Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.219
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Jurnal Hukum Respublica Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora WAJAH HUKUM Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis University Of Bengkulu Law Journal GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta) RIO LAW JURNAL Constitutionale Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Pustaka Mitra : Pusat Akses Kajian Mengabdi Terhadap Masyarakat Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Karya Abdi Masyarakat Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law PUSKAPSI Law Review Jurnal Pengabdian Kolaborasi dan Inovasi IPTEKS Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa Jurnal Pengabdian Sosial Joong-Ki Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mentari Joong-Ki
Meri Yarni
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 65 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 65 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
Constitutional Complaint Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional: Perbandingan Indonesia, Jerman, dan Korea Selatan Noviya, Anis; Yarni, Meri; Arfa'i
PUSKAPSI Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025 (On Progress)
Publisher : Pusat Pengkajian Pancasila dan Konstitusi (PUSKAPSI) FH UNEJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/puskapsi.v5i2.53829

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji urgensi pengaturan constitutional complaint sebagai mekanisme perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Selama ini, belum tersedia instrumen hukum yang memungkinkan warga negara mengajukan pengaduan langsung atas pelanggaran hak konstitusional oleh tindakan negara, sehingga menimbulkan kekosongan mekanisme perlindungan hak yang efektif. Kondisi tersebut juga menunjukkan keterbatasan peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam memberikan jaminan keadilan konstitusional secara menyeluruh. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konsep, landasan normatif, serta kemungkinan penerapan constitutional complaint di Indonesia, dengan membandingkannya terhadap praktik yang telah diterapkan di Jerman dan Korea Selatan. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan, serta menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan constitutional complaint di Jerman dan Korea Selatan telah terbukti efektif dalam menegakkan prinsip supremacy of constitution dan memperkuat perlindungan hak warga negara. Oleh karena itu, Indonesia perlu mempertimbangkan penerapan mekanisme serupa yang disesuaikan dengan karakteristik sistem hukumnya untuk mewujudkan perlindungan hak konstitusional yang lebih komprehensif dan berkeadilan.
Implementation of Assimilation in the Progressive Law Perspective: Toward a Humane and Beneficial Society Riko Hamdan; Helmi; Meri Yarni
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6314

Abstract

The overcapacity of correctional institutions in Indonesia has led to various complex humanitarian, legal and social problems. One of the solutions pursued by the government is the assimilation policy, which aims to reduce the capacity burden while encouraging the social reintegration of prisoners. However, the implementation of this policy is often trapped in a legalistic-formal approach that ignores aspects of substantive justice. This article examines the implementation of the assimilation policy in the perspective of progressive law, which places law as a means of social transformation, not merely a normative rule. Through normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches, this article finds that the progressive legal approach plays an important role in encouraging assimilation policies that are more humanist, inclusive, and just. Progressive law emphasizes the importance of rehabilitation, community participation, and protection of prisoners' rights as part of the development process. In addition, concrete support is needed in the form of job training programs, psychosocial assistance, and fair and transparent supervision. By emphasizing the principles of justice, humanity and social benefit, the implementation of progressive law-based assimilation can reduce stigma against prisoners and create a more dignified correctional system. The results show that the success of the assimilation policy is greatly influenced by the synergy between an adaptive legal approach and strong social participation. In conclusion, progressive law can be an effective foundation for reforming correctional policies to be more oriented towards recovery, not just punishment
Quo Vadis of the Constitutional Court in Resolving Disputes Over Regional Election Results After Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 Yarni, Meri; Najemi, Andi; Suhermi, Suhermi; Davega Prasna, Adeb; Rizki Amanda, Khofifah
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5287

Abstract

The research aims to determine and analyze the Legal Politics of the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes over the results of regional election disputes in Indonesia. The authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over the results of Regional Election has yet to be regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The authority of the Constitutional Court to decide disputes over the results of general election described in Article 24C paragraph (1) is different from regional election. This has been explained in the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97/PU U-XI-2013, which states that the election and regional election regimes are different and the authority to decide disputes over election results is not the authority of the Constitutional Court but the authority of a particular judicial body. This research used normative juridical research methods, where library law was studied by examining library materials. Then, the collected materials are analyzed in a descriptive qualitative manner. The study results concluded that the Constitutional Court has the authority to permanently examine, decide, and resolve disputes over election results by the Constitutional Court Number 85 / PUU-XX / 2022 decision. There is no longer a distinction between the election regime and the election. With the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 85 / PUU-XX / 2022, the authority of the Constitutional Court becomes more precise and more substantial because of the binding legal certainty.
The Reinstatement of Repealed Norms: A Paradox in Post–Constitutional Court Legislative Practice Prasna, Adeb Davega; Putri, Adelia; Yarni, Meri
Constitutionale Vol 6 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v6i2.4734

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is authorized to review statutes against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia,, and its decisions are final and binding. However, the absence of an explicit prohibition against reenacting annulled norms in Law Number 12 of 2011 in conjunction with Law Number 13 of 2022 on the Formation of Legislation creates legal uncertainty and risks weakening the authority of the Court. This study analyzes the legal implications of Constitutional Court decisions for lawmakers in regulating a prohibition on reenacting revoked norms within the framework of the rule of law. Using a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study finds that Constitutional Court decisions are erga omnes and obligate lawmakers to follow up through amendment, revocation, or normative adjustment. The absence of explicit regulation enables the recurrence of unconstitutional norms and undermines constitutional supremacy. Therefore, clear statutory provisions prohibiting the reenactment of annulled norms are necessary to strengthen legal certainty and preserve the authority of Constitutional Court decisions.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Notaris atas Pembuatan Akta di Luar Wilayah Jabatan dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Indah Ayu Silvyana; Umar Hasan; Meri Yarni
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Maret 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i3.5896

Abstract

The territorial authority of notaries in Indonesia is regulated in Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions, as amended by Law No. 2 of 2014. This territorial limitation aims to ensure that the deeds made by notaries have valid evidentiary power and do not exceed the granted authority. However, the practice of making deeds outside the territorial jurisdiction still occurs, leading to legal issues regarding the validity and legal certainty of such deeds. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of notaries who create deeds outside their territorial jurisdiction and the implications that arise from such actions. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that making a deed outside the designated jurisdiction may be considered ultra vires, resulting in the deed losing its authentic nature and being inadmissible as legal evidence in court. Additionally, notaries may face civil, administrative, and professional ethical sanctions. This study emphasizes the importance of strict supervision over notarial jurisdiction to maintain the integrity of the profession and protect the legal rights of the public. In conclusion, the regulation of territorial authority for notaries must be enforced rigorously to ensure legal certainty and prevent harm to the parties involved.
Co-Authors A. Zarkasi Achmad Noerkhaerin Putra alamsyah, Mardi Amada, Khofifh Rizki Amanda, Khofifah Rizki Amin Nasution, Muhammad Amir, Diana Ana Ramadhona Andi Najemi, Andi Andrizal Andrizal Andrizal Andrizal Arfa'i Arfa'i Arfa'i Arfa’I, Arfa’I Bela, Nova Bima Wahyu Bustanuddin . Davega Prasna, Adeb Dhil's Noviades Dhyta, Nova Bela Diana Amir Dina Lorenza Dwi Suryahartati Erwin Erwin Etika Dwi Hardiyaningsi Evalina Alissa dan Arrie Budhiartie Faizah Bafadhal Febrian, Rifqi Gemmy Anugerah Prasetya Hapsa Hapsa Hasra, Siska Helmi Helmi Herma Yanti Hsb, Nurul Laylan Indah Ayu Silvyana Irwandi Irwandi Irwandi Iswandi Iswandi Iswandi Juanson, Juanson juliani, lauri Kosariza Kosariza Kosariza Kosariza, Kosariza Latifah Amir M. Yogi Riyantama Isjoni Muhammad Eriton Murdiana, Ria Nababan, Simson Heskia Nazifah Nazifah, Nazifah Netty Netty Netty Netty,, Netty, Niken Arum Sari Noviya, Anis Nur ‘Azah Nys Arfa Nys. Arfa Oktavina, Yola Pebi Ramadian Pinki Anzasmara Pramestia, Regina Prasna, Adeb Davega Priskap, Ridham Putra, Taufan Dyusandra Putri, Adelia Raihan, Zachary Rema Syelvita Rifqi Febrian Riko Hamdan Risdayanti, Risdayanti Riski Saputri, Kiki Rizki Amanda, Khofifah Rona Indara SAPUTRA, BENY Sari, Kiki Angela Shelly Winda Puspita Sari Siswahyudianto Suhendri Suhendri Suhermi Suhermi Suhermi, Suhermi Syamsir Syamsir Syamsir Taufan Dyusandra Putra Taufani, A. Yuli Tito Kharfia Valen Umar Hasan Yetniwati Yetniwati Zanur, Annisa