Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Cognitive Dissonance dalam Perilaku Diet: Kajian Literatur Teoritis dan Empiris Syalsa Maulina Sitompul; Neviyarni S
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi Desember 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i12.1465

Abstract

Cognitive Dissonance Theory, developed by Leon Festinger (1957), explains that inconsistency among an individual’s beliefs, attitudes, and actions generates psychological tension known as dissonance. This article analyzes the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance in the context of eating behavior and dieting through a literature review of classical theories and recent empirical findings. The review indicates that individuals experiencing dissonance during the dieting process tend to employ various reduction mechanisms, such as internal justification, minimizing the importance of inconsistency, and gradual behavioral change. The effectiveness of dissonance management is influenced by environmental and social factors, including exposure to food advertising, social pressure, cultural identity, and support from the immediate social environment. This review highlights the relevance of cognitive dissonance theory in understanding the dynamics of dieting behavior and as a conceptual foundation for the development of health interventions grounded in social psychology. This article adopts a narrative literature review approach by examining theoretical and empirical literature published between 2015 and 2024.
Perilaku Agresif di Jalan Raya: Analisis Literatur tentang Ekspresi Emosi, Stres, dan Norma Sosial di Kalangan Pengendara di Indonesia Hafizhatul ‘Afifah; Neviyarni S
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi Desember 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i12.1473

Abstract

Aggressive behavior on the road has become increasingly prevalent in Indonesia, particularly in urban areas characterized by high traffic density. Aggressive driving, commonly referred to as road rage, not only threatens traffic safety but also reflects broader psychological, environmental, and socio-cultural dynamics. This article aims to provide a narrative review of studies examining aggressive driving behavior within the Indonesian context. A narrative literature review approach was employed by analyzing relevant national and international scholarly articles published between 2015 and 2024. The literature was thematically analyzed to identify psychological factors, situational and environmental stressors, socio-cultural influences, as well as the impacts and preventive efforts related to aggressive driving. The findings indicate that aggressive road behavior emerges from the interaction of anger, frustration, low self-control, traffic-related stress, and social norms that legitimize dominance and confrontation. Such behaviors contribute to increased accident risk, interpersonal conflict, and a reduced sense of public safety. Therefore, comprehensive interventions integrating law enforcement, emotional regulation education, and the promotion of empathetic and prosocial driving culture are essential to mitigate aggressive behavior on the road.
Kajian Literatur: Peran Teori Identitas Sosial dalam Pembentukan dan Reduksi Prasangka Antar Kelompok Muhammad Difa Putra Adrila; Neviyarni S
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi Desember 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i12.1484

Abstract

Intergroup prejudice remains a fundamental issue within multicultural societies, including Indonesia. Social Identity Theory (SIT) by Tajfel and Turner (1979) offers a comprehensive conceptual framework to understand how individuals construct self-concepts through group membership, which subsequently fosters ingroup–outgroup bias and prejudice toward other groups. This article aims to review, synthesize, and analyze empirical and theoretical research from the past decade concerning the relationship between social identity and prejudice. Literature findings confirm that strong social identity amplifies tendencies of ingroup favoritism and outgroup bias, while contextual factors such as threat, status, and intergroup contact serve as moderators that can intensify or reduce prejudice. Developments in theories such as Self-Categorization Theory and the Common Ingroup Identity Model have enriched intervention tools based on SIT, especially for multicultural education and cross-group dialogue. However, the reviewed literature also highlights the necessity for integrative approaches and contextual adaptation, particularly in local cultural settings like Indonesia. The article concludes that while SIT effectively explains the mechanisms of prejudice, its reduction strategies require combined theoretical models and contextually tailored practices.
Systematic Literature Review: Peer Conformity to Smoking Behavior in Adolescent Boys Afra Nuha Irwan; Neviyarni S
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Januari 2026) In Press
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v3i1.1500

Abstract

Conformity pressure in peer groups is one of the factors that most influence the emergence of smoking behavior in adolescent boys. The classic findings of Solomon Asch's experiments provide the basis that individuals can adjust their opinions and actions when under the pressure of majority norms. In line with this, various public health studies and social network research have highlighted the mechanisms of influence and selection as the main explanation for why smoking behavior can spread in adolescent groups. This literature review examines in detail 10 major empirical studies related to the relationship between conformity and smoking behavior in adolescents, along with additional analysis from 25 other scientific sources. The results of the study showed that normative group pressure, social status in the school network, closeness to close friends, and social relationship patterns affect adolescents' chances of starting smoking. Its interaction with other environmental factors suggests that conformity does not work alone, but is interrelated to the process of social selection and group dynamics. These findings hint at the importance of social network-based interventions and strengthening anti-smoking norms as prevention strategies.