Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika LAW REFORM Yustisia Lentera Hukum JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Spektrum Hukum AL-Daulah Arena Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum Novelty LAW REVIEW Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Pembaharuan Hukum JURNAL MAHKAMAH Unram Law Review International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Jurnal Selat Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Widya Yuridika Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Lex Scientia Law Review Jambe Law Journal Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran DE'RECHTSSTAAT International Journal of Supply Chain Management JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW KERTHA WICAKSANA Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Media Iuris University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Notaire International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR) Mulawarman Law Review JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Suara Hukum Majalah Hukum Nasional Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Journal of Judicial Review Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Legislatif Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan Yuridika JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) RechtIdee LamLaj Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law
Nugraha, Xavier
Faculty Of Law Of Airlangga University, Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 102 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 102 Documents
Search

 7   8   9   10   11 
Public Participation in Constitutional Amendments with Deliberation Requirements in the Unamendability Framework: A Comparative Study Nugraha, Xavier; Felicia, Stefania Arshanty; Hartono, Julienna
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 7 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.904

Abstract

From time to time, it is considered that Constitutional Amendments are lack of public participation and contains political aspects. Therefore, many nations regulate certain provisions to ensure that the Constitutional Amendments are merely for public order and welfare. One of the provision is the temporal unamendability. In the shape of deliberation requirements, which is essentially the involvement of the public in submitting constitutional amendments within a certain time limit. Indonesian Law doesn’t recognize the concept of deliberation requirements, therefore, the authors will analyze Sweden and South Korean Law, two countries that are also using civil law system and have regulated deliberation requirements in submitting constitutional amendments. This paper will discuss two problems: 1) the legal provisions for constitutional amendments in Indonesia, Sweden, and South Korea, and 2) the guarantee model for public participation in constitutional amendments using the deliberation requirements model. This paper uses legal research method, with a conceptual, statutory, and comparative approach. The results show that Sweden and South Korean Law have involved both the public and the Representative Body to determine wether constitutional amendment will be performed, meanwhile Indonesia hasn’t involve the public to vote for a constitutional amendments. Therefore, to guarantee public participation in constitutional amendments, the authors provide a model which include the public participation through vote or referendum to decide a constitutional amendments and a period of time to file for constitutional amendment.
Reformulation of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Public Information Requests to Achieve Constructive Law Enforcement and Legal Certainty Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah; Nugraha, Xavier; Tanbun, Elma Putri
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 4 No 1 (2021): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i1.122

Abstract

The nature of law enforcement in resolving multi-dimensional information disputes has a logical consequence on the need for constructive law enforcement. This research aims to examine the forms of law enforcement that exist in resolving disputes over requests for public information and to formulate a constructive mechanism to realize a series of law enforcement procedures with legal certainty. This research is normative legal research using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that law enforcement in the settlement of public information disputes consists of the objection, non-litigation adjudication, and litigation covering civil, state administration, and criminal law. In this case, The Criminal law instruments are placed as the final law enforcement if the relevant public agency does not carry out a decision that has permanent legal force. In addition, in the context of realizing comprehensive and constructive law enforcement, a Memorandum of Understanding was held between the Information Commission and the Police to synergize and effectively implement the criminal law as a final resort.
Verifikasi Manual Manifestasi Asas Kecermatan Sebagai Batu Uji Terhadap Keputuan Tata Usaha Negara Yulida, Devi; Utama, Kartika Widya; Nugraha, Xavier
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MAY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v5i1.4600

Abstract

Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk membahas mengenai realisasi penggunaan Verifikasi Manual (Fakta Sosial) sebagai manifestasi Asas Kecermatan dalam Batu Uji terhadap KTUN. Latar belakang dari penulisan ini adalah terkait peran AUPB sebagai Batu Uji KTUN yang sudah diterapkan di ruang lingkup PTUN, namun belum secara spesifik menjelaskan mengenai realisasi bentuk dari AUPB. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Penulisan hukum melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dilakukan dengan menelaah semua undang-undang dan regulasi yang terkait dengan isu hukum yang sedang ditangani. Pendekatan konseptual dilakukan dengan menganalisis dan mengkritisi terhadap pelaksanaan Verifikasi Manual (Fakta Sosial) sebagai manifestasi dari Asas Kecermatan dalam KTUN. Penulisan ini akan melengkapi penulisan sebelumnya, kelebihan penelitian ini adalah secara spesifik membahas Verifikasi Manual (Fakta Sosial) sebagai realisasi dari Asas Kecermatan yang merupakan bagian dari AUPB, serta peran dan kedudukan Verifikasi Manual sebagai Batu Uji dalam KTUN. Hasil penulisan ini menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan Verifikasi Manual (Fakta Sosial) sebagai batu uji KTUN berperan dalam memberikan jaminan agar setiap KTUN yang dikeluarkan oleh pejabat administrasi tidak hanya sejalan dengan hukum yang berlaku, tetapi juga sesuai dengan fakta yang ada di lapangan, sehingga mampu mewujudkan keadilan yang sebenar benarnya, berdasarkan fakta yang sesungguhnya.
Legal Protection Against Status Determination of Suspects for Unpleasant Crimes After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1/PUU-XI/2013 Nugraha, Xavier; Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah; Serfiyani, Citi Rahmati
Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol. 6 No. 2 December (2021)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jm.v6i2.1111

Abstract

Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and Article 21 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code are deemed to be contradicting Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution. Through the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013 excluding the phrase "unpleasant actions" because they are considered to cause multiple interpretations and put forward subjectivity. This article is exposed to arbitrary actions by the authorities to criminalize someone. In fact, after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013, there are still pre-trial cases of determining suspects based on unpleasant acts. The formulation of Article 335 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which is used after the decision, requires the fulfillment of 2 (two) elements, namely "using violence" or "threat of violence." Thus, in every indictment that wrote the phrase "unpleasant act" was considered a legal reason. Determination of a suspect because this is considered a formal defect
EQUATING VILLA WITH “HOUSE” IN AGGRAVATED THEFT OFFENSE Peter Jeremiah Setiawan; Xavier Nugraha; Widyanti Wibowo
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v6i1.109

Abstract

One of the places that is often targeted by thieves is in a villa. In Article 363 paragraph (1) 3 of the Criminal Code, there is a regulation related to theft with a aggravating if the theft is carried out at night in a house or closed yard where the house is, but there is no provision that explicitly states that it is related to theft in a villa. Based on this background, the formulation of the objectives of this article is to understand: 1. What are the elements of the aggravated theft offense ? 2. Can a villa be conaidered with a “house” as an element of the aggravated theft offense ? This research is a normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Based on the analysis in this article, it can be understood that 1. The elements in the offense are the same as ordinary theft, but there are additional elements that are alternative. 2. The theft in a villa at night can be qualified for theft with a aggravating factor as stipulated in Article 363 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, on the basis of socio-historical interpretation and extensive interpretation.
Redefining the Statute of Limitations in Document Forgery Cases: Implications for Legal Certainty and Criminal Investigations Aprilianto, Sapta; Prihandono, Yoga; Nugraha, Xavier; Fuady, Muhammad Ikram Nur
Media Iuris Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v8i3.76259

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 118/PUU-XX/2022 redefined the paradigm of the statute of limitations for document forgery offenses in Indonesia. Previously calculated from the date of the offense, it is now determined based on when the forged document is discovered, used, and causes loss. This article examines the legal implications of the court decision on the state of limitations to legal certainty and law enforcement practices, particularly those carried out by the Indonesian National Police. A conceptual and statutory approach is employed to analyze the amendments to Article 79(1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Court’s legal reasoning. The findings indicate that this change enhances legal protection for victims and requires investigators to cumulatively evaluate the elements of “discovery,” “usage,” and “loss” to determine the statute of limitations. The decision has erga omnes effect and serves as a binding precedent and guideline for investigating document forgery cases in Indonesia.
ANALISIS KEDUDUKAN KETERANGAN KORBAN TERKAIT KEJAHATAN TERHADAP HARTA KEKAYAAN DALAM LINGKUNGAN KELUARGA: SEBUAH ANTINOMI ANTARA HUKUM MATERIL DENGAN FORMIL Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah; Nugraha, Xavier; Enrick, Michael
Al-Daulah : Journal of Criminal Law and State Administration Law Vol 9 No 1 (2020): (June)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Tatanegara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/ad.v9i1.14761

Abstract

Kejahatan terhadap harta kekayaan merupakan kejahatan yang dapat pula terjadi dalam lingkup keluarga. Kejahatan terhadap harta kekayaan dalam lingkup keluarga sendiri secara materiil merupakan tindak pidana yang memiliki aturan yang lebih khusus dan spesifik dalam Pasal 367 dan Pasal 376 KUHP, dimana Kejahatan yang dilakukan dalam lingkup keluarga tersebut merupakan delik aduan. Kedudukannya sebagai delik aduan telah secara khusus menempatkan keluarga sebagai korban sebagai acuan terhadap proses penegakan hukum kejahatan terhadap harta kekayaan. Pentingnya keluarga selaku korban dan pengadu sebagai aspek penting yang ditetapkan hukum materiil tersebut nyatanya tidak dianut hukum formil dalam penegakannya. Berbeda dengan KUHP yang menempatkan keluarga sebagai aspek penting dalam kekhususan kejahatan terhadap harta kekayaan dalam lingkup keluarga, Pasal 168 KUHAP justru memberikan ancaman terhadap nilai pembuktian keterangan yang diberikan oleh saksi yang memiliki hubungan keluarga dengan pelaku. Antinomi yang ada diantara hukum materiil dan formil ini selanjutnya melandasi dua masalah hukum, yaitu mengenai kedudukan keterangan saksi dalam pembuktian hukum pidana di Indonesia dan kedudukan keterangan korban terkait kejahatan terhadap harta kekayaan dalam lingkungan keluarga di Indonesia.
A Chance to Defend Regional Heads in The Procedure of Regional Head Dismissal as A Manifestation of The Proportionality Principle Aris, Mohammad Syaiful; Fauzurrahman, Iqbal; Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian; Nugraha, Xavier; Felicia, Stefania Arshanty
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.241-266

Abstract

The existence of regional autonomy in Indonesia is implemented through regional leaders who have the authority to run local government. When carrying out their duties, regional leaders are supervised by other state institutions as a form of checks and balances in government power. Hence, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders regulates to involve the Regional People's Representative Assembly, the Supreme Court, and the President through the Minister of Home Affairs as a form of right to dismiss. However, the existence of the proportionality principle in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, through the right given to regional leaders to defend themselves, has yet to be regulated in the law. This article talks about two things: first, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, and second, the legal consequences and the position of a chance to summon regional leaders to explain and defend themselves in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. This article aims to find the importance of proportionality principles in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. The method used in this article is legal research, with statutes, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of this research show that although the procedure to dismiss regional leaders has been regulated in law, applying the proportionality principle only exists in jurisprudences. Hence, an ius constituendum is needed to determine legal consequences and certainty regarding the procedure to dismiss regional leaders.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN DEWAN KEHORMATAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU (DKPP) DALAM MENCIPTAKAN PEMILU YANG DEMOKRATIS DI INDONESIA Aldi, Jihan Anjania; Tanbun, Elma Putri; Nugraha, Xavier
DE'RECHTSSTAAT Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): JURNAL HUKUM DE'RECHTSSTAAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (777 KB) | DOI: 10.30997/jhd.v5i2.1941

Abstract

Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) merupakan salah satu dari triumvirat penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia. Politik hukum pemilu di Indonesia dalam status a quo memberikan kewenangan yang begitu koersif kepada DKPP terkait dengan penegakkan kode etik. Namun, begitu koersifnya kewenangan yang DKPP sejatinya menimbulkan pertanyaan mendasar, yaitu terkait dengan : 1.Bagaimana korelasi kode etik dengan penyelenggaraan Pemilu yang demokratis di Indonesia?2.Bagaimana korelasi kewenangan DKPP dengan terciptanya Pemilu yang demokratis?Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis yang menggunakan pendekatan statute approach, conceptual approach, dan case approach untuk menjawab problematika tersebut. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, ditemukan bahwa Kode Etik pemilu berkorelasi sebagai perwujudan aturan main yang dibentuk bersama agar terciptanya pemilu yang jujur dan adil agar terciptanya pemilu yang demokratis secara substansial, bukan hanya prosedural. Selain itu, ditemukan bahwa kewenangan DKPP yang koersif adalah untuk menjamin agar Penyelenggara Pemilu mentaati Kode Etik yang merupakan aturan main dalam penyelenggaraan Pemilu.  Ketika DKPP tidak memiliki wewenang yang koersif tersebut, akan membuat DKPP seolah menjadi harimau tanpa taring yang akan menyebabkan terjadinya pemilu yang tidak mencerminkan demokrasi yang substantif
PENATAAN ULANG KEWENANGAN PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PELANGGARAN HAM BERAT Ramadhan, Febriansyah; Nugraha, Xavier; Felany, Patricia Inge
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v6i1.3514

Abstract

This article discusses the problems encountered in the preliminary court proceeding of gross human right violation cases in Indonesia.  Identified are two state institutions, i.e. the National Human Right Commission and the Attorney General, who possess the authority to initiate investigation and subsequent successful prosecution of gross human right violation cases. Good cooperation and relation between these two agencies is therefore a must.  This article looks into the problems encountered by these two institutions in doing the preliminary process and discusses possible redistribution of these two state agency authorities. To do this a doctrinal approach will be used.
Co-Authors Abidin, Izzah Khalif Raihan Adelina, Alya Adiwinata, Gianina Elizabeth Agus Widyantoro Ahmad Ardhiansyah Ahmad Muzakki Alam Subuh Fernando Aldi, Jihan Anjania Alfredo, Juan Maulana Alip Pamungkas Alip Pamungkas Raharjo Alya Adelina Alya Anira Al’Azza, Nadya Eka Amalia Amilah Fadhlina Anak Agung Gede Ananta Wijaya Sahadewa Angelia, Alissa Angelica Milano Angelica Novia Walasondakh Answendy, Putri Riska Ardhana Christian Noventri Ardhana Christian Noventri Arinni Dewi Ambarningrum Aris, Mohamad Syaiful Aristyawan, Patricia Anais Arjuna, Gio Atiqoh Farhan Maulani Ave Maria Frisa K Ave Maria Frisa Katherina Bagus Oktafian Abrianto Bryan Owen Soeprapto Budi, Kukuh Pramono Budianto, Anneta Cornelia Budisusanto, Eko Christina Ella Yonatan Citi Rahmati Serfiyani Dania Shofi Maziyah Daniel Julian Tangkau Danmadiyah, Shevierra Darmawan, Monica Caecilia Desak Ayu Gangga Sitha Dewi Devi Yulida Dinda Ajeng Puspanita Dinda Silviana Putri Dinda, Giovanni Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri Dwiana Martanto Eka Widi Astuti Elma Putri Tanbun Emely Laurentius, Melva Enrick, Michael Ezra Tambunan Faizal Kurniawan Farid Ibrahim Fariz Rachman Iqbal Fauzurrahman, Iqbal Febrian Dirgantara Felany, Patricia Inge Felicia, Stefania Arshanty Fernando, Alam Subuh Firmansyah, Ridho Fuady, Muhammad Ikram Nur Ghansham Anand Gio Arjuna Putra Gio Arjuna Putra Giovanni Dinda Cahyawati Grace Sharon Gwyneth Eugenia Keisya Howard Hadiwidjayanti, Rizky Haidar Adam Harmanto, Toni Hartono, Julienna Heru Irianto Heru Irianto Insiyah, Sayyidatul Iqbal Fauzurrahman Iqbal, Fariz Rachman Izzaty, Risdiana Izzaty, Risdiana Jeniffer Avrillya Wibisono Jennifer Moniq Sutanto John Eno Prasito Putra Joni Eko Waluyo Juan Maulana Alfedo Julienna Hartono Kadek Anda Gangga Putri Kartika Widya Utama Kexia Goutama Kosuma, Indah Permatasari Krisna Angela Krisna Darari Hamonangan Putra Krisna Murti Kusuma Wardani Raharjo Lorenzo Nieuwenburg Luisa Srihandayani Luisa Srihandayani M Imron Rosyadi M. Adib Akmal Hamdi M. Syaiful Aris Marchethy Riwani Diaz Marzul Afiyanto Mas Rahmah, Mas Maulia Madina Melati Ayu Pusparani Melva Emely Laurentius Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Mohamad, Ani Munirah Mohammad Syaiful Aris Muhammad Mashuri Muhammad Rizky Febrianto Nasri Natasha Caecilia Lisanggraeni Rositaputri Nathanael Grady Nina Amelia Novita Sari Nina Amelia Novita Sari Patricia Inge Felany Patricia Inge Felany Peter Jeremiah Setiawan Peter Jeremiah Setiawan Pradnya Wicaksana Prawitra Thalib Prihandono, Yoga Purnamawadita, Baiq Elma Putri Saraswati Putri, Annida Aqiila Putri, Annida Aqiila Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Qona’aha Noor Maajid Rahmat , Nur Ezan Rahmat, Nur Ezan Ramadhan, Febriansyah Ramadhanti, Syifa Regita Nathalia, Angeline Ridho Firmansyah Risdiana Izzaty Risdiana Izzaty Risdiana Izzaty Rizki Firmansyah Rizki Istighfariana Achmadi Rosa Ristawati Rosyadi, Julianda Rr. Herini Siti Aisyah S., Bryan Owen Sabdo Adiguno Safira Noor Ramadhanty Sahadewa, Anak Agung Gede Ananta Wijaya Sapta Aprilianto Sayyidatul Insiyah Sayyidatul Insiyah Septiningrum, Shintya Yulfa Serfiyani, Citi Rahmati Shevierra Danmadiyah Shevierra Danmadiyah Shintya Yulfa Shintya Yulfa Septiningrum Simamora, Yohanes Sogar Siti Latifah Sri Winarsi Stefania Arshanty Felicia Stefania Arshanty Felicia Sudirman Sudirman Sumardji Suparto Wijoyo Syifa Ramadhanti Syifa Ramadhanti Tambunan, Ezra Tanbun, Elma Putri Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Thoriq Mulahela Tonic Tangkau Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti Ulfa Septian Dika Vincentius Sutanto Wahyu Purnomo Wibisono, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Berardus Bilyarto Wibisono, Jeniffer Avrillya Wibowo, Widyanti Wicaksana, Pradnya Widyaningrum, Sigmawati Widyanti Wibowo Windy Agustin Windy Agustin Yohana Apriliani Christianta Silaen Yulida, Devi Yuni Lathifah Yunia Utami Indah Haloho