Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.969
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Pandecta Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Jurnal Daulat Hukum INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Law Research Review Quarterly Jurnal Esensi Hukum The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence JHCLS Law Development Journal East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Securit Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Administrative and Sosial Science (JASS) Kreasi: Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyaraka Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Journal of Law and Legal Reform The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Tasyri' : Jurnal Muamalah dan Ekonomi Syariah Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services "Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development " Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Journal of Literature Review Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Didakta: International Journal of Social Sciences, Language, and Education Resocia: International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation Indonesian Court and Justice Review Indonesian Minority Justice Review Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies
Ali Masyhar
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 98 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 98 Documents
Search

 6   7   8   9   10 
Relevance of Classical Criminal Law Principles in the Handling of Cybercrimes Indung Wijayanto; Ali Masyhar; Winarsih Winarsih
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): November, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/zvm2mz93

Abstract

Cybercrime presents a significant challenge to traditional legal frameworks, particularly classical criminal law principles such as legality (nullum crimen sine lege), culpability, and proportionality. This study explores the extent to which these foundational principles remain relevant and applicable in Indonesia’s approach to cybercrime. Drawing upon legal doctrinal analysis and statutory review, as well as selected court decisions involving cyber defamation, hacking, and data theft, the research critically assesses how classical principles are being interpreted and adapted in digital contexts. The findings reveal a complex legal landscape: while the principles of legality and culpability continue to serve as cornerstones of criminal justice, ambiguities in cybercrime legislation and expansive interpretations by courts may undermine legal predictability and individual protections. For instance, the broad language of the Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT) Law often clashes with the requirement of specificity in criminal law. This study argues that a careful recalibration of classical doctrines is needed—one that maintains legal safeguards while allowing flexibility in addressing evolving digital harms. The novelty of the research lies in its re-examination of enduring criminal law theories in light of contemporary challenges, offering doctrinal and policy insights for reform. As cybercrime grows more sophisticated, ensuring that criminal law remains principled yet adaptable is both a legal and ethical imperative.
Drawing the Boundary between Extortion in Office and Gratification: An Analysis of Judicial Reasoning in the Syahrul Yasin Limpo Case Ali Masyhar; Ridwan Arifin
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): February, 2026
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/dbejde20

Abstract

The distinction between extortion in office and gratification remains a significant doctrinal issue in Indonesian anti-corruption law because both offences may involve public officials receiving economic benefits in connection with their official positions. However, the legal elements, modes of conduct, and evidentiary requirements applicable to each offence are not identical. This study examines the judicial reasoning in the Syahrul Yasin Limpo case to identify the legal boundary between extortion in office and gratification. The research aims to determine how the court interprets the relationship between official authority, coercion or pressure, receipt of benefits, and the intention underlying the defendant's conduct. A normative juridical method is employed using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The study analyses relevant provisions of Indonesian anti-corruption legislation, the judicial decision, and scholarly interpretations concerning bribery, gratification, abuse of authority, and extortion. The findings indicate that the distinction between these offences should not be based solely on the existence of payments or benefits received by a public official. Instead, judicial assessment should examine the mechanism through which the benefit was obtained, the position and authority of the official, the existence of coercive conduct, and the causal relationship between official duties and the benefit. The study argues that a clear doctrinal distinction is essential to prevent overlapping criminal classifications and arbitrary enforcement. This analysis contributes to the development of a more coherent framework for distinguishing corruption offences involving public officials and strengthens legal certainty in Indonesian anti-corruption adjudication.
Criminal Liability of Corporations and Beneficial Owners in Supreme Court Decision No. 8431–8433 K/PID.SUS/2025: An Analysis of Piercing the Corporate Veil Under the 2023 Criminal Code: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dan Beneficial Owner dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 8431–8433 K/PID.SUS/2025: Analisis Piercing the Corporate Veil Pasca-KUHP 2023 Salsabila, Arini; Masyhar, Ali; Wulandari, Cahya
Al-Jinayah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): June 2026 (Forthcoming)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Study Program, Faculty of Sharia and Law, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil in Supreme Court Decisions Nos. 8431, 8432, and 8433 K/PID.SUS/2025, which convicted the Wilmar Group, Musim Mas Group, and Permata Hijau Group of corruption related to CPO exports and ordered restitution of Rp17.7 trillion. Using a normative legal research method with a legislative, case-based, and conceptual approach, this article discusses: (1) the construction of corporate criminal liability in the 2023 Criminal Code, specifically Article 47 regarding beneficial owners; and (2) the Supreme Court’s application of the “Piercing the Corporate Veil” doctrine. Key findings indicate that the Supreme Court pierces the corporate veil by viewing corporate groups as a single entity and extending liability to beneficial owners. However, the ruling remains dependent on the Anti-Corruption Law (lex specialis), thereby creating a normative gap with the 2023 Criminal Code.
From Hate Speech to Social Exclusion: Rethinking Legal Protection for Religious Minorities in Indonesia's Digital Public Sphere Indah Sri Utari; Ali Masyhar; Ridwan Arifin
Indonesian Minority Justice Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): April, 2026
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/pacv9b83

Abstract

The expansion of digital communication has transformed the production and dissemination of hostility toward religious minorities in Indonesia. Online hate speech can extend beyond verbal harm by reinforcing social stigma, legitimizing discrimination, and contributing to offline intimidation and exclusion. This article examines the relationship between digital hate speech and the broader social marginalization of religious minorities. Using a normative and socio-legal approach, the study analyzes Indonesian legislation governing electronic communication, freedom of expression, religious freedom, and minority protection, together with selected cases and patterns of online discourse. The research applies a rights-based framework to assess the tension between freedom of expression and the state's responsibility to protect minorities from harmful forms of digital hostility. The article argues that existing legal responses frequently concentrate on individual statements and criminal liability while overlooking the structural and cumulative effects of digitally amplified hate. Algorithmic visibility, networked harassment, and repeated stereotyping may create environments in which minority groups are effectively excluded from equal participation in public discourse. The study proposes a broader regulatory framework combining legal accountability, platform responsibility, digital literacy, and effective remedies for targeted communities. It concludes that protecting religious minorities in the digital sphere requires more than criminalizing isolated expressions; it requires addressing the mechanisms through which digital hostility becomes social exclusion and undermines substantive equality.
Policing and Human Rights: Analyzing Excessive Use of Force in Indonesian Law Enforcement Ali Masyhar; Indah Sri Utari
Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/6zp8et83

Abstract

This paper investigates the issue of excessive use of force by law enforcement agencies in Indonesia, focusing on the human rights violations that arise from police brutality and militarized policing. While Indonesia has made significant strides in democratization, concerns about police violence, particularly during protests, anti-terrorism operations, and public disorder management, persist. Using data from human rights organizations, government reports, and interviews with victims, legal experts, and police officials, the study critically examines the legal and institutional factors contributing to excessive use of force in Indonesian policing. The research highlights the role of the police in enforcing order during politically sensitive events, such as demonstrations in Papua and Jakarta, and the broader implications for democratic governance and rule of law. The study also addresses the inadequacies of police accountability mechanisms and the role of judicial oversight in addressing police misconduct. The paper concludes with policy recommendations to improve police training, strengthen oversight, and ensure greater transparency in law enforcement practices.
Human Rights in the Context of Indonesia’s Anti-Terrorism Laws: Balancing National Security and Civil Liberties Ali Masyhar; Ridwan Arifin
Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): July, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/g0kqs526

Abstract

Indonesia’s anti-terrorism laws, enacted in response to security threats, have raised significant concerns regarding their impact on civil liberties, including due process, freedom of expression, and privacy. This paper analyzes how these laws, designed to combat terrorism, may infringe upon basic human rights, particularly with regard to preventive detention, surveillance, and restrictions on political dissent. Using case law, legal texts, and interviews with human rights organizations, the paper examines instances where national security concerns have been used to justify the erosion of civil liberties. The findings indicate that while these laws are crucial for maintaining national security, they often disproportionately affect political activists and marginalized groups. The research proposes a recalibration of Indonesia's counter-terrorism framework to ensure that security measures do not undermine fundamental rights, offering policy recommendations for balancing security with civil liberties. This paper provides a critical analysis of the tensions between national security measures and human rights protections, contributing to the literature on counter-terrorism laws and civil liberties in Indonesia. By focusing on the impact of anti-terrorism laws on human rights, this study offers recommendations for reform that balance national security with the protection of democratic values, advancing the field of human rights law and national security policy.
Judicial Integrity in Indonesia: Addressing Corruption Risks in Court Administration and Judicial Decision-Making Ridwan Arifin; Sergi Fernandez Alejandro; Indah Sri Utari; Ali Masyhar
Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June, 2026
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/fr30gw44

Abstract

Judicial integrity is fundamental to the rule of law because courts exercise authority over individual rights, public administration, and economic disputes. Corruption within judicial institutions can undermine equality before the law and public confidence in legal institutions. This article examines corruption risks within Indonesian court administration and judicial decision-making. Using normative juridical and institutional analysis, the study evaluates judicial ethics, administrative procedures, case allocation, asset disclosure, disciplinary mechanisms, and external oversight. The article argues that judicial anti-corruption policy should address both direct bribery and structural vulnerabilities that create opportunities for improper influence. The study proposes an integrity framework incorporating transparent case management, random case allocation, strengthened asset monitoring, conflict-of-interest disclosure, independent complaint mechanisms, and protection for individuals reporting judicial misconduct. Particular attention is given to the interaction between court users, legal professionals, and judicial officials. The article concludes that judicial integrity requires institutional safeguards capable of reducing discretionary opportunities for corruption while preserving judicial independence. Anti-corruption mechanisms should therefore be carefully designed to enhance accountability without enabling inappropriate interference with legitimate judicial decision-making.
Alasan Pembenar Korban yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Perspektif Teori Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Justika Hairani; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): September : Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : AMIK Veteran Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i3.6560

Abstract

This article explores the concept of justifying grounds (alasan pembenar) in the context of victims who commit criminal acts, analyzed through the lens of criminal liability theory. Under Indonesian criminal law, criminal liability requires the existence of an unlawful act; however, certain conditions may negate the unlawful nature of such acts, one of which includes justifying grounds. The focus of this article is to examine situations in which victims engage in criminal behavior as a response to threats or assaults they have experienced, such as in cases of self defense or coercion. The research employs a normative legal approach by analyzing statutory regulations and legal doctrines. The findings indicate that the application of justifying grounds can exempt victims from criminal liability if their actions meet specific criteria outlined in the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), particularly Articles 48 and 49. The article underscores the importance of a contextual approach in the application of criminal law and highlights the need for caution among law enforcement authorities when evaluating cases in which victims become perpetrators, in order to uphold justice and ensure balanced legal protection.
Co-Authors Abidah, Shofriya Qonitatin Abu, Roziya Achmad Cholidin Ade Adhari Adymas Hikal Fikri, Muhammad Afifah, Bayyinatun Aflah, Muhammad Hilmi Naufal Ahadi, Nugroho Ahmad Gelora Mahardika Ali Murtadho Allamah, Gita Nuzula Amira, Btari Anis Widyawati Anis Widyawati Aprila Niravita Aprila Niravita, Aprila Ariyad, Fikri ASYAFFA RIDZQI AMANDHA Avilla Deva Aryanda Avilla Deva Aryanda Baehaqi Bagus Hendradi Kusuma Bahriyah, Amalina Zukhrufatul Bin Hassan, Muhammad Sayuti Btari Amira Cahya Wulandari Chhachhar, Varun Cipta, Rachmadan Eka Damanik, Yeriko Anugrah Pratama Deo Renaldi Saputra Deo Syahputra, Bearlly Dewi Sulistianingsih Diandra Preludio Ramada Didik Purnomo, Didik Dwi Cahyaningdyah Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah Edi Waluyo Eko Handoyo Emovwodo, Silaas Oghenemaro Eram Tunggul Pawenang Eram Tunggul Pawenang Fahreshi Arya Pinthaka Fahrur Rozi Febriyanti, Diyah Anggun Fernando, Zico Junius Fikri, Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikriyah, Amalina Fuad, Adib Nor Ginta Amelia Cahya Ginta Amelia Cahya Harmoko, Fendi Setyo Hidayatuzzakia, Hana Hudha Bagus Setyadi Idris, Siti Hafsyah Ilahi, M. Ridho Indah Sri Utari Indung Wijayanto Irma Yuliawati, Irma JOKO SUSANTO Joko Widodo Juniza Indah Setiawati Justicea, Nadela Justika Hairani Kamaludin Kamaludin Kusuma, Bagus Hendradi Lagura, Syatriawan Laskarwati, Batari Maharani, Ferra Tiara Mardana Rifta Oktaviana Martitah Maskur, M. Azil Masrukhi Masrukhi Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Haidar Ghoni Muhammad Saifullah Muhammad Wahyu Alfakar Muhtar Hadi Wibowo Mursidah, Siti Nadela Justicea Naelufar, Rizqan Ngboawaji Daniel Nte Ningsih, Ayup Suran Nitha, Fitha Ayun Lutvia Novice Afnan El Fikry Obe, Redentor G A Paramitha Aulia Putri Nandira Paudel , Dolendra Pratiwi, Luh Prabha Primerta Putri Hapsari Puji Astuti Putri Balqis Nuril Hakim Rachmadan Eka Cipta Rahman, Aisha Nur Rahmiati Rahmiati Rahmiati Rahmiati Rajib, Rayi Kharisma Ramadhani, Arief Ramli, Asmarani Rasdi Rasdi, Rasdi Ratih Damayanti Ratih Damayanti Ridwan Arifin Ridwan Arifin Ridwan Arifin Rodiyah Rodiyah - Rohadhatul Aisy Ryadi, Arief Sabri, Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad Salsabila, Arini Saman, Moh Sebastian, Naufal Sergi Fernandez Alejandro Setiawati, Juniza Indah Shidqon Prabowo, Muchammad Solihah, Emi Nugraheni Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono Subhra Sanyal Sudibya, Dafa Pranaja Sarwahita Sugiyarta Stanislaus, Sugiyarta Suhadi Suhadi Suhadi Sukamto Sukamto Suwandoko Syatriawan Lagura Tamba, Arni Ranita Triandani, Salsabila Trias Saputra Ubaidillah Kamal Ulya, Laila Listiana Usman Usman Wahid Anshori Wahyudi Wahyudi Wahyudi Wahyudi Wardhani, Harumsari Puspa Waspiah - Wedhatami, Bayangsari Wibowo, Muhtar Hadi Widodo, Mulyo Widodo, Mulyo Wilson, Jack Andrew Winanta, Rizza Arge Winarsih Winarsih Windiahsari, Windiahsari Zjubaidi, Falikha Ardiyani zulfa Sakhiyya