Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.174
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Sriwijaya Law Review Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada WAJAH HUKUM Unes Law Review Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Jurnal Supremasi Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh PATTIMURA Legal Journal Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) PUSKAPSI Law Review Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Jurnal Anti Korupsi Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) PUSKAPSI Law Review
I Gede Widhiana Suarda
Faculty Of Law, University Of Jember
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 44 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 44 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Membedah Hakikat Ilmu Hukum dalam Paradigma Sanksi Pidana Mati dan Pidana Seumur Hidup Setiawan, Ady Nur; Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra; Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana; Suarda, I Gede Widhiana
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2909

Abstract

Penerapan pidana mati dan pidana penjara seumur hidup dalam sistem hukum Indonesia terus memunculkan perdebatan karena berkaitan dengan aspek moral, nilai kemanusiaan, dan orientasi pemidanaan. Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk menelaah dasar normatif serta rasionalitas dari kedua jenis sanksi tersebut dalam kaitannya dengan pencapaian tujuan pemidanaan kontemporer. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum dengan menggabungkan pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, dan pendekatan perbandingan, dengan KUHP lama dan KUHP baru sebagai rujukan utama yang dianalisis melalui penafsiran gramatikal dan sistematis. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidana mati dalam KUHP Baru mengalami perubahan penting melalui pengaturan masa percobaan dan peluang pengubahan pidana, sehingga menjadikan penerapannya lebih berorientasi kemanusiaan. Adapun pidana seumur hidup dipandang lebih selaras dengan nilai kemanusiaan karena tetap membuka peluang pembinaan dan rehabilitasi, meskipun unsur pembalasannya masih dipertahankan. Perbandingan kedua sanksi tersebut mengindikasikan adanya perubahan paradigma pemidanaan menuju titik temu antara kepentingan pembalasan, pencegahan, dan perlindungan masyarakat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemilihan antara pidana mati dan pidana seumur hidup perlu mempertimbangkan asas keadilan, kemanfaatan, serta penghargaan terhadap hak untuk hidup.
Pretrial In Indonesian Criminal Law Supriyono, Supriyono; Arief Amrullah, M.; Gede Widhiana Suarda, I
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v4i3.664

Abstract

The law is a collection of rules that must be obeyed by all people in a society with the threat of having to compensate for losses or get criminal if they violate or ignore these rules, so that an orderly and fair life in that society can be achieved. The conception that embodies that Indonesia is a state of law basically has joints that are universal, such as the recognition and protection of human rights, the legality of the actions of the state or government in the sense of a legally accountable state apparatus, and the guarantee of Free Justice. The type of writing used by the author is juridical normative (legal research) juridical normative research is carried out by examining various rules of law that have a formal nature, namely laws, regulations and literature that contain theoretical concepts that are then connected to the problems that the author will discuss in this dissertation research. Pretrial as part of the criminal justice system in force in Indonesia is an effort to combat crimes that are penal by using criminal law as the main means of material criminal law and formal criminal law. Pretrial as part of law enforcement, as stated by Barda Nawawi Arief that the problem of law enforcement, both in abstracto and in concreto is an actual problem that has recently received a sharp spotlight from the public. As is the case with the implementation of pretrial which is part of a principle of the rule of law which is that a rule of law has various criteria and elements.Based on the foregoing, the philosophical basis of the pre-trial arrangement in Indonesian criminal law is based on the existence of human rights, namely because Indonesia is a state of law based on Pancasila and recognizes human rights. The idea of a pretrial institution was born from inspiration derived from Habeas Corpus in the Anglo Saxon judiciary, which provided a fundamental guarantee to the human being of the right to independence.
CONTROVERSY OF EQUAL RIGHTS TO THE APPLICATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY TO EXTRA ORDINARY CRIME PERSPECTIVE PANCASILA WITH JUSTICE Islamy, Billy Pahlevy; Nurdin, Nurdin; Rato, Dominikus; Suarda, I Gede Widhiarna; Anggono, Bayu Dwi
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 14 No 4 (2025): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6990

Abstract

This study explores the controversy surrounding the application of the death penalty to perpetrators of extraordinary crimes from the perspective of Pancasila, which upholds the principles of civilized justice. Although the death penalty is officially regulated in the Criminal Code and sectoral laws related to narcotics, terrorism, and corruption, its practice shows inconsistencies. The state strongly enforces the death penalty for drug and terrorism offenders but is more lenient toward corruption offenders, even though the law allows the death penalty under certain circumstances. This disparity raises concerns about potential abuse of power, violates the principle of equality before the law, and undermines public trust in the legal system. The research employs a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, analyzing laws and regulations, doctrines, court decisions, and relevant academic literature. The analysis is conducted descriptively and analytically, with Pancasila used as an evaluative framework. The findings emphasize the need for consistent application of the death penalty for all extraordinary crimes to ensure that the law upholds substantive justice. Using Pancasila as a benchmark, the state is expected to enforce the law in an equitable, accountable, and fair manner, so that the death penalty serves as an instrument of justice rather than a tool of power.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Terorisme (Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim) Herlangga, Armanda; Suarda, I Gede Widhiana; Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian
PUSKAPSI Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Pusat Pengkajian Pancasila dan Konstitusi (PUSKAPSI) FH UNEJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/puskapsi.v2i1.30320

Abstract

This study examines the decision number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim in a case of criminal action of terrorism. This type of research is a normative legal research. The approaches used are the legal, case, and conseptual ones. The results showed that based on Decision Number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim found that the public prosecutor was not careful in formulating the charges, the indictment of the Public Prosecutor is not in accordance with the actions that have been carried out by the defendant as stated in the Terrorism Law. The public prosecutor does not meet the requirements in making an indictment as regulated in the provisions of Article 143 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the formal and material requirements in making an indictment in a criminal act that is charged to the defendant. And based on the decision in Decision Number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim, the judge's consideration is not in accordance with what was done by the defendant who considered that the defendant had attempted to commit a criminal act of terrorism as stated in the facts revealed by the trial in the decision number: 79/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim.
Co-Authors Afifah Nur Azizah Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra Ahmad Fahrudin Aida, Lutfi Nur Ainul Azizah Alfalah Naufal Yufianda Andriani Naftali, Septina Angga Wardana Anwar, Iryana Arief Amrullah, M. Awaludin Marwan Azizah, Afifah Nur A’an Efendi Bayu Dwi Anggono Bayu Dwi Anggono Dina Tsalist Wildana, Dina Tsalist Dominikus Rato Efendi, Aan Ermanto Fahamsyah Evan Hamman Fajrin, Nabila Fanny Tanuwijaya Fendi Setyawan Fendi Setyawan Firman Floranta Adonara, Firman Floranta Fiska Maulidian Nugroho Gautama Budi Arundhati, Gautama Budi Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi Habi Burrohim Hariyono, Dwiki Agus Heqqy Rioscar Bramanta Herlangga, Armanda I Nyoman Gede Surya Mataram Islamy, Billy Pahlevy Ismail Ismail Kapanadze, Maia Mardianto, Cuk Indah Mardiyono Mardiyono Miftahul Huda Moch. Marsa Taufiqurohman Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Moh. Ali Moh. Muhlisin Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian Nurcholis, Manggala Rizal Nurdin Nurdin Nuzulia Kumala Sari Ohoiwutun, Y A Triana Prakoso, Bhim Priambudi, Zaki Pribadi, R. Iman Prihatmini, Sapti Prihatmini, Sapti Putra, Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra, Steinly Suwanto R.A. Rini Anggraini Ramadhani, Kyagus Samuel Saut Martua Samosir Santoso, Sinung Teguh Sari, Pika Setiawan, Ady Nur Setiawan, Khafid Setyawan, Ady Nur Shofi Munawwir Effendi Siagian, Ruben Cornelius Supriyono Supriyono Suwandi, Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Taniady, Vicko Tanuwijaya , Fanny Tanuwijaya, Fannny Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Triana Ohoiwutun Ulfa Elfiah Walters, Reece Wardana, Dendik Surya WIDODO EKATJAHJANA Wijaya, Glenn Wulan Candrakirana, Wulan Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana Yanuarto, Totok Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum Zaki Priambudi