Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.75
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Sriwijaya Law Review Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada WAJAH HUKUM Unes Law Review Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Jurnal Suara Hukum Jurnal Supremasi Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh PATTIMURA Legal Journal Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) PUSKAPSI Law Review Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Jurnal Anti Korupsi Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies PUSKAPSI Law Review Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Rechtenstudent Journal Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum
I Gede Widhiana Suarda
Faculty Of Law, University Of Jember
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 53 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Illicit Enrichment and Human Rights: Comparative Legal Policy in Indonesia and Poland Ismail Marzuki; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Gautama Budi Arundhati
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n1.p301-323

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia has been classified as an extraordinary crime; however, the absence of an illicit enrichment offense has resulted in law enforcement primarily targeting the symptoms of corruption rather than its root cause, namely the accumulation of disproportionate and unexplained wealth. This condition creates an urgent need to examine the potential criminalization of illicit enrichment while ensuring the protection of human rights. This study aims to analyze the construction of legal policy in Indonesia and Poland and to assess the extent to which criminal law policies concerning illicit enrichment in both jurisdictions integrate fundamental principles of criminal law and human rights within their normative design. The research employs a normative legal method, applying both comparative and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia remains in a transitional phase between the orientations of state efficiency and defendant’s rights, whereas Poland places greater emphasis on rights protection through the mechanism of extended confiscation. The criminalization of illicit enrichment can only be justified if it is formulated with precision and proportionality in order to maintain a fair balance between the effectiveness of anti-corruption enforcement and the protection of fundamental human rights.
Illicit Cigarette Trade in Indonesia: Trends and Analysis from the Recent Judgments I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Evan Hamman; Bayu Dwi Anggono; Fendi Setyawan; Moch. Marsa Taufiqurohman; Zaki Priambudi
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.2726.pp38-59

Abstract

The illicit cigarette trade has begun to receive scholarly attention globally. Empirical studies on the illicit cigarette trade are available in the context of Indonesia. However, the Indonesian judicial system lacks a focus on treating illegal practices. To fill the gap, we examine Indonesian court decisions involving the illicit cigarette trade between 2010 and 2019. We provide an overview of the enforcement of Indonesia’s Excise Law 2007 relating to offences related to the illicit cigarette trade. By using a systematic quantitative literature review, we collected data on Indonesian court decisions and found the following: (1) convictions for the practice of illicit trade in cigarettes were relatively steady, with a total number from one to six court decisions annually; (2) certain offences from Indonesia Excise Law 2007 have not been found in the convictions, suggesting their underutilisation in terms of monitoring and enforcement effort; (3) the primary motivation of illicit cigarette traders as reported through the judicial system is the economic benefit or “profit” available to the enterprise; and (4) the sentencing decisions are dominated by the application of the “cumulative principle” with fines and imprisonment applied at the same time. The finding on the average length of imprisonment for illicit cigarettes, which was around 18 months, shows that this crime has low risk compared with the punishment for illicit trade in drugs and narcotics in Indonesia.
Digital Evidence Management in the Criminal Justice System: Towards a Fair and Technology-Responsive Legal Framework Ismail Marzuki; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Fendi Setyawan; Reece Walters
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v11i1.47067

Abstract

The increasing reliance on digital evidence in criminal justice proceedings poses new challenges for legal systems that were traditionally built to deal with physical and conventional evidence. With the development of information technology, digital data such as electronic communications, digital traces, and cyber forensic artefacts have become an important part of criminal case evidence. This article presents a conceptual analysis of the urgency of fair and technology-responsive digital evidence management in the criminal justice system. Through a literature review of legal theory, international practices, and national regulations, this paper identifies significant legal gaps, particularly in data authenticity, the chain of evidence, the validity of evidence, and the protection of privacy rights. In its novelty, this article proposes a five-pillar model for the governance of digital evidence, encompassing the principles of legality, evidence integrity, procedural justice, legal digital literacy, and institutional accountability, as an integrated framework to strengthen the management of digital evidence in Indonesia. This model provides a systematic approach that not only focuses on the technical aspects of digital forensics but also integrates legal normative standards, institutional capacity building, and the protection of fundamental rights within the criminal justice process. The scientific contribution of this research lies in its effort to bridge the conceptual gap between the principle of procedural justice and digital forensic practices within the criminal justice system, thereby supporting the realization of a legal framework that is responsive, transparent, adaptable to technological advancements, and oriented toward the protection of human rights. Ultimately, this article calls for a legal framework that not only accommodates the characteristics of digital evidence but also protects defendants' fundamental rights in criminal proceedings.
Co-Authors Abbas, Shahzada Rahim Ade Irma Suryani Afifah Nur Azizah Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra Ahmad Fahrudin Ainul Azizah Alfalah Naufal Yufianda Andriani Naftali, Septina Angga Wardana Anwar, Iryana Arief Amrullah, M. Awaludin Marwan Azizah, Afifah Nur A’an Efendi Bayu Dwi Anggono Bayu Dwi Anggono Bayu Dwi Anggono Billy Pahlevy Islamy Dina Tsalist Wildana, Dina Tsalist Dinara F Abdunayimova Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Dwi Novantoro Dwi Novantoro Efendi, Aan Ermanto Fahamsyah Evan Hamman Fajrin, Nabila Fanny Tanuwijaya Fendi Setyawan Fendi Setyawan Fendi Setyawan Firman Floranta Adonara Fiska Maulidian Nugroho Gautama Budi Arundhati, Gautama Budi Ginting, Beren Rukur Glenn Wijaya Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi Habi Burrohim Hariyono, Dwiki Agus Heqqy Rioscar Bramanta Herlangga, Armanda I Nyoman Gede Surya Mataram Ismail Ismail Ismail Marzuki Lutfi Nur Aida Maia Kapanadze Mardianto, Cuk Indah Mardiyono Mardiyono Marzuki, Ismail Miftahul Huda Moch. Marsa Taufiqurohman Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Moh. Muhlisin Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Suwandi Nurcholis, Manggala Rizal Nurdin Nurdin Nuzulia Kumala Sari Prakoso, Bhim Priambudi, Zaki Pribadi, R. Iman Prihatmini, Sapti Prihatmini, Sapti Putra, Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra, Steinly Suwanto R.A. Rini Anggraini Ramadhani, Kyagus Reece Walters Samuel Saut Martua Samosir Santoso, Sinung Teguh Sari, Pika Setiawan, Ady Nur Setiawan, Khafid Setyawan, Ady Nur Shofi Munawwir Effendi Siagian, Ruben Cornelius Supriyono Supriyono Taniady, Vicko Tanuwijaya , Fanny Tanuwijaya, Fannny Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Ulfa Elfiah Walters, Reece Wardana, Dendik Surya Widodo Ekatjahjana Wijaya, Glenn Wulan Candrakirana, Wulan Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y. A. Triana Yanuarto, Totok Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum Zaki Priambudi