Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.359
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa El-HARAKAH : Jurnal Budaya Islam Al-Lisan Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Abjadia, International Journal of Education Al-Ta'rib : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab UIN Palangka Raya Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jaqfi : Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies LEKSIKA IZDIHAR An Nabighoh Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab JP-BSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia) LISANAN ARABIYA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Bahasa Indonesia Prima Thariqah Ilmiah ; Jurnal ilmu-ilmu kependidikan & Bahasa Arab International Journal of Arabic Language Teaching IJALT Alibbaa': Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Alsina : Journal of Arabic Studies JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Franca DINAMIKA ILMU: Jurnal Pendidikan Asalibuna Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir AL-KILMAH Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Lughawiyah: Journal of Arabic Education and Linguistics Dirasah: International Journal of Islamic Studies Al-Irfan: Journal Of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies iRecall Journal e-Journal of Linguistics Lisanudhad: Jurnal Bahasa, Pembelajaran, dan Sastra Arab KARSA: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture)
Mohamad Zaka Al-Farisi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 44 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 44 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Ibn Taymiyya on Universals: Nominalism, Textual Hermeneutics, and the Question of Scientific Rationality Teddy Yusuf; Dadang Sudana; Mohamad Zaka Al Farisi; Aceng Ruhendi Saifullah; Nur Ainiyah
Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam
Publisher : Jurusan Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Universitas Negri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jaqfi.v11i1.46045

Abstract

It is frequently asserted that Ibn Taymiyya's (d. 728/1328) denial of extramental universals commits him to an anti-abstractionist literalism and, ultimately, to hostility toward scientific rationality. This article argues that the assertion rests on a conflation of three logically independent theses — a metaphysical thesis about universals, a hermeneutical thesis about textual meaning, and an epistemological thesis about the sources of knowledge — and that once these are disentangled, the inference to antagonism toward science does not follow. Working from al-Radd ʿalā al-Manṭiqiyyīn and Darʾ Taʿāruḍ al-ʿAql wa al-Naql, and using conceptual analysis together with a historically disciplined philosophical hermeneutics, the study advances three findings. First, Ibn Taymiyya's position on universals is better described as a moderate conceptualism than as radical nominalism, and on the narrow question of the universal's mode of existence it stands closer to Avicenna than is usually recognised. Second, his critique of the syllogism is driven by an epistemological preference for sense, experience, and reasoning from particulars; he is therefore a defender of induction rather than its opponent, and the widespread characterisation of him as anti-inductive inverts his actual position. Third, and consequently, the genuine difficulty in his thought is not hostility to empirical inquiry but a justification gap: having denied that shared natures exist extramentally, he lacks a metaphysical warrant for the inductive generalisations upon which he himself relies — a difficulty he shares with the empiricist tradition from Hume onward. Reframing the problem in this way is more faithful to the texts and relocates Ibn Taymiyya from the position of an adversary of science to that of an early participant in a problem internal to empiricism itself.
Acceptability of the Quran Translation Mohamad Zaka Al Farisi
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 61 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2023.612.329-363

Abstract

Muslims have regarded the translation of the Quran into languages other than Arabic as valuable since its benefits for non-Arabic speakers to understand the its messages. However, those translations are not a substitute for the original Arabic Quran, and reciting the Quran in Arabic is not the same as reading its translation. Linguistically, translation is a dual act of interlingual communication that involves the source language (SL), target language (TL), and translator as the main actor. The translator is in charge of presenting the acceptable equivalence of the SL text and the TL text, either on the levels of form, meaning, or intent. Therefore, the acceptability of the translation of Quranic verses is not related merely to their forms and meanings but also to the intended purpose of the text of the SL. In practice, the acceptability of translations can be realized, among other things, by applying appropriate translation techniques and procedures when handling micro-translation units, whether on word, phrase, clause, or sentence levels. In this regard, the acceptability of the Quran translation necessitates the fulfilment of the aspects of accuracy, clarity, naturalness, and relevance. These aspects will bring an acceptability model for a Quranic translation that considered complete and representative. This model stems from the view that translation is not merely seen from the point of communication theory of the code but also from the point of communication theory of inference model. [Umat Islam melihat terjemahan Al-Quran ke dalam bahasa selain bahasa Arab sebagai sesuatu yang berharga karena manfaatnya bagi penutur non-Arab untuk memahami pesan-pesannya. Namun, terjemahan tersebut sejajar dengan Al-Quran yang berbahasa Arab, sehingga membaca Al-Quran dalam bahasa Arab tidak dianggap sama dengan membaca terjemahnya. Secara linguistik, penerjemahan merupakan suatu tindakan komunikasi ganda antarbahasa yang melibatkan bahasa sumber (SL), bahasa sasaran (TL), dan penerjemah sebagai pelaku utama. Penerjemah bertugas menyajikan padanan teks SL dan teks TL yang dapat diterima, baik dalam tataran bentuk, makna, maupun maksudnya. Oleh karena itu, keterterimaan terjemahan ayat-ayat Al-Quran tidak semata-mata berkaitan dengan bentuk dan maknanya, tetapi juga dengan maksud teks tersebut. Dalam praktiknya, keterterimaan terjemah dapat diupayakan antara lain dengan menerapkan teknik dan prosedur penerjemahan yang tepat terkait dengan satuan terjemahan mikro, baik pada tataran kata, frasa, klausa, maupun kalimat. Dalam kaitan ini, akseptabilitas terjemah Al-Quran memerlukan pemenuhan aspek akurasi, kejelasan, kealamian, dan relevansi. Aspek-aspek tersebut akan melahirkan suatu model akseptabilitas suatu terjemah Al-Quran yang dapat dianggap lengkap dan representatif. Model seperti ini berdasarkan pada pandangan bahwa penerjemahan tidak hanya dilihat dari sudut teori komunikasi tentang kode tetapi juga dari sudut teori komunikasi tentang inferensi.]
FAIRCLOUGHFIANS SFL ANALYSIS OF ARABIC DISCOURSE Abdullah Haryono; Mohamad Zaka Al Farisi; Rinaldi Supriadi
Thariqah Ilmiah: Jurnal ilmu-ilmu kependidikan & Bahasa Arab Vol 13, No 2 (2025): THARIQAH ILMIAH: JURNAL ILMU-ILMU KEPENDIDIKAN DAN BAHASA ARAB
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/thariqahilmiah.v13i2.18358

Abstract

Arabic-language podcasts can play a significant role in shaping netizens’ perceptions of social norms, including language's role as a tool of communication, as they serve as a primary source of knowledge and cultural values. This study seeks to fill this gap by applying Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis to an Arabic podcast. The analysis employs a Systemic Functional Linguistics approach drawing on Norman Fairclough's three-dimensional framework: textual analysis, discursive practice, and social practice. Data were collected from public comments on social media platforms and analyzed to identify linguistic patterns, discourse strategies, and the construction of ideology and cultural identity. By examining the podcast channel comment section, the findings highlight the importance of advancing critical sociolinguistic studies in the digital sphere, particularly within the context of Indonesia–Arab interactions, and open opportunities for broader research across other online platforms and communities
From Tafsīr to Takfīr: When Differences in Interpretation are Regarded as Differences in Creed in the Literalism of the Divine Names and Attributes Teddy Yusuf; Dadang Sudana; Mohamad Zaka Al Farisi; Aceng Ruhendi Saifullah
Dirasah International Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Islam, Human Development, and Social Change
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Tarbiyah Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59373/drs.v4i2.142

Abstract

Debates over asmāʾ wa ṣifāt (divine names and attributes) have produced lasting differences in Islamic theological interpretation, particularly over terms such as istiwāʾ, yad, and wajh. A problem arises when such differences are no longer treated as legitimate disagreement but become grounds for defining orthodoxy, deviation, and, in some cases, takfīr. This study aims to clarify how semantic reduction in tafsīr discourse may contribute to religious exclusion and how literalist hermeneutics relates to exclusive interpretive authority. It employs a qualitative conceptual-documentary design based on close reading and analytical synthesis of scholarly literature and one official document, the Qur’an translation guideline of the Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an. The analysis combines semantic–pragmatic analysis, philosophical and contextual hermeneutics, and Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic power. The analysis suggests that literal interpretation does not in itself constitute takfīr. Exclusion becomes possible when one interpretation is positioned as the sole criterion of theological legitimacy and alternative readings are characterized as deviant. The study distinguishes four forms of judgment: criticism of an interpretation, the judgment that it is incorrect, the labeling of it or its adherents as deviant, and explicit takfīr. It concludes that the movement from disagreement to exclusion is conditional rather than automatic, shaped by interpretive authority and the construction of boundaries of legitimate belief. As the study does not analyze primary texts or digital discourse directly, it offers a mechanism to be tested in future research.
Co-Authors Abdullah Haryono Aceng Ruhendi Syaifullah Agil Husein Al Munawar Agil Husein Al Munawar Aisyah Sajidah Akhmad Ridlo Alfan Haidar Ali Abd al-Rubb Radman Taha Alpan Noor Habib Rangkuti Anisa Anisa Anwar Sanusi Asep Sopian Athaya Salsabila Binti Khoiriyah Deni Ramdani Deni Ramdani Didi Suryadi Dzihni Azka Sabila Eri Kurniawan Faisal Hamdani Sambo Gita Putri Ramadhani Hairuddin Arsyad Hikmah Maulani Humairoh, Jasmine Afifah Isnainiyah Jamaluddin Abdul Aziz Khairun Najmi Mad Ali Maulida Auladina Fadheela EF Mazin Abdelrazig Eljack Farag Alla Mia Nurmala Mohd Rafi, Fakhrur Razi Muhammad Habiibul Aulyaa Muhammad Kafahulloh Muhammad kafahulloh Muhammad Zainal Muttaqien Nada, Nada Nadia Putri Kusriani Nalahuddin Saleh Nur Ainiyah Nurul Fitriyah Rara Nur'aini Rinaldi Supriadi Rinaldi Supriadi Rio Nandes Rivera, John Robert Rully Agung Yudhiantara Salma Azzahra Salma Nur Istiqomah Shofa Musthofa Khalid, Shofa Musthofa Shofwan Sholahudin Shofwan Sholahudin Siti Marya Ulpah Siti Roisah Solihat Sofyan Sauri Sudana, Dadang Sultan Zainul Amin Supriadi, Rinaldi Syihabuddin Syihabuddin Tanzil Nurholis Teddy Yusuf Teddy Yusuf Tina Amelia Triya Fadhilah Dhianty Putri Uswah Mujahidah Rasuna Said Wafa Nurul Husna Yayan M.A Nurbayan Zahra Aulia Hanifa Zalfa Khansa Nurfauzia Zalfa Khansa Nurfauzia Zalfa Tsania Rachman