Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.858
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosiohumaniora JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum Tadulako Law Review PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Akta Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia USU Journal of Legal Studies Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Jurnal Notariil Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum ACTA DIURNAL : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Jurnal Akta Yudisia JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA Cepalo Vyavahara Duta Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Journal of Social Research COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yuridika Perspektif Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Anita Afriana
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 107 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 107 Documents
Search

 6   7   8   9   10 
Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan tentang Permohonan Pailit dan PKPU oleh Kreditur terhadap BUMN (Persero) Dinda Ayu Narassati; Yonathan Aji Pamungkas; Anita Afriana
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 1, No 5 (2023): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10406346

Abstract

Based on various collected court decisions, this research aims to highlight the fact that there is a disparity in the view of courts in deciding bankruptcy and debt payment suspension petitions against state-owned enterprises (Persero) by creditors. In addition, this research also explores the original intent of the legislator in Article 2 paragraph (5) juncto Article 223 of Law Nomor 37 of 2004 regarding Bankruptcy and Debt Payment Suspension so that it can be used as an academic reference in breaking the chain of debate because of interpretation differences in judicial practice. The discussion of problems in this research is based on a normative juridical approach, in which the materials and data collected are based on primary and secondary sources. Although the theme raised in this research has been presented in various studies, this research is still based on novelties. This research uses historical interpretation to explore the original intent of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law legislator. The spotlight on disparities in court views is based on numerous court decisions, so it is sufficient to be used as a basis for the conclusion that disparities exist in practice. Based on historical interpretation according to minutes of the law formation, the legislator's original intent was to limit the bankruptcy and debt payment suspension petitions to state-owned enterprises (Perum), which the finance minister can only submit. Therefore, this provision does not apply to state-owned enterprises (Persero), so the petition against it does not have to be submitted by the finance minister. Meanwhile, there is a disparity in the court's view of judicial practice. Hence, a specific law is needed to reaffirm which party has the authority to submit the petition to a Persero to end the disparity.
Cross border of Jurisdiction between Arbitration and District Court in Business Dispute Settlement under the Indonesian Legal System Fakhriah, Efa Laela; Afriana, Anita
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 17 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no3.3175

Abstract

In principle, the settlement of business disputes in Indonesia can be done amicably either through the court or outside the court. The court proceeding usually takes a long time, impacting overall case costs in comparison to dispute settlement outside the court. Arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution offers advantages compared to mediation, conciliation, and negotiation as it has an identical adjudicative nature to court proceedings. Therefore, arbitration is the preferred method for settling business disputes due to its perceived effectiveness and efficiency, resulting in win-win solutions. In addition, within the Indonesian legal framework, arbitration closely parallels court proceedings for dispute resolution, and its decisions carry the same level of binding authority and enforceability. This article relies on secondary data analyzed using a qualitative-juridical method to examine the jurisdiction of district court and arbitration. The findings reveal that arbitration has absolute jurisdiction when there exists an arbitration clause or an underlying arbitration agreement, thereby excluding the jurisdiction of the district court.
Pengawasan Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Kerja Sama Dengan Konsultan Hukum Radifan, Ody Raedi; Afriana, Anita; Baraba, Badar
Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Vol 11 No 02 (2023): Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/am.v11i02.4716

Abstract

Kerja sama antara Notaris dengan konsultan hukum yang pada hakekatnya bertindak sebagai perantara untuk mencari atau mendapatkan klien dilarang didalam Pasal 4 ayat (4) Kode Etik Notaris. Kerja sama antara Notaris dengan konsultan hukum ini kian marak beberapa tahun ke belakang, karena Pemerintah sedang berupaya untuk memulihkan keadaan ekonomi negara setelah pandemi dengan cara mempermudah legalitas dan perizinan berusaha agar masyarakat dapat melakukan kegiatan berusaha. Banyak konsultan hukum yang secara terang-terangan melakukan promosi di media sosial terhadap beberapa produk berupa akta Notaris seperti pendirian PT, CV dan Yayasan. Pengawasan Notaris dilakukan oleh Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dan untuk pelaksanaannya Menteri membentuk Majelis Pengawas Notaris. Majelis Pengawas Notaris merupakan suatu badan yang mempunyai kewenangan dan kewajiban terhadap pembinaan dan pengawasan terhadap Notaris. Majelis Pengawas Notaris ini terdiri dari Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) untuk setiap Kabupaten/Kota, Majelis Pengawas Wilayah (MPW) untuk setiap Provinsi dan Majelis Pengawas Pusat yang terletak di Ibukota Negara, Metode penelitian dilakukan secara yuridis normatif, dengan data sekunder sebagai data utama dengan didukung data primer. Disimpulkan bahwa pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris masih bergantung kepada laporan masyarakat,
IMPLICATIONS AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF IMPLEMENTING A RISK BASED ONLINE SINGLE SUBMISSION SYSTEM FOR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSING Kusmiati, Susi; Afriana, Anita; Faisal, Pupung
Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL POROS HUKUM PADJADJARAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jphp.v5i1.1367

Abstract

Limited Liability Company (PT) as a Business Entity must have permits to carry out its business activities legally. Risk-based Online Single Submission (OSS) is designated as a Business Licensing portal based on the level of risk of a business activity in determining the type of business licensing. The purpose of this research is to find out how much influence the implementation of business licensing through the risk-based OSS system has in the business licensing of Limited Liability Companies and to formulate the legal consequences that arise if the Limited Liability Company does not comply with the standards of its business activities. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with analytical descriptive research specifications. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative normative methods. The results of the study show that the implementation of business licensing through the risk-based OSS system in practice has implications for limited liability company business licensing, namely providing convenience for limited liability companies in managing business licensing, because permits are issued at the beginning then the government as the authority will verify compliance with business activity standards. legal consequences that arise if the Limited Liability Company does not fulfill the standards of its business activities is the imposition of administrative sanctions on the Limited Liability Company.
CONTEMPT OF COURT: PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN MODEL PENGATURAN DI INDONESIA / CONTEMPT OF COURT: LAW ENFORCEMENT AND RULE MODELS IN INDONESIA Anita Afriana; Artaji Artaji; Elis Rusmiati; Efa Laela Fakhriah; Sherly Putri
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.441-458

Abstract

Di Indonesia sesungguhnya banyak kasus yang terjadi berkaitan dengan pelecehan terhadap pengadilan dan aparat penegak hukum. Hal tersebut berpengaruh terhadap integritas dan kewibawaan lembaga peradilan sebagai benteng terakhir untuk mendapatkan keadilan. Namun, sampai saat ini di Indonesia belum ada ketentuan yang secara khusus mengatur tentang pranata Contempt of Court. Artikel ini merupakan bagian dari penelitian yang telah selesai dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif yang mengedepankan data sekunder dengan dilengkapi data primer berupa penelitian lapangan yang dilakukan pada beberapa pengadilan negeri yang ada di Indonesia. Pembahasan difokuskan pada permasalahan eksistensi pengaturan dan penegakan hukum Contempt of Court serta menentukan model pengaturannya di Indonesia.  Peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang Contempt of Court secara khusus sampai saat ini masih belum ada. Akan tetapi, pengaturannya telah tersebar dalam  Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Oleh karena itu, dari sekian kasus terkait dengan Contempt of Court baik berupa tindakan  maupun perbuatan yang sesungguhnya mengganggu keselamatan, ketenangan psikis maupun fisik, serta apa pun yang pada prinsipnya merupakan bentuk penghinaan terhadap pengadilan belum diberikan sanksi yang tegas tetapi hanya sekedar dikeluarkan dari ruang persidangan. Contempt of Court dapat terjadi baik di dalam ruang persidangan maupun di luar persidangan baik pada perkara pidana, perdata, maupun hubungan industrial.  Semakin meluaskan berbagai tindakan yang dapat dikategorikan sebagai contempt of court maka  perlu untuk mengatur Contempt of Court dalam bentuk aturan tersendiri.This crisis of public confidence greatly affects the integrity and authority of the judiciary as the last defence for justice. Many things happened related to the harassment of the courts and law enforcement agencies but until now in Indonesia there has been no provision specifically about contempt for the court. This article is a part of research that its used normative judicial method which gave priority to primary data with secondary and primary data. Therefore, field research was conducted by interviewing judge in some  district court in Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to know the existence of regulation and law enforcement of Contempt of Court in Indonesia and to determine the model of Contempt of Court arrangement that is in accordance with the judiciary in Indonesia, and  the summary is the laws and regulations governing the Contempt of Court in particular have so far not existed, but are scattered in the Criminal Code (Criminal Code), therefore in many cases both actions and deeds which in principle interfere with safety, psychic and physical calm which in principle is a form of humiliation to the court has not been given strict sanctions but only just removed from the courtroom. Contempt of Court can take place both within the courtroom and outside the court so that by extending the various actions that can be categorized as contempt of court, it is deemed necessary to regulate the Contempt of Court in the form of a separate rule.
Quo Vadis of The Legal Standing and Ownership of A Moveable Object (Cars) Which Not Yet Fully Paid In A Perspective of Civil and Bankruptcy Law Dian Priharyanti; Anita Afriana
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (September-October 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The implementation of buying and selling is often carried out on cash or credit, which often has an impact if something happens to the debtor, especially if the debtor is bankrupt. In bankruptcy, the Debtor’s asset are collateral for creditors to obtain payment of the bills that has been registered. This research will answer the question whether assets in the form of four-wheeled motorised vehicles that have not been paid in full by bankrupt debtors can be withdrawn into bankruptcy assets in bankruptcy? And when does the ownership right to a movable object transfer in a sale and purchase that overrides Article 1458 of the Civil Code with an agreement?. As for the truth in connection with these questions, the results of the discussion are obtained in the form of an explanation that motorised vehicles purchased on credit can still be part of the bankruptcy estate, even though it has not been paid in full by the debtor. As for the transfer of property rights itself, it is actually based on Article 612 of the Civil Code.
Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Pembuktian Tidak Langsung Dalam Perkara Penetapan Harga dan Kartel Tiket Pesawat (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1811 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2022): PENERAPAN BUKTI TIDAK LANGSUNG DALAM PERKARA PENETAPAN HARGA DAN KARTEL TIKET PESAWAT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1811 K/PDT.SUS-KPPU/2022) Arvianda, Adzradhia Nabila; Suryanti, Nyulistiowati; Afriana, Anita
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i1.3501

Abstract

Indirect evidence is used by the Competition Supervisory Commission to determine the existence of violations of competition law by business actors. Indirect evidence consists of communication evidence and economic evidence. The application of indirect evidence in competition cases presents a unique challenge due to the difficulty in interpreting it. This research aims to understand and examine the validity of indirect evidence used in cases related to airline price-fixing and cartels, in the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1811 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2022. The research uses a normative juridical approach method with analytical descriptive research specifications. The research results show that the considerations in the Supreme Court's Decision regarding the existence of an implied contract among the Reported Parties, which is proven through indirect evidence, are in accordance with Law Number 5 of 1999. The validity of indirect evidence to prove violations of the competition law is equivalent to the evidence categorized as bukti petunjuk which is regulated in Article 42 of Law Number 5 of 1999.
TANGGUNG JAWAB CAMAT SEBAGAI PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH SEMENTARA (PPATS) TERKAIT AKTA HIBAH YANG DIBATALKAN KARENA MENGANDUNG CACAT HUKUM DITINJAU DARI KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN PERATURAN JABATAN PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH Qarani, Meta Tarisha; Afriana, Anita; Nurhayati, Elis
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 1 (2025): JUSTITIA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i1.171-182

Abstract

Tanggung jawab Camat selaku PPATS dalam pembatalan Akta Hibah yang dibuatnya karena mengandung cacat hukum sehingga tidak terpenuhi nya asas kepastian hukum dalam peralihan hak atas tanah melalui Hibah. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan. Menggunakan metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif, spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah Deskriptif Analitis dengan metode analisis normatif kualitatif. Bahwa akibat hukum terhadap kedudukan akta hibah yang dibuat oleh camat selaku PPATS yang mengandung cacat hukum adalah tidak memberikan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang bersangkutan dan masyarakat karena melanggar syarat sahnya perjanjian baik secara subjektif yang menyebabkan akta dapat dibatalkan maupun syarat objektif yang berakibat akta batal demi hukum berdasarkan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata. PPATS dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban terhadap akta hibah yang cacat hukum dikarenakan kelalaian, ketidakcermatan, maupun kesalahan, terhadap objek tanah yang dialihkan melalui hibah berdasarkan Peraturan Jabatan PPAT adalah berupa tanggung jawab secara administratif maupun perdata.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM KEDUDUKAN PEMEGANG SAHAM AKIBAT PUTUSAN PEMBATALAN AKTA PEMINDAHAN SAHAM OLEH PENGADILAN Elvaretta, Alysia; Afriana, Anita; Faisal, Pupung
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 1 (2025): JUSTITIA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i1.183-187

Abstract

Terdapat pemindahan hak atas saham yang terjadi akibat putusan pembatalan akta pemindahan saham oleh pengadilan dan tidak diberitahukan kepada Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Penelitian ini meneliti bagaimana kedudukan hukum kepemilikan saham yang telah dibatalkan akta pemindahan sahamnya oleh pengadilan dan kepastian hukum terhadap pihak yang telah dinyatakan sah oleh pengadilan  yang tidak dilakukan pemberitahuan kepada Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa pihak yang telah dibatalkan akta pemindahan hak atas sahamnya oleh pengadilan tidak memiliki kedudukan hukum sebagai pemilik saham dalam perseroan terbatas tersebut dan pihak yang telah dinyatakan sah dapat menjalankan hak-haknya dengan syarat memenuhi ketentuan yang telah diatur dalam UUPT. Diperlukan pencatatan nama pemegang saham yang telah dinyatakan sah dalam daftar perseroan.
Tinjauan Yuridis Jabatan Rangkap Direksi BUMN (Persero) Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Penetapan Harga Tiket Pesawat Ditinjau dari Hukum Positif Indonesia Puteri Nurjanah; Elisatris Gultom; Anita Afriana
Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Desember 2021
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jssh.v5i2.14882

Abstract

Adanya keterkaitan antara praktik jabatan rangkap dengan penetapan harga dijelaskan dalam Peraturan KPPU No. 4 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Penetapan Harga bahwa perilaku penetapan harga sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 5 UU No.5/1999 akan menjadi lebih mudah dilakukan apabila terdapat jabatan rangkap pada perusahaan yang saling bersaing. Persoalan ini dapat mempengaruhi secara negatif iklim persaingan usaha dan memiliki dampak serius bagi realitas dunia usaha di Indonesia. Walaupun terdapat aturan hukum yang melarang jabatan rangkap, nyatanya praktik jabatan rangkap masih sering terjadi khususnya jabatan rangkap oleh direksi badan usaha milik negara yang seharusnya berperan menyelenggarakan kemanfaatan umum dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Berdasarkan penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa telah terjadi ketidakpastian hukum terkait jabatan rangkap direksi BUMN, yang mana dalam peraturan menteri BUMN No.3/2015 memperbolehkan seorang direksi BUMN merangkap jabatan namun hal ini bertentangan dengan peraturan diatasnya yang melarang praktik tersebut. Dengan demikian telah terjadi inkonsistensi norma antara Undang-Undang dengan peraturan pelaksananya yang melanggar ketentuan hierarki yang lebih tinggi. Implikasi dari adanya praktik jabatan rangkap Direksi BUMN ini berpotensi menimbulkan persaingan usaha tidak sehat karena penetapan harga tiket pesawat bukan bersumber dari pertimbangan nilai keekonomisan tetapi adanya kepentingan yang sama dari organ Persero.
Co-Authors A.A.P*, Karina Widyadhari Abdoel Harun Lamo Adelia Audiana Gerchikova Agitha Putri Andany Hidayat Agitha Agung La Tenritata Agus Mulya Karsona, Agus Mulya Agustus Sani Nugroho & Ema Rahmawati Heryaman, Agustus Sani Nugroho & Alysia Elvaretta Aman Wibawa Ginting An An Chandrawulan An An Chandrawulan Andony, Fakta Anrihal Rona Fajari Arini Yunia Pratiwi Artaji, Artaji Arvianda, Adzradhia Nabila Azizah Kamilah Putri Bagus Sujatmiko Baraba, Badar Betty Rubiati Bima Nuranda Cep Juli Chairanie, Refhianti Dede Kania Deviana Yuanitasari Deviana Yuanitasari Dewi Kania Sugiharti Dian Priharyanti Dinda Ayu Narassati Efa Laela Fakhirah, Efa Laela Efa Laela Fakhriah Efa Laela Fakhriah Efa Laela Fakhriah Elis Nurhayati Elisatris Gultom Elvaretta, Alysia Fajri, Anrihal Fakhirah, Efa Laela Fakta Andony Firdausa Pratonggopati, Hanna Ghani Satria Hartanto Handryas Prasetyo Utomo Hatami, Raka Fauzan Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Hendri Sita Ambar Kumalawati Hessy Oktiarifadah Hilmansyah, Salma Syifaya Holyness Nurdin Singadimedja Inayatillah, Revi Indra Prayitno Indriasri, Alivia isis Ikhwansyah Isis Ikhwansyah Jonathan Fide Mulya Karina Widyadhari A.A.P* Kilkoda Agus Saleh Kilkoda Agus Saleh Kusmiati, Susi Lastuti Abubakar Lastuti Abubakar Matteo Rossi Melin Simorangkir Meta Tarisha Qarani Muhamad Amirulloh, Muhamad Muhammad Ridwan Fadhly Mulya, Jonathan Fide Nabiela Ramadhani Nanda Anisa Lubis Nun Harrieti, Nun Nuranda, Bima Nurfauzi, Febri Nurhakim, Lukman Ilman Nurhayati, Elis Nyulistiowati Suryanti Olwintra Sitorus Olwintra Sitorus Prayitno, Indra Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Pupung Faisal Purnama Trisnamansyah Puteri Nurjanah Puteri Nurjanah Puteri Nurjanah Putri, Sherly Putri, Sherly Qarani, Meta Tarisha Radifan, Ody Raedi Rai Mantili Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam Refhianti Chairanie Rian Fauzi Rahman Rusmiati, Elis Ruth Felyta Worang Salsabilla Novalika , Aurelia Sari, Melia Putri Purnama Sekarwati, Raden Ajeng Astari Seto Wahyudi Shafira Meidina Rafaldini Sherly Ayuna Putri Sherly Putri Shintadewi Dibrata Silitonga, Yoas Panggawa Simorangkir, Melin Singadimedja, Holyness N Sonny Dewi Judiasih Sudaryat Sujatmiko, Bagus Suparto, Susilowati Susilowati Suparto Susilowati Suparto Syahbaniar, Alia Putri Teguh Tresna Puja Asmara Tony Richard Alexander Samosir Vinie Rachmadiena Devianti Windy Riani Putri Yonathan Aji Pamungkas Zidna Sabrina