Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Intellectual Property Challenges for AI-Driven Creativity: A Focus on Copyright and Patents in Emerging Economies Lu Sudirman; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Henry Soelistyo Budi; Jihyun Park; Ninne Zahara Silviani
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.20611

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into scientific advancements has become a crucial part of daily life for many people. In the creative industry, AI has the potential to not only enhance the level of creativity, but also productivity. The legal implications of this development must be carefully analyzed for the development of the creative industry, to establish a legal position on where AI stands in the increasingly competitive market, especially when Intellectual Property Right (IPR) as a key factor is taken into account. This research examines the need for a legal framework for AI. It was conducted through the lens of intellectual property law, to determine its place within existing IPR regimes using the comparative legal method. The results conceptually justify the urgency to regulate AI, and highlights the taxonomy dilemma of AI-generated works within the current dynamics of the creative industry, indicating a taxonomy dilemma. Further analysis also indicates that while there’s a decent urgency to address all of the normative issues that exist within Indonesia’s IPR legal framework, it’s imperative that Indonesia prioritizes the development of the copyright and patent regimes, which are closely related to the nature of AI-generated works.
Personal Data Protection in Private Sector Electronic Systems for Businesses: Indonesia vs. South Korea Ninne Zahara Silviani; Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah; Vanessa Riarta Atmaja; Park Ji Hyun
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.517-546

Abstract

This paper explores the various practices surrounding the legal framework for protecting personal data in the context of private electronic systems used by commercial companies. The research's main focus is the ambiguity of the goals of Indonesia's Electronic System providers and how they may adopt better practices to enhance data protection within Electronic System Providers, so this extensive examination also includes a thorough comparison of the personal data protection laws in South Korea and Indonesia. This investigation aims to carefully define, evaluate, and harmonize the two countries' unique legal systems. This study uses a normative legal research framework with a Teleological and Legal Protection approach as its research technique. Additionally, it uses the comparative law method to clarify, outline, and examine the specifics of the personal data protection laws that are now in force in Indonesia and South Korea. The results of this research go beyond identifying problems; they are expected to produce a thorough understanding of the complexities surrounding personal data security in the context of electronic commerce. These discoveries are well-positioned to be the foundation for upcoming regulatory improvements, eventually encouraging more potent and reliable data protection procedures in both nations.
Asset Forfeiture as A Solution for Fraudulent Investments: Insight from Indonesia and South Korea Indah Tiara Ceisarina; Ninne Zahara Silviani; Emiliya Febriyani
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 10 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v10i1.10562

Abstract

Fraudulent investment is an investment activity that offers to give a promise of maximum profit in a short time without the need to do a job that is physically, mentally and mentally exhausting and find information about the origin of the platform. Asset forfeiture by law enforcement aims to make the perpetrator fall into poverty to provide a deterrent effect and uphold a sense of justice for perpetrators of criminal acts such as money laundering. Poverty is a frightening thing in their lives. The purpose of the research is the general objective in conducting this research to find out how the recovery of asset forfeiture in handling cases of money laundering crimes. The specific objective is to analyze how the effectiveness of asset forfeiture implementation against fraudulent investment through legal comparison (Indonesia & South Korea). The research method that the author uses is in accordance with the title and relevant, so the author uses normative legal research methods. In this case, normative research is used because the characteristics of this normative legal research method are to examine legal comparisons regarding the Asset Forfeiture Law in Indonesia and South Korea. Asset forfeiture in South Korea shows effective enforcement of justice. The Indonesian people hope that this measure will be implemented to realize the 5th principle of Pancasila “Social justice for all Indonesian people” by impoverishing criminals through asset forfeiture.
Adapting EU CSRD to Indonesia: A Regulatory Sandbox Approach Nurlaily Nurlaily; Lu Sudirman; Ninne Zahara Silviani; Hari Sutra Disemadi
ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/adliya.v20i1.46294

Abstract

Mandatory sustainability reporting is an important method for evaluating and monitoring sustainable development. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the feasibility of adapting the principles underlying the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive to enhance the sustainability reporting framework in Indonesia. A normative legal study method was used with a comparative approach to provide relevant analysis. The results showed that the direct modelling of the EU’s legal framework for mandatory sustainability disclosure was unrealistic for Indonesia due to the substantial disparity in legal development between the jurisdictions. This study contributed to the literature by proposing a novel regulatory sandbox framework as a transitional legal mechanism for Indonesia to adapt EU CSRD principles into the sustainability disclosure policy. Unlike direct transplantation approaches, this phased experimental model enabled evidence-based policy development while accounting for institutional capacity gaps and a fragmented regulatory landscape. The proposed framework offered a practical pathway for developing economies to bridge the developmental gap in sustainability disclosure requirements without imposing premature financial burdens on enterprises.
Co-Authors Abrar, Farhan Rabbani Agustina Agustina Agustini, Shenti Alberta Adeline Marvel Alhakim, Abdurrakhman Amelia Putri Anisah Anisah, Amelia Putri Anweidri Chai Asep Rinaldy Avisa Putri Anggara Belinda Oktaviani Ceisarina, Indah Tiara CHRISTIANA CHRISTIANA, CHRISTIANA Cindy Tan Daniella Natasha Dedi Jaya Deni Achmad Deni Achmad Disemadi, Hari Sutra Efrintan Debora Sibarani Eko Pratama Sinaga Elvin Valentino Elza Syarief, Elza Emiliya Febriyani Erni Erni Evy Evy Febriyani, Emiliya Fennesy Fiorent Lim Ferawati Ferawati Fitri, Winda FL. Yudhi Priyo Amboro, FL. Yudhi Priyo Girsang, Junimart HARTONO, ADI Henry Soelistyo Budi Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana Indah Tiara Ceisarina James Gan Jaya, Febri Jesen Winardo Jeslyn Teo Jihyun Park Joel Jordan Tobing Jonathan Jonathan Junimart Girsang Kalita, Manashi Kellie Leslie Kevin Saputra Kristina Dwi Putri Lidia Kando Br Gea Lu Sudirman Mahendra, Adam Maya Shafira Maya Shafira Mega Hardianti Kho Melisa Melisa Mellberg Limanda Mimi Sintia Mohd Bajury Muhammad Alfiq Zhian Muhammad Ikhsan Kasturi Muhammad Ikhwanul Amri Nanda Melani Nellsen Purwandi Ninin Ernawati Ninin Ernawati Nipon Sohheng Nur Fatihah Nurlaily Nurlaily Nurlaily NURLAILY, NURLAILY Park Ji Hyun Park, Jihyun Putri, Erika Emilia Rahayu, Putri Ratna Kumala Sari Raymond Raymond Rehulina Rehulina Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah Rudolf Haiti Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutahuruk Rusdiana, Shelvi Sadiah, Azzhara Halimatus Santoso, Inggrid Rosemary Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa Seela Anwar Sya'adah Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Silvia Yolanda Octavia Situmeang, Ampuan Sri Zanariyah Tampubolon, Theresia Tan, David Tan, Winsherly Tantimin, Tantimin Tianto, Agus Triana Dewi Seroja Vanessa Babyliany Vanessa Riarta Atmaja Vivi Willson Willson Windi Afdal, Windi Yenny Permata Liegestu Yustisio Mahendra Ziko Riandi Zuraini Zuraini