Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.531
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA DE JURE Yustisia Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum International Journal of Law Reconstruction Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jurnal Selat Jurnal Panorama Hukum Widya Yuridika Jurnal HAM Martabe : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Jurnal Masyarakat Merdeka (JMM) Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Pelayanan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (Pamas) Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JUSTISI Abdi Masyarakat Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Legal Spirit BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Analisis Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Humanism : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Yustitia Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Jurnal Abdimas Bina Bangsa Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Legalita DAS SEIN: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum dan Humaniora VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Media Bina Ilmiah JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Jurnal Abdimas Maduma Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia (J-PeHI) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Nawadeepa: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani
Universitas Pendidikan Nasional
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 66 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : DE JURE

 1 
The Interpretation of Misconduct Act as A Reason to Dismiss President: An Ethical Approach Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 13, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v13i1.12122

Abstract

Abstract: The President of Indonesia gets the supervision of the Senate as regulated by the constitution. The Senate has the authority to dismiss the president at the recommendation of the House of Representatives if the president is deemed to have committed treason against the state, corruption or bribery, serious crimes, and misconduct acts or is deemed no longer eligible for president. Misconduct act is a reason for dismissing a president does not have legal certainty because the constitution does not limit the intent of the misconduct act itself. At the same time, the Constitutional Court Act in Indonesia has extended the meaning of this misconduct act. This paper will discuss the meaning of the misconduct act from an ethical perspective and comparative study. Furthermore, it also describes the appropriateness of the limits on misconduct as regulated in the Constitutional Court Act with the intention of constitution drafting for amendment. These legal problems will then be studied using normative methods through historical, comparative, and interpretation approaches then presented on a descriptively-analysis paper. The results of the study indicate that a misconduct act is an act that degrades the dignity of the position as president. Misconduct acts have a broader meaning than criminal acts but can also violate unwritten norms that are determined as law in society.Keywords: dismissal of president; interpretation; misconduct act.Abstrak: Presiden Indonesia mendapat pengawasan dari Senat sebagaimana diatur dalam konstitusi. Senat memiliki kewenangan untuk memberhentikan presiden atas rekomendasi DPR jika presiden dianggap telah melakukan pengkhianatan terhadap negara, korupsi atau penyuapan, kejahatan berat, dan tindakan tidak senonoh atau dianggap tidak lagi memenuhi syarat untuk menjadi presiden. Perbuatan tercela menjadi alasan memberhentikan seorang presiden yang tidak memiliki kepastian hukum, karena konstitusi tidak membatasi maksud dari perbuatan tercelaitu sendiri. Padahal UU MK di Indonesia telah memperluas makna dari maksud perbuatan maksiat ini. Makalah ini akan membahas tentang pengertian perbuatan salah dari sudut pandang etika. Lebih lanjut, juga menggambarkan kesesuaian batasan perbuatan tercela sebagaimana diatur dalam UU MK dengan maksud penyusunan konstitusi untuk diubah. Permasalahan hukum tersebut kemudian akan dikaji dengan menggunakan metode normatif melalui pendekatan historis, komparatif, dan interpretasi, kemudian disajikan dalam makalah analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbuatan tercela merupakan perbuatan yang merendahkan martabat jabatan sebagai presiden. Perbuatan tercela memiliki makna yang lebih  luas dari tindak pidana, namun bisa juga pelanggaran atas norma-norma tak tertulis yang berlaku sebagai hukum di masyarakat.Kata Kunci: Interpretasi, pemberhentian presiden; perbuatan tercela.
The Implementation of Omnibus Law in Indonesia Law Making Process on Philosophy Review Putu Eva Ditayani Antari
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 14, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v14i1.15757

Abstract

The omnibus law is a method of law-making in Indonesia that began to be applied when the creation of the Job Creation Act was established. The adaptation of this method is controversial because in addition to aiming to simplify Indonesian regulations, it also violates the provisions of the formation of laws regulated in the law. The implementation of this omnibus law is the focus of research studies that lead to discourses based on schools of legal philosophy, especially the Positivism and Legal Realism schools which lead to contradictory conclusions. In order to answer this question, a juridical literature research will be carried out based on an understanding of the various schools of law based on philosophy, using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study conclude that legal positivism requires omnibus law to be stipulated in law as a method of law formation before it is implemented, so that it can provide legitimacy to its position in Indonesian legislation. Meanwhile, legal realism views that the presence of omnibus law is the will of the community and must be responded to in a responsive manner to overcome the excess regulations that occur in Indonesia and tend to overlap.
Co-Authors Abdee Prasatya, Galang Adnyana, I Kadek Budiadinata Satriatama Anak Agung Ayu Intan Puspadewi Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Sri Rahayu Gorda Anditya, Ariesta Wibisono Anggarini, Ni Kadek Listya Anindia Putri, Adinda Trisya Ari Rama, Bagus Gede Arsawati, Ni Nyoman Juwita Artami, Ida Ayu Ketut Budiana, I Nyoman Cahyani, Putu Rita Cakranegara, Pandu Adi Dananjaya, Made Adi Widhirestu Daparhita, Ida Bagus Agung Deta, Helena Cruisita Dewa Ayu Yeni Asmari Dewi Bunga Dewi Lestari, Ni Ketut Sucia Dewi, Ni Made Ari Sita Dinata, Kadek Indra Prayoga Ekaresty Haes, Putri Evirio Rahman, Royan Fadli, Moh. Farhansyach, Muhammad Daffa Figo Gadis, Gadis Penta Listaryadi Gawati, Veren Kris Gorda, A.A.A. Ngr Sri Rahayu Gorda, AAA Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda, AAA. Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda, Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Tini Rusmini Himalaya, I Gede Oka I Gede Agus Kurniawan i gede suastika I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Triwulandari I Gusti Ngurah Widya Hadi Saputra I Kadek Budiadinata Satriatama Adnyana I Kadek Budiadinata Satriatama Adnyana I Made Arya Utama I Made Wirya Darma I Putu Edi Rusmana I Putu Wahyu Yudha Negara Ida Ayu Devina Aishwarya Putri Suteja Ida Bagus Agung Daparhita Ida Bagus Bujangga Pidada Kastu Suardana Juwita Sari, Putu Ratna Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma Kadek Julia Mahadewi Komang Ayu Trisna Yanti Lessu, Milida Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri Made Oka Cahyadi Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana Mahendra, I Gede Rizal Mas Tri Wulandari, Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Merva Putri Salvia Mohammad Fadli Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Triwulandari Ni Kadek Intan Wiradewi Ni Luh Made Ayu Nia Pradnya Paramitha Ni Nyoman Juwita Arsawati Ni Putu Sawitri Nandari Ni Wayan Diah Sukmadewi Nindi Lestari, Ni Kadek Nurlita Cahyani, Ni Kadek Dwi Prasada, Dewa Krisna Puspitasari, Ni Putu Intan Putra, Komang Satria Wibawa Putri Ekaresty Haes Putri, Kesari Pringga Juwita Sedana Putri, Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putu Ratna Juwita Sari Putu Sherly Chandra Sasmitha Rama, Bagus Gede Ari Ratna Juwita Sari, Putu Riana Susmayanti Riana Susmayanti Rusmana, Putu Edi Sari, Putu Ratna Juwita Satriatama Adnyana, I Kadek Budiadinata Suherman, Annisa Aullia Sukadana, Dewa Ayu Putri Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Usrinase, Yulius Utami, Ni Luh Febby Satya Utami, Putu Ananda Nadya Vaisile Moisa, Robert Wayan Ardita, I Wicaksana, I Putu Bayu Andre Widjana, Ni Putu Julietta Maheswari Putri