadilah; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 1 (2021): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i1.334-350

Abstract

Fenomena kasus penyebaran Covid-19 di Indonesia begitu pesat hal ini tentu sangat berdampak negatif terhadap ketenagakerjaan dan melemahnya perekonomian negara Indonesia sehingga menimbulkan implikasi nyata yang harus dihadapi banyak perusahaan untuk melakukan pemutusan hubungan kerja kepada pekerja/buruh di Indonesia secara masal. Pasal 164 dan 165 Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan kurang lebih menyatakan bahwa suatu perusahaan berhak memutus hubungan kerja terhadap pekerja apabila suatu perusahaan mengalami force majeure atau dalam keadaan memaksa. Pada prinsipnya saat terjadi force majeure maka tanggung jawab atas segala ganti rugi dan tuntutan itu akan hilang dan tidak ada pergantian biaya kerugian apabila terjadi suatu keadaan memaksa (force majeure) atau kejadian yang tidak disengaja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hukum tentang Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja bisakah dikategorikan sebagai alasan force majeure karena kondisi Pandemi Covid-19 yang sudah dikatakan sebagai bencana nasional dan memberikan informasi mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja/buruh yang terkena pemutusan hubungan kerja dengan alasan force majeure. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan Yuridis Normatif
Juridical Analysis of Non-Consensual AI-Generated Sexual Content as Digital Voyeurism in Indonesian Criminal Law Devy Fitri Syahrani; Muhammad Athaya Primananda; Nirwasita Zada Paramesti; Yearta Kurnia Zalifah; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17810678

Abstract

This study examines Non-Consensual AI-Generated Sexual Content as a form of digital voyeurism under Indonesian criminal law. Using a normative juridical method, the research analyzes the application of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, Pornography Law, Sexual Violence Law, and Personal Data Protection Law in addressing deepfake pornography that manipulates a victim’s image without consent. The findings show that such acts constitute layered criminal offenses, including electronic data manipulation, obscenity violations, electronic-based sexual violence, and personal data misuse. However, law enforcement faces significant challenges, including technical detection issues, lack of AI-specific regulations, perpetrator anonymity, and cross-border jurisdiction barriers. This study highlights the need for dedicated AI regulation and strengthened law-enforcement capacity to ensure effective victim protection.
Legal Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Musical Works Produced Through Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of Suno AI Platform Implementation Angga Sandhika Raharjo; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.48973

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has significantly transformed the fields of art and creative industries, particularly in musical creation. One of the most notable AI platforms capable of automatically generating music is Suno AI, which raises legal debates regarding its legal status and copyright protection for AI-generated works. This study aims to analyze the legal standing of Suno AI as a creator and examine the legal responsibilities related to musical works produced through artificial intelligence within the framework of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach, using data derived from legislation, legal literature, and relevant national and international case studies. The findings indicate that Suno AI cannot be recognized as a legal subject or creator, as it lacks consciousness and legal personality as required by Article 1 paragraph (2) jo. Article 31 of Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Therefore, AI functions merely as a technological tool, while legal rights and responsibilities rest entirely on humans, namely developers or users who control the system. In cases of copyright infringement, as stipulated in Articles 34 and 112 of the Copyright Law, human operators of the AI system bear legal responsibility, not the AI itself. Cases such as the lawsuit against Suno AI and Udio AI in the United States, as well as instances of AI-based music fraud in Indonesia, highlight the urgent need for adaptive and comprehensive legal regulations. This study concludes that Indonesia must establish a comprehensive legal framework on AI-generated creations to ensure legal certainty, protect the moral and economic rights of human creators, and promote the ethical and responsible use of AI technology in the music industry.
TANGGUNG JAWAB OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN DALAM PENANGGULANGAN PENIPUAN INVESTASI Heru Suyanto; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho; Surahmad Surahmad
Pamulang Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Agustus 2018
Publisher : Prodi Hukum S1 - Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/palrev.v1i1.2843

Abstract

Abstract The Financial Services Authority (OJK) is an institution that has the functions, duties and authority to regulate, supervise, examine and investigate. In addition OJK also has the duty and authority to protect consumers throughout the financial services sector. In the task of protecting consumers regulated in article 28 of Law No. 21 of 2011, includes providing information and education to the public on the characteristics of the financial services sector, services and products; ask the Financial Services Institution to stop its activities if the activity has the potential to harm the community; and other actions deemed necessary in accordance with the provisions of legislation in the financial services sector
Co-Authors Achmad Hanif Avicenna Setiady ADINDA ZAHRA ANDRIYANI Adira Mutiara Jasmine Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Akbar, Masyhur Al Fitriyani Alvito, Haykal Rizki Anatasia Lamminar Andriyan Rahardi Angelia Carla Angga Sandhika Raharjo Anindya, Salma Elsa Anisah, Aura Artanti Zahra Adisa Aryaputri, Aqila Shafiqa Atik Winanti Azalia, Zatira Rahma Azareel Sulistiyanto Jusuf Azizah A Azkia An Nida Fasya Bayu Suryadi Manggala Cahaya Grace Roulina Centia Sabrina Nuriskia Chairunnisa Yumna Risti Christiansen, Nicholas Daniel Dara Puspita Riyawan DARRYL ANNE LANITA SIMANUNGKALIT Devy Fitri Syahrani Dhitania Annisa Diah Ayu Wulandari, Diah Ayu Diani Sadiawati Dieka Qaulam Nabilla Diva Salsabila Ferdiansyah Djie, Bryan Storm Feryan Dorinda S, Gabriel Eliska Vioni Faizal Erick Lingga Wisnu FANDY GULTOM Farbadi, Mayla Putri Farizh Maulana Yusuf Feby, Amanda Ferdiansyah, Reza Feryan Djie, Bryan Storm Fitria Syahwa Fawdhisa Gabriella Angelina Permatasari Gabriella Ivana Ghina Rhoudotul Gracy, Clony Christy Guna Gerhat Sinaga Gunawan, Rafy Akmal Hasna Nurul Zahida Hendra Parulian Hermawati, Mutiara Heru Suyanto Hilyah Az Zahra Human Santoso Hutabarat, Josefid Keitharo Indriani Rieda Astuti Insani, Gema Mutiara Irene Liansah Jihan Shaumy Julia Elfany Shavira K, Kefianto Karina Hasiyanni Manurung Khalda Fadilah Kinanti Puput Septiana Kusuma, Nanda Putri Ananda Lambok Suprianto Lamminar, Anatasia Lestari, Marcella Agustia Logan Al Ghozi Maharani, Nurrachma Mahendra, Rayhan Syahbana Manggala, Bayu Suryadi Manogu Sitompul, Theodore Daniel Sebastian Marpaung, Velani Christina Marsya Arviela Maharani Matondang, Togar Ibrahim Maylinda, Prisca Dwi Muhammad Athaya Primananda muhammad fikri Muhammad Rifqi Murti, Terra Whisnu Mustafid Milanto Achmad Muthia Sakti Nadila Devita Nafisa Verlee Ameeralia Najwa Latisha Natalia, Imelda Hera Natasya Fhadyah Azzahra Negara, Revolusi Shandi Nicholas Pratama Budi Eryono Nirwana, Rena Putri Nirwasita Zada Paramesti Noviani, Laila Nurchasanah Nurfajriana, Syifa Nurrachma Maharani Nurrachman, Azzahra Ongkowiguno, Cheryl Michaeli Parlagutan, Dodi Pramudita Antasia Priyambodo, Muhammad Bagus Pujia Khoirunisa Rachim, Muhammad Hafidz Rafidah, Annisa Rahma Rafli, Muhammad Raihan Fadhilah Putra Raka Wicaksono Ramadhan, Niko Rafael Ramadhandiko, Difqa Alvi Rebecca Purba Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla Rifa Nasya Shafwa Rofi Ayyasy Sadiqa, Hafsa Syahrain Safina Nabila Fikrie Sandiah, Rara Siti Seraf, Yudea Maruli Setyarini, Astri Dewi Sheila, Eirene Eva Marta Shiddiq Gymnastiar, Abdur Rahman Silvia Fernanda Silvia Rosiana Siregar, Tiara Rebecca Kezia SITI NUR AMALIAH Sitorus, Yosua Audric Matthew Subakdi Suci, Indah Meisyana Suherman Sulthoni Ajie Sahidin Surahmad Suyanto, Heru Suzeeta, Nala Syandhira Swanasti Djatu Dianti Syahrani, Devy Fitri Syifa Nurfajriana Tambunan, Yesaya Geraldo Tantri Nur Aditya S Tazkia Asshiva Maryam Thoriq Umam Farisy Tigor Akhmad Fahrezi Utami, Safira Maharani Putri Wahyo Santoso Winati, Atik Yearta Kurnia Zalifah Yuliana Yuli Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Yuliana, Adelia Zahra Auliana Noor Alfatah Zainab Cahya Rosuli Zalfa, Nabila