Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.858
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosiohumaniora JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum Tadulako Law Review PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Akta Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia USU Journal of Legal Studies Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Jurnal Notariil Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum ACTA DIURNAL : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Jurnal Akta Yudisia JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA Cepalo Vyavahara Duta Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Journal of Social Research COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yuridika Perspektif Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Anita Afriana
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 107 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 107 Documents
Search

 7   8   9   10   11 
The Annulment of Homologation in the Case of PKPU Application of Intidana Savings and Loan Cooperative in Review of Law Number 37 of 2004 A.A.P*, Karina Widyadhari; Gultom, Elisatris; Afriana, Anita
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Social and Religious Aspect in History, Economic Science and Law
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i2.31817

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the annulment of homologation in the case of a PKPU application for KSP Intidana in terms of Law No. 37 of 2004. This research method is normative juridical which is guided by primary legal materials and secondary legal materials contained in a legislation. The results of the research show that first, the action of not accepting the annulment of homologation on the basis that the application submitted was premature is not in accordance with the provisions of the KPKPU Law because the concept of negligence as a reason for homologation annulment in the KPKPU Law is interpreted as an action where the debtor really does not fulfill the clauses agreed upon in the composition agreement, not waiting until the payment deadline expires. Secondly, the judge's action in not accepting the homologation annulment request submitted by KSP Intidana's creditors was inappropriate because it did not fulfil one of the principles of the decision in which the judge's decision must contain a clear basis.
PENGATURAN BATASAN UTANG DALAM PERMOHONAN PAILIT ANALISIS UNDANG-UNDANG PKPU DAN KEDUDUKAN PUTUSAN HAKIM Silitonga, Yoas Panggawa; Gultom, Elisatris; Afriana, Anita
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 10, No 4 (2024): Volume 10, Nomor 4 Oktober-Desember 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v10i4.10987

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenyelesaian utang piutang merupakan persoalan perdata yang dapat diselesaikan dengan berbagai mekanisme salah satunya mengajukan permohonan kepailitan. Pailit merupakan suatu keadaan berhenti membayar di mana Debitor dalam keadaan tidak mampu atau tidak mau untuk melakukan pembayaran terhadap utang-utang dari para kreditornya. Permohonan kepailitan akan diterima oleh pengadilan niaga jika memenuhi persyaratan Debitor memiliki utang kepada 2 (dua) atau lebih Kreditor dan terdapatnya satu utang yang telah jatuh waktu dan dapat ditagih, selanjutnya syarat ini harus dapat dibuktikan secara sederhana. Dalam praktik, ditemukan permohonan kepailitan yang telah memenuhi unsur, namun ditolak oleh pengadilan niaga dengan alasan jumlah minimal utang yang terlalu kecil. Tujuan yang hendak dicapai dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui kepastian hukum terkait batasan utang dalam UUKPKPU serta pertimbangan hakim yang menolak permohonan pailit dengan nilai jumlah utang yang kecil melalui tata cara penyelesaian gugatan sederhana atas dasar semua persyaratan telah terpenuhi ditinjau dari kepastian hukum.  Kata Kunci : Utang, Kepailitan, Putusan Hakim. ABSTRACTSettlement of debts is a civil matter that can be resolved through various mechanisms, one of which is filing a bankruptcy petition. Bankruptcy is a state of stopping payment where the Debtor is unable or unwilling to make payments on debts from his creditors. A bankruptcy petition will be accepted by the commercial court if it meets the requirements that the Debtor has debts to 2 (two) or more Creditors and there is one debt that has matured and can be collected, then this requirement must be proven simply. In practice, bankruptcy petitions have been found that have met the elements, but were rejected by the commercial court on the grounds that the minimum amount of debt is too small. The objectives to be achieved in this study are to analyze and determine the legal certainty related to debt limits in the UUKPKPU and the considerations of judges who reject bankruptcy petitions with small debt values through simple lawsuit settlement procedures on the basis that all requirements have been met in terms of legal certainty. The approach method used is normative juridical. The specifications of this study are descriptive analytical. This research stage includes the literature research stage, namely collecting secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques that are considered relevant and adequate to obtain secondary data in this study are document studies and interviews. Data analysis as data processing in the form of qualitative analysis, so that the results of the analysis are obtained in the form of legal certainty of rejection of bankruptcy applications on the basis of minimum debt limits reviewed from Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. Keywords: Debt, Bankruptcy, Judge's decision
Analisis Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Yang Berstatus Dijaminkan Kepada Pihak Ketiga Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Terkait Olwintra Sitorus; Anita Afriana; Kilkoda Agus Saleh
Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1736

Abstract

Sale and purchase of land agreement is a legal act that involves two provisions, which are the provisions of agreement law and the provisions of agrarian law.. Sale and purchase of land agreement can’t be made privately and might cause disputes in the future. This dispute can cause losses for certain parties so that legal action is needed. The purpose of this research is to understand and examine the validity of the transfer of land rights through sale and purchase agreement related to its status that is guaranteed to third parties and the legal action that can be taken by the land buyer as the disadvantaged party because of the transfer of land and/or building rights through sale and purchase agreement related to its status that is guaranteed to third parties. The research uses a normative juridical approach method with analytical descriptive research specifications. Data collection technique in this research is obtained through literature study which was then analyzed using qualitative juridicial method. The analysis shows that the validity of the transfer of land rights through sale and purchase agreement related to its status that is guaranteed to third parties is invalid. That situation violates the legal terms of the agreement which results in the agreement being null and void. The land buyer as the party who is disadvantaged by these actions can file a legal act which is a civil lawsuit. The existence of a court judgement is a form of legal certainty for the parties in dispute to obtain their rights.
Kepastian Hukum Direksi Yang Merangkap Sebagai Pendiri Perseroan Perorangan Dalam Meningkatkan Status Menjadi Perseroan Terbatas di Hadapan Notaris Hilmansyah, Salma Syifaya; Afriana, Anita; Trisnamansyah, Purnama
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i9.14331

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi isu kepastian hukum terkait posisi direktur yang merangkap sebagai pendiri dalam perseroan perorangan yang berupaya meningkatkan statusnya menjadi perseroan terbatas. Fokus penelitian terletak pada aspek hukum yang mencakup proses perubahan status di hadapan notaris. Analisis dilakukan terhadap kerangka hukum yang mengatur peralihan status perusahaan, dengan mempertimbangkan implikasi dan tanggung jawab hukum yang mungkin timbul. Temuan penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih baik terkait aspek hukum dalam upaya meningkatkan status perusahaan.
Asas Nebis In Idem Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Dikaitkan Dengan Gugatan Perceraian Yang Diajukan Kembali Setelah Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Dihubungkan Dengan Kepastian Hukum Simorangkir, Melin; Afriana, Anita; Ayuna Putri, Sherly
Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Volume 6, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jssh.v6i1.27074

Abstract

Pada Putusan Nomor 295/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mdn dan Putusan Nomor 159/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bdg, yang mana pada kedua putusan tersebut Penggugat mengajukan gugatan untuk kedua kalinya. Namun, terdapat inkonsistensi hakim dalam memutuskan gugatan nebis in idem pada perkara perceraian yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pengaturan dan alasan perceraian dalam UU Perkawinan serta penerapan asas nebis in idem pada perkara gugatan cerai yang sudah berkekuatan hukum tetap dan diajukan kembali dihubungkan dengan kepastian hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa pendekatan yuridis normatif, yang mana objek dari penelitian ini akan diteliti dan dianalisis dengan mengedepankan norma serta asas yang terdapat dalam hukum positif berupa data sekunder dan dilengkapi data primer. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu pada putusan yang menjadi objek penelitian telah memenuhi alasan perceraian yang sesuai dengan hukum positif dan terdapat inkonsistensi dalam penerapan asas nebis in idem pada putusan tersebut, yang mana Majelis Hakim pada Putusan Nomor 295/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mdn tidak mengabulkan gugatan yang diajukan untuk kedua kalinya karena mengandung unsur nebis in idem berdasarkan Pasal 1917 KUHPerdata dan SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2002, sedangkan Majelis Hakim pada Putusan Nomor 159/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bdg mengabulkan gugatan yang diajukan untuk kedua kalinya yang berdasarkan Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 110/K/KG/1992 tanggal 23 Juli 1993 yang dijadikan pula sebagai rujukan dalam Rapat Kerja Nasional Mahkamah Agung RI Tahun 2007.
Praktik Konversi Utang Menjadi Saham Sebagai Penerapan Prinsip Business Going Concern dalam Kepailitan dan PKPU Jonathan Fide Mulya; Lastuti Abubakar; Anita Afriana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Mei - Juni 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2142

Abstract

The research was conducted with the aim of knowing and explaining the implementation of business going concern through the conversion of debt into shares (debt to equity swap) in PKPU in order to achieve peace between debtors and creditors. The research was carried out by providing understanding to legal practitioners, entrepreneurs, the government and readers that debtors who experience problems paying debts to two or more creditors can submit a PKPU application to prevent the debtor from being threatened with bankruptcy. The research carried out uses a normative juridical approach which includes research on library materials or secondary materials which includes research on the application of legal principles and norms to produce arguments, theories and inventions for resolving legal problems in implementing business going concern principles through converting debt into shares. (debt to equity swap) in the PKPU process by reviewing the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law (UUKPKPU). The research results show that the conversion of debt into shares (debt to equity swap) is part of debt restructuring in order to provide justice for creditors and debtors by achieving peace at PKPU.
Application Of Fast Events In Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Based On Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 Of 2016 In The Perspective Of Easy Of Doing Business Rian Fauzi Rahman; Anita Afriana; Hazar Kusmayanti
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i2.4437

Abstract

This study aims to determine the comparison of conventional procedural lawsuits and simple event lawsuits for sharia economic dispute settlement based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Resolving Sharia Economic Disputes. This research refers to the perspective of Easy of Doing Business or ease of doing business to the extent of its contribution to improving the ranking of ease of doing business that has been indicatored, especially in Indonesia. The government has made regulations to provide business protection, among others, through legal certainty and ease of doing business. Various problems in the arrangement regarding the dispute resolution process are sufficient to make business actors reluctant to continue their business activities, from the length of the series of judicial methods, expensive costs, to the very confiscated time. This research uses normative juridical research methods carried out with research events on applicable positive legal principles or doctrines, research on legal systematics that can be carried out on certain laws and regulations or written which aims to identify the main understanding / basis of rights and obligations, legal events, legal relationships, legal objects that review Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures Sharia Economic Case Settlement in support of Easy Of Doing Business (EoDB) in business dispute cases with its resolution through a simple court system. The conclusion of this study is that the simple event lawsuit system in sharia economic disputes has been effectively applied in its application, which can be considered to have implications for the ease of doing business including starting business and enforcement contracts.
Reviewing Law Enforcement on Small and Medium Enterprise Partnerships in Indonesia from a Competition Law Perspective Anita Afriana; Efa Laela Fakhriah
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5132

Abstract

Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) play a crucial role in the economic development of Indonesia. One activity MSMEs can engage in is forming partnerships. These partnerships are established through innominate contracts, which, in principle, constitute partnership agreements. The Business Competition Supervision Commission, or Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha (KPPU), holds the authority to oversee both the formation and performance of partnership agreements entered into by MSMEs. This article uses a normative juridical approach with qualitative data to evaluate the supervisory role of KPPU in overseeing the performance of partnership agreements and the amicable settlement of disputes through changes in behavior under competition law. The results conclude that KPPU oversees compliance with the agreements and performance in accordance with general contractual principles, specifically those that must be included in partnership agreements. KPPU’s supervision, as part of law enforcement, occurs in two phases: the preliminary stage and the subsequent stage. In the subsequent stage, KPPU may impose administrative sanctions and criminal compensation based on the material facts of the proceedings. If the reported party changes their behavior during the preliminary stage, the proceeding may be terminated, allowing the dispute to be settled amicably. This approach should be prioritized as part of restorative justice, as it emphasizes law enforcement focused on restoring the original state and reestablishing harmonious relationships within society.
Meninjau Kembali Pengimplementasian Apostille di Indonesia: Apakah Notaris Harus Diberi Kewenangan Apostille? Ruth Felyta Worang; Anita Afriana; Nanda Anisa Lubis; Matteo Rossi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6599

Abstract

Indonesia’s accession to the Apostille Convention, through Presidential Regulation No. 2 of 2021, represents a significant step toward simplifying the legalization process for documents intended for cross-border use. However, the implementation of the Apostille in Indonesia continues to face legal challenges, particularly concerning the verification period, which often exceeds the time limits stipulated in Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 6 of 2022. This issue has prompted discussions about transferring Apostille authority to notaries, by leveraging cyber notary systems to support notarial tasks related to Apostille issuance. This study employs a normative juridical approach combined with comparative legal analysis. This findings indicate that delegating Apostille authority to notaries may enhance the flexibility and efficiency of the Apostille process, given that notary are widely distributed across Indonesia and are bound by professional code of ethics and ethical accountability in performing their duties. A cyber notary system, particularly in the form of digitally authenticated official signatures managed by the Ministry of Law in coordination with the Indonesian Notary Association (Ikatan Notaris Indonesia), could significantly support notaries in the issuance of Apostille certification.
SISTEM ONLINE PADA TRANSAKSI PEMBAYARAN JASA DITINJAU DARI ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA Sekarwati, Raden Ajeng Astari; Suryanti, Nyulistiowati; Afriana, Anita
LITIGASI Vol. 23 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v23i1.4416

Abstract

Dugaan praktik monopoli oleh PT.O dan Bandara I Gusti Ngurah Rai yang hanya menyediakan satu sistem pembayaran jasa berbasis online menimbulkan kerugian diantaranya banyak masyarakat yang kesulitan melakukan pembayaran karena sedikitnya pilihan sistem pembayaran, ditambah dengan sulit masukannya para pelaku usaha lain dalam melaksanakan usahanya. Hal ini menimbulkan permasalahan, permasalahan yang timbul antara lain; Bagaimana implementasi sistem online pada transaksi pembayaran jasa, serta bagaimana penerapan asas keseimbangan dalam transaksi pembayaran jasa berdasarkan sistem online. Penelitian yang dilakukan bersifat deskriptif analitis yang menggambarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, dikaitkan dengan teori-teori hukum dalam praktik pelaksanaan yang menyangkut permasalahan yang diteliti, metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan normatif kualitatif, yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan dengan betolak pada segi yuridis normatif yang lebih lanjut akan ditelaah secara kualitatif dengan berpedoman pada teori-teori dan asas-asas yang relevan. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian diketahui bahwa 1) PT.O melakukan kerjasama dengan Lippo Group untuk menjadi sistem pembayaran tunggal yang mengakibatkan pemusatan ekonomi dengan dikuasainya jasa pembayaran di mal-mal tersebut hingga menghambat para pelaku usaha lainnya untuk masuk dan melakukan kegiatan usahanya. Sedangkan G, melakukan kerjasama dengan Bandara tertentu untuk menjadi satu-satunya platform penyediaan angkutan umum berbasis aplikasi dan hanya menyediakan satu sistem pembayaran yang telah ditentukan oleh pihak G yang mengakibatkan terhambatnya para pelaku usaha lain untuk masuk ke pasar telah memenuhi unsur-unsur dalam pasal 17 dan terbukti melanggar Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat; dan 2) penerapan asas keseimbangan dalam pasal-pasal Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, dapat di lihat asas keseimbangan tidak diterapkan oleh pelaku usaha dalam transaksi pembayaran jasa berbasis online pada kasus Lippo Group (PT.O) dan Bandara I Gusti Ngurah Rai, Hal ini terbukti dengan hanya ditunjuknya satu pelaku usaha untuk melakukan kegiatan membuktikan tidak diberikannya kesempatan usaha pada pelaku usaha lain di pasar tersebut. Kata Kunci : Asas Keseimbangan; Pembayaran online; Persaingan Usaha.
Co-Authors A.A.P*, Karina Widyadhari Abdoel Harun Lamo Adelia Audiana Gerchikova Agitha Putri Andany Hidayat Agitha Agung La Tenritata Agus Mulya Karsona, Agus Mulya Agustus Sani Nugroho & Ema Rahmawati Heryaman, Agustus Sani Nugroho & Alysia Elvaretta Aman Wibawa Ginting An An Chandrawulan An An Chandrawulan Andony, Fakta Anrihal Rona Fajari Arini Yunia Pratiwi Artaji, Artaji Arvianda, Adzradhia Nabila Azizah Kamilah Putri Bagus Sujatmiko Baraba, Badar Betty Rubiati Bima Nuranda Cep Juli Chairanie, Refhianti Dede Kania Deviana Yuanitasari Deviana Yuanitasari Dewi Kania Sugiharti Dian Priharyanti Dinda Ayu Narassati Efa Laela Fakhirah, Efa Laela Efa Laela Fakhriah Efa Laela Fakhriah Efa Laela Fakhriah Elis Nurhayati Elisatris Gultom Elvaretta, Alysia Fajri, Anrihal Fakhirah, Efa Laela Fakta Andony Firdausa Pratonggopati, Hanna Ghani Satria Hartanto Handryas Prasetyo Utomo Hatami, Raka Fauzan Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Hendri Sita Ambar Kumalawati Hessy Oktiarifadah Hilmansyah, Salma Syifaya Holyness Nurdin Singadimedja Inayatillah, Revi Indra Prayitno Indriasri, Alivia Isis Ikhwansyah isis Ikhwansyah Jonathan Fide Mulya Karina Widyadhari A.A.P* Kilkoda Agus Saleh Kilkoda Agus Saleh Kusmiati, Susi Lastuti Abubakar Lastuti Abubakar Matteo Rossi Melin Simorangkir Meta Tarisha Qarani Muhamad Amirulloh, Muhamad Muhammad Ridwan Fadhly Mulya, Jonathan Fide Nabiela Ramadhani Nanda Anisa Lubis Nun Harrieti, Nun Nuranda, Bima Nurfauzi, Febri Nurhakim, Lukman Ilman Nurhayati, Elis Nyulistiowati Suryanti Olwintra Sitorus Olwintra Sitorus Prayitno, Indra Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Purnama Trisnamansyah Puteri Nurjanah Puteri Nurjanah Puteri Nurjanah Putri, Sherly Putri, Sherly Qarani, Meta Tarisha Radifan, Ody Raedi Rai Mantili Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam Refhianti Chairanie Rian Fauzi Rahman Rusmiati, Elis Ruth Felyta Worang Salsabilla Novalika , Aurelia Sari, Melia Putri Purnama Sekarwati, Raden Ajeng Astari Seto Wahyudi Shafira Meidina Rafaldini Sherly Ayuna Putri Sherly Putri Shintadewi Dibrata Silitonga, Yoas Panggawa Simorangkir, Melin Singadimedja, Holyness N Sonny Dewi Judiasih Sudaryat Sujatmiko, Bagus Suparto, Susilowati Susilowati Suparto Susilowati Suparto Syahbaniar, Alia Putri Teguh Tresna Puja Asmara Tony Richard Alexander Samosir Vinie Rachmadiena Devianti Windy Riani Putri Yonathan Aji Pamungkas Zidna Sabrina