This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Rechtsidee Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal SOLMA DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesia Journal of Halal Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Unes Law Review MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender RISTEK : Jurnal Riset, Inovasi, dan Teknologi Kabupaten Batang Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Abdimas UNWAHAS : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat UNWAHAS Abdi Dosen : Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Jurnal Berdaya Mandiri Jurnal Suara Hukum Bakti Cendana: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Pena : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Indonesian Journal of Police Studies Jurnal Pengabdian Nasional (JPN) Indonesia Jurnal Litbang Kota Pekalongan Batulis Civil Law Review JHCLS Interdisciplinary Social Studies Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Journal of Social Research RISTEK: Jurnal Riset, Inovasi dan Teknologi Kabupaten Batang Ruang Cendekia : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi PENA ABDIMAS : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat International Journal of Law Society Services Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues RechtIdee Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian Nasional (JPN) Indonesia SASI Abdurrauf Law and Sharia Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Law Research Review Quarterly Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Substantive Justice in Consumer Protection Law: A Comparative Study of Regulations in Indonesia and Russia Wibowo, Dwi Edi; Wibowo, Aurea Qonita; Begishev, Ildar
Batulis Civil Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3, NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v6i3.3359

Abstract

Introduction: Consumer protection is a crucial aspect in maintaining the balance between business interests and the rights of consumers. Legal regulations must embody the principles of substantive justice, ensuring not only formal legal procedures but also tangible outcomes that directly benefit society. the application of substantive justice theory within consumer protection regulations in Indonesia and Russia, two countries with distinct legal systems and socio-political contexts.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze the extent to which consumer protection regulations in Indonesia and Russia have implemented the principles of substantive justice, and to identify points of convergence as well as divergence between the two systems.Methods of the Research: This research employs a normative legal method with a comparative approach. Data are obtained through statutory analysis, examination of relevant provisions, and a review of scholarly literature on substantive justice. The research emphasizes how the respective legal frameworks address consumer rights, business obligations, and dispute resolution mechanisms.Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Indonesia, through Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, primarily emphasizes the distribution of rights, obligations, and accessible dispute resolution mechanisms. Meanwhile, Russia, under the Law on Protection of Consumer Rights Number 2300-1 of 1992, places greater weight on comprehensive compensation, including moral damages. The originality of this research lies in its comparative analysis of the application of substantive justice theory between Indonesia and Russia, a juxtaposition rarely explored in consumer law scholarship. The study contributes to the academic discourse by demonstrating that the realization of substantive justice depends not only on statutory provisions but also on the effectiveness of legal enforcement and public legal awareness.
The Binding Force of Goods/Services Procurement Contracts from the Perspective of Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code Andhika Ariayuda; Sarwono Hardjomuldjadi; Sami'an Sami'an; Dwi Edi Wibowo
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.988

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the binding force of procurement contracts within the framework of Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUH Perdata), which establishes that any legally executed agreement shall bind the parties with the force of law (pacta sunt servanda). Using a literature-based methodology, this study examines national regulations (the Indonesian Civil Code, public procurement legislation, Presidential Regulation No. 16/2018 and its amendments), legal doctrines of contract law and administrative law, as well as relevant judicial decisions. The findings show that procurement contracts possess a dual legal nature: they are private agreements governed by civil law while simultaneously being influenced by public law due to the state’s involvement and the use of public financial resources. As a result, their binding force is determined not only by compliance with the legal conditions for contract validity (Article 1320 of the Civil Code) but also by adherence to principles of transparency, accountability, efficiency, and regulatory conformity in public procurement. The study reveals that the application of Article 1338 to procurement contracts must consider: (1) the limits of freedom of contract, (2) standardized government procurement documents, (3) safeguards against abuse of power, and (4) dispute-resolution mechanisms such as objections, mediation, arbitration, or litigation. This article concludes that the binding nature of procurement contracts is not absolute; rather, it is contextual and conditioned by principles of good governance and public financial accountability. The study contributes to the development of procurement contract doctrine within the Indonesian legal system.
Legal Analysis of Compensation for Building Failure Endry Zhulham Pratama; Sami'an Sami'an; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Dwi Edi Wibowo
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.1020

Abstract

Building failure is a multidimensional problem in the construction sector that includes aspects of agreements, technical performance, and civil consequences. This study examines legal arrangements related to building failures in Indonesia, reads the pattern of accountability in a number of Supreme Court decisions, and contrasts it with international practice. The research was conducted through the search for regulations, court decisions, and academic literature as the basis for normative analysis. The findings show that the absence of uniform technical investigation procedures, weak project documentation, and differences in expert approaches also trigger differences in verdicts. As a new contribution, this study introduces the Building Failure Integrated Analysis Model (MAT-KB) which combines contract analysis, tort principles, forensic evaluation, and economic considerations to strengthen the accuracy and consistency of dispute resolution. This model is considered to be able to provide a more comprehensive evaluation framework for construction law practice in Indonesia.
Legal Protection for Foreign Investors in Infrastructure Projects Supporting Mining Downstreaming in Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review Sandi Saputra; Sami'an Sami'an; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Dwi Edi Wibowo
Journal of Social Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v5i2.3024

Abstract

The article aims to identify legal issues and legal solutions that affect legal protection for foreign investment in infrastructure and downstream projects in Indonesia. The analysis uses a systematic literature review method. The focus of the analysis lies in four areas: (1) enforcement of arbitral awards (New York Convention 1958; Law 30/1999), (2) the position of arbitration (seat), lex arbitri, and the standard of "public order", (3) the division of contractual risks in GPBU/EPC/O&M (change-in-law, tax gross-up, step-in lender, termination/compensation, government guarantee, land acquisition), and (4) BIT/ISDS as an additional layer of protection. Although the results show a more pro-enforcement tendency, key problems remain: flexible interpretation of "public order", slow and formalistic exequatur, undisciplined seat selection, inconsistency in clauses in contract documents, inconsistencies in land procurement, and unclear reasons and regressions in government guarantees. This article provides several legal options. The first is a judicial guideline that aims to reduce "public order" and avoid reassessing the subject matter. The second is the standardization of exequatur, which includes standards such as SLAs, file templates, and e-filing. The third is the recognition of short-term relief, which includes an emergency arbitrator. The fourth is the hygienic arbitration clause model, which includes changes in the law, seat, lex arbitri, consolidation, and joinder. The package reduces the risk of greater actions, speeds up the opening of financial accounts, and enhances the legal protection of foreign investors.
Consumer Protection in the Digital Era: Challenges and Solutions from an Islamic Legal Perspective Dwi Edi Wibowo
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 11, No 2 (2024): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v11i2.4752

Abstract

Technological advancements have transformed buying and selling transactions from conventional to digital, providing convenience for people in conducting transactions. However, this progress also brings new challenges for consumers, particularly regarding protection from fraud, privacy issues, and fulfillment of consumer rights. Consumers' personal data stored in digital systems is vulnerable to misuse, and there is no guarantee that the goods or services received match the agreement with the seller. This study aims to analyze consumer protection challenges in the digital era from an Islamic legal perspective and offers solutions based on sharia principles. This research employs a normative legal method with a literature study approach. The findings reveal that Islamic law, through primary sources such as the Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijma', and Qiyas, as well as muamalah principles such as ash-shiddiq (honesty), al-adl (justice), and al-ihsan (benevolence), provides a strong foundation for consumer protection in the digital era. The study highlights that Islamic law not only emphasizes technical protections but also ethical and moral aspects in digital commerce. In conclusion, consumer protection solutions from an Islamic perspective include three main aspects: transparency in digital transactions, strengthening sharia-based regulations, and enhancing consumer education. By applying the values of justice, honesty, and responsibility in transactions, the goal is to establish safe and fair digital transactions for all parties involved
Antitrust Law Reform in Emerging Economies: A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Oman Dwi Edi Wibowo; Aurea Qonita Wibowo; Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): July-December
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v5i2.53699

Abstract

This study aims to analyse anti-monopoly law reform efforts in developing countries by conducting a comparative study between Indonesia and Oman. This research is normative legal research using conceptual and legislative approaches. The research findings confirm the urgency of anti-monopoly legal reform in developing countries as an important instrument for creating a fair, competitive, and sustainably innovative market. The reform aims not only to meet international standards but also to be grounded on the principles of social justice, economic democracy, and national legal sovereignty amid global economic dynamics and digital technology. Philosophically, this reform is necessary to protect the public interest from monopolistic practices that widen economic disparities and undermine general welfare. A comparative study between Indonesia and Oman reveals differences in the context and approach to reform, with Indonesia focusing on updating laws and strengthening dispute resolution mechanisms, while Oman integrates regulations with Islamic law and economic diversification strategies. Both emphasise institutional strengthening, regulatory harmonisation, and increased awareness among business operators as key to the reform's success. The results of this comparison open opportunities for the exchange of experiences to enrich anti-monopoly legal reform strategies, supporting the creation of competitive and inclusive markets, as well as sustainable economic growth and the equitable distribution of community welfare in developing countries.
Penerapan Kontrak Konstruksi Berbasis FIDIC dalam Proyek Jalan Tol Indonesia: Kajian Normatif terhadap Undang-Undang Jasa Konstruksi Kodrat Insany Taqwim; Samián Samián; Dwi Edi Wibowo
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/vfhfek84

Abstract

The application of FIDIC-based construction contracts in Indonesian toll road projects raises significant normative questions regarding their compatibility with the national legal framework. This study employs a normative legal approach, combining statutory, conceptual, and comparative analyses to examine the alignment between FIDIC contractual structures and Indonesian Construction Services Law, the Civil Code, and the Arbitration Act. The findings indicate that while FIDIC reflects common law traditions emphasizing party autonomy, detailed risk allocation, and multi-tier dispute resolution mechanisms, Indonesian law imposes mandatory norms that limit contractual freedom in the interest of public order and legal certainty. Normative tensions primarily arise in clauses concerning risk distribution, variations, claims management, and the finality of dispute board and arbitral decisions. Nevertheless, these tensions do not render FIDIC inapplicable. Instead, adaptive drafting and systematic interpretation enable its integration within the Indonesian civil law system. Proper harmonization ensures that FIDIC contracts remain legally valid while supporting efficiency, certainty, and accountability in the delivery of strategic toll road infrastructure projects.
Community Empowerment and Tax Law Reform in Strengthening Consumer Protection: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, Nigeria, and India Anik Kunantiyorini; Dwi Edi Wibowo; Achmad Soeharto; Geraldha Islami Putra Disantara; Uche Nnawulezi; Uzodinma Yurriens Ezenduka
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): (January-June 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v9i1.37520

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the digital economy has intensified consumer protection challenges in developing countries, particularly in cross-border digital transactions where information asymmetry, price opacity, and limited regulatory capacity expose consumers to unfair commercial practices. While tax law has traditionally been regarded as an instrument for generating state revenue, its regulatory function offers significant potential to strengthen consumer protection in digital markets. This study examines the construction of tax law as a consumer protection instrument in Indonesia, India, and Nigeria, analyzes the role of community empowerment in supporting responsive tax reform, and formulates an integrated policy model based on a functional comparative approach. This research employs normative legal research using comparative, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The comparative analysis adopts the functional comparative method developed by Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kötz, while legal materials consist of legislation, judicial and policy documents, academic literature, and relevant institutional reports. The findings demonstrate that the three jurisdictions adopt different approaches to integrating tax law with consumer protection. Indonesia emphasizes market neutrality through digital value-added tax reform, India explicitly protects consumers through anti-profiteering provisions under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, whereas Nigeria primarily prioritizes fiscal revenue mobilization with limited consumer-oriented safeguards. The study further reveals that responsive regulation, co-regulation, fiscal literacy, and community participation significantly influence the effectiveness of tax law beyond formal legal norms. Accordingly, this study proposes an integrated model of responsive tax governance that combines substantive tax justice, co-regulatory institutional arrangements, community empowerment, and digital transparency mechanisms to strengthen consumer protection in digital commerce while accommodating the legal pluralism and institutional diversity of developing countries. This is in line with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 12: Responsible Consumption and Production.
Telaah Yuridis Kontrak Konstruksi pada Proyek Investasi dengan Porsi Kepemilikan Kontraktor dalam Porsi Investasi Non-Mayoritas Martika Setyo Akas; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Dwi Edi Wibowo; Ganis Vitayanty Noor
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i12.9273

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis konstruksi yuridis kontrak konstruksi pada proyek investasi dengan porsi kepemilikan kontraktor dalam posisi investasi non-mayoritas. Dualitas peran kontraktor sebagai pelaksana konstruksi dan pemegang saham minoritas menimbulkan kompleksitas hukum yang memerlukan pendekatan integratif antara hukum kontrak dan hukum perseroan. Permasalahan yang dikaji meliputi konstruksi yuridis kontrak konstruksi yang tepat, mekanisme penyelesaian konflik kepentingan, serta perlindungan hukum bagi kontraktor-investor minoritas dalam menghadapi keputusan sepihak pemegang saham mayoritas. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini mengkaji Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi khususnya Pasal 22 sampai Pasal 30, Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas terutama Pasal 52, Pasal 61, Pasal 97, Pasal 114, dan Pasal 138, serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 14 Tahun 2021 dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 38 Tahun 2015 tentang Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konstruksi yuridis yang tepat memerlukan sinkronisasi antara kontrak konstruksi dengan perjanjian pemegang saham, mekanisme penyelesaian konflik kepentingan melalui pendekatan preventif berupa pembentukan komite independen dan klausul deadlock resolution, serta pendekatan represif melalui mediasi dan arbitrase. Perlindungan hukum komprehensif bagi kontraktor-investor minoritas mencakup hak mengusulkan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham, menggugat direksi dan komisaris, mengajukan pemeriksaan perseroan, serta penetapan hak veto dalam keputusan strategis. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya regulasi khusus yang mengatur dualitas peran kontraktor dalam skema investasi campuran untuk memberikan kepastian hukum bagi seluruh pemangku kepentingan dalam proyek infrastruktur.
Antitrust Law and Legal Advocacy: Perspective on Promoting Fair Competition in Indonesia, Uzbekistan, and Russia Dwi Edi Wibowo; Fradhana Putra Disantara; Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna; Ildar Begishev
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Legal Advocacy and Justice Innovation
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v8i1.34027

Abstract

Antitrust law plays a critical role in ensuring fair competition, yet its effectiveness varies across different legal and institutional contexts. This paper examines the comparative regulation and implementation of antitrust law in Indonesia, Uzbekistan, and Russia, with particular attention to the role of legal advocacy and legal services in enhancing compliance and enforcement. The objective is to analyze how these three countries, with distinct political and economic systems, construct and operationalize their competition law frameworks to promote healthy market competition. Employing a normative legal research method with a comparative approach, the study relies on statutory texts, institutional documents, case law, and scholarly literature. Data were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-comparative analysis. The findings reveal that Indonesia has developed a comprehensive legal framework through Law No. 5/1999, yet its enforcement remains inconsistent due to institutional limitations and judicial resistance. Uzbekistan has adopted modern competition principles in its 2012 Competition Law, but enforcement is hindered by state dominance in the economy and limited legal capacity. Russia, in contrast, possesses a mature regulatory framework and a powerful Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS), though enforcement often reflects political considerations. Across all three contexts, legal advocacy and professional legal services significantly influence compliance by educating businesses, guiding merger notifications, and shaping litigation strategies. This study contributes to comparative competition law scholarship by highlighting the interplay between regulation, enforcement, and advocacy in shaping effective competition regimes. The conclusion underscores that building effective antitrust law requires not only robust statutes but also active advocacy and accessible legal services. Recommendations include strengthening compliance mechanisms in Indonesia through KPPU’s DPKPU guidelines, enhancing legal education in Uzbekistan to foster a bottom-up competition culture, and encouraging FAS Russia to sustain transparency in digital markets. 
Co-Authors Abduloh, Agus Yosep Achmad Soeharto Achmad Soeharto ADITYA DIMAS WAHYU SASONGKO Aditya Migi Prematura Agung Aditya Agung Aditya AH. Asari Taufiqurrohman Ahmad Yazid Andhika Ariayuda Andung Maheswara Anik Kunantiyorini Anik Kunantiyorini Ari Muhardono Arum Ardianingsih Astuti, Fitriani Dwi Aulia . Aurea Qonita Wibowo Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna Begishev, Ildar Beny Diah Madusari Beny Diah Madusari dede agus, dede Diah Madusari, Benny Disantara, Fradhana Putra Dubey, Anita Chaturvedi dwi hartanto Encep Taufik Rahman Endry Zhulham Pratama Evi Latifah Ezzerouali, Souad Ahmed Fradhana Putra Disantara Ganis Vitayanty Noor Geraldha Islami Putra Disantara Henny Saida Flora Heri Ariadi Hisam Ahyani Ildar Begishev Jaya Maulana Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega Kamalina Din Jannah Khairuddin - Khomaini, Khomaini Kodrat Insany Taqwim Kuncoro, Irfan Liana Endah Susanti Loso loso Lousada, Sérgio António Neves Maghfiroh Maghfiroh Marlinda Irawati Marom, Saeful Martika Setyo Akas Muhammad Nur Muharir, Muharir Mukhamad Adzar Mulyanto Mutimatun Niami Nasution, Nur Baiti Nauval Rabbani Nila Oktaviani Novia Bella Alifvia Nur Susanti Nurul Huda Osman, Noor Dzuhaidah Pandapotan Damanik Permanasari, Pradya Pradya Permanasari Prija Djatmika, Prija Rachmawati Rahman, Wahbi Ridwan Ridwan robert lengkong weku Rully Syahrul Mucharom Saeful Marom Sajuri, Sajuri Sami'an Sami'an Sami'an Sami'an Samian Samian Sandi Saputra Sarah Rum Handayani Sarwono Hardjomuldjadi Sarwono Hardjomuljadi Sarwono Hardjomuljadi Siti Nur Aisah Siti Nurlaela Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali Suharto, Achmad Sulastri Sulastri Sunarjo, Wenti Ayu Suryani Suryani Taufiq Taufiq Taufiq Taufiqurohman, A. H. As’ari Tufiqurrohman, A.H. As’ari Ubaidillah Uche Nnawulezi Ulummudin, Ulummudin Uzodinma Yurriens Ezenduka Victoria, Ong Wenti Ayu Sunarjo Wibowo, Aurea Qonita Yosie Saputri, Maharani Octavia Yuniarti .