Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.969
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Pandecta Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Jurnal Daulat Hukum INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Law Research Review Quarterly Jurnal Esensi Hukum The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence JHCLS Law Development Journal East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Securit Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Administrative and Sosial Science (JASS) Kreasi: Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyaraka Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Journal of Law and Legal Reform The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Tasyri' : Jurnal Muamalah dan Ekonomi Syariah Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services "Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development " Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Journal of Literature Review Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Didakta: International Journal of Social Sciences, Language, and Education Resocia: International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation Indonesian Court and Justice Review Indonesian Minority Justice Review Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies
Ali Masyhar
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 98 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 98 Documents
Search

 6   7   8   9   10 
Sentencing Disparity and the Reformulation of Rehabilitation Policy for Narcotics Users under Law Number 35 of 2009 and the Indonesian National Criminal Code Mardana Rifta Oktaviana; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.66931

Abstract

Drug abuse in Indonesia continues to generate complex legal and public health problems due to the inconsistency between punitive narcotics law enforcement and recovery-oriented rehabilitation policies. Although Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics recognizes rehabilitation through Articles 54, 103, and 127, the implementation of these provisions remains ineffective because the law simultaneously criminalizes narcotics users while providing facultative rehabilitation measures. The phrase “may” in Article 103 creates excessive judicial discretion, resulting in sentencing disparities, inconsistent rehabilitation practices, and the continued dominance of imprisonment for narcotics users. This condition reflects a normative conflict between punitive criminalization under the Narcotics Law and the rehabilitative measures paradigm introduced by Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian National Criminal Code. This study aims to analyze the doctrinal weaknesses of rehabilitation regulation for narcotics users and formulate an integrated rehabilitation model within the national criminal law system. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through qualitative legal analysis of legislation, court decisions, and criminal law doctrines. The study finds that the primary weakness of the current rehabilitation policy lies in the ambiguity of legal subject classification, the absence of standardized assessment mechanisms, and the facultative nature of rehabilitation norms. This study proposes a reformulation model in the form of mandatory conditional rehabilitation for narcotics users and addicts proven to consume narcotics for personal use and not involved in trafficking networks. The reformulation should systematically integrate rehabilitation provisions in the Narcotics Law with rehabilitative measures under Articles 103 and 105 of the Indonesian National Criminal Code to establish a more proportional, health-based, and restorative criminal justice system. This model contributes to contemporary Indonesian criminal law reform by strengthening therapeutic jurisprudence and public health criminal policy approaches in narcotics law enforcement.
Politik Hukum RUU Perampasan Aset Korupsi: Studi Komparatif Non-Convention Based Asset Forfeiture Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Primerta Putri Hapsari; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.7009

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi merupakan kejahatan luar biasa yang menimbulkan kerugian negara secara masif. Sistem pemulihan aset di Indonesia yang masih bergantung pada mekanisme conviction-based forfeiture dinilai tidak memadai dalam menghadapi kompleksitas kejahatan ekonomi modern, sebagaimana tercermin dalam kasus Harvey Moeis di mana uang pengganti yang ditetapkan hanya 0,14 persen dari total kerugian negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji politik hukum pidana Indonesia dalam kerangka RUU Perampasan Aset dan membandingkannya dengan sistem Non-Conviction Based (NCB) Asset Forfeiture di Amerika Serikat. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum dan penarikan kesimpulan secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia menghadapi tiga kelemahan struktural, yakni kekosongan substansi hukum, fragmentasi kewenangan kelembagaan, dan budaya hukum yang berorientasi pada pemidanaan badan. Dibandingkan dengan Amerika Serikat yang telah menerapkan mekanisme civil forfeiture melalui gugatan in rem berdasarkan Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA) 2000, Indonesia masih tertinggal dalam efektivitas pemulihan aset. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengesahan RUU Perampasan Aset dengan adopsi mekanisme NCB model hybrid, penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan KPK, PPATK, dan Kejaksaan Agung, serta pengembangan mekanisme Mutual Legal Assistance yang lebih proaktif.
Objectification of Conditional Death Penalty Criteria Under Article 100 of The Criminal Code Perspective Legality And Legal Certainty Novice Afnan El Fikry; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari; Muhammad Saifullah; Wahid Anshori
International Journal of Social Sciences, Language, and Education Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : April: Didakta: International Journal of Social Sciences, Language, and Educa
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/1m9wmk22

Abstract

This study examines the regulation of conditional death penalty under Article 100 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code from the perspectives of legality and legal certainty while formulating objective and accountable assessment criteria for sentence commutation. Employing a normative legal research method, the study utilizes statutory and conceptual approaches supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis demonstrates that the introduction of a ten year probation period reflects a significant transformation in Indonesian sentencing policy toward a corrective and rehabilitative orientation. However, the legal concepts of remorse and commendable conduct remain insufficiently defined, creating risks of subjective interpretation and inconsistent application. To address this problem, the study develops objective indicators based on responsibility acceptance, rehabilitation participation, behavioural consistency, institutional compliance, positive correctional engagement, and social adaptation. The study further proposes a multidisciplinary assessment framework involving correctional officers, psychologists, criminologists, legal experts, and an integrated assessment board supported by documentation, verification, periodic review, and written justification mechanisms. These findings indicate that the objectification of evaluative criteria and the institutionalization of accountable assessment procedures strengthen legality, enhance legal certainty, and improve the legitimacy of conditional death penalty implementation within a rule of law based criminal justice system.
Legal Analysis of the Modus Operandi of Terrorism Funding Under the Guise of Charity: Analisis Hukum Terhadap Modus Operandi Pendanaan Terorisme Berkedok Amal Muhammad Haidar Ghoni; Ali Masyhar
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.24075

Abstract

Terrorist funding is an important part of a series of terrorist acts. Various methods are used by terrorist groups to obtain funds as an effort to continue to exist to spread radicalism and carry out acts of terror. According to data, the population in Indonesia has a high level of generosity in the world, this makes terrorist groups take advantage of opportunities by using the guise of charity by using non-profit organizations (NPOs) to obtain funds with structured methods and without using violence. This study aims to analyze the mode used by NPOs in carrying out the guise of charity as a medium for collecting funds and the form of formulation for eradicating terrorism funding that has been taken by the government, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of these policies and actions in the national context. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach. This study emphasizes the aspect of fundraising carried out by NPOs in a series of terrorism funding activities. The Indonesian government must always control NPOs by coordinating with related institutions. This is a step in overcoming terrorism funding under the guise of charity in order to create safe and responsible fundraising activities which will be explained in this study.
Reconstruction of Restorative Justice for Drug Users in Metro Jaya Police Jurisdiction Paramitha Aulia Putri Nandira; Masyhar, Ali; Wulandari, Cahya
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/lg.v15i1.34385

Abstract

Drug abuse is a serious problem in Indonesia’s criminal justice system, which has traditionally been addressed through a repressive approach by treating drug users as offenders who must be punished. This approach is considered ineffective because it does not address the root cause of drug dependency. Therefore, restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach that emphasizes recovery through rehabilitation mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the implementation of restorative justice for drug users within the jurisdiction of the Metro Jaya Regional Police and to formulate a more effective policy reconstruction based on humanitarian principles. This research employs empirical legal research with a socio-legal approach by collecting primary data through interviews with law enforcement officers and observations at the Directorate of Narcotics Investigation of the Metro Jaya Regional Police, as well as secondary data from legislation, legal literature, and institutional reports. The findings show that restorative justice has been implemented through an integrated assessment mechanism that directs drug users to medical and social rehabilitation programs. However, its implementation still faces challenges, including limited rehabilitation facilities, suboptimal inter-agency coordination, and differing paradigms among law enforcement officers. This study proposes reconstruction through strengthening rehabilitation regulations, optimizing assessment mechanisms, improving rehabilitation capacity, transforming law enforcement paradigms, and strengthening inter-agency coordination. This reconstruction is expected to enhance the implementation of restorative justice and create a more humane, recovery-oriented law enforcement system.
Juridical Analysis of the Culpa in Causa Principle in Indonesian Criminal Law Reform (Study of Law No. 1 of 2023) Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah; Ali Masyhar
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.4.809-816

Abstract

The explicit integration of the culpa in causa principle in Pasal 55 of Law No. 1 of 2023 one the New Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP Baru) refolutionizes criminal law by limiting the misuse of grounds for exemption from punishment, such as necessity and self-defense, when the offender intentionally creates those conditions. Unlike the old KUHP’s implicit reliance on jurisprudence, this provision strengthens the geen straf zonder schuld principle while balancing judicial pardon authority, through proof of subjective causality via at least two valid pieces of evidence. Courts distinguish it from objective justifications by analyzing initial intent, nullifying subsidiarity without eliminating the defendant’s subjective fault. Impacts include optimized restorative justice, legal certainty, reduced impunity from provocation, and proportional individualized sanctions, fostering an adaptive penal system that protects victims while upholding humanity. This reform aligns continental doctrines with national contexts, enhancing judicial legitimacy.
Conservation Based Disaster Resilient Schools in Realizing Legal Protection from Disaster Risks in Magelang Regency Suwandoko; Rizza Arge Winanta; Rodiyah; Suhadi; Ali Masyhar
Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v9i1.35632

Abstract

Magelang Regency is a region with a high level of disaster vulnerability, as recorded by the Regional Disaster Management Agency in 2020-2024, showing several disasters that occurred, including landslides, earthquakes, extreme weather, building fires, forest fires, droughts, volcanic eruptions, and floods. This situation demands concrete steps in disaster mitigation, especially for vulnerable groups such as children. Children are not physically and mentally prepared to face disasters, and their knowledge of disaster risk reduction is still limited. Schools are strategic places to build preparedness while providing legal protection for children in emergency situations. This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing disaster resilient schools as a mitigation strategy and analyze the concept of conservation based disaster resilient schools to realize legal protection from disaster risks in Magelang Regency. The research method used is empirical juridical research. The results of the research on the urgency of disaster resilient schools as disaster mitigation in Magelang Regency are seen from the aspect of Pancasila, especially the 5th principle. The sociological aspect is that there are 106 Elementary Schools and 21 Junior High Schools located in disaster prone zones, while legally supported by various regulations related to formulating disaster resilient schools. The concept of conservation based disaster resilient schools realizes legal protection from disaster risks in Magelang Regency, namely by integrating elements of legal protection and conservation principles to realize sustainable legal protection for all school residents in facing potential disasters in Magelang Regency. The conclusion of the study shows the urgency of having disaster resilient schools and the concept of conservation based disaster resilient schools that integrate legal protection as a guarantee of safety and sustainability of children's educational rights in disaster prone areas. Suggestions for the need a synergistic relationship between schools in Magelang Regency, the Magelang Regency Education Office, and the Magelang Regency Regional Disaster Management Agency in the formation of conservation based disaster responsible schools as an effort to provide legal protection from disaster risks.
The Evolution of Corporate Criminal Liability in Indonesia: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis of Judgment No. 1405 K/Pid.Sus/2013 and the 2023 Criminal Code Deo Renaldi Saputra; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): April: Resocia: International Journal of Applied Research and Innovation
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/1egvns71

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia through a theoretical and comparative analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number 1405 K/Pid.Sus/2013 and the regulatory framework introduced by Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code. The research aims to analyze how the construction of corporate liability has developed from a model centered on individual attribution of fault toward a more systemic and organizational form of responsibility. This study employs normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The primary legal materials include the Supreme Court decision and relevant statutory provisions governing corporate criminal liability, while secondary materials consist of scholarly articles and legal literature discussing modern corporate liability doctrines. The findings show that the Supreme Court decision still relies on identification theory, where the actions and intentions of corporate managers are attributed to the corporation. In contrast, the 2023 Criminal Code introduces broader parameters of liability, including failure to prevent, omission, and control by beneficial owners. This shift reflects a significant transformation toward organizational liability, strengthening the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement against corporate crimes in Indonesia
Legal Politics of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement in Encouraging Investment and Innovation: Implementation Study in Indonesia Avilla Deva Aryanda; Ali Masyhar
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.50726

Abstract

Intellectual property rights play an essential role in advancing and improving investment activities in Indonesia. Investment activities can develop rapidly with the existence of intellectual property rights that have the aim of providing legal protection and legal certainty for these investment activities. In this scientific article, two legal problems will be explained, namely, among others, regarding the enforcement of intellectual property rights in encouraging investment and innovation activities in Indonesia and regarding the legal political strategy in balancing the interests of holders or owners of intellectual property rights in investment activities and public interests. In writing this scientific article, the author uses a type of research in the form of normative research using various legal materials to produce various arguments, concepts, and new theories that can later resolve existing legal problems. Then, in this scientific article, two research results will also be explained regarding two existing legal problems, namely, among others, trademark enforcement which has a function as a differentiator for various investment products, and copyright, and patent enforcement which has a function as a potential asset of intangible objects and regarding the protection of intellectual property rights by providing exclusive rights to holders or owners of intellectual property rights but still paying attention to the public interest in encouraging investment and innovation activities in Indonesia.
REHABILITASI ATAU PIDANA? STUDI KRITIS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA BERBASIS TEORI PEMIDANAAN INTEGRATIF Ginta Amelia Cahya; Ali Masyhar; Cahya Wulandari
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 6 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2026.v14.i06.p08

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kerangka regulasi keadilan restoratif di Indonesia, menelusuri landasan teoretis yang menopangnya, serta mengkaji penerapannya dalam penanganan perkara penyalahgunaan narkotika pada tahap penyidikan kepolisian. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, melalui telaah bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan komparasi hukum. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa keadilan restoratif telah mendapatkan legitimasi normatif melalui berbagai instrumen hukum, di antaranya Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Perpol Nomor 8 Tahun 2021, Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020, Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2024, serta semakin terpadukan dalam KUHP Nasional dan KUHAP (UU No. 20 Tahun 2025). Dari sudut pandang teoretis, orientasi pemidanaan mengalami transformasi dari paradigma retributif ke arah pendekatan yang lebih restoratif dan rehabilitatif, dengan menempatkan pemulihan, keseimbangan sosial, dan reintegrasi pelaku sebagai prioritas. Dalam konteks narkotika, pengguna narkotika dapat diposisikan sebagai korban yang memerlukan rehabilitasi medis maupun psikososial. Meski demikian, penerapan keadilan restoratif di tingkat kepolisian belum berjalan optimal akibat adanya keterbatasan regulasi, ketidakseragaman penafsiran, lemahnya asesmen, koordinasi lintas lembaga yang belum efektif, serta terbatasnya sarana rehabilitasi. Oleh karenanya, diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi, penguatan kapasitas aparat, dan sinergi lintas sektor guna mendukung implementasi yang lebih efektif dan berkelanjutan. This research aims to examine the regulatory framework of restorative justice in Indonesia, to trace the theoretical foundations underlying its application in narcotics offenses, and to analyze its implementation in resolving narcotics criminal cases at the police level. A normative juridical approach is applied, combining statutory and conceptual analyses of primary and secondary legal sources along with comparative legal studies. The findings reveal that restorative justice has gained normative grounding through multiple legal instruments, including the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021, Prosecutor Regulation Number 15 of 2020, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024, and has been progressively embedded in the newly enacted Criminal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). From a theoretical standpoint, the philosophy of punishment has undergone a fundamental shift away from a retributive orientation toward more integrative, restorative, and rehabilitative objectives, centering on recovery, social equilibrium, and the offender’s reintegration into society. In the specific context of narcotics enforcement, the application of Restorative Justice carries distinct characteristics, given that drug abusers are regarded as victims of dependency who require medical and social rehabilitation rather than punitive measures. Nonetheless, its implementation at the police level remains suboptimal. This is illustrated by the contrasting outcomes of two cases: the Rambu case, where restorative justice was successfully applied, and the Iman case, where procedural and institutional constraints prevented its use. These disparities are attributable to regulatory gaps, inadequate assessment mechanisms, diverging interpretations among law enforcement personnel, limited inter-agency coordination, and insufficient rehabilitation infrastructure. Consequently, regulatory harmonization, capacity-building among law enforcement, and stronger cross-sectoral cooperation are essential to ensure that Restorative Justice in Indonesia is implemented effectively and sustainably.
Co-Authors Abidah, Shofriya Qonitatin Abu, Roziya Achmad Cholidin Ade Adhari Adymas Hikal Fikri, Muhammad Afifah, Bayyinatun Aflah, Muhammad Hilmi Naufal Ahadi, Nugroho Ahmad Gelora Mahardika Ali Murtadho Allamah, Gita Nuzula Amira, Btari Anis Widyawati Anis Widyawati Aprila Niravita Aprila Niravita, Aprila Ariyad, Fikri ASYAFFA RIDZQI AMANDHA Avilla Deva Aryanda Avilla Deva Aryanda Baehaqi Bagus Hendradi Kusuma Bahriyah, Amalina Zukhrufatul Bin Hassan, Muhammad Sayuti Btari Amira Cahya Wulandari Chhachhar, Varun Cipta, Rachmadan Eka Damanik, Yeriko Anugrah Pratama Deo Renaldi Saputra Deo Syahputra, Bearlly Dewi Sulistianingsih Diandra Preludio Ramada Didik Purnomo, Didik Dwi Cahyaningdyah Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah Dyajeng Ayu Musdalifah Edi Waluyo Eko Handoyo Emovwodo, Silaas Oghenemaro Eram Tunggul Pawenang Eram Tunggul Pawenang Fahreshi Arya Pinthaka Fahrur Rozi Febriyanti, Diyah Anggun Fernando, Zico Junius Fikri, Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikriyah, Amalina Fuad, Adib Nor Ginta Amelia Cahya Ginta Amelia Cahya Harmoko, Fendi Setyo Hidayatuzzakia, Hana Hudha Bagus Setyadi Idris, Siti Hafsyah Ilahi, M. Ridho Indah Sri Utari Indung Wijayanto Irma Yuliawati, Irma JOKO SUSANTO Joko Widodo Juniza Indah Setiawati Justicea, Nadela Justika Hairani Kamaludin Kamaludin Kusuma, Bagus Hendradi Lagura, Syatriawan Laskarwati, Batari Maharani, Ferra Tiara Mardana Rifta Oktaviana Martitah Maskur, M. Azil Masrukhi Masrukhi Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad Haidar Ghoni Muhammad Saifullah Muhammad Wahyu Alfakar Muhtar Hadi Wibowo Mursidah, Siti Nadela Justicea Naelufar, Rizqan Ngboawaji Daniel Nte Ningsih, Ayup Suran Nitha, Fitha Ayun Lutvia Novice Afnan El Fikry Obe, Redentor G A Paramitha Aulia Putri Nandira Paudel , Dolendra Pratiwi, Luh Prabha Primerta Putri Hapsari Puji Astuti Putri Balqis Nuril Hakim Rachmadan Eka Cipta Rahman, Aisha Nur Rahmiati Rahmiati Rahmiati Rahmiati Rajib, Rayi Kharisma Ramadhani, Arief Ramli, Asmarani Rasdi Rasdi, Rasdi Ratih Damayanti Ratih Damayanti Ridwan Arifin Ridwan Arifin Ridwan Arifin Rodiyah Rodiyah - Rohadhatul Aisy Ryadi, Arief Sabri, Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad Salsabila, Arini Saman, Moh Sebastian, Naufal Sergi Fernandez Alejandro Setiawati, Juniza Indah Shidqon Prabowo, Muchammad Solihah, Emi Nugraheni Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono Subhra Sanyal Sudibya, Dafa Pranaja Sarwahita Sugiyarta Stanislaus, Sugiyarta Suhadi Suhadi Suhadi Sukamto Sukamto Suwandoko Syatriawan Lagura Tamba, Arni Ranita Triandani, Salsabila Trias Saputra Ubaidillah Kamal Ulya, Laila Listiana Usman Usman Wahid Anshori Wahyudi Wahyudi Wahyudi Wahyudi Wardhani, Harumsari Puspa Waspiah - Wedhatami, Bayangsari Wibowo, Muhtar Hadi Widodo, Mulyo Widodo, Mulyo Wilson, Jack Andrew Winanta, Rizza Arge Winarsih Winarsih Windiahsari, Windiahsari Zjubaidi, Falikha Ardiyani zulfa Sakhiyya