Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Hermeneutika Pembebasan Farid Esack Dari Perspektif Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn Ridani Faulika Permana; Sujiat Zubaidi; M. Adib Fuadi Nuriz; Usmanul Khakim; Fahman Mumtazi
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol 6, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4244

Abstract

Farid Esack on Hermeneutic of Liberation from Thomas Kuhn’s Scientific Revolution PerspectiveThis article aims to elaborate on Farid Esack's Hermeneutic of Liberation from Thomas S Kuhn's scientific revolution perspective. The background of this study is the liberation of society from apartheid hegemony in South Africa in the 1949-1991 period; Farid Esack - from the beginning engaged in the practical political movement and now focuses on the scientific field - gave rise to new methodical ideas in the study of the Koran i.e hermeneutics of liberation; which is an effort to fight against racist rulers. From Kuhn's point of view, what Essack was doing was actually a scientific revolution. This assumption will be elaborated in this study. This study is a literature review using qualitative-content analysis as the data analysis technique. The results of this study are; first, his method of Qur'anic is a scientific revolution; which he supported the strengthening of the hermeneutical paradigm in the study of the Qur'an. In that way, secondly, as Kuhn requires that the new paradigm of scientific revolution must be supported by the scientific community, Farid Esack can be said to have a scientific community with Fazl Rahman, Hasan Hanafi, Mohamed Arkoun, Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid, etc. Thus, it is worth waiting for the success of this community revolution; to strengthen hermeneutics as a new paradigm in Qur'anic study in the future
The sentence al-Itmi’nan in the Qur’an and its relationship to science (Analytical study of the quranic simantics) Sujiat Zubaidi; Hujjadtul Fadhilah; Muhammad Muhammad; Zuhrufan Failasufa
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jpdk.v5i2.13481

Abstract

Kalimat itmi’nan bukan sesuatu yang biasa, akan tetapi ia merupakan kalimat yang mempunyai keutamaan dan rahasia baik makna dan lain sebagainya, hingga kalimat tersebut tidak hanya berbentuk satu bentuk, akan tetapi menjadi bebrapa bentuk baik dari segi mufrad dan lain sebagainya. Dari hal tersebut akan ada pertanyaan yang muncul di benak semua orang tentang kalimat itmi’nan tersebut, apakah didalamnya ada rahasia yang terkandung dalam kalimat tersebut?. Maka dari permasalahan ini, penulis ingin mengetahui semuanya agar terungkap semua rahasia Al-Qur’an. Maka peneliti ingin membahasnya secara mendalam tentang kalimat itmi’nan. Dalam hal ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif pustaka dalam mencari data yang diperlukan dari segi simantik al-Qur’an. setelah melalui proses panjang penulis menemukan hasil tentang kalimat itmi’nan. Bahwa ia mempunyai beberapa bentuk dan makna mulai dari kata itmi’nan yang bermakna sakinah yang merupakan ketenangan dalam hati, juga bermakna ridha yang merupakan poin atau titik permulaan dalam ketenangan hati, dan juga bermakna iqamah yaitu melaksanakan semua perintah hingga menimbulkan keteangan jiwa, di samping itu kalimat itmi’nan juga berkaitan dengan dengan ilmu pengetahuan baik proses pemerolehan ilmu pengetahuannya tersebut. yaitu bahwa jika seseorang mempunyai ketenangan (itmi’nan) maka ia akan bisa memperoleh pengetahuan karena tidak ada sesuatu yang menghalanginya. Karena di dalam hatinya ada ketenangan yang tertancap dalam hatinya. Oleh karena itu, bisa disimpulkan bahwa kalimat itmi’nan mempunyai beberapamakna seperti: sakinah, ridha, dan iqamah, yang semuanya mempunyai kaitan erat dengan pemerolehan ilmu pengetahuan.
The Political Identity: Between Qur'anic View and Western Theory Sujiat Zubaidi; Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi; Ide Mafaza Sansayto; Humaira Agam Putri
Buletin Al-Turas Vol 29, No 1 (2023): Buletin Al-Turas
Publisher : Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/bat.v29i1.31443

Abstract

Purpose:Identity nowadays has become very complicated in the political sphere. Political identity needs to be studied from two perspectives; Western theory and Islamic theory. Islamic political identity taken from the concept of the Qur'an. This research aims to reveal identity politics from these two perspectives, namely the perspective of the al-Qur'an and Western theory.  Method:The library research method is used for this critical analysis research, which takes a qualitative approach. The qualitative method collected data and news references from books, journals, or trusted online sources.  Results/Findings:The results show that there are contradictions in interpreting identity politics. Identity politics is often interpreted as something that is considered harmful. Through critical analysis, researchers found differences from the most fundamental aspects of understanding and theory to the value of their influence on society.  Conclusion:Even though the theory of identity in the West existed and was developed by Henry Tajfel and John Turner, the theory is in line with how Islam views political identity as necessary as a political strategy that emphasizes differentiation and the utilization of primordial ties as its main category. Identity in the Qur'an is called Shibgah. The theory of identity, both in politics and outside politics, is correct and reasonable.
Antara Teodisi dan Monoteisme: Memaknai Esensi Keadilan Ilahi Sujiat Zubaidi
TSAQAFAH Vol. 7 No. 2 (2011): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v7i2.2

Abstract

In the tradition of Islamic thought, the problem of crime usually arises in connection with the justice of God. Various schools of Islamic thought have their own views and interpretations in accordance with their respective principles. However, they differ from Western philosophers and thinkers who tend to discredit God. For the Muslim philosophers, especially theologians, their orientation in addressing this problem is precisely to maintain the tanzih and the tawhid of God. In principle, the word fair is used in four aspects. First, the fair is a state of balance; second, equality and disclaimer of any distinction; third, to maintain individual rights and give the right to every person entitled to receive; fourth, maintaining the right of sustainability of the life existence. Furthermore, the most crucial problem is if the principle of divine justice which is confronted with the phenomenon of various evils in the world. Indeed, when there is the evil, there must be the good, and where there is the good there will be the evil. Good and evil are united and bounded with in nature. Both are a compound between existence and non-existence. According to Iqbal, the universe can be updated again, while the elements of sin and evil can be eliminated gradually through optimal effort and full of optimism with the good. Iqbal claimed that Muslims could be strong and free from evil and its destruction by the selfaffirmation, self-expression, and self-development.Dalam tradisi pemikiran Islam, masalah kejahatan biasanya dihubungkan dengan keadilan Ilahi. Berbagai madzhab pemikiran Islam memiliki pandangan dan interpretasi sendiri sesuai dengan prinsip masing-masing. Namun, mereka berbeda dari filsuf dan pemikir Barat yang cenderung mendiskreditkan Tuhan.Para filsuf Muslim, terutama teolog, orientasi mereka dalam menangani masalah ini justru untuk menjaga tanzih dan tauhid Allah. Dalam prinsipnya, kata adil digunakan dalam empat aspek. Pertama, adil adalah suatu keadaan keseimbangan; kedua, kesetaraan dan sanggahan terhadap perbedaan; ketiga, untuk mempertahankan hak-hak individu dan memberikan hak kepada setiap orang yang berhak untuk menerima; dan keempat, mempertahankan hak keberlanjutan keberadaan kehidupan. Selain itu, masalah yang paling krusial adalah jika prinsip keadilan Ilahi yang dihadapkan dengan fenomena berbagai kejahatan di dunia. Memang, bila ada kejahatan, harus ada yang baik, dan di mana ada kebaikan, maka akan ada kejahatan. Tulisan iuni menyimpulkan, bahwa baik dan buruk selalu inheren dan menyatu dalam kosmos. Keduanya adalah senyawa antara eksistensi dan non-eksistensi. Menurut Iqbal, alam semesta dapat diperbarui lagi, sedangkan unsur dosa dan kejahatan dapat dihilangkan secara bertahap melalui upaya optimal dan penuh optimisme dengan baik. Iqbal menyatakan bahwa umat Islam dapat menjadi kuat dan bebas dari kejahatan dan kehancuran oleh penegasan diri, ekspresi diri, dan pengembangan diri.Keywords: tradisi, omni kebaikan, wajib al-wujud, teologi keadilan, monoteisme.
Ibn Rusyd al-Qurtubi wa Manhajuhu al-Fiqhi fi Kitabihi "Bidayah al-Mujtahid" Sujiat Zubaidi
TSAQAFAH Vol. 8 No. 2 (2012): Islamic Jurisprudence
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v8i2.34

Abstract

So far, studies focusing on the pattern of Ibn Rusyd’s thought are less performed. Whereas, according to Muhammad Abduh, it is important  to intensively study it, so that there is a balance with his brilliant thought  of philosophy. In this research, the author tries to analyze the patterns of philosophical thought of Islamic jurisprudence of Ibn Rusyd in his book “Bidayah al-Mujtahid”. This short study records many characteristics of his genuineIslamic jurisprudence thoughts namely the presence of strong interrelation and intermediation among jurists, by comparing various opinions of the scholars, followed with istidlal, to the al-khuruj min al-khilaf and tarjih concept. Although earning many praises from many scholars such as Ibn Taymiyya, Ibn Qayyim and Al-Syatibi as contained in his work al-Muwafaqat, however, he also suffered from number of critics due to his preference to the opinions of Imam Malik. Interestingly, Bidayah al-Mujtahid was written by Ibn Rusyd as a critique against Al-Wajiz of Al-Ghazali which is according to Ibn Rusyd it inclines to only one school of thought of Islamic jurisprudence namely Imam Syafi’i. Furthermore, he did also to the same thing to the philosophy of Al-Ghazali in his famous work, Tahafut al-Tahafut.
Epistemologi Penafsiran Ilmiah al-Qur’an Sujiat Zubaidi Saleh
TSAQAFAH Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011): Qur'anic Studies
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v7i1.112

Abstract

The main objective in interpretating al-Qur’an is to explain the will of God and the operationalization of the will in the field of faith, laws, or ethics. At the phase of Islamic civilization, when the linguistic and philosophy science codified, raises the various method (manhaj), and interpretation streams (ittijahat), exegesis school (madzhab) of al-Qur’an. In addition, also found in various shades of interpretation such as: fiqhi, kalami, balaghi, and isyari/ sufi, even philosophical. It was also discovered methods of tafsir ‘ilmi oriented to the utilization of the discovering science in order to prove the truth of scientific fact. The last pattern was ignited pro and contra among scholars and mufassir. As we know that alQur’an was not descended in the condition of cultural vacuum but it is a form of dialectics and the response to the condition and social situation, politic, and religion. This is relevant to the characteristics of al-Qur’an which can be applied throughout the periods. As we understood that interpretation is one of reflections of thought and civilization products. It always developed and influenced by the dynamics of human civilization, so in its development, science and al-Qur’an can be brought together in dialogue, although with some prerequisites specified interpretation.
PerspektifInsider-Outsider dalam StudiAgama: Membaca Gagasan Kim Knott Sujiat Zubaidi Saleh
TSAQAFAH Vol. 6 No. 2 (2010)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v6i2.121

Abstract

This article contains a study of Kim Knott which gives a new offer in religious study. This is due to many universities store a number of constraints surrounding the study of religion. In addition, the occurrence of methodology stagnant in the students circumstance in applying explorative studies about religion. In this study, Knott tries to take eliminate the subjectivity element by aparting two basic problems; between emic perspective appeared from the studies of insider, and ethical perspective from outsider. In the end, Knott divides roles conceptions in empowering the social religious interconections into four elements; the pure participant, the observer as participant, the participant as observer, dan the pure observer. However, this pattern turns out to save a serious problem in the benchmark objectivity. Because the issue is whether the observer from outsider is excatly objective, reliable, and has scientific validity seen from the view of insider. In this regard, Knott tries to put both frameworks in the rapprochement method. This approach is an intersubjective solution to give a position of observer in the margin of appreciation as the border line between insider-outsider. With this approach, the religious study is expected will be more objective and distant from the subjectivity element.
Qadiyyah Tawassu’ al-‘Alam Bayna Abi Hamid al-Ghazali wa Ibn Rusyd al-Qurtubi Sujiat Zubaidi Saleh
TSAQAFAH Vol. 5 No. 2 (2009)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v5i2.134

Abstract

This research tries to compare between the position of Abu Hamid alGhazali and the position of Abu al-Walid ibn Rushd in the question of the size of the universe and the possibility of it to be greater or smaller. Al-Ghazali says the possibility of the universe to be greater or smaller than it is, while Ibnu Rushd denies such possibility. According to the latter, if the universe is greater or smaller than it is, it will lead to the possibility of the existence of a magnitude which has no end. In this discussion, Ghazali relies on the Mutakallimin position of the universe concept, while Ibnu Rushd prefers to base his idea of universe on the philosophers such as Aristotle.
Kritik Ibn Rusyd Terhadap Pandangan Para Filsuf Tentang Ketuhanan Sujiat Zubaidi Saleh
TSAQAFAH Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v5i1.149

Abstract

Being indirect disciple of Aristotle, Ibn Rusyd mostly studied deeply in the area of philosophy, but he also criticized frequently the view of other Muslim philosophers. Ibn Rusyd’s critics in this case are in order to purify Aristotle’s philosophy from infiltration and distorted ideas. So then he could present the philosophy of Aristotle genuinely. In this article, the writer wishes to present the analysis of Ibn Rusyd on the views of Al-Farabi, Ibn Sina and Al-Ghazali. Among the philosophers except al-Ghazali, he criticized both two from their views on the existence of God through the theory of wajib al-wujud (necessary being) and mumkin al-wujud (possible being). Ibnu Rusyd also rejected the theory on emanation of al-Farabi and Ibn Sina, because not derived from Aristotle. Ibn Rusyd concerned upon the al-Ghazalis Tahafut Al-Falasifah (Incoherence of the Philosophers) not represented all philosophers views, but the views of philosophers on Neo-Platonic which destroys the thought of Aristotle. In this point Ibn Rusyd judges, that Al-Ghazali’s criticism is incoherence.
Uslûb al-Hiwâr al-Qur’âni bayna al-Muslimîn wa al-Nasâra ‘inda Badî’uzzamân Sa’îd al-Nursi Sujiat Zubaidi Saleh
TSAQAFAH Vol. 10 No. 2 (2014): Religious Studies
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v10i2.196

Abstract

In order to solve some issues, the scholars’ dialogue often generates new ideas as it works to clarify the values of al-Qur’an and to enrich their understanding about it. Therefore, Nursi pointed to unite at present not only with the Muslim community and even with Christians, aside from the differences and disputes over union issues. It is possible to do so when the Muslims and the Christians refrain from their controversies among them. Nursi’s idea does not mean that he does not recognize any differences between them. There are some significant differences between the Christian and the Muslim faith, but those differences should not prevent them from the most important goal to provide new humanitarian look for human life, where God is the axis and the divine will for the moral values of this point. Nursi believes that the current religious relationship marred by erroneous thought as the result of post-modernism worldview. In fact, al-Qur’an recommended a mutual awareness of the communities that shapes them to gain a common goal in God witnesses as the divine values of this modern civilization in opposition to “clash of civilizations”, but this task needs some efforts to discuss on Quranic Dialogue. This dialogue could be undertaken well, as long as it sets out with full love and affection rather than with the fierce conflict and distress. Thus, Nursi introduced new ideas into interfaith dialogue between Muslims and Christians, to build a true civilization based on mutual relations of love.
Co-Authors Abdul Rohman Abdul Rohman Abdullah Muslich Rizal Maulana Agus Mulyana Amal Fadholah Amir Hidayatullah Amir Hidayatullah Amir Reza Kusuma Amir Reza Kusuma Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi Arifah, Farah Nur Arrois, Syaiful Makhi Ula Binte Mochamad Sandisi, Zahratur Rofiqah Dahniar Maharani Deki Ridho Adi Anggara Devi Rafika Sari Dini Amalia Fattah Dwi Syafitri, Aprilia Fachri Khoerudin Fahman Mumtazi Fattah, Dini Amalia Fikriyah, Asfa Hamzah, Muhammad Habibi Harda Armayanto Hilda, Nurul Arifah Hujjadtul Fadhilah Humaira Agam Putri Ide Mafaza Sansayto ilham habibullah Inayatul Maula Intan Pratiwi Mustikasari Jiatrahman, Farisma Khomarul Kuniyati Lisa Ihdiatul Jannah M. Adib Fuadi Nuriz M. Kharis Majid Marfu'ah, Nurul Moh Isom Mudin Moh. Ali Ghafir Moh. Henri Moh. Ismail Muhajir, Muhammad Arif Muhamad Anwar Aditya Muhammad Arwani Rofi’i Muhammad Chirzin Muhammad Dini Syauqi Al-Madani Muhammad Fajar Adyatama Muhammad Irkham Firdaus Muhammad Muhammad Muhammad, Emyr Muttaqin Muttaqin Nalatama, Rahma Nasution, Alhafidh Nindya Ayoumi Delahara Nisa, Salma Sholochatun Nofriyanto Nofriyanto Pahlevi, Miftah Prayogo, Tonny Ilham Prima Rahmatika Ahmad Purnama, Hakim Qorib, Khoffifa Assakhyyu Rakhmad Agung Hidayatullah Ramadhan, M Akmal Ridani Faulika Permana Ridani Faulika Permana Sahidin, Amir Sasongko, Yogi Banar Septrianto, Wahyu sitti zafirah tilsaf Syamsuddin Arif Taqiyuddin, Muhammad Triana Harmini Trisnani, Asif Ummu Salamah Usmanul Khakim Yusron, Saidil Zuhrufan Failasufa Zulianita Zulianita