Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Manhaj Tarjih Muhammadiyah: Perspektif, Sumber, Pendekatan, dan Prosedur Teknis Safitrianingsih; Sumiyati; Amaliyatul Fitriyah; Nurul Hayati; Heri Rifhan Halili
PARADIGMA: JURNAL PEMIKIRAN DAN PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): MEI
Publisher : Educational Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64540/56c2jm11

Abstract

This study examines the Manhaj Tarjih of Muhammadiyah, a methodological framework developed to guide Islamic legal reasoning and decision-making, by exploring its perspectives, sources, approaches, and technical procedures in order to elucidate its epistemological foundations and contemporary relevance. Employing a library research design and a content analysis approach, the study analyzes primary sources issued by the Majelis Tarjih and official Muhammadiyah publications, alongside secondary academic interpretations. The findings indicate that the Manhaj Tarjih of Muhammadiyah integrates classical Islamic jurisprudence with rational and contextual considerations, positioning the Qur’an and Sunnah as the primary sources while also recognizing ijmāʿ, qiyās, and contemporary ijtihād. The study identifies a distinctive methodological synthesis that balances textual authority with the demands of social reform through an integrative approach combining bayānī (textual), burhānī (rational), and ʿirfānī (spiritual) epistemologies. Theoretically, this research contributes to the discourse on Islamic legal methodology by offering a contextual framework adaptive to modern challenges, while practically it provides guidance for scholars, educators, and Islamic policymakers in applying religious reasoning that remains faithful to revelatory sources yet responsive to contemporary realities, thereby positioning the Manhaj Tarjih of Muhammadiyah as a dynamic and reformist paradigm in Islamic thought and underscoring Muhammadiyah’s role as a progressive Islamic movement within the global landscape of Islamic scholarship.
EMPOWERING STITM KEDIRI LECTURERS IN WRITING HIGH-QUALITY INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ARTICLES THROUGH SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR) METHODOLOGY Benny Prasetiya; Muhammad Alfi Syahrin; Nur Wiji Sholikin; Heri Rifhan Halili
DEVELOPMENT: Journal of Community Engagement Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/djce.v4i3.2546

Abstract

The low productivity of international publications among lecturers at small higher education institutions has become a major challenge, affecting both academic reputation and career advancement. Contributing factors include limited understanding of advanced research methodologies such as the Systematic Literature Review (SLR), lack of experience in writing for international journals, and restricted access to academic resources. To address these issues, a community service programme was implemented at STITM Kediri using the Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) approach to enhance lecturers’ capacity in producing SLR-based international scientific articles. The programme engaged 15 lecturers through four stages: Discovery (mapping academic assets), Dream (formulating a collective vision), Design (developing training plans), and Delivery (implementation and mentoring). The results indicate a substantial improvement in participants’ understanding of the SLR methodology, with the average score rising from 2.1 (on a 1–5 scale) before the training to 4.3 afterwards. All participants were actively engaged (100% attendance, 87% active participation), resulting in 15 article drafts, three of which are ready for submission to reputable international journals (Scopus Q3–Q4). These achievements demonstrate that the ABCD-based training successfully empowered existing academic potential, fostered writing motivation, and strengthened the culture of international publication at STITM Kediri. This model has the potential to be replicated in other small higher education institutions as a strategy for sustainable academic capacity building.
Revitalizing the Muhammadiyah: Jamaah-Based Da’wah Movement Da'wah in the Digital Transformation Era Rahmat Dipuro; Edy Purwanto; Saukani Nur Akbar; Heri Rifhan Halili
JURNAL PENELITIAN DAN EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026): JULI (JURNAL PENELITIAN DAN EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN)
Publisher : Education Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64540/0f5t4158

Abstract

The Jamaah-Based Da’wah Movement (Gerakan Jamaah Dakwah Jamaah/GJDJ) represents one of Muhammadiyah’s strategic paradigms in developing a community-based da’wah system that emphasizes participatory, collective, and sustainable religious empowerment. This study was conducted in three Muhammadiyah branches and five sub-branches located in urban and semi-urban areas of South Sumatra Province that actively implement the GJDJ program. Within the dynamics of contemporary society, GJDJ faces serious challenges, including the weakening of social solidarity, the rise of urban individualism, digital transformation, and the shift of da’wah orientation toward institutional rather than communitarian approaches. This study aims to analyze the transformation of Muhammadiyah’s GJDJ implementation in strengthening community-based da’wah in the modern era, as well as to identify the structural, cultural, and ideological problems affecting the movement’s effectiveness. The research employs a qualitative approach using a critical case study design through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, organizational documentation, and discourse analysis of Muhammadiyah policies related to GJDJ. The findings reveal that the implementation of GJDJ experiences fragmentation between ideological ideals and institutional praxis due to the dominance of institutional-oriented charitable enterprises (amal usaha), weak cadre regeneration of community mentors, and the lack of integration of community-based digital da’wah strategies. The study also finds that revitalizing GJDJ requires reconstructing a more adaptive, collaborative, and socio-participatory model of da’wah in order to remain relevant within modern society. The novelty of this research lies in the development of an integrative model combining community da’wah, social empowerment, and digital transformation within the framework of Muhammadiyah’s modernist Islamic movement
LAZIZMU Philanthropy Potential in The Empowerment of Mustahiq’s Economic and Welfare (A Case Study in Probolinggo, Jember, and Pasuruan) Benny Prasetiya; Heri Rifhan Halili; M. ALfi Syahrin; Muhammad Arifin
Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 17 No. 2: December 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Studi Islam dan Peradaban, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/afkaruna.v17i2.10463

Abstract

Indonesia has a large zakat potential and has not been widely used for economic empowerment for the poor. Lazismu, as part of the national zakat institution, develops to provide solutions in zakat management in the form of economic empowerment for the poor to turn mustahiq into muzakki. This study was field research, and the data were obtained directly from the field and research objects. The research applied a normative sociological approach. This research was descriptive-analytic and clearly and in detail described the phenomena as the main problem without doing hypotheses or statistical calculations. Specifically, this research intended to describe in general the management of zakat conducted by Lazismu in Probolinggo, Jember and Pasuruan, then systematically reviewed them to achieve Lazismu’s Role strategy in poverty alleviation for the people of Probolinggo, Jember and Pasuruan, so that it was easier to understand and conclude. The results showed that the three Regional Lazismu in this study carried out the empowerment of mustahik to become muzakki with economic empowerment. Early empowerment is carried out by providing training and assistance to Mustahiq in managing productive economic businesses that are carried out sustainably. Economic empowerment for mustahiq has the potential to improve the economy to be more independent in running their business.
Actualizing the SDGS Through Pesantren Pedagogy: An Iqbalian Panentheistic Foundation for Islamic Educational Philosophy Rifqi Khairul Anam; Benny Prasetiya; Khoiriyah Khoiriyah; Heri Rifhan Halili; Athar Abdullatif Husain
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/kpjipm.v12i1.574

Abstract

The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) currently faces a severe motivational crisis due to its reliance on pragmatic-secular frameworks devoid of spiritual grounding. Concurrently, Islamic environmental discourse remains polarized between rigid legalism and passive mysticism. Addressing this gap, this study aims to formulate an Islamic Educational Philosophy by excavating the ecological dimension of the Indonesian pesantren tradition through an Iqbalian panentheistic lens. Employing a qualitative approach grounded in Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, the research explores a “lived ontology” to achieve a fusion of horizons between historical pesantren pedagogy and contemporary SDG urgencies. The findings reveal a dynamic dialectic of “contextualized panentheism.” This paradigm transitions from a mystical fusion with nature into a proactive ethical stance, embodied by the awakened Iqbal’s concept of khudi as a responsible khalīfah. By perceiving nature as a living divine mirror (tajallī), this pedagogy systematically dismantles the alienated, exploitative Cartesian ego. Empirically, this educational praxis manifests in successful community-driven conservation models—such as the eco-pesantren and customary maritime laws—which consistently outperform secular technocratic policies by internalizing ecological care as a binding moral obligation. The study concludes that pesantren pedagogy provides an authentic, internally driven motivational grammar, ultimately transforming environmental stewardship from an external regulatory duty into a sacred existential expression.
PENDAMPINGAN PROGRAM MEMBACA AL-QUR'AN USIA DEWASA DENGAN PETA KONSEP DAN KOSA KATA INDONESIA DI MAJELIS TA'LIM AHLUDZ DZIKRI SIDOARJO Muhammad Alfi Syahrin; Heri Rifhan Halili; Ahmad Fuad Abdul Baqi; Adiba Maulidiyah; Moch. Salman Alfarizi
DEVELOPMENT: Journal of Community Engagement Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/fg1x1f62

Abstract

This community service article describes a Qur'anic reading mentoring program for adult learners at Majelis Ta'lim Ahludz Dzikri Sidoarjo. The program was designed to respond to adults' difficulties in recognizing hijaiyah letters, connecting Arabic sounds with Indonesian explanations, and applying basic tajwid rules during recitation. The mentoring used concept maps and Indonesian vocabulary as learning aids so that participants could visualize the relationship among letters, vowels, articulation points, short-long sounds, and selected tajwid concepts. The program employed Participatory Action Research through planning, action, observation, reflection, and follow-up cycles. Thirty adult participants joined the mentoring once a week every Sunday from 10.00 to 11.30 WIB. Data were collected through initial reading diagnosis, observation notes, weekly practice records, oral reading assessment, and reflective dialogue with participants. The results indicate that concept maps helped participants organize Qur'anic reading materials into simpler and more memorable structures, while Indonesian vocabulary reduced anxiety and supported adult learners who had limited Arabic background. Participants became more confident in distinguishing similar letters, reading connected syllables, recognizing basic signs of vowels and sukun, and applying simple tajwid rules in short surahs. The main obstacles were limited practice time at home, different starting abilities, and hesitation among older participants. The mentoring shows that adult Qur'anic literacy can be strengthened through participatory, visual, and contextual learning strategies that respect learners' experiences and learning pace.
Rethinking Islamic Political Thought in Contemporary Muslim Societies Muhammad Alfi Syahrin; Khoiriyah; Heri Rifhan Halili; Babussalam
Al-Hikmah: International Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): JUNI
Publisher : PT. Education Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64540/j0j9k418

Abstract

Contemporary Muslim societies face political transformation involving democracy, citizenship, religious authority, state power, and public ethics. Debates on Islamic politics often remain polarized between formalistic legalism and secular exclusion, making contextual reconstruction necessary. This study aims to formulate a renewed framework of Islamic political thought that connects classical Islamic principles with contemporary civic realities. This research used a qualitative conceptual design with a library research approach. Data were taken from recent peer-reviewed literature on Islamic political thought, maqasid, democracy, citizenship, governance, and public reason. Data collection was conducted through documentation, source selection, thematic classification, and critical reading. Data were analyzed through conceptual analysis and philosophical-hermeneutical interpretation to build a contextual model of Islamic political reasoning. The main finding shows that Islamic political thought needs to move from state-centric legalism toward an ethical-deliberative paradigm based on justice, welfare, plural citizenship, accountability, and non-coercive morality. The study concludes that Islamic political concepts remain relevant when reinterpreted through maqasid-oriented reasoning, democratic participation, and sensitivity to contemporary realities. This article contributes a conceptual model for developing Islamic political discourse that is ethical, inclusive, democratic, and responsive to modern public life.  
Reconstructing Islamic Governance Through Maqasid Al-Shariah Muhammad Alfi Syahrin; Khoiriyah; Heri Rifhan Halili; Babussalam
Al-Hikmah: International Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): JUNI
Publisher : PT. Education Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64540/t4gg3q37

Abstract

This conceptual article reconstructs Islamic governance through maqasid al-Shariah by shifting the focus from formal compliance to public value, institutional trust, and measurable maslahah. Contemporary governance in Muslim societies is often trapped between procedural modernity and symbolic religiosity: institutions may display Islamic labels while policy design, accountability, and public welfare remain weak. The study therefore asks how maqasid al-Shariah can be translated into a practical governance framework for law, policy, finance, and public administration. Using an integrative literature review and maqasidi hermeneutic analysis, this article synthesizes recent studies published between 2021 and 2026. The analysis identifies four findings. First, Islamic governance requires a normative anchor that joins tawhid, amanah, justice, shura, and ihsan with contemporary principles of transparency, participation, and evidence-based policy. Second, maqasid must be operationalized as indicators of protection, empowerment, and flourishing, not merely as abstract legal objectives. Third, a reconstructed model should connect rule legitimacy, institutional capability, ethical leadership, and public accountability. Fourth, the maqasid approach expands governance evaluation beyond economic growth toward human dignity, social justice, environmental stewardship, and intergenerational welfare. The article contributes a maqasid governance matrix and an implementation cycle that can guide future empirical research and policy evaluation in Muslim-majority and minority contexts.
From Caliphate To Nation-State: Evolution Of Islamic Political Authority Muhammad Alfi Syahrin; Khoiriyah; Heri Rifhan Halili; Babussalam
Al-Hikmah: International Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : PT. Education Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64540/ws5w5890

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of Islamic political authority from the caliphal ideal to the modern nation-state. The study argues that the transformation was not a simple decline from religious unity to secular fragmentation, but a layered shift in legitimacy, territory, law, citizenship, and institutional capacity. The caliphate historically functioned as a symbol of universal Muslim unity, yet practical authority was often mediated by dynastic rule, scholarly jurisprudence, imperial administration, and local political arrangements. The rise of colonial borders, constitutionalism, international law, and bureaucratic statehood reshaped Islamic authority into territorial forms governed by citizenship and public institutions. Using a qualitative conceptual-historical method, the article synthesizes recent scholarship on political authority, Islamic governance, state legitimacy, constitutionalism, and post-Ottoman political imagination. The findings show four patterns: the symbolic persistence of the caliphate, the territorial consolidation of the nation-state, the constitutional translation of Islamic norms, and the pluralization of religious-political authority. The discussion demonstrates that contemporary Islamic governance should not be reduced to restoring a single caliphal structure; rather, it requires ethical reconstruction within nation-state realities through justice, consultation, public welfare, accountability, and protection of citizenship. The article contributes a conceptual model for studying post-caliphal authority and offers implications for Islamic political thought, public policy, and future empirical research in Muslim-majority societies.
Reconstructing Islamic Political Epistemology for Modern Governance Febry Suprapto; Babussalam; Heri Rifhan Halili
Al-Hikmah: International Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : PT. Education Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64540/rg4hee07

Abstract

The growing complexity of contemporary governance has renewed scholarly interest in reconstructing Islamic political thought as a normative framework for modern political and administrative challenges. Although previous studies have widely discussed Islamic governance, maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, and political reform, limited attention has been given to reconstructing the epistemological foundations of classical Islamic political thought into an integrated model for contemporary governance. This study aims to reconstruct those foundations and examine their contribution to accountable, participatory, and ethical governance in Muslim societies. Using qualitative library research with historical-philosophical and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes classical Islamic political literature and contemporary scholarship through documentary research. Data were examined using qualitative content analysis, thematic analysis, and constant comparative analysis. The findings show that Islamic political epistemology is built upon six interconnected sources of knowledge: the Qur’an, Sunnah, ijmā‘, qiyās, ijtihād, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. These principles can be transformed into a governance-oriented framework emphasizing accountability, participation, ethical leadership, transparency, and public welfare. The study argues that contemporary Islamic political epistemology is a dynamic knowledge system capable of integrating Islamic intellectual heritage with modern governance principles. Its novelty lies in proposing an integrated epistemological model that bridges classical Islamic political thought and contemporary governance theory. 
Co-Authors A Ansorullah A Rafiq Zainul Mun'im Abdul Wafi abdur rohman abdurrahmanwahid Wahid Abdurrohman Wahid Adawiyah, Roviatul Adiba Maulidiyah Agusti, Maulid Ahmad Fuad Abdul Baqi, Ahmad Fuad Abdul Ahmad Mujahidin Ahmad Solehudin Ahmad Syaifullah Ahsan Hakim Aimatul Khoiriyah Al-Azhari, Yahya Husein Alfi Noer Diana Hafidah Amaliyatul Fitriyah Amin Udin Ammar Wangyee Anggra, Dwy Annisa Maryam Nurrohmah Anom Athar Abdullatif Husain ayub baitullah izzatin Babussalam Beni Zakaria Fitriyanto Benny Prasetiya Benny Prasetiya Benny Prasetya Chusnul Chotimah Cik Na'imah Darul Qutni Hakiki Daud Ridwan Devy Habibi Muhammad Dewi Yulia Wati Edo Ferdian Edy Purwanto Eka Sri Rusminingsih Emilia Nurwati R Erna Kartinaningsih Farhana Farhana Febry Suprapto fitri yani Hamdan Saleh Hasnun Umar Hera Hapsari Kusuma Ilham Kamaruddin Jalaluddin Suyuthi Winulyo Khoiriyah Khoiriyah Lilik Saidah Luluk Aviva Lutfiatul Jannah M. ALfi Syahrin Malik Ashari Maryam Yulianti Masnu’atul Khoiriyah Mastora Miasari MIFTAHUL JANNAH Moch. Salman Alfarizi Mohammad Arifin Mohammad Nahrawi Muhammad Adz Dzahabie muhammad alfi syahrin Muhammad Ali Muhammad Ali Muhammad Arifin Muhammad Sakdulloh Musleh, Musleh Musthofa, Achmad NALI NALI Nizrina Sofiani Rizkillah Nur Wiji Sholikin Nurul hayati Rahmat Dipuro Ramadhan, Fahim Abu Rifqi Khairul Anam Riza Ashfari Mizan Roviatul Adawiyah Safitrianingsih Saidah, Lilik Samsiyah Nuril Hidayah Saukani Nur Akbar Septiadi, Septiadi SITI KHODIJAH Siti Khodijah Siti Qomariatul Munawaroh Sumiyati Suyanto Syamsul Arifin Ulil Hidayah Ummi Astutik Wahyudi Mutalib Yasril Gunawan Yolanda Dwintarisma Andrini Yulis Sutiani Zaenudin Mudaham Amin