Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Proses Penyelesaian Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Terhadap Masyarakat Mudung Darat Kabupaten Muaro Jambi Najemi, Andi; Hafrida, Hafrida; Monita, Yulia; Erwin, Erwin; Prasna, Adeb Davega
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mentari Vol. 2 No. 9 (2026): April
Publisher : Amirul Bangun Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59837/jpmm.v2i9.267

Abstract

Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) semakin banyak terjadi. Sehingga diperlukan tindakan dan  perhatian khusus, karena kasus ini  bukan lagi  persoalan individu (privasi) tetapi telah menjadi persoalan negara (public). Tingginya kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang terjadi di dalam Masyarakat  seperti kekerasan fisik, seksual dan psikis.  Hal tersebut tidak terlepas dari dari  masih sedikit korban yang berani untuk melaporkan kasusnya kepada aparat penegak hukum,  adanya perasaan takut, ketidaktahuan, serta struktur budaya yang masih belum dipahami sebagian masyarakat dan juga mereka beralasan tidak mau tersebar karena menganggap adalah aib keluarga,  dianggap sebagai urusan yang privat yang masih ditutup-tutupi yang mana orang lain tidak berhak ikut campur permasalahan keluarganya. Oleh karena itu salah satu upaya yang dilakukan dalam pencegahan KDRT adalah melalui penyuluhan hukum,  Dari kondisi yang ada  masyarakat  belum mengetahui bahwa siapa saja yang dapat melaporkan dan selain itu belum mengetahui bentuk kekerasan dalam rumah tangga itu apa saja yang dapat dilaporkan. Sehingga sebagai akademisi yang memiliki kewajiban untuk mengupayakan kesejahteraan keluarga perlu melakukan upaya pencegahan bersama dalam meminimalisir adanya kasus KDRT di lingkungan sekitarnya melalui penyuluhan hukum. Program pengabdian ini  dilakukan guna memberikan bekal kepada mitra    agar mitra dapat mengetahui pencegahan perbuatan KDRT dan cara penyelesaiannya melalui Restorative Justice apabila terjadi kasus KDRT di lingkungan sekitarnya.
Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah Perbankan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana di Indonesia Wulandari, Sacra Resti; Hafrida, Hafrida; Erwin, Erwin
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal protection for banking customers from a criminal law perspective has become a crucial issue in line with the increasing complexity of banking crimes, particularly those involving information technology. This study aims to analyze the current criminal law policy on the legal protection of banking customers in Indonesia (ius constitutum) and to formulate future policy directions (ius constituendum). The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are analyzed through interpretation, evaluation, and assessment of various regulations, including Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking, Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions, as well as several regulations issued by the Financial Services Authority and Bank Indonesia. The results indicate that, normatively, Indonesia has established a relatively comprehensive legal framework to provide protection for banking customers through both preventive and repressive mechanisms. Preventive protection is implemented through supervision, the prudential principle, and the deposit insurance system, while repressive protection is carried out through criminal sanctions, civil claims, and dispute resolution mechanisms. However, the implementation of such protection still faces several challenges, including weak inter-agency coordination, the complexity of proving cybercrimes, and the unequal bargaining position between banks and customers. Therefore, criminal law reform oriented toward policy and value-based approaches is necessary, including regulatory strengthening, enhancement of law enforcement capacity, harmonization of regulations, and the application of a more progressive liability principle for banks. Through this integrative approach, criminal law protection for banking customers is expected to become more effective, adaptive, and just.
Criminal Sentencing of Doctors as Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Against Patients from the Perspective of the Objectives of Punishment Pratiwi Dwi Saputri; Hafrida; Herry Liyus
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3096

Abstract

Sexual violence committed by doctors against patients constitutes a serious criminal offense that not only violates criminal law provisions but also undermines human values, professional ethics, and public trust in healthcare services. The unequal power relations between doctors and patients place victims in a vulnerable position, thus requiring a fair, firm, and victim-oriented sentencing system. This research aims to analyze the legal regulation and application of criminal sentences for sexual violence committed by doctors against patients within the Indonesian criminal law system, as well as to formulate ideal sentencing policies for the future. The research problems are formulated as follows: (1) how are the legal regulations and implementation of sentences for sexual violence committed by doctors against patients within the Indonesian criminal law system; and (2) how should future sentencing policies for such crimes be developed from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. This study employs normative legal research methods using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, particularly through the analysis of Decision of the Palembang District Court Number 919/Pid.B/2024/PN Plg. The data are analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The results of this study indicate that, normatively, the legal framework governing sentencing for sexual violence has been established in the Criminal Code (KUHP), Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes, and other relevant regulations. However, in practice, the implementation of sentencing still faces various obstacles, particularly in terms of evidentiary challenges, unequal power relations between doctors and patients, and victims' reluctance to report due to social stigma and psychological pressure. Furthermore, the sentence imposed in court decisions has not fully reflected substantive justice, as it has not thoroughly considered the psychological impact and long-term trauma experienced by victims. Based on these findings, it is recommended that legal regulations be strengthened, particularly regarding sentencing enhancements for perpetrators from certain professions, improvement of evidentiary mechanisms, and integration of criminal sanctions with administrative and professional ethical sanctions. Accordingly, the sentencing system is expected to provide maximum protection for victims, create a deterrent.
Bargaining for Punishment in Corruption Crime: Toward Justice from a Victimology Perspective Gussman, Angga Aldilla; Hafrida, Hafrida; Usman, Usman; Lasmadi, Sahuri; Sudarti, Elly; Rahayu, Sri
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 11 (2024): Ipso Jure - December
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/be8qn325

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that causes significant losses to the state, both materially and immaterially, which has a broad impact on the economic, social and political stability of a country. As the main victim in corruption crimes, the state bears the burden of recovering the losses incurred. The concept of bargaining for punishment offers an alternative approach in corruption law enforcement by allowing the perpetrator to reduce the sentence through the return of state losses. This research aims to analyze the application of the concept of bargaining for punishment in the context of Indonesian criminal law, especially in realizing justice and benefits for the state as a victim. The method used is Normative Juridical legal research, this research discusses the relevance of bargaining for punishment in bridging the interests of the state for the recovery of losses with the principles of criminal justice. The results show that the application of this concept can accelerate the case settlement process, reduce the burden on the justice system, and maximize the return of lost state assets. However, the application of bargaining for punishment must be closely monitored so as not to harm the principle of justice, especially in dealing with perpetrators with a significant level of guilt. Bargaining for punishment has the potential to become a strategic mechanism in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, provided that it is applied proportionally by considering aspects of justice, expediency, and legal certainty. This research recommends strengthening regulations and guidelines for the implementation of bargaining for punishment to ensure optimal recovery for the state as victims of corruption crimes
Implementation of Criminal Law Enforcement Against Environmental Pollution in Indonesia Hafrida, Hafrida; Rakhmawaty, Dessy; Herlambang, M. Ricky Putra
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025)
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ij.v2i9.41

Abstract

Criminal law enforcement is an important instrument in protecting and managing the environment in a sustainable manner. This study aims to analyze the application of criminal law to environmental pollution based on Law Number 32 of 2009 and identify obstacles in its implementation. The focus of the study includes the effectiveness of criminal sanctions against polluters and factors that hinder the optimization of law enforcement. The method used is empirical juridical with a qualitative approach, through interviews, observations, and document studies at the Jambi City Environmental Office. Research shows that criminal law enforcement has not been running optimally. The administrative and restorative justice approach is more dominant, but it has not been effective in having a deterrent effect. The main obstacles include weak coordination between institutions, limited resources, and low awareness of business actors on environmental document obligations. In addition, the permissive legal culture and the infrequent application of criminal sanctions also weaken law enforcement. There is a need to strengthen synergy between agencies, increase the capacity of law enforcement officials, and balance between repressive and restorative approaches. More effective criminal law enforcement is expected to improve legal compliance and provide real protection for the environment.