Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Efektivitas Restorative Justice Terhadap Perkara Penyalahguna Narkotika: Sebuah Tinjauan Yuridis Antara Kebijakan dan Realita Arrie Budhiartie; Fauzi Syam; John Freddy Simbolon
QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : FASYA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/qj.v9i1.10614

Abstract

Restorative Justice atau Keadilan Restoratif adalah suatu pendekatan alternatif dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang berorientasi pada pemulihan kondisi dan hubungan antara pelaku tindak pidana, korban, serta masyarakat yang terdampak. Pendekatan ini telah menjadi salah satu inovasi dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana di Indonesia, dengan menitikberatkan pada penyelesaian yang bersifat partisipatif, dialogis, dan berkeadilan restoratif, sebagai pelengkap terhadap mekanisme peradilan konvensional. Dalam konteks penyalahgunaan narkotika, pendekatan ini dinilai mampu mengurangi overkapasitas lembaga pemasyarakatan serta memberikan keadilan yang lebih berorientasi pada pemulihan. Namun, realitanya masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan, termasuk tumpang tindih kebijakan, resistensi aparat penegak hukum, dan pemahaman yang belum seragam. Studi ini memiliki tujuan untuk melakukan analisis efektivitas implementasi restorative justice terhadap perkara penyalahguna narkotika secara yuridis, dengan meninjau peraturan perundang-undangan serta praktiknya di beberapa daerah di Indonesia.
Legal Implications of Local Legal Products Formed Without a Problem Inventory List (DIM) Dinda Suryaningsih; Fauzi Syam; Arfa'i Arfa'i
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 5 No 6 (2026): June
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v5i6.1017

Abstract

This research is motivated by problems within the local legislative system in Indonesia, where the Problem Inventory List (DIM), a crucial quality control instrument at the central level, loses its regulatory footing at the regional level. This study aims to analyze the institutionalization of DIM in lawmaking and the legal implications of its absence in drafting Local Regulations. Employing a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, the results indicate that at the central level, DIM is an imperative requirement regulated hierarchically (Law No. 12/2011, MD3 Law, and DPR RI Regulation No. 2/2020), where its absence automatically halts deliberations. Conversely, a regulatory vacuum exists at the regional level since Government Regulation No. 12/2018 and Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 80/2015 do not mandate it. Consequently, while its absence does not formally invalidate Local Regulations, methodologically it eliminates structural discipline during sessions. Implicatively, this absence triggers substantive issues like policy smuggling, redundant terminology, and fragile considerations clauses, leading to massive corrections by central ministries during evaluations and declining legislative functions within the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD).
Digital Transformation of the Notary Profession: Juridical Analysis of Cyber Notary Implementation in Authentic Deed Making in Indonesia Alex Ramalus; Fauzi Syam; Dwi Suryahartati
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6315

Abstract

Digital transformation in the field of notary is a structural imperative in the era of rapid development of information technology. The concept of Cyber Notary is present as a form of modernization of the notary position through the integration of technology such as electronic signatures, video conferencing, and digital document management and storage systems. This study aims to examine the juridical aspects of the implementation of Cyber Notary in the making of authentic deeds in Indonesia. The method used is a normative legal research method with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results of the study show that there is no explicit regulation in the Law on Notary Positions (Law No. 30 of 2004 jo. Law No. 2 of 2014) related to the practice of Cyber Notary causing legal uncertainty, especially in terms of the validity of digital deeds and verification of the identity of the parties. In addition, the lack of suboptimal digital infrastructure and information security systems increases the risk of ethical violations and data leaks. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of regulatory reformulation through the harmonization of the UUJN with the ITE Law and the PDP Law, as well as the need for digital competency development and the renewal of the notary profession code of ethics so that the implementation of Cyber Notary can be carried out legally, accountably, and professionally.
Pengujian Keputusan Pemberhentian Tidak Dengan Hormat sebagai Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Peradilan Administrasi Fauzi Syam; Helmi Helmi; Fitria Fitria
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 20 No 1 (2020): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.49-70

Abstract

Adanya perbedaan penafsiran atas norma PTDH PNS yang melakukan kejahatan jabatan berdasarkan putusan pengadilan incraht sebelum berlakunya UU ASN, menyebabkan terjadinya perbedaan penerapan penegakan hukum dalam praktik (ada yang diberhentikan tidak dengan hormat, diberhentikan dengan hormat, atau tidak diberhentikan). Perbedaan juga tercermin dalam9 putusan pengadilan di lingkungan PERATUN atas gugatan PTDH PNS, baik di tingkat judex facti maupun judex juris. Ada gugatan yang dikabulkan, ditolak, atau dinyatakan tidak diterima. Persoalan-persoalan hukum yang muncul dalam putusan hakim di lingkungan PERATUN, bersifat mendasar dan strategis dalam menentukan maju mundurnya pembangunan hukum administrasi Indonesia yang pondasinya telah diatur dalam UU No. 30/2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.