Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Transforming Majelis Taklim into a Hub for Productive and Sustainable Community Development Evanita, Susi; Syofyan, Rita; Syukur, Yarmis; Fahmi, Zul
Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): All articles in this issue include authors from 3 countries of origin (Indonesi
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/kharaj.v7i4.8641

The Majelis Taklim, as a non-formal Islamic educational institution, plays a strategic role in enhancing the socio-spiritual and economic capacities of communities. However, its activities often remain confined to religious rituals with limited empowerment outcomes. This community engagement initiative aimed to transform Majelis Taklim Nurul Islam in Air Tawar Barat, Padang City, into a productive and sustainable community through entrepreneurship training, managerial capacity building, digital marketing literacy, and the establishment of a sharia cooperative. Using a participatory and needs-based approach, the program involved lecturers, students, and community members collaboratively. The outcomes revealed significant improvements in entrepreneurial motivation, digital skills, and business organization. The creation of Koperasi Syariah Kacio Mitra Islami symbolized institutionalized community empowerment. This initiative demonstrates the transformative potential of Majelis Taklim as a catalyst for women’s empowerment and sustainable economic development aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1, 5, 8, and 9.

Village Funding Governance and Administrative Capacity: A Systematic Review on Their Role in Community Empowerment Hafiz, Muhammad; Eriyanti, Fitri; Fahmi, Zul
Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): All articles in this issue include authors from 3 countries of origin (Indonesi
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/kharaj.v8i1.8881

This study aims to systematically examine the role of village fund governance and administrative capacity in shaping community empowerment outcomes. Grounded in public administration, fiscal decentralization, and participatory governance perspectives, this review synthesizes peer-reviewed articles published between 2021 and 2025 and indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and nationally accredited Indonesian journals (SINTA). To ensure the relevance and feasibility of the study, a bibliometric analysis was conducted using Harzing’s Publish or Perish and VOSviewer to map publication trends, thematic clusters, and the conceptual evolution of research on village funding, governance, and empowerment. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of village funds is strongly mediated by governance quality particularly transparency, accountability, participation, and effectiveness as well as by multidimensional administrative capacity encompassing financial management, human resources, institutional arrangements, and risk management. Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that well-governed village funds contribute positively to economic self-reliance, social inclusion, and citizen participation. Nevertheless, limited administrative capacity and weak institutional coordination remain significant challenges to achieving sustainable community empowerment.

Fiqh Sosial dan Gender dalam Kajian Fiqh Kontemporer Abidin, Zainal; Suhendro, Adi; Fahmi, Zul; Nurintan, Nurintan
Invention: Journal Research and Education Studies Volume 6 Nomor 3 November 2025
Publisher : CV. PUSDIKRA MITRA JAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51178/invention.v6i3.3189

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh kajian fiqh selama ini sering dipersepsikan bersifat normatif dan kurang responsif terhadap dinamika sosial, termasuk persoalan gender. Padahal, fiqh sebagai produk ijtihad ulama sejatinya memiliki karakter kontekstual yang memungkinkan reinterpretasi sesuai dengan perubahan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konsep fiqh sosial dalam perspektif kesetaraan gender, hak perempuan, fiqh keluarga, dan fiqh al-aqalliyat sesuai dengan kaidah-kaidah fiqh kontemporer. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan (library research) dengan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif, melalui analisis terhadap sumber-sumber fiqh klasik dan kontemporer, serta literatur tentang gender dan keadilan sosial. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa fiqh sosial menempatkan kemaslahatan (maslahah) dan keadilan (al-‘adl) sebagai prinsip utama dalam penetapan hukum, sehingga membuka ruang bagi penafsiran fiqh yang lebih inklusif dan berkeadilan gender. Pendekatan ini menegaskan bahwa perbedaan gender dalam Islam tidak dimaksudkan untuk melahirkan diskriminasi terhadap siapapun, melainkan untuk menjamin keseimbangan peran dan tanggung jawab sosial masing-masing. Dengan demikian, fiqh sosial berperspektif gender dapat menjadi paradigma alternatif dalam pengembangan hukum Islam yang humanis, adaptif, dan relevan dengan konteks masyarakat modern sekarang ini.

Negotiating Mahr as a Woman’s Right in Islamic Marriage: A Normative–Comparative Study of Nigeria and Indonesia Zakari, Hamza Naziru; Fahmi, Zul; Dirgantara, Muhammad; Manda, Rifky Mei; Maulana, Fadhlan
Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025): Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : PT. Ratu Bilqis Azzahira bekerjasama dengan Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63731/jhk.v2i02.11

Mahr (dowry) serves as a fundamental institution in Islamic marriage law and represents a legally recognized economic right of women, grounded in Qur’anic injunctions and Islamic Law. Despite sharing a common normative foundation, the regulation and practical enforcement of mahr vary considerably across Muslim societies, particularly those characterized by legal pluralism and differing levels of state codification. This article examines mahr as a women’s right within Islamic family law through a normative-comparative analysis of Nigeria and Indonesia. Employing doctrinal legal research and a comparative law approach, the study analyzes the concept of mahr in Islamic jurisprudence and its regulation within the respective Islamic family law frameworks of both countries. The findings reveal that both Nigeria and Indonesia recognize mahr as a mandatory obligation of the husband and the exclusive proprietary right of the wife. However, significant divergences emerge in terms of regulatory structure, institutional enforcement, and legal certainty. In Nigeria, Islamic family law operates within a plural legal system where Islamic law—predominantly influenced by the Maliki school—coexists with customary and statutory laws, resulting in fragmented enforcement and uneven protection of women’s mahr rights. By contrast, Indonesia has incorporated Islamic family law into a more unified statutory framework through Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law, supported by the jurisdiction of Religious Courts, thereby providing relatively clearer mechanisms for legal enforcement, notwithstanding ongoing challenges related to customary practices and implementation. This comparative analysis demonstrates that legal codification, institutional coherence, and state involvement play a crucial role in enhancing legal certainty and strengthening the protection of women’s economic rights in marriage.

The Persistence of Victim Blaming in Child Rape Trials: A Victimological Analysis of the Banjarmasin High Court Acquittal Liantha Adam Nasution; Zul Fahmi; Sumardi Efendi; Ahmad Rozali; Maulana Muklis; Muhammad Asim Rafiq
NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18662151

This study examines the extent to which victim blaming shapes judicial reasoning in child rape trials, focusing on the acquittal in Decision No. 42/PID/2017/PT Bjm and addressing a gap in systematic appellate-level analyses of PERMA No. 3 Tahun 2017 implementation. It employs doctrinal legal analysis combined with qualitative content analysis of two primary decisions—Decision No. 20/Pid.B/2017/PN Mrh and the aforementioned appellate ruling—and evaluates them against relevant normative frameworks, including the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. The findings indicate that the appellate panel systematically shifted the evidentiary burden onto the child victim by privileging her conduct while discounting non-physical forms of coercion and psychiatric evidence of trauma. This pattern operationalises notions of victim precipitation and conflicts with procedural and protective norms, thereby producing secondary victimisation through courtroom rhetoric that denigrates victims. Conceptually, the article advances an integrated analytical framework that combines the ideal-victim construct, victim blaming, and secondary victimisation to interpret appellate reasoning, thereby refining the role of victimology as a trauma-informed evaluative lens for judicial texts. Juridically, the findings reveal a structural tension between appellate practice and KUHAP’s recognition of psychological harm as valid evidence, as well as PERMA No. 3 of 2017’s prohibition of victim-blaming conduct, with broader implications for child protection, judicial integrity, and public confidence in the justice system. The study therefore recommends targeted reforms: explicit statutory recognition of non-physical coercion and psychiatric evidence; enforceable ethical sanctions and monitoring mechanisms to ensure PERMA compliance; trauma-informed judicial training; and harmonised institutional measures that internalise child-protection principles, including the integration of Islamic law–informed recommendations within a broader institutional harmonisation framework to ensure alignment with national pro-victim legal reform.

Preventing Violence Against Women and Children in Mandailing Natal Regency: A Criminological Perspective Fahmi, Zul
Saree: Research in Gender Studies Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Saree: Research in Gender Studies
Publisher : Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak - PSGA (Center for Gender and Child Studies) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Lhokseumawe, Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/saree.v7i2.6265

ABSTRACT ENGLISHThis study analyzes the patterns and characteristics of violence against women and children in Mandailing Natal Regency during 2023–2024, focusing on sexual violence, domestic abuse, and homicide. The primary aggravating factors include poverty, gender inequality, early marriage, low educational attainment, and weak law enforcement. A criminological approach, drawing on Social Disorganization, Strain, Social Control, and Labeling theories, was employed to uncover root causes and propose prevention strategies based on economic empowerment, education, and legal reform. A qualitative methodology, utilizing literature review and content analysis, was applied to assess key themes in primary and secondary data sources, including books, scholarly articles, and local and national news reports. The findings reveal that sexual violence constitutes the most prevalent category, followed by domestic abuse often resulting in fatalities, and a rising incidence of child sexual exploitation, predominantly perpetrated by acquaintances of the victims. Factors such as gender disparity, poverty, limited educational opportunities, and inadequate law enforcement significantly exacerbate these conditions. Effective mitigation requires synergy among government agencies, community stakeholders, and related sectors, including strengthening legal frameworks, enhancing law enforcement capacities, and providing integrated support services. Community-based interventions and sustained educational programs, engaging religious and customary leaders—are expected to foster a safer, more inclusive environment. Cross-sector collaboration is identified as the key to reducing violence and bolstering public confidence in the justice system. ABSTRACT INDONESIANPenelitian ini menganalisis pola dan karakteristik kekerasan terhadap perempuan dan anak di Kabupaten Mandailing Natal pada periode 2023-2024, dengan fokus pada kekerasan seksual, penganiayaan domestik, dan pembunuhan. Faktor utama yang memperburuk situasi ini adalah kemiskinan, ketimpangan gender, pernikahan dini, rendahnya tingkat pendidikan, dan lemahnya penegakan hukum. Pendekatan kriminologi, dengan menggunakan teori Disorganisasi Sosial, Strain, Social Control, dan Labeling, diterapkan untuk menggali akar permasalahan dan menawarkan solusi pencegahan berbasis pemberdayaan ekonomi, pendidikan, serta reformasi hukum. Metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi literatur dan analisis konten digunakan untuk menilai tema-tema utama dalam data primer dan sekunder, termasuk buku dan artikel jurnal, serta laporan berita local dan nasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kekerasan seksual adalah kasus dominan, diikuti oleh penganiayaan domestik yang sering berujung pada kematian, serta meningkatnya eksploitasi seksual terhadap anak, terutama oleh pelaku yang dikenal korban. Faktor-faktor seperti ketimpangan gender, kemiskinan, rendahnya pendidikan, dan lemahnya penegakan hukum berperan besar dalam memperburuk kondisi ini. Penanggulangan kekerasan memerlukan sinergi antara pemerintah, masyarakat, dan sektor terkait, termasuk penguatan regulasi, peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, serta penyediaan layanan terintegrasi. Pendekatan berbasis komunitas dan edukasi berkelanjutan diharapkan dapat menciptakan lingkungan yang lebih aman dan inklusif, dengan melibatkan tokoh agama dan adat. Kolaborasi lintas sektor menjadi kunci dalam mengurangi kekerasan dan meningkatkan kepercayaan terhadap sistem hukum.

The Persistence of Victim Blaming in Child Rape Trials: A Victimological Analysis of the Banjarmasin High Court Acquittal Liantha Adam Nasution; Zul Fahmi; Sumardi Efendi; Ahmad Rozali; Maulana Muklis; Muhammad Asim Rafiq
Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18662151

This study examines the extent to which victim blaming shapes judicial reasoning in child rape trials, focusing on the acquittal in Decision No. 42/PID/2017/PT Bjm and addressing a gap in systematic appellate-level analyses of PERMA No. 3 Tahun 2017 implementation. It employs doctrinal legal analysis combined with qualitative content analysis of two primary decisions—Decision No. 20/Pid.B/2017/PN Mrh and the aforementioned appellate ruling—and evaluates them against relevant normative frameworks, including the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. The findings indicate that the appellate panel systematically shifted the evidentiary burden onto the child victim by privileging her conduct while discounting non-physical forms of coercion and psychiatric evidence of trauma. This pattern operationalises notions of victim precipitation and conflicts with procedural and protective norms, thereby producing secondary victimisation through courtroom rhetoric that denigrates victims. Conceptually, the article advances an integrated analytical framework that combines the ideal-victim construct, victim blaming, and secondary victimisation to interpret appellate reasoning, thereby refining the role of victimology as a trauma-informed evaluative lens for judicial texts. Juridically, the findings reveal a structural tension between appellate practice and KUHAP’s recognition of psychological harm as valid evidence, as well as PERMA No. 3 of 2017’s prohibition of victim-blaming conduct, with broader implications for child protection, judicial integrity, and public confidence in the justice system. The study therefore recommends targeted reforms: explicit statutory recognition of non-physical coercion and psychiatric evidence; enforceable ethical sanctions and monitoring mechanisms to ensure PERMA compliance; trauma-informed judicial training; and harmonised institutional measures that internalise child-protection principles, including the integration of Islamic law–informed recommendations within a broader institutional harmonisation framework to ensure alignment with national pro-victim legal reform.

Title

Found 37 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 37 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 37 Documents
Search