Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.46
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MATEMATIKA Statistika Prosiding Seminar Biologi Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika (JITEKI) Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Teknologi Fakultas Teknik Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan Suska Journal of Mathematics Education Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Indonesian Journal of Applied Statistics Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal of Computing Science and Applied Mathematics Journal of Education Technology M A T H L I N E : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika BISECER (Business Economic Entrepreneurship) Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal Jurnal Bumigora Information Technology (BITe) Jurnal TIKOMSIN (Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Sinar Nusantara) Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Journal of Applied Data Sciences Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Proceeding Biology Education Conference Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Elektro, Sistem Informasi, dan Teknik Informatika (SNESTIK) Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar Pancaran Pendidikan Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Radiant : Journal of Applied, Social, and Education Studies
Sri Subanti
Program Studi Statistika, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 191 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 191 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PENEMUAN TERBIMBING, PAIR CHECKS, DAN THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR Muawanah, Lina; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (332.546 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of guided discovery learning model, Pair Check (PC), and Think Pair Share (TPS) on the mathematics achievement of students in terms of student learning styles. This research used the quasi-experimental with factorial design 3x3. The population of this research was all Junior High School eighth grade students in Semarang Regency that used KTSP 2006. The sampling technique was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and questionnaire learning styles. The data was analyzed using two ways ANOVA with unbalanced cell, then then preceded with multiple comparative test using Scheffe method. Based on the hypothesis test, the results of this research obtained the following conclusions. 1) Guided discovery learning model provided a better learning achievement than learning model PC and TPS, as well as learning model TPS and PC  provided the same learning achievement. 2) Students with a visual learning style had better learning achievement than the students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles, as well as students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles had the same learning achievement. 3) In each learning model that guided discovery, PC and TPS, students with learning styles visual, auditory and kinesthetic provided the same mathematics learning achievement (4) In each of the students with visual and kinesthetic learning styles, learning model guided discovery, PC, and TPS had the same learning achievement. At the students with auditory learning styles, learning models had guided discovery learning achievement were better than a PC, the PC and TPS learning model had the same mathematics achievement, as well as guided discovery learning model and TPS had the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Learning model, cooperative learning, guided discovery, PC, TPS, learning styles, learning achievement in Mathematics
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRY LEARNING DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN SPASIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Aziz, Abdul; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (419.287 KB)

Abstract

 Abstract: The purpose of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement and mathematics communication ability viewed from the spatial quotient. The learning models compared were Inquiry learning, Discovery learning and Classical model. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The study population was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Solo city. Sample was collected by stratified cluster random sampling and consisted of 260 students which where divided into three groups,  86 students in Experimental Group 1, 86 students in Experimental Group 2, and 88 students in Control Group . The instruments of the research include mathematics achievement test, mathematics communication ability test and spatial intelligence test. The technique of analyzing data used the two-way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. The results of this research could be concluded as follows ,  (1) Inquiry Learning and Discovery Learning have better learning achievement and mathematics communication ability aspects than the Classical learning, Besides that, Inquiry Learning and Discovery Learning  have the same learning achievement and mathematics communication ability; (2) The students with high spatial intelligence have the same learning achievement and mathematics communication ability as middle spatial intelligence. In addition, students who have high and middle spatial intelligence have better learning achievement and mathematics communication ability than students who have low spatial intelligence.; (3) In each learning model, the students with high and middle spatial intelligence have better learning achievement and mathematics communication ability than students who have low spatial intelligence, and the students with high and middle spatial intelligence have the same learning achievement and mathematics communication ability; (4) In each of the spatial intelligence, the cooperative learning model of Inquiry Learning and Discovery Learning give a better learning achievement and mathematics communication ability than the Classical model, and the cooperative learning model of Inquiry Learning and Discovery Learning give the same learning achievement and mathematics communication ability.Keywords: Inquiry Learning, Discovery Learning, Spatial Quotient, Learning Achievement, Mathematics Communication Ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VII DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS Fadlilah, Umi; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (249.351 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from anxiety mathematics learning. The learning models compared were direct, PBL with scientific approach, and DL with scientific approach. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Banyumas. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Patikraja, SMPN 2 Patikraja, and SMPN 2 Kalibagor, taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and anxiety mathematics learning. The data analysis technique used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students receiving PBL with scientific approach to DL with scientific approach achievement than those receiving direct learning model. The students receiving PBL with scientific approach and DL with scientific approach had the same learning outcome. (2) Students with lower levels of mathematics anxiety learning had better learning outcome than students with medium and high anxiety level. Students’ learning anxiety level on math was better in their learning outcome than students with high levels of learning anxiety mathematics. (3) In each group, the anxiety level of students learning mathematics, learning model PBL with scientific approach and learning model DL with scientific approach provides better performance than direct learning model, learning model PBL with scientific approach produces the same learning outcome with learning model DL with scientific approach. (4) In each of the learning model, students with lower levels of anxiety level of mathematics learning outcome had better math outcome than students with medium and high math anxiety level learning, students learn math anxiety levels were to have better learning outcome than students with high levels of anxiety learn mathematics.Keywords: Direct learning model, PBL learning model with scientific approach, DL learning model with scientific approach, Math Anxiety Learning
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BLORA Nugroho, Zuhdha Basofi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (459.348 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from the logical mathematical intelligence of the students. This research was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population of the research was the seven class students of Junior High School at Blora regency on academic year 2014/2015 and the samples were students from SMP Negeri 2 Blora, SMP Negeri 1 Ngawen, and SMP Negeri 1 Japah which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) TTW with scientific approach gave better achievement than TPS, and classical with scientific approach TPS with scientific approach gave better achievement than classical with scientific approach. 2) The students with high logical matematical intelligence better achievement than the students with medium and low logical matematical intelligence. The students with medium logical matematical intelligence better achievement than the students with low logical matematical intelligence. 3) At the students with high and medium logical matematical intelligence, TTW, TPS, and classical with scientific approach gave the same achievement. At the students with low logical matematical intelligence TTW and TPS with scientific approach gave the same achievement, TTW and TPS with scientific approach gave better achievement than classical scientific learning model. 4) In TTW with scientific approach, students with high and medium logical matematical intelligence had the same achievement, students with medium and low logical matematical intelligence had the same achievement, and students with high logical matematical intelligence had better achievement than students with low logical matematical intelligence. In TPS with scientific approach students with high logical matematical intelligence had better achievement than students with medium and low logical matematical intelligence, and students with medium and low logical matematical intelligence had the same achievement. In classical with scientific approach, students with high and medium logical matematical intelligence had the same achievement, students with high and medium logical matematical intelligence had better achievement than students with low logical matematical intelligence.Keywords:  Think Pair Share, Think Talk Write, Classical learning model, Scientific Approach, Logical Matematical Intelligence, Achievement.
SPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI SELF-EFFICACY Shalikhah, Maratu; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (238.142 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement and learning interest viewed from students self-efficacy. The learning model compared were NHT with scientific approach, SNH with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Bantul regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMPN 1 Pleret, SMPN 2 Sewon, and SMPN 2 Imogiri. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self-efficacy questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusion were as follows. (1) SNH with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with scientific approach, and both gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Mathematics achievement of students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have medium and low self-efficacy, and both (medium and low) have the same mathematics achievement. (3) For NHT with scientific approach, students who have high and medium self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have low self-efficacy. Students who have medium and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. For SNH with scientific approach, mathematics achievement of students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have medium and low self-efficacy, and both (medium and low) have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students who have high, medium, and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have high self-efficacy, SNH with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. NHT with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement. For students who have medium and low self-efficacy, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Structured Numbered Heads (SNH), classical, scientific approach, self-efficacy.
PROSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA KELAS XI FARMASI SMK CITRA MEDIKA SRAGEN DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA Retnowati, Dwi; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.043 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research was to describe the critical thinking process of the students in Grade XI pharmacy of SMK Citra Medika Sragen who have the high, moderate, and low abilities in each stage of clarification, analysis and solving strategy in solving mathematics problem. This research used qualitative case study approach. The results of research are the critical thinking process of the students as follows (1) The students with the high initial ability in mathematics: (a) clarification, they mention the information which they know and ask question by using their own language; (b) analysis, the students identify the necessary information. They formulate the step of problem solving and explain it confidently. It is proven when they illustrate the reason logically about the necessary information, using inequalities symbol, and non-negative condition. The students use their prior knowledge, after that, they draw a conclusion by returning the final result to the problem context; (c) solving strategy, they evaluate their work to re-calculate and that find another problem solving alternative at last; (2) The students the moderate initial ability in mathematics: (a) clarification, they mention the information which they know and ask question by using their own language;  (b) analysis, the students identify the necessary information to reread the problem. They formulate the solving problem step precisely. They use their prior knowledge to draw the conclusion by returning the final result to the problem context; (c) solving strategy, the students evaluate their work by seeing it; (3) The students with the low initial ability in mathematics: (a) clarification, they mention the information which they know and question it after reading it for few times and they need of question stimulus; (b) analysis, the students identify the necessary information to reread the problem, and, again, they need a question stimulus. They takes long time in formulating the problem solving. They draw the conclusion by returning the final result to the problem context; (c) solving strategy, the students commit the evaluation by seeing their work from the beginning to the end.Keywords: Critical Thinking Process, Mathematics Problem Solving, and Initial Ability in Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BOYOLALI Adiningsih, Sri; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (620.499 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s AQ. The learning models compared were TPS with scientific approach, NHT with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were all students of Junior High School in Boyolali. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Boyolali, SMPN 1 Sawit and SMPN 3 Sawit, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and AQ questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TPS with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with scientific approach, and both gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Climbers students have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters students,  campers students have better mathematics achievement than quitters students. (3) For TPS with scientific approach, climbers students have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters students. Campers and quitters students have the same mathematics achievement. For NHT and classical with scientific approach, climbers students have better mathematics achievement than quitters students. Climbers and campers students have the same mathematics achievement. Campers and quitters students have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For climbers students, TPS with scientific approach and NHT with scientific approach give the same mathematics achievement. NHT with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach give the same mathematics achievement. TPS with scientific approach gives the better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For campers and quitters students, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TGT, NHT, Classical, Scientific Approach, AQ.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TAPPS DAN PS PADA MATERI STATISTIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS XI IPS Arianto, Febri; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (404.676 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the students’ Mathematics learning creativity. The learning models compared were Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS), Problem Solving (PS), and direct learning. This study was quasi-experimental research. The population of this study was students in grade XI social class of state senior high schools in Klaten year 2015/2016. Stratified cluster random sampling was utilized for collecting samples. Two ways Anova with 3x3 of factorial design was used for hypothesis test. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded: (1) the students who are given TAPPS have better achievement than those who are given PS and direct learning, students who are given PS have the same achievement as those who are given direct learning, (2) high creativity students have better achievement than middle and low creativity students, middle creativity students have the same achievement as low creativity students, (3) in the TAPPS; high, middle, and low creativity students have the same achievement. In the PS; high, middle, and low creativity students have the same achievement. In direct learning, high creativity students have the same achievement as middle creativity students, middle creativity students have the same achievement as low creativity students. High creativity students have better achievement than low creativity students, (4) in high creativity, the students who are given TAPPS have the same achievement as those who are given PS and direct learning. In the middle creativity, those students who given TAPPS have the same achievement as those who are given PS and direct learning. In low creativity, the students who are given TAPPS have the same achievement as those who are given PS; those who are given PS have the same achievement as those who are given direct learning model, while the students who are given TAPPS have better achievement than those who given direct learning.Key words: TAPPS, PS, Direct learning, Mathematics Learning Creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRAN BELAJAR Brilliyanti, Fanny; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (396.812 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one gives better mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD), model Problem Based Learning (PBL), or model classical with scientific approach;  (2) which one has better mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or low of self regulated learning; (3) for each learning model, which one has better  mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or lowof self regulated learning; (4) For each category of self regulated learning, which one gives better mathematics achievement, STAD, PBL, or classical with scientific approach. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Surakarta City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMP N 2 Surakarta, SMP N 15 Surakarta and SMP N 24 Surakarta. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self regulated learning questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova. The conclusion were as follows. (1) PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than STAD with scientific approach, and STAD with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach have the same mathematics achievement. (2) Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have medium and low self regulated learning and students who have medium self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning (3) For STAD and PBL with scientific approach, students who have high and medium self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning. Students who have medium and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students who have high, medium, and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have high self regulated learning, STAD with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement with PBL and classical with scientific approach but PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For students who have medium and low self regulated learning, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Student Team Achievment Division (STAD), Problem Based Learning (PBL), classical, scientific approach, self regulated learning (SRL)
RESPONS MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA UNIVERSITAS VETERAN BANGUN NUSANTARA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL LOGIKA BERDASAR TAKSONOMI SOLO Exacta, Annisa Prima; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (234.823 KB)

Abstract

Abstract. The objectives of this research were: 1) to describe the response level of mathematics students in Veteran Bangun Nusantara University Sukoharjo based on SOLO taxonomy in solving logic problems; 2) to describe the characteristic of students response at each level of SOLO taxonomy; 3) to study if there is misconception at each level of SOLO taxonomy about students response.This research was a qualitative research. The subject in this research were the students of Mathematics Education, Veteran Bangun Nusantara University on the first semester academic year 2014/2015. The main instruments used in this research to collect the data was the researcher and the other instruments were test instrument and interview guide instrument. Data analysis technique was conducted by data reduction, data presentation and data verification or made conclusion. The conclusions as follows. 1) Students response level based on SOLO taxonomy in solving logic problems comprised prestructural, unistructural, multistructural, relational, and extended abstract, 2) Students response characteristic at each level of SOLO taxonomy as follows. a) Prestructural: the answer completely irrelevant, could not understand the problem given, could not connect the concept and the answer, and the answer was illogical. b) Unistructural: there was a clear and simple relationship between one concept to another but the core of concept widely was not yet understood. c) Multistructural: understood some of the components but still separated from each other so a comprehensive understanding was not formed, some simple connections have been established however metacognitive abilities have not appeared yet at this level. d) Relational: could connect the fact and the theory and also connect the action and the objective, showed understanding ability of some components from the whole concept, understood the role of the parts to the whole and has been able to apply a concept in similar circumstances, have better ability to expressed ideas and made some automatic repetition. e) Extended Abstract: have the ability to think conceptually, to connect not only limited to the concepts that have been given alone but with concepts beyond that, could made generalizations in different problems and made parables in specific situations. 3) Based on the 5 response level of SOLO that happened to students, scheme on each level as shown below. At prestructural and unistructural response levels that were students who have misconceptions. At the multistructural response level, there were students who have a scheme but invalid because the result of the first and second data collection was not the same. The first result were correct scheme but the second result were misconceptions. At the relational response level, there were students who have misconceptions and at the extended abstract response level, there were students who have a correct scheme or in other words did not experience misconceptions.Keywords: SOLO taxonomy, response level, scheme, misconception.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Abdul Aziz Abdul Aziz Abdul Aziz Hidayat Achmad Nurrofiq Achmad Nurrofiq Adi Wicaksono, Nanda Aflich Yusnita Fitrianna Aflich Yusnita Fitrianna Agus Supriyanto Ahmad Abdul Mutholib Amalia Zulvia Widyaningrum Ambarawati, Mika Amiratih Siti Aisyah Andhika, Niken Dwi Anggraira, Attilah Suci Annisa Swastika Annur, M. Firman Anwar Ardani Aprilia, Nabila Churin Arianto, Febri Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arifa Apriliana Arifa Apriliana, Arifa Ariska Yuliana Putri Ariska Yuliana Putri Arsita Anggraeni Pramesti Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Rahmawati, Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Assyifa Lala Pratiwi Hamid Astuti, Arinda Tri Astuti, Indra Puji Atika Amalia Attilah Suci Anggraira Aulia Rizki Destarani Ayu Rahmawati Bastian Al Ravisi Berlyana Ayu Prasasti Brilliyanti, Fanny Brilliyanti, Fanny Budi Santosa Budi Santosa Budi Santosa Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Danar Supriadi Desi Tri Utami, Desi Tri Diana Tri Purnamasari Dini Yuniarti Dwi Ambarwati, Dwi Dwi Retnowati Dwi Retnowati Dyah Auliya Agustina Endang Widiyastuti Era Hervilia Etika, Erdyna Dwi Exacta, Annisa Prima Fajar Suryatama Farida Nurhasanah Fhadilla, Nahdatul Fitri Apriyani Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani Fitri Era Sugesti Fitria, Camelina Fitriana Anggar Kusuma Fitriana, Laila Getut Pramesti Giant Aprisetyani Giant Aprisetyani H Hartatik, H Hendriyanto, Agus Husna Afanyn Khoirunissa Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ikrar Pramudya Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Indra Raditya , Dionisius Intan Novia Sari Intan Novia Sari Intan Rachmawati Irwan Susanto Irwan Susanto Isnaini, Bayutama Isnandar Slamet Isnandar Slamet Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Iwan Kurnianto Kadar, Jimmy Abdel Karina Pramitasari Karina Pramitasari, Karina Kartikaningtyas, Nafiqoh Elsa Katherine Her Pratiwi Khafittulloh Viqriah Khafittulloh Viqriah, Khafittulloh Khoiriyah, Nor Kumarahadi, Brigitta Melati Kurniasih, Rini Kurniati, Edy Dwi Lestari, Fajar Lina Muawanah, Lina Mahmudah Titi Muanifah Mahmudah Titi Muanifah Mahmudati, Rina Maratu Shalikhah Maratu Shalikhah, Maratu Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Marfuah, Ismiyati Mida Nurani Mika Ambarawati Mohamad Nur Fauzi Muhammad Bayu Nirwana Muhammad Wildan Fadilah Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Nabila Tri Amanda Nais Qonita Salsabila Ningsih, Maya Kristina Nirwana, Muhammad Bayu Nopiana, Medi Nor Khoiriyah Novi Dya Meylasari Nugraha, Titis Jati Nugroho, Purwo Setiyo Nuraini, Latifah Nurudin, M. Pardede, Hilman Ferdinandus Prabowo, Haniftia Haqqiendini Pramesti, Arsita Anggraeni Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani pratiwi, hasih Proborini, Ellen Purna Bayu Nugroho Purnamasari, Anita Pusaka, Semerdanta Putra Adi Wibowo Putra Adi Wibowo Rahmita Ika Sari Raodatul Jannah Raodatul Jannah Rara Sugiarti Ratih Kusumaningrum Ratih Kusumaningrum Reka Pramukti Reka Pramukti, Reka Respati wulan Retno Anggraheni Ria Wahyu Wijayanti Rina Mahmudati Riyadi Riyadi Riyadi Riyadi Riyadi Riyadi Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi Rizky Wahyudi Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan, Sandhy Prasetyo Satrio Wicaksono Sudarman Savitri, Maria Endah Savitri, Maria Endah Septiana Wijayanti Setiaputra, Felix Indra Sri Adiningsih Sri Sulistijowati Handajani Sugesti, Fitri Era Sugianto Sugianto Sugiyanto - Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sugiyanto, Sugiyanto Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sulandari, Winita Sumantri, Astri Wiliastri Susilotomoa, Dhestahendra Citra Titik Yuniarti Triyazulfa, Azkiya Umi Fadlilah, Umi Umi Supraptinah Umi Supraptinah, Umi Veronica Sri Wigiyanti Veronica Sri Wigiyanti Very Hendra Saputra Virlina Zuhanisani Wahyuni, Fina Tri Wahyuni, Fina Tri Wahyuningtyas, Widyana Wardani, Endang Purwati Wardani, Endang Purwati Widyana Wahyuningtyas Wihasti Imas Priyandani Wihasti Imas Priyandani, Wihasti Imas Winita Sulandari Winita Sulandari Winita Sulandari Winita Sulandari Wulandari, Lina Yadi Ardiawan Yadi Ardiawan Yudho Yudhanto Yudho Yudhanto Yudho Yudhanto, Yudho Yuliana Susanti Yuliana Susanti, Yuliana Yuniarti, Titik Yusnita Rahmawati Yusnita Rahmawati Zainal Arifin Zuhanisani, Virlina Zuhdha Basofi Nugroho Zuhdha Basofi Nugroho, Zuhdha Basofi Zukhronah, Etik