p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Pandecta Bestuur Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Jurnal Daulat Hukum INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Law Research Review Quarterly Jurnal Esensi Hukum The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence JHCLS Law Development Journal East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Securit Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Administrative and Sosial Science (JASS) Kreasi: Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyaraka Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Journal of Law and Legal Reform The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Tasyri' : Jurnal Muamalah dan Ekonomi Syariah Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) Lex Scientia Law Review Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services "Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development " Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Law Research Review Quarterly Journal of Literature Review Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Legal Challenges in Criminal Execution of The Environmental Crime Cases in Indonesia: Efforts Toward Criminal Law Reform Widyawati, Anis; Fernando, Zico Junius; Arifin, Ridwan; Mursyid, Ali Masyhar
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): (In progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/k1djt237

Abstract

Environmental crimes in Indonesia, including illegal logging, pollution, and ecosystem destruction, continue to pose serious challenges despite the existence of an extensive regulatory framework. Most previous studies on environmental law enforcement in Indonesia have focused on investigation, evidentiary issues, or corporate criminal liability, while the execution of criminal judgments in environmental cases remains underexamined. This article analyzes the legal and institutional obstacles affecting the execution of criminal judgments in environmental crime cases, particularly those involving corporations, fines, additional sanctions, and environmental restoration orders. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. It examines Law on Environmental Protection and Management, the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, and relevant sectoral regulations, and compares the Indonesian framework with selected practices in Germany, Brazil, and the United States. The analysis demonstrates that regulatory disharmony, overlapping institutional authority, limited procedural clarity, and weak post-judgment enforcement mechanisms undermine the effectiveness of environmental criminal law enforcement. The article argues that the central weakness of Indonesian environmental criminal enforcement lies in the post-judgment stage, where fines, additional penalties, corporate compliance orders, and restoration measures frequently remain ineffective in practice
REFORMULASI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEJUDIAN ONLINE Ginta Amelia Cahya; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v3i3.10027

Abstract

The development of information technology has given rise to new forms of crime, one of which is online gambling, characterized by its cross-border nature, anonymity, and digital system-based operations. However, the criminal punishment of such offenses in Indonesia still relies on Article 303 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), which was originally designed to regulate conventional gambling. This condition creates juridical problems because the application of outdated legal norms to online gambling is often carried out through analogical interpretation, which potentially contradicts the principle of legality (nullum crimen sine lege). This study aims to analyze the current criminal punishment framework for online gambling offenses and examine the urgency of reformulating criminal law policy regarding online gambling in Indonesia. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches to relevant court decisions. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources in the form of legislation and secondary legal sources such as legal literature, journals, and expert doctrines. The analysis is conducted qualitatively and descriptively by examining the compatibility of existing legal norms with the development of digital crimes. The results of the study indicate that Article 303 of the Criminal Code is no longer capable of addressing the complexity of online gambling, particularly in terms of offense formulation, legal subjects, and operational mechanisms of digital crime. The existing criminal sanctions are also considered disproportionate to the socio-economic impacts caused, such as money laundering, public financial losses, and increasing derivative crimes. Therefore, the reformulation of criminal law policy has become an urgent necessity through the establishment of specific legal norms explicitly regulating the definition of online gambling, forms of conduct, criminal liability, and proportional sanctions. Thus, the national criminal law system can become more responsive, effective, and capable of providing legal certainty in addressing the development of digital crime. Keywords: Criminal Law Reformulation, Online Gambling, Criminal Policy, Principle Of Legality, Digital Crime.
Sentencing Disparity and the Reformulation of Rehabilitation Policy for Narcotics Users under Law Number 35 of 2009 and the Indonesian National Criminal Code Mardana Rifta Oktaviana; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.66931

Abstract

Drug abuse in Indonesia continues to generate complex legal and public health problems due to the inconsistency between punitive narcotics law enforcement and recovery-oriented rehabilitation policies. Although Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics recognizes rehabilitation through Articles 54, 103, and 127, the implementation of these provisions remains ineffective because the law simultaneously criminalizes narcotics users while providing facultative rehabilitation measures. The phrase “may” in Article 103 creates excessive judicial discretion, resulting in sentencing disparities, inconsistent rehabilitation practices, and the continued dominance of imprisonment for narcotics users. This condition reflects a normative conflict between punitive criminalization under the Narcotics Law and the rehabilitative measures paradigm introduced by Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian National Criminal Code. This study aims to analyze the doctrinal weaknesses of rehabilitation regulation for narcotics users and formulate an integrated rehabilitation model within the national criminal law system. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through qualitative legal analysis of legislation, court decisions, and criminal law doctrines. The study finds that the primary weakness of the current rehabilitation policy lies in the ambiguity of legal subject classification, the absence of standardized assessment mechanisms, and the facultative nature of rehabilitation norms. This study proposes a reformulation model in the form of mandatory conditional rehabilitation for narcotics users and addicts proven to consume narcotics for personal use and not involved in trafficking networks. The reformulation should systematically integrate rehabilitation provisions in the Narcotics Law with rehabilitative measures under Articles 103 and 105 of the Indonesian National Criminal Code to establish a more proportional, health-based, and restorative criminal justice system. This model contributes to contemporary Indonesian criminal law reform by strengthening therapeutic jurisprudence and public health criminal policy approaches in narcotics law enforcement.
Politik Hukum RUU Perampasan Aset Korupsi: Studi Komparatif Non-Convention Based Asset Forfeiture Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Primerta Putri Hapsari; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.7009

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi merupakan kejahatan luar biasa yang menimbulkan kerugian negara secara masif. Sistem pemulihan aset di Indonesia yang masih bergantung pada mekanisme conviction-based forfeiture dinilai tidak memadai dalam menghadapi kompleksitas kejahatan ekonomi modern, sebagaimana tercermin dalam kasus Harvey Moeis di mana uang pengganti yang ditetapkan hanya 0,14 persen dari total kerugian negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji politik hukum pidana Indonesia dalam kerangka RUU Perampasan Aset dan membandingkannya dengan sistem Non-Conviction Based (NCB) Asset Forfeiture di Amerika Serikat. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum dan penarikan kesimpulan secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia menghadapi tiga kelemahan struktural, yakni kekosongan substansi hukum, fragmentasi kewenangan kelembagaan, dan budaya hukum yang berorientasi pada pemidanaan badan. Dibandingkan dengan Amerika Serikat yang telah menerapkan mekanisme civil forfeiture melalui gugatan in rem berdasarkan Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA) 2000, Indonesia masih tertinggal dalam efektivitas pemulihan aset. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengesahan RUU Perampasan Aset dengan adopsi mekanisme NCB model hybrid, penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan KPK, PPATK, dan Kejaksaan Agung, serta pengembangan mekanisme Mutual Legal Assistance yang lebih proaktif.
Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries Masyhar, Ali; Aisy, Rohadhatul; Bahodirovna, Akhmedova Mehrinigor; Mukhanova, Gaini
BESTUUR Vol 12, No 1 (2024): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v12i1.78576

Abstract

Indonesia continues to experience recidivist terrorism regularly as a result of the injustices it faces. As a result, it is critical to prioritize the legitimacy of social justice for both victims and perpetrators, as well as adopt a humanitarian approach to non-criminal terrorism to mitigate and avert criminal acts of terrorism. This research aims to analyze the legitimacy of social justice in counterterrorism environments. This research employs normative juridical research to compare the counterterrorism regulations of several countries that incorporate social justice legitimacy. The findings of this research show that, first, it is crucial to integrate procedural justice and legitimacy principles into counterterrorism initiatives to preserve public confidence in the justice system, prevent exploitation, and uphold human rights. Second, it is critical to compare other countries' terrorism regulations to understand and evaluate their strategies for enhancing international cooperation and preventing terrorist attacks. In response to persistent terrorist threats, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, and the European Union implemented more ambitious counterterrorism strategies and incorporated social justice into their policies. To achieve effective and socially just terrorism regulations, Indonesia must adopt regulations in these countries.
Co-Authors Abidah, Shofriya Qonitatin Abu, Roziya Achmad Cholidin Ade Adhari Adymas Hikal Fikri, Muhammad Afifah, Bayyinatun Aflah, Muhammad Hilmi Naufal Ahadi, Nugroho Ahmad Gelora Mahardika Ali Murtadho Allamah, Gita Nuzula Amancik Amancik Amira, Btari Anis Widyawati Anis Widyawati Aprila Niravita Aprila Niravita, Aprila Ariyad, Fikri Aryanda, Avilla Deva ASYAFFA RIDZQI AMANDHA Avilla Deva Aryanda Baehaqi Bagus Hendradi Kusuma Bahodirovna, Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahriyah, Amalina Zukhrufatul Barus, Sonia Ivana Bin Hassan, Muhammad Sayuti Btari Amira Cahya Wulandari Chhachhar, Varun Cipta, Rachmadan Eka Damanik, Yeriko Anugrah Pratama Deo Syahputra, Bearlly Dewi Sulistianingsih Diandra Preludio Ramada, Diandra Preludio Didik Purnomo, Didik Dwi Cahyaningdyah Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah Edi Waluyo Eko Handoyo Emovwodo, Silaas Oghenemaro Eram Tunggul Pawenang Eram Tunggul Pawenang Fahreshi Arya Pinthaka Fahrur Rozi Fatihah, Kaila Intan Febriyanti, Diyah Anggun Fernando, Zico Junius Fikri, Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikriyah, Amalina Fuad, Adib Nor Ghoni, Muhammad Haidar Ginta Amelia Cahya Harmoko, Fendi Setyo Hassan, Muhamad Sayuti Hidayatuzzakia, Hana Hudha Bagus Setyadi Idris, Siti Hafsyah Ilahi, M. Ridho Irma Yuliawati, Irma JOKO SUSANTO Joko Widodo Juniza Indah Setiawati Justicea, Nadela Justika Hairani Kamaludin Kamaludin Kusuma, Bagus Hendradi Lagura, Syatriawan Laskarwati, Batari Maharani, Ferra Tiara Mardana Rifta Oktaviana Martitah Maskur, M. Azil Masrukhi Masrukhi Muhammad Azam Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Wahyu Alfakar Muhtar Hadi Wibowo Mukhanova, Gaini Musdalifah, Dyajeng Ayu Nadela Justicea Nadhira Madania Dimarti Naelufar, Rizqan Ngboawaji Daniel Nte Ningsih, Ayup Suran Nitha, Fitha Ayun Lutvia Nur, Asrul Ibrahim Obe, Redentor G A Paudel , Dolendra Pratiwi, Luh Prabha Primerta Putri Hapsari Puji Astuti Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh Putri Balqis Nuril Hakim Rachmadan Eka Cipta Rahman, Aisha Nur Rahmiati Rahmiati Rahmiati Rahmiati Rajib, Rayi Kharisma Ramadhani, Arief Ramli, Asmarani Rasdi Rasdi, Rasdi Ratih Damayanti Ridwan Arifin Rodiyah - Rohadhatul Aisy Ryadi, Arief Sabri, Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad Saman, Moh Sanyal, Subhra Sebastian, Naufal Setiawati, Juniza Indah Shidqon Prabowo, Muchammad Siti Mursidah Solihah, Emi Nugraheni Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono Sudibya, Dafa Pranaja Sarwahita Sugiyarta Stanislaus, Sugiyarta Suhadi Suhadi Sukamto Sukamto Syatriawan Lagura Tamba, Arni Ranita Tiara Maharani, Tiara Triandani, Salsabila Trias Saputra Ubaidillah Kamal Ulya, Laila Listiana Usman Usman Wahyudi Wahyudi Wahyudi Wahyudi Wardhani, Harumsari Puspa Waspiah - Wedhatami, Bayangsari Wibowo, Muhtar Hadi Widodo, Mulyo Widodo, Mulyo Wilson, Jack Andrew Windiahsari, Windiahsari Zjubaidi, Falikha Ardiyani zulfa Sakhiyya