p-Index From 2020 - 2025
6.707
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Litera Interaksi : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) Lingua Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra BAHASA DAN SASTRA Lingua Cultura Semantik : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia English Review: Journal of English Education KEMBARA Indonesian Language Education and Literature RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Diksa : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya ABDIMAS SILIWANGI JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS AND LITERATURE Literasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN Sawerigading Arkhais - Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia JISAE (Journal of Indonesian Student Assesment and Evaluation) Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Imajeri: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching Jurnal Pena Indonesia Edusentris: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Educenter: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya IBDA': Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Budaya Journal of Language and Literature Studies Widyaparwa DIMASATRA BAHASTRA EDUCENTER JURNAL PENDIDIKAN Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research

ANALYZING POLITICAL DEBATE STRATEGIES: TOULMIN'S ARGUMENTATION MODEL IN THE 2024 BINJAI MAYORAL ELECTION Pulungan, Hendra; Anshori, Dadang S.; Sumiyadi, Sumiyadi; Mulyati, Yeti
Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research Vol 5, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : ppjbsip

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51817/jpdr.v5i1.1223

Abstract

Political debates play a crucial role in democratic processes, allowing candidates to present their ideas, defend policies, and persuade voters. This study applies Toulmins argumentation model to analyze the rhetorical strategies used in the 2024 Binjai Mayoral candidate debate. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through video recordings, transcripts, and documentation of debate discussions. The analysis identifies the presence and structure of Toulmins six argumentation components: claim, grounds, warrant, backing, modal qualifier, and rebuttal. Findings indicate that while candidates frequently use claims and grounds, they often lack strong warrants and rebuttals, leading to arguments that are persuasive but not necessarily well-justified. Additionally, emotional appeals and rhetorical tactics often replace logical reasoning, impacting the overall quality of the debate. The study highlights the need for stronger argumentation frameworks in political communication, emphasizing the importance of data-driven and evidence-based claims. This research contributes to the field of political communication by providing insights into argumentation trends in modern political debates. The findings suggest that training political candidates in structured argumentation techniques could improve public discourse and enhance voters ability to critically assess political messages. Future research should consider comparative analyses of debates across different political levels and the role of media framing in shaping argumentation effectiveness.