Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.418
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pranata Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Progressive Law Review AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Harsa Wahyu Ramadhan
Universitas Lampung
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Analisis Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum pada Penguasaan Tanah Tanpa Hak (Putusan Nomor 115/PDT.G/2023/PN TJK) Aiedil, Rahmat Akbar; Sonata, Depri Liber; Febrianto, Dita; Oktaviana, Selvia; Ramadhan, Harsa Wahyu
AHKAM Vol 5 No 1 (2026): MARET
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.9291

Abstract

Although land disputes frequently occur, studies that specifically discuss the clash of claims between a good-faith purchaser in an underhand sale and the seller’s heirs who base their claim on a will remain limited. This study aims to analyze the fulfillment of the elements of an Unlawful Act (Perbuatan Melawan Hukum [PMH]), the legal considerations of the panel of judges, and the legal consequences of Decision of the Tanjung Karang District Court Number 115/Pdt.G/2023/PN Tjk. This study employed a normative legal approach with a judicial case study design. Data were collected through library research and document study covering primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and were then analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the heirs’ act of continuing to physically control the land unilaterally fulfilled all elements of an Unlawful Act as regulated in Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The judges’ considerations emphasized the evidentiary strength of the payment receipt and certificate compared with the argument based on a unilateral will, although the claims for compensation and dwangsom were rejected because they were not supported by proof of actual loss. These findings affirm that a sale and purchase that has been fully paid has legally binding force and can nullify conflicting inheritance claims, while also strengthening the application of the nemo plus juris principle in the settlement of ownership disputes. The implications of this study indicate the importance of legal protection for good-faith purchasers as well as the need for the prompt registration of transfer of rights to minimize similar disputes in the future. Keywords: Nemo Plus Juris Principle; Good-Faith Purchaser; Unlawful Possession; Unlawful Act; Land Dispute
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Boedel Pailit dari Perbuatan Hukum Direksi melalui Gugatan Actio Pauliana Adiwangsa, Bintang; Murniati, Rilda; Ramadhan, Harsa Wahyu
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9415

Abstract

The bankruptcy estate constitutes the entirety of the debtor’s assets that serves as the source for the repayment of debts to creditors. In bankruptcy practice, the integrity of the bankruptcy estate is often threatened by the debtor’s legal acts that transfer assets to third parties before a declaration of bankruptcy is pronounced in order to avoid general attachment by the curator. This problem becomes increasingly complex when the debtor is in the form of a Limited Liability Company, because the directors, as the company’s organ, have authority over asset management and are therefore in a position that allows asset transfers to be carried out through seemingly lawful legal acts. This study aims to analyze the application of the actio pauliana lawsuit as a legal instrument in protecting the bankruptcy estate from the legal acts of directors and its legal consequences. This study is normative legal research employing a normative-applied approach through a judicial case study. Data were obtained through library research and document study in the form of statutory regulations and court decisions, which were analyzed qualitatively. The results show that the actio pauliana lawsuit is an effective legal instrument for protecting the bankruptcy estate from the debtor’s legal acts that are detrimental to creditors. All assets transferred by the directors to PT Sinar Mas with the approval of Bank ICBC were declared to be returned to the bankruptcy estate and must be handed over to the curator for the repayment of creditors’ claims. These findings affirm the importance of actio pauliana as a legal protection mechanism for the bankruptcy estate and reinforce the role of the curator in ensuring the recovery of the debtor’s assets for the benefit of creditors.
Pertanggungjawaban PT KAI Commuter Indonesia terhadap Kerugian Penumpang Akibat Gangguan Operasional KRL Jabodetabek Kuranii, Kelvin Akhmad; Adhan S, Sepriyadi; Ramadhan, Harsa Wahyu; Zazili, Ahmad; Mustika, Dora
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Public transportation has become a basic need of the community in mobilizing. For every transportation process, passengers are required to have a ticket as proof of travel documents. Passengers and carriers are bound by the existence of a contract of carriage, which is a contract of carriage that gives birth to a legal relationship and gives rise to rights and obligations. This research aims to determine the civil liability of PT KAI Commuter Indonesia is based on an operational disruption event that caused an accident that occurred while transporting passengers. This study uses a normative juridical research method that is descriptive with a qualitative approach. The type of data used is primary data obtained from laws and regulations and secondary data sources obtained from literature materials. The data collection method uses literature studies and direct interviews as supporting data in processing data to produce conclusions regarding legal protection for consumers in legal events in the form of operational disruptions to the EMU Jabodetabek Commuter Line. The results of the study show that passengers and carriers have the right and obligation to get safety guarantees, as well as PT KAI Commuter Indonesia is responsible for losses suffered by passengers in the form of ticket refunds and compensation for accident victims, whether they are dead, disabled, or injured. The compensation paid by PT KAI Commuter Indonesia is a premium paid by passengers managed by the insurance company, namely PT Jasa Raharja. However, in practice, it is still unclear in the laws and regulations and also the scope in the agreement with the insurance company.
Implementasi Prinsip Unconditional dalam Surety Bond: Analisis terhadap Kewajiban Penjamin dan Penyelesaian Klaim di Sektor Konstruksi Indonesia Daris Akmal Syafiq Al Ghiffary; Tokris Lumbantobing; Selvia Oktaviana; Depri Liber Sonata; Harsa Wahyu Ramadhan
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.5835

Abstract

Pembangunan infrastruktur di Indonesia membutuhkan instrumen penjaminan yang memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap risiko wanprestasi kontraktor. Surety bond unconditional secara normatif memungkinkan pencairan klaim tanpa pembuktian terlebih dahulu, namun dalam praktik masih sering terjadi penundaan atau penolakan pembayaran klaim oleh penjamin yang memicu sengketa hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan tipe penelitian deskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan meliputi pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk menilai penerapan norma hukum dan pertimbangan yuridis dalam praktik pembayaran klaim surety bond. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penjamin dalam surety bond unconditional memiliki kewajiban hukum untuk membayar klaim kepada obligee setelah terpenuhinya persyaratan formal klaim, tanpa bergantung pada pembuktian wanprestasi principal melalui proses peradilan. Sengketa pembayaran klaim dapat diselesaikan melalui mekanisme non-litigasi maupun litigasi, dengan konsekuensi hukum berupa wanprestasi penjamin apabila terjadi penolakan pembayaran tanpa dasar hukum yang sah. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi pedoman bagi perusahaan penjamin dalam menyusun klausul surety bond yang jelas dan melindungi hak obligee, sekaligus memperkuat kepastian hukum dalam pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi di Indonesia.
Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Perubahan Tempat Konser Secara Sepihak: (Studi Kasus Pada Acara Forever Young Day6 in Jakarta 2025) Solihin, Bella Justicia; Rusmawati, Dianne Eka; Nurhasanah, Siti; Nurlaili, Elly; Ramadhan, Harsa Wahyu
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.6040

Abstract

Perkembangan industri hiburan global, khususnya fenomena Korean Wave (Hallyu), mendorong peningkatan penyelenggaraan konser internasional di Indonesia. Salah satu kasus yang disoroti adalah konser DAY6 WORLD TOUR [FOREVER YOUNG] in Jakarta 2025 oleh promotor Mecimapro. Konser yang semula dijadwalkan di Jakarta International Stadium (JIS) berkapasitas 82.000 penonton dipindahkan secara sepihak ke Stadion Madya Gelora Bung Karno yang hanya berkapasitas sekitar 9.000 penonton, tanpa adanya opsi pengembalian dana (refund) bagi konsumen. Penelitian ini mengkaji tanggung jawab hukum promotor dan upaya perlindungan konsumen atas pemindahan lokasi secara sepihak tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Bahan hukum primer meliputi KUHPerdata dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (UUPK), didukung oleh bahan sekunder berupa literatur dan dokumentasi digital terkait. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan dianalisis menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa promotor, sebagai pelaku usaha, bertanggung jawab atas wanprestasi, karena perubahan tempat konser merupakan pengubahan substansial terhadap prestasi yang dijanjikan. Tanggung jawab ini mewajibkan promotor memberikan kompensasi atau pengembalian dana. Klausula baku yang membatasi pengembalian dana hanya pada pembatalan konser secara penuh dinyatakan batal demi hukum. Perlindungan konsumen dapat diupayakan secara preventif melalui transparansi informasi, pembatasan klausula baku, dan pengawasan negara; serta secara represif melalui mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa non-litigasi, litigasi, gugatan perwakilan kelompok (class action), dan penegakan ketentuan UUPK untuk menjamin hak-hak konsumen.
Pengaturan Hukum Terhadap Pencipta Manga Atas Praktik Manga Scanlation Di Indonesia Gendo Mulya Simorangkir; Elly Nurlaili; Harsa Wahyu Ramadhan; Selvia Oktaviana; Nenny Dwi Ariani
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.6108

Abstract

Praktik manga scanlation di Indonesia berkembang pesat seiring kemajuan teknologi digital dan tingginya minat masyarakat terhadap komik Jepang. Kegiatan ini umumnya dilakukan tanpa izin dari pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta, sehingga menimbulkan persoalan hukum terkait pelanggaran hak ekonomi dan hak moral pencipta. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum terhadap pencipta manga atas praktik scanlation di Indonesia serta bentuk perlindungan hukum yang tersedia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik scanlation bertentangan dengan ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, khususnya terkait hak eksklusif pencipta dalam memperbanyak dan mendistribusikan karya. Selain itu, penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran ini masih menghadapi berbagai kendala, seperti rendahnya kesadaran hukum masyarakat dan keterbatasan pengawasan di ranah digital. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya peningkatan penegakan hukum, edukasi kepada masyarakat, serta kerja sama antara pemerintah dan platform digital untuk memberikan perlindungan yang optimal bagi pencipta manga.
Analisis Yuridis SEMA 3 Tahun 2018 Terhadap Dalil Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Gugatan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Novalita br Siboro; Dita Febrianto; Selvia Oktaviana; Sepriyadi Adhan S; Harsa Wahyu Ramadhan
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.6388

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 terhadap kedudukan dalil Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) dalam gugatan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (PHI). Sebelum terbitnya SEMA tersebut, terdapat dualisme yurisprudensi yang menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum, di mana PHI seringkali menyatakan diri tidak berwenang mengadili tuntutan PMH karena dianggap merupakan kompetensi absolut Pengadilan Negeri. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2018 membawa transformasi signifikan dengan menegaskan kewenangan PHI untuk memeriksa dan memutus gugatan PMH sepanjang perbuatan tersebut timbul dari hubungan kerja. SEMA ini memberikan dampak positif berupa efisiensi peradilan melalui penyelesaian sengketa dalam satu forum, pencegahan putusan yang saling bertentangan, serta peningkatan perlindungan hak konstitusional pekerja atas ganti rugi yang komprehensif. Meskipun demikian, penerapannya di berbagai PHI masih belum seragam dan menimbulkan perdebatan mengenai batas kewenangan PHI serta kedudukan SEMA dalam hierarki norma hukum nasional.
Co-Authors Adiwangsa, Bintang Ahmad Zazili Aiedil, Rahmat Akbar Alexander Wardhana Tamba Aliuni, Lembayung Azzahra Aura Carissalonika Azahra, Hafifah Permata Daris Akmal Syafiq Al Ghiffary Depri Liber Sonata Depri Liber Sonata Diana Rose Tambunan Dianne Eka Rusmawati, Dianne Eka Dita Febrianto Dita Febrianto Ditavarsya, Riega Dora Mustika Elly Nurlaili Elly Nurlaili Gendo Mulya Simorangkir Georgius Karis Paschali Hamzah Hamzah Harahap, Zahra Zamaya Juarsyah, Mutia Lingga Kuranii, Kelvin Akhmad M. An-Nabil Karindra Made Widhiyana Meidika, Regina Moh. Wendy Trijaya Muhammad Havez Mustika, Dora Nenny Dwi Ariani Novalita br Siboro Oktaviana4, Selvia Primadi, Lingga Ricco Andreas, Ricco Rilda Murniati Roberta R.P Situmorang Rohaini Salsabila Nazhwa Anindya Sayyidah Sekar Dewi Kulsum Selvia Oktaviana Selvia Oktaviana, Selvia Sepriyadi Adhan S Shazfa Azzahra, Shalina Sihombing, Fanny Marsela Siti Nurhasanah Siti Nurhasanah Solihin, Bella Justicia surya prameswari, regita Syamsiar, Syamsiar Tokris Lumbantobing Torkis Lumbantobing Wahyu Sasongko Yohana Maria Girsang