p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.238
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal BAHASA DAN SASTRA Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Jasmani, Kesehatan dan Rekreasi MALIH PEDDAS Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan PROMINE Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUDIKA EDUCATION) Jurnal GEOSAPTA JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Manuju : Malahayati Nursing Journal Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan Musamus Journal of Physical Education and Sport (MJPES) JE (Journal of Empowerment) JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Jurnal Sains Riset JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran: JPPP Indomera : Jurnal Magister Manajemen Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU Al Mashaadir : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Journal of Community Development Journal of Physical Activity and Sports (JPAS) Jurnal Pengabdian Olahraga Masyarakat Education Enthusiast : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan AJAD : Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Convergence; Jurnal Oneline Jurnalistik Jurnal Pengabdian Mandiri JIMAKUKERTA Tahqiqa: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam EJOIN : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dikdimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat JEC (Jurnal Edukasi Cendekia) Journal International Journal of Teaching and Learning (INJOTEL) kawanad jes PESARE: Science and Engineering Service Journal Educommunity Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Differential: Journal on Mathematics Education
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU

KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA MODELDISCOVERY LEARNING DAN CONNECTED MATHEMATICS PROJECT Ebrianti, Hepi Laura; Masri, Masri
Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU Vol 6, No 2 (2019): Volume 6, Nomor 2, Tahun 2019
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36085/math-umb.edu.v6i2.997

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) find out the significant differences of students’ math reasoning abilities with the Discovery Learning model, Connected Mathematics Project (CMP) learning model, and conventional learning models; (2) find out which one of the above models are considered as the better model. This study was a quasi-experimental with the population from eighth grade students of SMPN 6 Bengkulu city and took sample from three classes namely VIII-D as the experimental class 1, class VIII-E as the experimental class 2, and class VIII-F as the control class.The technique for collecting data used a test of mathematics reasoning ability and analyzed by using one-way ANOVA test and continued with LSD test. Based on the result of study there were significat differences in students’ math reasoning abilities by using Discovery Learning, Connected Mathematics Project (CMP) and the conventional learning models.From the BNT test was obtained that Connected Mathematics Project (CMP) learning model gives the better results of students’ mathematics reasoning abilities than the Discovery Learning and Conventional learning models. Keywords: Reasoning Ability, Discovery Learning, CMP
KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI TERBIMBING DAN MEANS ENDS ANALYSIS Sari, Yenny Puspita; Masri, Masri
Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU Vol 7, No 2 (2020): Volume 7, Nomor 2, Tahun 2020
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36085/math-umb.edu.v7i2.780

Abstract

In this research aims to see the difference of mathematical problem solving students with Guided Inquiry learning model and Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental research in SMPN 14 Kota Bengkulu. The population of this research is all of VIII class students, with the sample of research is VIII I class as the experimental class I that given using guided inquiry model treatment, students of class VIII 3 as the experimental class II that given Means Ends Analysis model treatment, students of class VIII 2 as the control class that given conventional model treatment. The data collection of students result study using mathematical problem solving skills test consists of pre-test and post-test. The data obtained were analyzed using one path ANAVA and continued with BNT test. Based on the ANAVA result there is a difference between students' mathematical problem solving abilities in experimental class I, experimental class II and control class. From the BNT test that the treatment between experimental class I given the Guided Inquiry, Experimental class II treatment given the Means Ends Analysis  treatment no difference in mathematical problem solving ability, while experimental class I (Guided Inquiry) with control and experimental class II Means Ends Analysis with the control there is a difference in problem solving abilities mathematically and the highest average score was obtained in the students treated with the Guided Inquiry model.  Keywords : Ability of Mathematical Problem Solving Students, Guided Inquiry Model, Means Ends Analysis Model
KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS SISWA PADA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI Fatmawati, Fatmawati; Masri, Masri
Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU Vol 3, No 3 (2016): Volume 3, Nomor 3 Juli 2016
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36085/math-umb.edu.v3i3.1438

Abstract

Mathematical creative thinking ability is the ability of students in generating new ideas to solve mathematical problems. To develop mathematical creative thinking abilities of students, teachers must have and implement a learning model that fits in the learning process. Learning model that can be used to measure students' ability to think creatively mathematical namely the model of inquiry learning and teaching model . This study aims to determine whether the inquiry learning model in individually and together better than conventional. This research is a quasi experimental research with the population of students class X SMAN 01 Mukomuko The sample in this study is student class X 3 and class X 1 as a class experiment and X 2 as a class control. This study was conducted in April-May 2015. Data was collected using a mathematical creative thinking ability test. Data were analyzed using statistical tests Anova test of the lanes and the Advanced Test (BNT). Based on calculations obtained Anava no difference mathematically creative thinking abilities of students in class experimen I, experiment II, and class control. Based on the test of Least Significant Difference (LSD) showed that three treatments give different results. Based average value the final test learning  and conventional learning in develop student to think creatively mathematical good to teacher or a student. Keywords : Creative Thinking Mathematically, Inquiry
KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW Lasmi, Lasmi; Masri, Masri
Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU Vol 8, No 3 (2021): Volume 8 Nomor 3 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36085/math-umb.edu.v8i3.2005

Abstract

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model
Co-Authors AA Sudharmawan, AA Abdul jalil Abdurahman Abdurrahman Abqariah Abrar, Faizal Adi Asmara Adriadi, Rekho Afianti, Afianti Agus wiyanto Akbar, Azaz Akbar, Muhammad Hafizh Alensa, Rizki Ammar, Zahran Anggoro, Abdurrobbil Falaq Dwi Anggoro, Shadaqnas Dewarif Tri Anggraini, Dara Anisa Riskayati Anshari, Erwin Anugrah Ilahi, Puja Anwar Thaib Apriyanto, Nanang Aprizal Aprizal ARHAMI Arhami, Arhami Ariani, Nyanyu Masyita Arsyad, Mufid Asmara, Adi Atikah, Nurul Azaz Akbar Azzaman, Muhammad Arba Baehaqi Bahdad, Bahdad Baso Madiong Cecep Nuryadin Destania, Yuriska DEWI HERAWATY Dian Kusumawati Ebrianti, Hepi Laura Fajri, Muhammah Niki Faza Nur Fajrial, Jul Fatmawati Fatmawati Faulina, Riza Febriani, Lia Putri Firdaus Firdaus Fricticarani, Ade Gawise, Gawise Haqiqi, Nurul Azizah Harisma Buburanda, Harisma Hasria Hasria, Hasria Husaini Husaini Husaini Husni Husni Husni Rifqo, Muhammad Ifanda, Anugrah Ifwandi Ifwandi, Ifwandi Irawan, Piki Anderi Irawan, Sukma Isdarianti, Novi Lidya Jesika, Rine Jonaidi, Jonaidi Kamarudin Kamarudin Karimuddin, Karimuddin Kashardi, Kashardi Keminanda, Enjellina Kinanti, Anggi Destri La Ode Ngkoimani, La Ode Lestari, Restu Lestari, Teri Lista, Lista Lubis, Rakhmad Syafutra M Nural Fajri M. Nizar Machmud Maalimut Tanzil Fuad Mahdi Syukri Mai Manan, Manan Mansur Mansur Masitah, Nurul Masyita Ariani, Nyayu Masyita, Nyayu Matje, Irman Muhammad Jafar, Muhammad Mukhlis Mukhlis Muna, Viqah Akmalia Subardin Azis Musran, Musran Nugraha, Iqbal Nugroho, Khathibul Umam Z Nurhadi Santoso Nurhizrah Gistituati Nurrohman, Deni Nurwijayanti Nyayu Masyita Ariani Okto, Ali Peto, Ammar Primadoni, Ade Bagus Putra, T. Edisah Putri, Leni Diyana Rahmat Jumri Rahmi, Nelvin Ramadhan, Alan Muhammad Ramdhan Halid Siregar Rinaldy, Alfian Risnanosanti Risnanosanti Ristiana, Rina Ristontowi, Ristontowi Riwayati, Selvi Rohmah, Siti Nur Rufiana, Rufiana Rusdinal, Rusdinal Ruslan Renggong Sabta Anugrah Safitri, Vickha Ayu Sanusi Sanusi Sari, Dea Julita Sari, Yenny Puspita Septiana, Sara Setianingrum, Riska Siswanto, Rangga Suhaeri Suhaeri, Suhaeri Surani, Dewi Suriadi Suriadi Susanna Susanna Syakban, Ismail Syofiana, Mardiah Tasman, Rali Wahyu Widada Wahyudin Wahyudin Wibisana, Muh. Isna Nurdin Wicahyani, Sri Williyanto, Septian Winda Ramadianti Winda Ramadianti, Winda Yesika, Putri Okta Yolanda, Helpa Yuwaldi Away Zainuddin, Zainuddin Zam Mili, Marwan Zulfikar Zulfikar