Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.831
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Sriwijaya Law Review Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada WAJAH HUKUM Unes Law Review Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Jurnal Supremasi Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh PATTIMURA Legal Journal Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) PUSKAPSI Law Review Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Jurnal Anti Korupsi Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) PUSKAPSI Law Review Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Rechtenstudent Journal
I Gede Widhiana Suarda
Faculty Of Law, University Of Jember
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 48 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 48 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Terorisme (Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim) Herlangga, Armanda; Suarda, I Gede Widhiana; Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian
PUSKAPSI Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Pusat Pengkajian Pancasila dan Konstitusi (PUSKAPSI) FH UNEJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/puskapsi.v2i1.30320

Abstract

This study examines the decision number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim in a case of criminal action of terrorism. This type of research is a normative legal research. The approaches used are the legal, case, and conseptual ones. The results showed that based on Decision Number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim found that the public prosecutor was not careful in formulating the charges, the indictment of the Public Prosecutor is not in accordance with the actions that have been carried out by the defendant as stated in the Terrorism Law. The public prosecutor does not meet the requirements in making an indictment as regulated in the provisions of Article 143 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the formal and material requirements in making an indictment in a criminal act that is charged to the defendant. And based on the decision in Decision Number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim, the judge's consideration is not in accordance with what was done by the defendant who considered that the defendant had attempted to commit a criminal act of terrorism as stated in the facts revealed by the trial in the decision number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim.
Dampak Overcrowded Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Terhadap Upaya Pemenuhan Hak Kesehatan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Kasus Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Malang) Alfalah Naufal Yufianda; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Dina Tsalist Wildana; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Sapti Prihatmini
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Edisi Februari 2023
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v4i1.102

Abstract

Pandemi Covid-19 yang melanda dunia terkhusus di Indonesia, menyebabkan Lapas menjadi salah satu tempat yang beresiko tinggi penyebaran Covid-19. Kondisi terebut diperparah dengan tingkat hunian Lapas yang melebihi kapasitas (overcrowded) menyebabkan diharuskan adanya penyesuaian kebijakan untuk menangani keadaan tersebut. Mengingat kondisi tersebut, maka berdampak pada pemenuhan hak-hak warga binaan pemasyarakatan didalamnya terutama hak mendapatkan akses kesehatan dan makanan yang layak. Hak untuk mendapatkan pelayanan kesehatan merupakan suatu hak asasi manusia dan harus diwujudkan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Dengan mendapatkan pelayanan kesehatan yang baik dapat meningkatkan kualitas kesehatan yang lebih tinggi dari sebelumnya. elayanan kesehatan akan terganggu apabila jumlah tahanan dan narapidana tidak terkendali sehingga menciptakan situasi kelebihan kapasitas (overcrowded) sehingga menciptakan situasi yang dapat mengancam kesehatan narapidana. Dalam waktu yang bersamaan di tengah situasi overcrowded yang terjadi di Lapas di Indonesia, negara menghadapi situasi bencana non alam yang melanda dunia, yaitu pandemi Corona Virus Disiase (Covid-19) yang telah menyebar masif di Indonesia.
DEPORTATION AND PRO JUSTITIA COMPULSORY MECHANISM: THE PREVENTION REMEDY OF ABUSE OF POWER AND HUMAN RIGHTS UPHOLDING I Nyoman Gede Surya Mataram; Widodo Ekatjahjana; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; A’an Efendi
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2562

Abstract

One of the sources of Non-Tax State Revenue increasing comes from the Administrative Sanctions of Immigration. The enforcement of the sanction is followed up by the deportation of the foreigners who violate the law in Indonesian territory. The juridical basis for this authority is the attribution regulated in Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration and its derivatives. In practice, the implementation of Article 75 of Immigration Regulation is disrupted which has resulted the human rights protection is not accommodated as stipulated in Article 9 of Declaration of Human Rights and also Article 34 Law Number 39 of 1999. This cannot be allowed in the name of the Principle of Legal Certainty, Transitional Justice, and Global Justice. The result must refer to the declaration agreed upon at United Nations, in which Article 34 stipulates that “every person shall not be exiled or disposed arbitrarily”. This article is an arrangement in Article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Thus, this article must be added to the legal substance regarding the obligation to have a judge’s verdict with permanent legal force from the court in Indonesia against the foreigners who violate the Law. This commitment must also be applied in all legislative products stipulated by the government as the legislator. This includes all legal regulations in Immigration.
CONTROVERSY OF EQUAL RIGHTS TO THE APPLICATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY TO EXTRA ORDINARY CRIME PERSPECTIVE PANCASILA WITH JUSTICE Billy Pahlevy Islamy; Nurdin Nurdin; Dominikus Rato; I Gede Widhiarna Suarda; Bayu Dwi Anggono
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 14 No 4 (2025): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6990

Abstract

This study explores the controversy surrounding the application of the death penalty to perpetrators of extraordinary crimes from the perspective of Pancasila, which upholds the principles of civilized justice. Although the death penalty is officially regulated in the Criminal Code and sectoral laws related to narcotics, terrorism, and corruption, its practice shows inconsistencies. The state strongly enforces the death penalty for drug and terrorism offenders but is more lenient toward corruption offenders, even though the law allows the death penalty under certain circumstances. This disparity raises concerns about potential abuse of power, violates the principle of equality before the law, and undermines public trust in the legal system. The research employs a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, analyzing laws and regulations, doctrines, court decisions, and relevant academic literature. The analysis is conducted descriptively and analytically, with Pancasila used as an evaluative framework. The findings emphasize the need for consistent application of the death penalty for all extraordinary crimes to ensure that the law upholds substantive justice. Using Pancasila as a benchmark, the state is expected to enforce the law in an equitable, accountable, and fair manner, so that the death penalty serves as an instrument of justice rather than a tool of power.
Legal Certainty in the Criminalization of Directors Misusing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Funds Ade Irma Suryani; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Y. A Triana Ohoiwutun
Rechtenstudent Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Rechtenstudent December 2025
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v6i3.374

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a legal obligation for companies as regulated in Article 74 of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (PT Law). However, in practice, misuse of CSR funds remains common in both private companies and State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN), creating adverse impacts on society and the government. This study aims to examine the legal framework governing the criminal liability of directors for the misuse of CSR funds within the Indonesian criminal law system and to analyze the application of the principle of legal certainty. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study finds that directors may be held criminally liable under Article 488 of the Criminal Code when CSR funds are misused in private companies, while similar acts in BUMN may be categorized as corruption under Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Law. Nonetheless, ambiguity within Article 74 of the PT Law continues to generate multiple interpretations, potentially hindering legal enforcement and conflicting with the principles of legality and legal certainty. Therefore, a specific regulation (lex specialis) addressing directors’ criminal liability in CSR fund management is required to enhance legal certainty and strengthen accountable and transparent corporate governance.
The Philosophy of Law in Enforcing Criminal Liability for Nominee Accounts: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Pakistan Ginting, Beren Rukur; Suarda, I Gede Widhiana; Rato, Dominikus; Anggono, Bayu Dwi; Abbas, Shahzada Rahim
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review Vol 6, No 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Postgraduate Program in Law, Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pamali.v6i1.3654

Abstract

Introduction: The use of nominee accounts is an increasingly prevalent phenomenon in the practice of financial crimes, such as money laundering, tax evasion, and the financing of other criminal acts. The nominee account is basically used to disguise the identity of the actual beneficial owner, thus posing a serious challenge in the enforcement of criminal responsibility.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the concepts and foundations of legal philosophy, especially justice, legal certainty, and usefulness in the enforcement of criminal liability for the use of nominee accounts in Indonesia and Pakistan, as well as compare the positive legal arrangements that apply in the two countries.Methods of the Research: This research uses normative legal research methods with approaches to legal philosophy, legislation, and comparative law.Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings of the study show that philosophically, the enforcement of criminal liability against nominee accounts in Indonesia and Pakistan is based on efforts to realize substantive justice by penetrating the formalities of legal ownership to reveal the true beneficial owners. From the perspective of legal certainty, both Indonesia and Pakistan still face challenges due to the lack of an explicit and comprehensive regulation of nominee accounts, so law enforcement often relies on the interpretation of other criminal norms, such as money laundering and banking crimes. Meanwhile, from the aspect of utility, regulation and law enforcement of nominee accounts are directed to maintain financial system stability, prevent abuse of the banking system, and protect the interests of the community and the state. Legally positive, Indonesia regulates criminal liability related to nominee accounts indirectly through the Money Laundering Act, banking regulations, and policies related to beneficial ownership, while Pakistan regulates it through an anti-money laundering legal framework and financial sector regulations that emphasize ownership transparency and due diligence obligations. This comparison shows that although the two countries have similar normative approaches, the difference lies in the explicit level of regulation and effectiveness of their implementation. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the philosophical foundation and harmonize legal arrangements to ensure the enforcement of fair, definite, and beneficial criminal liability for the practice of using nominee accounts.
Criminal Law Politics and Punishment Theories: A Comparative Study of Retributive vs. Restorative Justice in Indonesia and Georgia Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Suwandi; Lutfi Nur Aida; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Y A Triana Ohoiwutun; Maia Kapanadze
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Volume 4 Issue 3 December (2025): PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v4i3.21767

Abstract

Introduction: The debate between retributive and restorative justice remains a central issue in the politics of criminal law across jurisdictions. Indonesia and Georgia represent two countries undergoing legal transitions with distinct historical and socio-political contexts, yet both face similar challenges in determining the orientation of their penal policies. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the differences in the application of retributive and restorative penal theories within the criminal law policies of Indonesia and Georgia, as well as to identify the factors influencing these orientations. Methods of the Research: The research adopts a normative legal method with a comparative approach, examining statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and relevant judicial decisions. Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Indonesia continues to rely on its colonial legacy through the Criminal Code, which predominantly reflects a retributive paradigm, while gradually incorporating restorative principles in specific legislation such as the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. Conversely, Georgia, which previously enforced an extreme zero tolerance policy rooted in a retributive approach, has shifted toward restorative justice within its juvenile justice system through the enactment of the Juvenile Justice Code of 2015. The novelty of this research lies in its comparative analysis, which uncovers how historical, cultural, political, socio-economic, and legal factors shape each country’s penal orientation. These findings contribute to the development of comparative criminal law scholarship and provide valuable insights for promoting more balanced penal policies that integrate both retributive and restorative justice.
A Philosophical and Comparative Legal Analysis of Amnesty: Lessons from Indonesia and the United States Dwi Novantoro; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Dominikus Rato; Bayu Dwi Anggono; Dinara F Abdunayimova
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Volume 5 Issue 1 April (2026): PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v5i1.23893

Abstract

Introduction: Amnesty occupies an uneasy position within contemporary legal systems, situated between the ideals of justice, mercy, and constitutional authority. While often justified as an extraordinary legal response to exceptional circumstances, its application continues to provoke concerns regarding legal certainty, equality before the law, and institutional accountability within modern constitutional democracies. Purposes of the Research: This article seeks to explore the philosophical foundations and legal justification of amnesty through a comparative analysis of its practice in Indonesia and the United States. It aims to examine how differing constitutional traditions conceptualise the legitimacy, limits, and moral implications of amnesty as a legal institution. Methods of the Research: The research adopts a normative legal methodology employing philosophical, statutory, and comparative approaches. Constitutional texts, legal doctrines, and theoretical perspectives are analysed through qualitative legal reasoning in order to assess the normative coherence of amnesty within each legal system. Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings indicate that although both Indonesia and the United States recognise amnesty as an extraordinary legal mechanism, they diverge significantly in terms of constitutional design, institutional safeguards, and moral justification. This article contributes by reframing amnesty not merely as an executive prerogative, but as a legal institution that demands philosophical accountability and constitutional restraint.
Co-Authors Abbas, Shahzada Rahim Ade Irma Suryani Afifah Nur Azizah Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra Ahmad Fahrudin Ainul Azizah Alfalah Naufal Yufianda Andriani Naftali, Septina Angga Wardana Anwar, Iryana Arief Amrullah, M. Awaludin Marwan Azizah, Afifah Nur A’an Efendi Bayu Dwi Anggono Bayu Dwi Anggono Bayu Dwi Anggono Billy Pahlevy Islamy Dina Tsalist Wildana, Dina Tsalist Dinara F Abdunayimova Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Dwi Novantoro Efendi, Aan Ermanto Fahamsyah Evan Hamman Fajrin, Nabila Fanny Tanuwijaya Fendi Setyawan Fendi Setyawan Firman Floranta Adonara Fiska Maulidian Nugroho Gautama Budi Arundhati, Gautama Budi Ginting, Beren Rukur Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi Habi Burrohim Hariyono, Dwiki Agus Heqqy Rioscar Bramanta Herlangga, Armanda I Nyoman Gede Surya Mataram Ismail Ismail Lutfi Nur Aida Maia Kapanadze Mardianto, Cuk Indah Mardiyono Mardiyono Miftahul Huda Moch. Marsa Taufiqurohman Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Moh. Ali Moh. Muhlisin Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Suwandi Nurcholis, Manggala Rizal Nurdin Nurdin Nuzulia Kumala Sari Prakoso, Bhim Priambudi, Zaki Pribadi, R. Iman Prihatmini, Sapti Prihatmini, Sapti Putra, Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra, Steinly Suwanto R.A. Rini Anggraini Ramadhani, Kyagus Samuel Saut Martua Samosir Santoso, Sinung Teguh Sari, Pika Setiawan, Ady Nur Setiawan, Khafid Setyawan, Ady Nur Shofi Munawwir Effendi Siagian, Ruben Cornelius Supriyono Supriyono Taniady, Vicko Tanuwijaya , Fanny Tanuwijaya, Fannny Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Ulfa Elfiah Walters, Reece Wardana, Dendik Surya Widodo Ekatjahjana Wijaya, Glenn Wulan Candrakirana, Wulan Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y. A. Triana Yanuarto, Totok Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum Zaki Priambudi