Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analisis Yuridis Hak Pemegang Saham dalam Perseroan Terbatas : Studi Pasal 72 UUPT dalam Situasi Restrukturisasi Perusahaan Prasetya, Ahmad Fanani Eko; Sriwidodo, Joko; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jh.v5i2.5205

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perlindungan hukum terhadap hak pemegang saham minoritas dalam situasi restrukturisasi perusahaan, khususnya terkait pembagian dividen dan dampak terhadap kontrol serta kepemilikan saham. Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 72 UU Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT), pembagian dividen interim dapat dilakukan dengan syarat tertentu, namun dalam praktik restrukturisasi, pemegang saham minoritas berisiko menghadapi kerugian berupa hilangnya hak dividen, dilusi saham, dan berkurangnya pengaruh dalam pengambilan keputusan perusahaan. Selain itu, kendala dominasi pemegang saham mayoritas seringkali mengurangi perlindungan bagi pemegang saham minoritas. Penelitian ini juga memberikan saran untuk meningkatkan transparansi dan mekanisme perlindungan hak minoritas melalui perubahan anggaran dasar atau perjanjian pemegang saham yang mengatur keputusan strategis dan restrukturisasi perusahaan
Polwan dan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT): Analisis Kasus Pembakaran Suami Di Mojokerto Dari Perspektif Gender dan Hukum Wong, Novita Irene; Sriwidodo, Joko; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i1.5527

Abstract

Cases of gender-based violence in the family (KDRT) continue to be an important issue because of its major impact. Gender stereotypes that consider men as perpetrators and women as victims often ignore the fact that women can also be perpetrators. This study uses a normative approach with an analysis of laws and regulations, cases, and literature studies to understand the influence of gender roles in KDRT and the application of the law to perpetrators who are members of the police. The results of the study indicate the need for inclusive legal reform and an understanding of gender equality to ensure equal legal protection for all victims. In cases of KDRT involving female police officers, the application of the PKDRT Law is more relevant because it regulates physical violence that causes death. Handling this case requires a transparent, fair, and objective legal process, regardless of the status of the perpetrator
Kepastian Hukum Transaksi Dengan Menggunakan Mata Uang Dinar Dan Dirham Dalam Pendekatan  Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Anwar, Faisal; Sriwidodo, Joko; Hutomo, Putra
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 1 No. 9 (2024): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, September 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/fdrhb544

Abstract

Legal certainty related to transactions using Dinar and Dirham currencies in the criminal law approach in Indonesia. Based on Law No. 7 of 2011 on currency, Rupiah is the only legal tender in Indonesia. The use of currencies other than Rupiah, including dinars and dirhams, is not legally recognized and has the potential to violate criminal provisions, such as those related to fraud or forgery. However, this phenomenon also involves social and cultural dimensions, especially in communities based on sharia economics, where dinars and dirhams are considered as means of transaction that are more in line with Islamic principles of justice and ethics. Overly repressive law enforcement can generate resistance in society, so more inclusive legal reforms and adjustments are needed. By promoting dialogue and collaboration between policy makers, business actors, and the community, it is expected to create a legal system that is fair and responsive to social needs and is able to maintain legal stability in Indonesia . From the research results, the transfer of receivables by Cessie by the creditor in the event that the debtor fails to pay the third party mortgage guarantee does not comply with the applicable provisions as regulated in Article 613 of the Civil Code and Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. Form legal protection for third parties by filing a lawsuit before or during the execution process. The government, stakeholders and related parties are expected to make changes to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights over Land and Objects related to Land, by accommodating third party protection which is explicitly regulated in guaranteeing rights to land, these regulations do not clearly regulate the rights and obligations of third parties so they cannot provide legal protection for collateral owners. The results of this study that legal certainty related to transactions using dinars and dirhams, as done by Zaim Saidi, in the approach of Indonesian criminal law is a violation of Article 9 of Law No. 1 of 1946 on Criminal Law regulations in conjunction with Law No. 7 of 2011 on currency. Enforcement of these transactions can be carried out through the application of criminal sanctions, since the use of currencies other than Rupiah for payment purposes is not justified by law. In addition, the low legal awareness of the public in using the Rupiah as a legal tender also became an important factor in this case.  
EFEKTIVITAS SELF ASSESSMENT SYSTEM PADA PELAPORAN PAJAK Widodo, Akmal Alfarisi; Sriwidodo, Joko
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 9, No 3 (2023): Volume 9, Nomor 3 July-September 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v9i3.8602

Abstract

AbstrakPajak sangat penting untuk meningkatkan kemakmuran dan kemajuan manusia. Agar pembangunan dapat terwujud sebagai representasi Negara dalam mencapai Bonum Publicum, maka masyarakat umum dan otoritas pajak harus memahami hal tersebut. Menurut Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan (UU KUP), Indonesia menggunakan Self Assessment System sebagai salah satu cara pemungutan pajak. Self Assesment System sebagaimana dimaksud dalam peraturan perundang-undangan perpajakan mengandaikan wajib pajak menentukan besarnya pajak yang terutang dan dibayar serta melaporkannya secara berkala. Namun, mengingat tingginya jumlah wajib pajak yang tidak patuh dan seringnya terjadi kecurangan baik oleh oknum maupun aparat pajak, sistem pemungutan pajak di Indonesia sebenarnya belum berjalan dengan baik. Pemerintah diharapkan dapat memberikan penyuluhan kepada masyarakat tentang bagaimana mengelola pajak dengan baik dan benar serta memastikan tidak ada celah terjadinya kecurangan dalam pemungutan pajak dengan menetapkan peraturan yang dapat diterapkan secara konsisten dan tegas serta meningkatkan profesionalisme aparatur. otoritas pajak dalam melayani wajib pajak. Kata kunci: penerimaan pajak; penghindaran pajak; self assesment system Abstracttaxes is very important to increase human prosperity and progress. In order for development to materialize as a representation of the State in achieving a Bonum Publicum, the general public and tax authorities must understand this. According to the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (UU KUP), Indonesia uses the Self Assessment System as a way of collecting taxes. The Self Assessment System as referred to in the tax laws and regulations presupposes that the taxpayer determines the amount of tax owed and paid and reports it periodically. However, given the high number of disobedient taxpayers and the frequent occurrence of fraud by both tax officials and officials, the tax collection system in Indonesia is actually not running well. The government is expected to be able to provide counseling to the public on how to manage taxes properly and correctly and ensure that there are no loopholes for fraud in tax collection by establishing regulations that can be applied consistently and firmly and increasing the professionalism of the apparatus. tax authorities in serving taxpayers. Keywords: tax revenue; tax evasion; self assessment system
PENERAPAN PERATURAN KEJAKSAAN NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2021 TERKAIT REHABILITASI NARKOTIKA BERDASARKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF Hastuti, Ari; Sriwidodo, Joko; Basuki, Basuki
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Maret 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/4je9ak19

Abstract

Restorative Justice is utilized as an approach to resolve criminal cases involving offenders, victims, families, and relevant parties to seek a fair resolution, prioritizing rehabilitation over retribution. The Guidelines for Narcotics Rehabilitation based on Restorative Justice guide Prosecutors in the stages of pre-prosecution, prosecution, and rehabilitation supervision. In practice, there are differences in the interpretation and application of the dominus litis principle by Prosecutors in handling narcotics cases with a restorative justice approach. The limitations in understanding and applying the dominus litis principle can affect the consistency and uniformity of rehabilitation policies provided by the Prosecutor's Office in narcotics criminal cases. Moreover, this issue can also lead to inconsistent treatment of narcotics defendants in need of rehabilitation. The issue concerning the authority of the prosecutor's office in implementing rehabilitation policies in narcotics criminal cases with a restorative justice approach and enforcing the law in narcotics criminal cases with a restorative justice approach. This research method employed a normative juridical research type using legislative and conceptual approaches as the basis for analysis in addressing the issues. The conceptual approach used includes the concept of narcotics rehabilitation by the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office based on theories of authority and law enforcement, serving as analytical tools in addressing the issue of prosecutor's authority in law enforcement rehabilitation in narcotics criminal cases. In conclusion, the Prosecutor's Office has the juridical authority to conduct rehabilitation in narcotics criminal cases with a restorative justice approach. This is regulated in the Indonesian Prosecutor's Regulation Number 18 of 2021. Prosecutors play a central role in controlling cases, from investigation to court judgment execution, based on the dominus litis principle. Public prosecutors have a significant role in ensuring that medical and social rehabilitation efforts are carried out appropriately by designated rehabilitation institutions or health services, as well as in issuing warnings and taking further action if suspects fail to comply with the prescribed rehabilitation process. Law enforcement in cases of narcotics abuse requires a thorough understanding and strict application of the requirements based on the Indonesian Prosecutor's Regulation Number 18 of 2021
Penegakan Hukum Monopoli Persaingan Usaha dalam Tender Proyek Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha (KPBU) Yudhatama Fitriargo, Bambang; Sriwidodo, Joko; Hendro, Gatut
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 3 No. 01 (2022): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v3i01.526

Abstract

Presiden Republik Indonesia menetapkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 38 Tahun 2015 tentang Kerjasama Pemerintah Dengan Badan Usaha Dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur yang bertujuan untuk Mencukupi kebutuhan pendanaan secara berkelanjutan dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur melalui pengerahan dana swasta. Namun dengan adanya Perpres tersebut menyebabkan adanya celah hukum bagi BUMN/BUMD untuk melakukan praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normatif dengan obyek yang diteliti adalah asas-asas hukum dan kaidah-kaidah hukum yang masih berlaku namun juga didukung dengan data empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan larangan monopoli persaingan usaha dalam tender proyek KPBU yaitu adanya larangan tindakan post bidding yang merupakan tindakan mengubah, menambah, mengganti dan/atau mengurangi dokumen pengadaan dan/atau dokumen penawaran setelah batas akhir yang telah ditetapkan masih terjadi. Dalam hal ini KPPU tidak mengatur tentang post bidding hanya saja KPPU dapat memutuskan tindakan post biding yang terjadi dalam kerjasama pemerintah dan badan usaha terkait pengadaan barang dan jasa apabila melakukan persekongkolan tender.