Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
16.992
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Kertha Semaya Wacana Hukum DE JURE Bestuur Lentera Hukum Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Cita Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Diponegoro Law Review El-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Pembaharuan Hukum Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM AKSIOLOGIYA : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Varia Justicia Jurnal HAM Lex Scientia Law Review Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI International Journal of Supply Chain Management Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Jurnal Yudisial Asia Pacific Fraud Journal Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Mulawarman Law Review JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Unnes Law Journal Law Research Review Quarterly Journal of Community Service and Empowerment LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Journal of Morality and Legal Culture Journal of Judicial Review Indonesian Journal of Law and Society JHCLS Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Jurnal Konstitusi Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Hang Tuah Law Journal Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues International Journal of Law and Society Journal of Law and Legal Reform Domus Legalis Cogitatio Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 142 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY

 1 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP IKAN HIU DAN IKAN PARI UNTUK MENJAGA KESEIMBANGAN EKOSISTEM LAUT INDONESIA Aditya, Zaka Firma; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24, No 2 (2016): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (275.31 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/jihl.v24i2.4273

Abstract

The population of sharks and rays in Indonesia threatened with extinction. Based on the findings of WWF Indonesia that there are at least 10 million sharks caught in Indonesian waters each year for commercial purposes. Urgency of protection against sharks and stingrays are not only conservation activities related to efforts to save species of marine animals from extinction, but also related to global environmental issues. Until this time there has been no regulation of the Indonesian government, which specifically provides protection to the conservation of sharks and rays in Indonesia’s marine waters. In this paper, the author will discuss two findings. First, the lack of regulations that provide legal protection to sharks and stingrays from illegal fishing activity. Secondly, there are two efforts can be made by the government, repressive and preventive measures. A repressive measure carried out by law enforcement with a very heavy sanction the perpetrators of fishing of sharks and stingrays. Preventive efforts done by making shark conservation areas and through education and awareness to the community.
MODEL PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN SATU ATAP MELALUI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 25, No 2 (2017): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (397.982 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/jihl.v25i2.6005

Abstract

Post-reform of the role of judicial institution is run by two institutions namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The duties and authorities of the two institutions are regulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 and the act that addresses the three institutions more specifically. Several powers possessed by the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, one of them is the authority to judicial review. The Constitutional Court is authorized to review the act on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945, while the Supreme Court is authorized to review under the Act on the above legislation.The unfairness of the regulatory testing function is feared to trigger bureaucratic inefficiency. Based on data released by the Supreme Court Clerk, it was recorded during 2016 that the Supreme Court received 18,514 cases, including the Hak Uji Materi (HUM) subject to legislation under the Act. While the number of cases of judicial review of the Constitutional Court in 2016-2017 amounted to only 332 cases. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a bureaucratic reform and provide new ideas related to the model of one court of judicial review in Indonesia. So that in this paper will be discussed deeply about problematic of judicial review in Indonesia and the authority of the Constitutional Court to review the act under one roof with SIJURI mechanism.
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM COMMON LAW, CIVIL LAW DAN ISLAMIC LAW DALAM PERSPEKTIF SEJARAH DAN KARAKTERISTIK BERPIKIR Aulia, Farihan; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 25, No 1 (2017): Maret
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (414.858 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/jihl.v25i1.5993

Abstract

The legal system or commonly referred to as the legal tradition, has a wealth of scientific treasures that can be examined in more depth through a holistic and comprehensive comparative process. Exactly, the comparison of the legal system must accommodate at least three legal systems that are widely used by countries in the world today. The three legal systems are the Continental European legal system, Anglo American and Islamic Law. The comparative study of the three types of legal systems found that the history of the Continental European legal system is divided into 6 phases, while Anglo American legal history began in the feudalistic era of England until it developed into America and continues to be studied until now. Meanwhile, the history of Islamic law is divided into 5 phases, starting from the Phase of the Prophet Muhammad to the Resurrection Phase (19th century until nowadays). In addition to history, the authors find that the Continental European legal system has the characteristic of anti-formalism thinking, while the Anglo American legal thinking characteristic tends to be formalism and is based on a relatively primitive mindset. While the thinking character of Islamic Law is much influenced by the thought of the fuqoha (fiqh experts) in determining the law to solve a problem, so relatively dynamic and moderate.
THE LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST TERRORISM SUSPECTS IN INDONESIA (CASE STUDY OF THE ARREST PROCESS OF TERRORISM SUSPECTS BY DENSUS 88) Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Aditya, Zaka Firma
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 27, No 1 (2019): Maret
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (323.089 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/jihl.v27i1.8954

Abstract

Terrorism is a form of extraordinary crime that not only leads to lives and material losses, but also creates a continuing fear in society. Backed by the many cases of terrorism with suicide bombing mode, especially in the case of Bali Bombing 1 and 2, then born special datachment 88 (Densus 88) which has the obligation to combat terrorism. Unfortunately, in cracking down on the perpetrators of terror, even those still suspected as terrorist suspects, Densus 88 often uses violence and even shoots off on the spot. The late Siyono was one of the victims of repressive measures carried out by Densus 88. In other cases, Densus 88 is also often proven to mis-arrest after the suspect has lost his life. This condition is certainly contrary to the spirit of democracy and efforts to guarantee human rights protection in Indonesia. This paper discusses: (1) the Standard Operational Procedure of terrorist suspected arrest process by Densus 88 and its comparison with anti terrorism agency in other country; and (2) Guarantees and legal protection in the fulfillment of the rights of suspected terrorists.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP IKAN HIU DAN IKAN PARI UNTUK MENJAGA KESEIMBANGAN EKOSISTEM LAUT INDONESIA Zaka Firma Aditya; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2016): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The population of sharks and rays in Indonesia threatened with extinction. Based on the findings of WWF Indonesia that there are at least 10 million sharks caught in Indonesian waters each year for commercial purposes. Urgency of protection against sharks and stingrays are not only conservation activities related to efforts to save species of marine animals from extinction, but also related to global environmental issues. Until this time there has been no regulation of the Indonesian government, which specifically provides protection to the conservation of sharks and rays in Indonesia’s marine waters. In this paper, the author will discuss two findings. First, the lack of regulations that provide legal protection to sharks and stingrays from illegal fishing activity. Secondly, there are two efforts can be made by the government, repressive and preventive measures. A repressive measure carried out by law enforcement with a very heavy sanction the perpetrators of fishing of sharks and stingrays. Preventive efforts done by making shark conservation areas and through education and awareness to the community.
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM COMMON LAW, CIVIL LAW DAN ISLAMIC LAW DALAM PERSPEKTIF SEJARAH DAN KARAKTERISTIK BERPIKIR Farihan Aulia; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 (2017): Maret
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The legal system or commonly referred to as the legal tradition, has a wealth of scientific treasures that can be examined in more depth through a holistic and comprehensive comparative process. Exactly, the comparison of the legal system must accommodate at least three legal systems that are widely used by countries in the world today. The three legal systems are the Continental European legal system, Anglo American and Islamic Law. The comparative study of the three types of legal systems found that the history of the Continental European legal system is divided into 6 phases, while Anglo American legal history began in the feudalistic era of England until it developed into America and continues to be studied until now. Meanwhile, the history of Islamic law is divided into 5 phases, starting from the Phase of the Prophet Muhammad to the Resurrection Phase (19th century until nowadays). In addition to history, the authors find that the Continental European legal system has the characteristic of anti-formalism thinking, while the Anglo American legal thinking characteristic tends to be formalism and is based on a relatively primitive mindset. While the thinking character of Islamic Law is much influenced by the thought of the fuqoha (fiqh experts) in determining the law to solve a problem, so relatively dynamic and moderate.
MODEL PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN SATU ATAP MELALUI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 25 No. 2 (2017): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Post-reform of the role of judicial institution is run by two institutions namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The duties and authorities of the two institutions are regulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 and the act that addresses the three institutions more specifically. Several powers possessed by the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, one of them is the authority to judicial review. The Constitutional Court is authorized to review the act on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945, while the Supreme Court is authorized to review under the Act on the above legislation.The unfairness of the regulatory testing function is feared to trigger bureaucratic inefficiency. Based on data released by the Supreme Court Clerk, it was recorded during 2016 that the Supreme Court received 18,514 cases, including the Hak Uji Materi (HUM) subject to legislation under the Act. While the number of cases of judicial review of the Constitutional Court in 2016-2017 amounted to only 332 cases. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a bureaucratic reform and provide new ideas related to the model of one court of judicial review in Indonesia. So that in this paper will be discussed deeply about problematic of judicial review in Indonesia and the authority of the Constitutional Court to review the act under one roof with SIJURI mechanism.
THE LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST TERRORISM SUSPECTS IN INDONESIA (CASE STUDY OF THE ARREST PROCESS OF TERRORISM SUSPECTS BY DENSUS 88) Sholahuddin Al-Fatih; Zaka Firma Aditya
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019): Maret
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Terrorism is a form of extraordinary crime that not only leads to lives and material losses, but also creates a continuing fear in society. Backed by the many cases of terrorism with suicide bombing mode, especially in the case of Bali Bombing 1 and 2, then born special datachment 88 (Densus 88) which has the obligation to combat terrorism. Unfortunately, in cracking down on the perpetrators of terror, even those still suspected as terrorist suspects, Densus 88 often uses violence and even shoots off on the spot. The late Siyono was one of the victims of repressive measures carried out by Densus 88. In other cases, Densus 88 is also often proven to mis-arrest after the suspect has lost his life. This condition is certainly contrary to the spirit of democracy and efforts to guarantee human rights protection in Indonesia. This paper discusses: (1) the Standard Operational Procedure of terrorist suspected arrest process by Densus 88 and its comparison with anti terrorism agency in other country; and (2) Guarantees and legal protection in the fulfillment of the rights of suspected terrorists.
The legal protection system of indigenous peoples in Southeast Asia Aditya, Zaka Firma; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 31 No. 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v31i2.27619

Abstract

Globalization has a bad impact on the indigenous peoples in Southeast Asia countries. The demands of globalization have led the governments in Southeast Asia countries to exploit and industrialize indigenous regions excessively, resulting in marginalized indigenous peoples and the threat of extinction. Not intended for the benefit and welfare of indigenous peoples, the policy made by the government in several Southeast Asia countries did much to reduce the value of humanity and the rights of indigenous peoples. Even with rapid industrialization in Southeast Asia countries, many indigenous peoples are poor, left far behind, and illiterate due to isolation from the outside world. This paper aims to analyze the legal protection of indigenous people in Southeast Asia, especially in facing digital age. By normative juridical method, this paper found that the government and developers' exploitation of indigenous peoples in the region has always been laden with conflicts between the government, the developers (economic motive), and indigenous peoples, and such conflicts of interest are usually won by the interests of the government and/or developers. Indigenous peoples' right to sue for damages caused is sometimes hampered with difficulty simply because the government holds powerful and dominant standing in courts. Moreover, most countries in the Southeast Asia region does not have customary courts in their judicial institution.
Co-Authors A Salman Maggalatung, A Salman Aan Eko Widiarto Abdul Chalim Abdul Kadir Abdullah, Umar Abdurrahman Raden Aji Haqqi Abdurrahman Raden Aji Haqqi Adzimi, Muhammad Wildan Ramadhan Afrizal Mukti Wibowo Ahmad Faiz Alamsyah Ahmad Murtadho Ahmad Siboy Aisya Sanghra Devi Nugraha Akmal Maulana N. M. Alam, Moch. Zairul Ali Roziqin AllahRakha, Naeem Amiruddin, Denie Andre Purnairawan Angelina Lucky Rahmawati Arinta, Ulfa Aristo Arie Notoprojo Asep Syarifuddin Hidayat, Asep Syarifuddin Asrul Ibrahim Nur Asrul Ibrahim Nur Asrul Ibrahim Nur Asyari, Muhammad Dahlan Aulia, Farihan Bayu Aji Satria Bernieka Nur Annisa Borsa, Merve Ozkan Brillian Gustama Catur Wido Haruni Cony Dehas Ratna Devi David Pradhan Devi Triasari Dhia Al Uyun, Dhia Disemadi, Hari Sutra Eliza Putri Sanggarwati Emi Puasa Handayani Ezzerouali, Souad Fachry Ahsany Fadli, Moh. Fadloli Falah Parama, Jovial Farihan Aulia Fatha Khaira Annajid Elfauzi Febriyani, Emiliya Felinda Istighfararisna Aulia Firyal Azelia Nasera Fitria Esfandiari Fuadi, Abdul Basid Gustama, Briliant Hany Krisna Priratna Haris Haris, Haris Hasnan Bachtiar Hayat, Muhammad Jihadul Hendra Saputra Jaya Hilaire Tegnan Himawan Estu Bagijo . Hirmo, Meelika Hussain, Mohammad Azam Isdian Anggraeny Isma Novalia Firdha Susanto Jade, Adinda Putri Jamil Jamil Jamil Jamil Jauhar Nashrullah Jihadi, Muhammad Jovial Falah Parama Khoshim ugli, Madiev Fakhriddin Kukuh Tejomurti Kukuh Tejomurti, Kukuh Kurniawan, Kukuh Dwi Kurniawan, Wahyudi Ladiqi, Suyatno Luthfillah Arrizqi Zainsyah Mabarroh Azizah Makmun, Fatimatuz Zakiya Marwa, Muhammad Habibi Miftakhul Maynanda Shadrina Meilana Rifqi, Achmad Daffa Merve Ozkan Borsa Moch. Zairul Alam Moh. Iqra Syabani Korompot Mohammad Affan Mohammad Affan Mohammad Al An'imat Mohammad Fadli Mohammad Syahrul RA Mohd Ali, Adi Syahid Muchamad Ali Safaat Muhammad Ayman al-Akiti Muhammad Nur Mujib, M Misbahul Mujibur Rahman Khairul Muluk Najella Zubaidi Niken Nendy Istaqnaligh Sanda Nilasari, Nilasari Nur Putri Hidayah Nur, Asrul Ibrahim Nursyah, Yufani Julia Nursyah Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana Putra, Marsudi Dedi Putri, Diah Nadia Rahmat, Al Fauzi Rama Thimoty Sanjaya Ranendra, Bagas Raras Verawati Ratri Novita Erdianti Regy Gusti Pratama Resti Dian Luthviati Rety Bella Octavya Zain Rifan T, Vicko Wahyu Risky, Saiful Rusdiana, Shelvi Rustamovich, Bekov Ikhtiyor Saiful Risky Salsabila, Mutiara Shaquila Samira, Echaib Sanda, Niken Nendy Istaqnaligh Sarita Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa Sayed Khalid Shahzad Shahzad, Sayed Khalid Shinta Ayu Purnamawati Shohib Muslim Sidik Sunaryo Silviani, Ninne Zahara Sinha, Sara Sirajuddin Sukarmi Sukarmi, Sukarmi Sukarmi, Sukarmi Suprayitno, Wasis Surya Anoraga Syahra Ramadhani Syariful Alam Tajrim, Muhammad Ikhsan Taufiqur Rahman Shaleh Thahir, Putri Shafarina Tinuk Dwi Cahyani Tongat Tongat Triya Indra Rahmawan Tuan Sembok, Tuan Muhammad Zukri Ulfa Arinta Uyun, Dhia Al Virga Dwi Efendi Wahyudi Kurniawan Wasis Suprayitna Wasis Suprayitno Wasis Wasis Wimbi Vania Riezqa Salshadilla Yaris Adhial Fajrin Yunus, Nur Rohim Yusro, Mochammad Abizar Yusuf Hamdika Zainal Arifin Zaka Firma Aditya Zaka Firma Aditya Zaka Firma Aditya Zaka Firma Aditya zaka firma aditya, zaka firma Zakaria Saxon