p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.264
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika Masalah-Masalah Hukum Pandecta Lentera Hukum JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) AL-Daulah FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Jendela Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Rechtsidee Mimbar Keadilan Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Constitutional Review Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Unes Law Review Jurnal Hukum Prasada JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Yustisiabel SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Al-Syakhsiyyah : Journal of Law and Family Studies Pamulang Law Review Jurnal Syntax Transformation Journal of Strategic and Global Studies Jurnal Mandala Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Jurnal Preferensi Hukum (JPH) Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Hang Tuah Law Journal Trunojoyo Law Review Jurnal Yustitia Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies RechtIdee Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Lentera Hukum

Omnibus Law in Indonesia: A Comparison to the United States and Ireland Bayu Dwi Anggono; Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus
Lentera Hukum Vol 7 No 3 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v7i3.19895

Abstract

Recently, omnibus law has become a critical discourse in Indonesia, both academically and practically. This discourse emerges from the relatively fast drafting and ratification of the Job Creation Law. This law's formation uses the omnibus law method because it contains many laws' substance into one law. One of Indonesia's fundamental issues is the absence of rules, methods, and techniques for forming the omnibus law. On the other hand, the techniques and methods of forming these omnibus laws have been practiced in various countries to accelerate the legislative process and organize regulations. However, public participation becomes one of the fundamental shortcomings to draft the legislation under omnibus law. This article aims to review and compare the omnibus law concept applied in selected countries, referencing the United States and Ireland as the model. This article also analyzes how to form the ideal omnibus law by learning from the omnibus law application in other countries that have successfully implemented it first. This study finds that omnibus laws in the United States and Ireland contribute to ushering hyper-regulation symptoms that are vulnerable and hamper economic development. The above comparison needs to be adjusted to the Indonesian context to enact the omnibus law. KEYWORDS: Omnibus Law, Indonesian Law, Comparative Omnibus Law.
Menimbang Kewenangan DPR dalam Penggunaan Hak Angket Pada Kasus Korupsi KTP Elektornik Firdaus, Fahmi Ramadhan; Anggono, Bayu Dwi
Lentera Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v6i1.9545

Abstract

In Indonesia, the control function of the House of Representatives (DPR) includes interpellation rights, inquiry rights and the right to express opinions. In 2017, the DPR's inquiry rights to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) were considered unconstitutional because the law did not include the KPK as the object of the inquiry mechanism. However, the Constitutional Court (MK) in Decision Number 36 / PUU-XV / 2017 defined KPK as an executive so that this institution can be monitored through the inquiry mechanism. This court's decision, however, contradicts to the four previous decisions which classified KPK as an independent institution. This article examines the validity of the DPR's inquiry rights to the KPK by considering the DPR's inquiry rights as a form of a mechanism for mutual checks and balances to the other state institutions. In practice, there are both formal and material rules that must be fulfilled so that their implementation is legally valid and the DPR's inquiry rights to the KPK in cases of the electronic KTP corruption ignore these conditions. This article recommends that the DPR be careful when using inquiry rights as a monitoring mechanism. Keywords: Inquiry rights, House of Representatives, Corruption Eradication Commission
Debating Political Rights: The Revocation of Former Convict's Rights to Be Elected in Indonesian Elections Suarda, I Gede Widhiana; Anggono, Bayu Dwi; Setyawan, Fendi; Taniady, Vicko
Lentera Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v12i1.52923

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyse the revocation of the political right of former convicts to candidacy as public officials in the Indonesian context based on positive law and decisions of the Indonesian Constitutional Court. In addition, this article aims to conduct a comparative study analysis of the issue, namely, between the arrangements in Indonesia and those in the United States and Australia. In Indonesia, everyone has the right to stand as a candidate for public office, including former prisoners, with certain conditions in accordance with positive law. However, the matter of revoking the political rights of former convicts remains a matter of debate, especially before the General Election. The Constitutional Court affirmed that the political right of former convicts to hold elected public office must fulfil several requirements. The political rights of former convicts are still guaranteed, but there are certain limitations. In Australia and the United States, the political rights of former convicts are also maintained, but with exceptions for some instances, such as corruption or treason against the state. Looking at the existing debate, it is necessary to safeguard civil and political rights universally, while paying attention to the specific cases that underlie the prohibition on former convicts from running for public office.KEYWORDS: Elections, Political Rights, Former Convicts.
Co-Authors A'an Efendi Adi Partha, Putu Gde Nuraharja Adiyatma, Septhian Eka Ahmad Subhan Ahmad Suryono Ahmad Zairudin Amri, Ahmad Ihsan Ana Laela Fatikhatul Choiriyah Andini, Pratiwi Puspitho Andri Setiawan Andri Setiawan Anggoro, Setyo Bimo Antikowati Antikowati Anwar, Wildan Rofikil Awaludin Marwan Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas Cahyo Setiono, Gentur Chandra, M Jeffri Arlinandes Dinh, Tran Ngoc Disantara, Fradhana Putra Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Efendi, Aan Emanuel Raja Damaitu Erwin Prasetyo Fachry Abda El Rahman Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus Fanny Tanuwijaya Febrian Febrian Fendi Setyawan Gautama Budi Arundhati, Gautama Budi Harianti, Isnin Hartono, Danang Tri Hidayat, Rivan I Gede Widhiana Suarda Icha Cahyaning Fitri Indyravastha Rezhana Irham Rahman Islamy, Billy Pahlevy Ismail, Indi Muhtar Jarmoko, Muhammad Nurulloh Khanif, Al Khanif, Al M Jeffri Arlinandes Chandra Mafazi, Agung Maya Cristiana Moh. Ali Mohammad Arief Amrullah Muhammad Imaduddin Muhlisin Muhlisin Muhtar, Achmad Mukhlis Mukhlis Muslim Lobubun Nando Yussele Mardika Nur Nafa Maulida Atlanta Nurdin Nurdin Nuzulia Kumala Sari Octavianus, Dwi Caesar Patmiati, Tutik Purwaningtyas, Lovika Augusta Puspita, Putu Lia Putra, Restu Adi Putra, Steinly Suwanto RA. Rini Anggraeni Rofi Wahanisa Rosita Indrayati Safira Aulia Nisa Sapti Prihatmini Sari A.P, Aulia Oktarizka Vivi Puspita Sari, Pika Septiansyah, Veris Siagian, Ruben Cornelius Sucitrawan, I Nyoman Sujatmiko, Bagus Sulistina, Sulistina Syifa Alam Taniady, Vicko TOLIB EFFENDI Totok Yanuarto Wutwensa, Bruri Marwano Yanuarto, Totok