Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.881
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Jurnal Hukum Respublica Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora WAJAH HUKUM Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis University Of Bengkulu Law Journal GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta) RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Pustaka Mitra : Pusat Akses Kajian Mengabdi Terhadap Masyarakat Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Karya Abdi Masyarakat Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law PUSKAPSI Law Review Jurnal Pengabdian Kolaborasi dan Inovasi IPTEKS Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa Jurnal Pengabdian Sosial Joong-Ki Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mentari NuCSJo : Nusantara Community Service Journal Joong-Ki
Meri Yarni
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 63 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 63 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
Polemik Hukum Penunjukan Penjabat (PJ) Kepala Daerah Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati dan Walikota Yarni, Meri; Kosariza, Kosariza; Irwandi, Irwandi; Juanson, Juanson; Yanti, Herma; Taufani, A. Yuli
Wajah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v7i2.1333

Abstract

The appointment of acting regional heads to fill the vacancy for definitive regional head officials caused by postponing regional elections in 271 regions in Indonesia has created problems in the administration of government in Indonesia. Regarding Article 201 of Law No. 10 of 2016 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors which is the legal basis for the appointment of acting regional heads, a judicial review has been carried out resulting in MKRI Decision Number 67/PUU-XIX/2021 and MKRI Decision Number 15/PUUXX /2022. These legal materials were obtained through literature study and analyzed descriptively-qualitatively. The postponement of the 2022 and 2023 regional elections is still causing polemics. Based on data from the Ministry of Home Affairs in May 2022, the needs for filling regional head officials include 5 provinces, 6 cities and 37 districts. Meanwhile, there are as many as 101 regional heads whose leadership terms will end in 2022 and as many as 170 regional heads and deputy heads in 2023. This means that 271 regional head positions will end before the 2024 simultaneous elections. 
Quo Vadis of the Constitutional Court in Resolving Disputes Over Regional Election Results After Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 Yarni, Meri; Najemi, Andi; Suhermi, Suhermi; Davega Prasna, Adeb; Rizki Amanda, Khofifah
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5287

Abstract

The research aims to determine and analyze the Legal Politics of the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes over the results of regional election disputes in Indonesia. The authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over the results of Regional Election has yet to be regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The authority of the Constitutional Court to decide disputes over the results of general election described in Article 24C paragraph (1) is different from regional election. This has been explained in the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97/PU U-XI-2013, which states that the election and regional election regimes are different and the authority to decide disputes over election results is not the authority of the Constitutional Court but the authority of a particular judicial body. This research used normative juridical research methods, where library law was studied by examining library materials. Then, the collected materials are analyzed in a descriptive qualitative manner. The study results concluded that the Constitutional Court has the authority to permanently examine, decide, and resolve disputes over election results by the Constitutional Court Number 85 / PUU-XX / 2022 decision. There is no longer a distinction between the election regime and the election. With the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 85 / PUU-XX / 2022, the authority of the Constitutional Court becomes more precise and more substantial because of the binding legal certainty.
Constitutional Complaint Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional: Perbandingan Indonesia, Jerman, dan Korea Selatan Noviya, Anis; Yarni, Meri; Arfa'i
PUSKAPSI Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025 (On Progress)
Publisher : Pusat Pengkajian Pancasila dan Konstitusi (PUSKAPSI) FH UNEJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/puskapsi.v5i2.53829

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji urgensi pengaturan constitutional complaint sebagai mekanisme perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Selama ini, belum tersedia instrumen hukum yang memungkinkan warga negara mengajukan pengaduan langsung atas pelanggaran hak konstitusional oleh tindakan negara, sehingga menimbulkan kekosongan mekanisme perlindungan hak yang efektif. Kondisi tersebut juga menunjukkan keterbatasan peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam memberikan jaminan keadilan konstitusional secara menyeluruh. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konsep, landasan normatif, serta kemungkinan penerapan constitutional complaint di Indonesia, dengan membandingkannya terhadap praktik yang telah diterapkan di Jerman dan Korea Selatan. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan, serta menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan constitutional complaint di Jerman dan Korea Selatan telah terbukti efektif dalam menegakkan prinsip supremacy of constitution dan memperkuat perlindungan hak warga negara. Oleh karena itu, Indonesia perlu mempertimbangkan penerapan mekanisme serupa yang disesuaikan dengan karakteristik sistem hukumnya untuk mewujudkan perlindungan hak konstitusional yang lebih komprehensif dan berkeadilan.
Co-Authors A. Zarkasi Achmad Noerkhaerin Putra Ajidirman , alamsyah, Mardi Alissa, Evalina Alissa, Evalina Amada, Khofifh Rizki Amanda, Khofifah Rizki Amin Nasution, Muhammad Amir, Diana Ana Ramadhona Andi Najemi, Andi Andrizal Andrizal Andrizal Andrizal Arfa'i Arfa, Nyimas Arfa’I, Arfa’I Bela, Nova Bima Wahyu Bustanuddin . Davega Prasna, Adeb Dhil's Noviades Dhyta, Nova Bela Diana Amir Dina Lorenza Dwi Suryahartati Erwin Erwin Etika Dwi Hardiyaningsi Faizah Bafadhal Febrian, Rifqi Gemmy Anugerah Prasetya Hapsa Hapsa Hasra, Siska Herma Yanti Hsb, Nurul Laylan Irwandi Irwandi Irwandi Irwandi Irwandi Iswandi Iswandi Iswandi Juanson, Juanson juliani, lauri Kosariza Kosariza Kosariza Kosariza, Kosariza Latifah Amir Moh Ihsan Muhammad Eriton Muhammad Haris Saputra Murdiana, Ria Nababan, Simson Heskia Nazifah Nazifah, Nazifah Netty Netty Netty Netty,, Netty, Niken Arum Sari Noviya, Anis Nys Arfa Nys. Arfa Nys. Arfa Oktavina, Yola Pebi Ramadian Pinki Anzasmara Pramestia, Regina Prasna, Adeb Davega Priskap, Ridham Putra, Taufan Dyusandra Raihan, Zachary Rema Syelvita Rifqi Febrian Risdayanti, Risdayanti Riski Saputri, Kiki Rizki Amanda, Khofifah Rona Indara SAPUTRA, BENY Sari, Kiki Angela Shelly Winda Puspita Sari Suhendri Suhendri Suhermi Suhermi Suhermi, Suhermi Syamsir Syamsir Syamsir Taufan Dyusandra Putra Taufani, A. Yuli Tito Kharfia Valen Wiskandar , Yetniwati Yetniwati Zanur, Annisa