p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.969
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education AKSIOMA Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan JMPM: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika PRISMA IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Jurnal Tadris Matematika Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Humanities and Social Studies Math Educa Journal Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika Jurnal Karinov JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika) International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching (IJOIMT) Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang MATHEMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Research in Social Sciences and Technology Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI) Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI) Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi Jurnal MIPA dan Pembelajarannya Nuris Journal of Education and Islamic Studies International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER) Indonesian Journal of Science, Technology, and Humanities PEDAMAS (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Jurnal Tadris Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education Jurnal Didaktik Matematika Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

ANALYTICAL THINKING PROCESS OF STUDENTS IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS OF QUADRATIC FUNCTIONS Naela Nur Azizah; Susiswo Susiswo; Sisworo Sisworo
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 10, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (698.93 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3440

Abstract

Analytical thinking is an ability to observe objects thoroughly and solve facts comprehensively. This study is set to describe students' analytical thinking processes in solving mathematical problems, especially in quadratic functions. It employs a qualitative approach with qualitative descriptive research. The subjects in this study are one student with high mathematics ability, one student with medium mathematics ability, and one student with low mathematics ability of Tenth Grade of State Islamic Senior High School 3 Tulungagung. Data collection are carried out through task-based interviews. Meanwhile, data analysis technique are data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion Based on the results of data analysis and discussion, it is concluded that (1) The student with high mathematical ability pass several stages, namely differentiating, and organizing, he/he can solve the quadratic function problem properly according to the problem solving steps. (2) The student with medium mathematical ability can go through differentiating and organizing stages. But at the attributing stage, he/she are less able to solve problems based on the objectives.  (3) The student with low mathematical ability tends not to pass differentiating, organizing, and attributing analytical thinking stages. He/she are less able to solve quadratic function problems according to the solving steps.Keywords: Analytical thinking process; problem solving; quadratic functions
EXPLORING THE EXPLANATION OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHER IN MATHEMATICS TEACHING PRACTICE Wasilatul Murtafiah; Cholis Sa'dijah; Tjang Daniel Chandra; Susiswo Susiswo; Abdur Rahman As'ari
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol 9, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Department of Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education, Sriwijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.9.2.5388.259-270

Abstract

This study aims to describe the types of explanations made by pre-service teachers in mathematics learning. In this research, the types of explanations are used to describe the explanatory trends used by pre-service teachers in mathematics teaching. The descriptive qualitative research was chosen in this research. The research subjects are pre-service teacher as the students of Mathematics Education of PGRI Madiun University and Madura University who are studying Field Experience Practice. Of the 105 mathematics student, five students with a cumulative grade achievement of more than 3.50 were observed during the teaching practice at the school for approximately five meetings. The research data was obtained from observation, video recording, and interview. Data analysis was done through data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion/verification focused on pre-service teacher explanation on mathematics learning activity. The research findings indicate that the explanation used by the pre-service teacher in the mathematics learning starting from the most frequently used is the descriptive explanation (51,7%), giving of reason (36,2%) and interpretative (12,1%). Descriptive explanations are used to describe mathematical procedures. The type of reason-giving explanation is used to explain reasons based on mathematical principles. Furthermore, the interpretative explanation is used to explain the concepts and facts of mathematics.
COMPARING MODEL-BUILDING PROCESS: A MODEL PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS USED IN INTERPRETING STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL THINKING Mujiyem Sapti; Purwanto Purwanto; Edy Bambang Irawan; Abdur Rahman As'ari; Cholis Sa'dijah; Susiswo Susiswo; Ariyadi Wijaya
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol 10, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Department of Doctoral Program on Mathematics Education, Sriwijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.10.2.7351.171-184

Abstract

Mathematical thinking is an important aspect of mathematics education and, therefore, also needs to be understood by prospective teachers. Prospective teachers should have the ability to analyze and interpret students’ mathematical thinking. Comparing model is one of the interpretation models from Wilson, Lee, and Hollebrands. This article will describe the prospective teacher used the model of the building process in interpretation students' mathematical thinking. Subjects selected by considering them in following the students’ strategies in solving the Building Construction Problem. Comparing model is a model of interpretation in which a person interprets student thinking based on student work. There are two types comparing model building process prospective teacher use in interpreting students’ mathematical thinking ie. comparing work and comparing knowledge. In comparing works, prospective teachers use an external representation rubric. This is used to analyze student activities in order to provide an interpretation that is comparing the work of students with their own work. In comparing knowledge, prospective teachers use internal representation rubrics to provide interpretation by comparing the students' work with their knowledge or thought.
Students’ semantic reasoning characteristics on solving double discount problem Lydia Lia Prayitno; Purwanto Purwanto; Subanji Subanji; Susiswo Susiswo; Ninik Mutianingsih
JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Volume 7 Issue 2 April 2022
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16325

Abstract

Semantic is associated with the relationship between symbol, reference, and the problem’s context involved in the problem-solving process which also involves reasoning and decision-making. Hence, this study describes the characteristics of students’ semantic reasoning to solve the double discounts problem. 51 high school students in Sidoarjo participated in this qualitative study. The data were collected through 15-20 minutes problem-solving tests. The students' answers were grouped into correct and wrong answers. The correct answers were then regrouped once more based on the strategies used by the students to answer the test and to identify their semantic reasoning characteristics. The data were analyzed by reducing, classifying the think-aloud and observing. Then the similarity of characteristics of students' semantic reasoning when solving the double discount problem was identified. To test the accuracy of the data, triangulation method was used. This semantic reasoning was identified by  (1) giving the problem situation, (2) stating the keywords and their meaning, (3) stating the relationship, (4) transforming it into a mathematics statement, (5) calculating based on their strategies, (6) decision making, and (7) completing the answer interpretation. This study contributes to developing basic knowledge in interpreting each process of solving ill-structured problems until finding a solution. 
ANALISIS KESALAHAN NEWMAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL NILAI MUTLAK DAN SCAFFOLDING-NYA Bhakti Setya Budi; Toto Nusantara Nusantara; Subanji Subanji Subanji; Susiswo Susiswo Susiswo
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha
Publisher : Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jjpm.v11i2.24732

Abstract

This study aims to describe the types of errors made by students in solving questions of absolute value and scaffolding based on the Newman error analysis stage. The research method used is descriptive qualitative method. The research subjects are students of class X MA Miftahul Huda Kepanjen. Sampling with purposive sampling technique. Data obtained from the results of student tests, interviews and the scaffolding process. Based on the results of the study there were 81.25% reading errors, while transformation errors were 37.5%, and process skills were 28.13%. From this research it can be concluded that the types of mistakes made by students are reading inaccuracies, comprehension errors, transformation errors, process skill errors and encoding errors. While the form of scaffolding conducted is explaining, reviewing, restructuring and developing conceptual thinking
Proses berpikir siswa kelas XI dalam menyelesaikan soal berorientasi HOTS pada materi deret aritmatika Dewi Astutik; Toto Nusantara; Cholis Sa'dijah; Susiswo Susiswo
AKSIOMA : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2020): AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/aks.v11i2.5998

Abstract

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal berorientasi HOTS pada materi Deret Aritmatika dilihat dari empat tahapan penyelesaian masalah George Polya. Penelitian yang dilakukan berupa penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode studi kasus. Subjek penelitian studi kasus adalah siswa kelas XI IPS 1 MAN Kota Batu tahun ajaran 2019/2020 dengan keunikan bisa mengerjakan soal berorientasi HOTS dengan benar disertai langkah-langkah pengerjaan yang lengkap dibandingkan dengan siswa dalam kelas yang sama. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode pemberian tes dan wawancara untuk mengetahui proses berpikir. Hasil penelitian berdasarkan jawaban dan wawancara dengan siswa menunjukkan bahwa siswa melakukan tahapan understanding the problem (walaupun secara tertulis tidak lengkap), devising the plan, dan carrying out the plan, tetapi tidak melakukan tahapan looking back.Kata kunci: proses berpikir; HOTS; deret aritmatika
Condition of Students' Mathematical Reasoning Abilities Based on Their Ability to Argue Arlina Trie Cahyono; Susiswo Susiswo; Tjang Daniel Chandra
Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI) Vol 2, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (321.128 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um072v2i22021p98-112

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the condition of students' reasoning abilities based on the way students argue. This research uses a qualitative-descriptive approach. The subjects in this study were 3 students of junior high school with high reasoning abilities and 3 students with low reasoning abilities who viewed the reasoning ability scores when providing problem solving solutions on the written test. The data obtained in this study were in the form of students' written test scores and the results of student interviews. Interviews were conducted to bring up students 'ability to argue that describe and reveal the condition of students' reasoning abilities in the process of solving problems. The results of students 'arguments are analyzed and adjusted to the model of StephenToulmin's argument which reveals that there are 6 components of the argumentation to show the seriousness of students in arguing in order to obtain valid argument results to assess students' reasoning abilities. The arguments from students succeeded in uncovering 4 conditions that describe the conditions of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. These conditions are: 1) Students who show high reasoning ability in written tests and are able to show their reasoning process in the arguments that are brought up, 2) Students who show low reasoning abilities in written tests but are able to show their reasoning processes in the arguments that are brought up, 3) Students which shows a high reasoning ability in a written test but have not been able to demonstrate the reasoning process in the arguments that are brought up, and 4) Students who show a low reasoning ability in a written test and have not been able to demonstrate their reasoning process in the arguments that are brought up.
Proses Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Matematika Berdasarkan Masalah Open-Ended pada Materi Bangun Datar Dian Putri Wulandari; Susiswo Susiswo; I Made Sulandra
Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 5 No 3 (2021): Volume 5 Nomor 3 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Mathematics Education Study Program

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.847

Abstract

Berpikir kreatif adalah masalah penting dalam pembelajaran matematika. Sebagian besar guru di sekolah kurang memperhatikan kemampuan tersebut. Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan mengetahui proses berpikir kreatif siswa mengakibatkan guru memperoleh pengetahuan yang luas terhadap potensi yang siswa miliki. Tujuan Penelitian ini yaitu mengetahui proses berpikir kreatif dan kemampuan siswa melalui masalah open-ended. Kriteria subjek dapat dikategorikan sebagai a) siswa memiliki kemampuan berpikir kreatif tinggi; b) siswa memiliki kemampuan berpikir kreatif sedang; dan c) siswa memiliki kemampuan berpikir kreatif rendah. Kemudian indikator kemampuan berpikir kreatif pada penelitian ini yaitu kelancaran (fluency), fleksibilitas (fexibelity), dan kebaruan (novelty) sementara tahap proses berpikir kreatif yaitu; 1) mengetahui adanya masalah; 2) memahami masalah; 3) membuat dugaan dan merumuskan hipotesis; 4) menguji hipotesis dan mengevaluasi; dan 5) mengkomunikasikan ide. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Data diperoleh dari jawaban siswa dan hasil wawancara. Penelitian dilakukan di kelas VII SMP An-Nur dengan jumlah siswa sebanyak 29 siswa. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu berupa proses berpikir kreatif siswa, 3 siswa dikategorikan sebagai kemampuan tinggi, 12 siswa memiliki kemampuan sedang, dan 14 siswa berkemampuan rendah.
Imitasi Dalam Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Untuk Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Andika Setyo Budi Lestari; Toto Nusantara; Susiswo Susiswo; Tjang Daniel Chandra
IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education Vol 2 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (728.2 KB) | DOI: 10.30738/indomath.v2i2.4681

Abstract

Imitation-related studies have been widely studied in children with autism, infants and young children. Imitation in the learning process is inseparable. The study of imitation in adults and school-aged children is still rarely studied, so the researcher was interested in conducting imitation-related research in mathematical communication in junior high school learners of class VII in one of the public schools in Bangil, Pasuruan, Indonesia. The type of the research was a qualitative research. The main instrument in this study was the researcher herself. The data sources in research were in the form of learner works, interview recordings, and field notes. The results showed that junior high school learners of class VII who became the subject of this research in communicating the completion of mathematical problems in doing an imitation towards elementary school teachers (primary school).The finding in this study was that personal closeness truly affects the imitations made by students in solving mathematical problems.
Elementary School Teachers' Mathematical Connections in Solving Trigonometry Problem Sitti Fithriani Saleh; Purwanto Purwanto; Sudirman Sudirman; Erry Hidayanto; Susiswo Susiswo
Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 3 No 3 (2018): Research in Social Sciences and Technology
Publisher : Research in Social Sciences and Technology- OpenED Network

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46303/ressat.03.03.3

Abstract

This study aims to reveal mathematical connections of elementary school teachers in solving trigonometric problem. The subjects of this study were 22 elementary school teachers as the prospective participants of Professional Teacher Education and Training (PTET). They came from several districts of South Sulawesi Province. The teachers were given trigonometry problem. Trigonometry problems could encourage teachers to connect geometrical and algebraic concept, graphical representation and algebraic representation, as well as daily life context. The result shows that most of the subject teachers of this study solved the problem according to procedures they know without considering everyday life context. On the other hand, there were some subjects who connected problem with everyday life context using graphical, verbal, or numerical representation. Thus, subjects who were able to connect problem information with appropriate concepts and procedures are categorized as substantive connections. While the subjects who were able to connect problem information with mathematical concepts but less precise in using the procedure are categorized as classification connections.
Co-Authors Abdillah, Rizka Abdur Rahman As’ari Adika Setyo Budi Lestari Adityawan, Tofan Agung, Citra Amelia Agus Alamsyah Akbar Sutawidjaja Alaiya, Syekha Vivi Alfiani Athma Putri Rosyadi Alkans Sofyawati Sutrisno Andika Setyo Budi Lestari Anies Fuady Anita Dewi Utami Annisa Andika Karisa Arilaksmi, Ni Putu Gita Ariyadi Wijaya Arlina Trie Cahyono As'ari, Aburrahman Azizah Azizah Azizah Azizah Barep Yohanes Bhakti Setya Budi Budi, Bhakti Setya Cholis Sa’dijah Dahliatul Hasanah Damayanti, Hanifah Devinta Reza Prasanti Dewi Astutik Dewi Astutik Dian Nastiti Utami Dian Putri Wulandari Diyo Kriswanto Dwi Rahmawati Utami Dyah Tri Wahyuningtyas Edy Bambang Irawan Edy Sutarto Eka Damayanti Eka Damayanti Eko Prasetyo Erika Arum Puspita Erry Hidayanto Ery Febrianto Falahi Nurmaulina Fatma Noordinar Rahma Firdha Mahrifatul Zana Firdha Mahrifatul Zana Firnanda Pradana Putra Flavia Aurelia Hidajat, Flavia Aurelia Gatot Muhsetyo Hamidah, Dewi Harfin Lanya, Harfin Henny Rismawatie Yusmarina Hery Susanto Hery Susanto Hijriani, Lailin I Made Sulandra I Nengah Parta Iis Afidah Ikram, Muhammad Imam Rofiki Indrawatiningsih, Nonik Intan Ayu Maharani Intan Faraminda Putri Intan Syafitri Lathiful Anwar Latifah Mustofa Lestyanto Linda Ramadhanty Januar Lita Wulandari Aeli Lorenza, Nella Luluk Wahyu Nengsih Lydia Lia Prayitno Makbul Muksar Mamluatus Sa’adah Maulana, Hanief Maulidiyah Tutut Nurjanah Meira Indria Pratiwi Mila Sekar Ayu Mufidah, Wayan Indi Haidar Muhammad Ainur Rizqi Mujiyem Sapti Mujiyem Sapti Muliana Sari Nadia Nurudini Naela Nur Azizah Najwa, Wulida Arina Ni Putu Gita Arilaksmi Ningsih, Nova Widia Ninik Mutianingsih, Ninik Nursani Indah Pratiwi Nury Yuniasih, Nury Octavina Rizky Putri Utami Oktoviana, Lucky Tri Osman, Sharifah Pahrani, Andi Daniah Parameswari, Pradina Permadi, Hendra Permadi, Hendro Pradina Parameswari Prasanti, Devinta Reza Pratiwi, Enditiyas Pratiwi, Meira Indria Puguh Darmawan Purnomo, Purnomo Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Puspitasari, Yesy Putri, Octavina Rizky Utami Putri, Reni Albertin Qohar, Abd. Ratna Titi Wulandari Ria Kurniawati Ria Norfika Yuliandari Rini Nurhakiki Risaldi Risaldi Risma Firda Diana Royyan Faradiba Rustanto Rahardi Samuntya, Fitri Sari, Ulum Rohma Sigmamitha Aghni Izzananda Sisworo Sitti Fithriani Saleh Subanji Subanji Sudirman Sudirman Suhartatik, Peni Surianastutiningtyas, Angela Maricilia Susilo, Claudya Zahrani Suwanti, Vivi Suwarman, Ramdhan F Swasono Rahardjo Syafitri, Intan Syaiful Hamzah Nasution Syamsul Hadi Tatik Retno Murniasih Tjang Daniel Chandra Toto Nusantara Trianingsih Eni Lestari Ulfa Ni'matil Hasanah umi faizah Wangguway, Yustinus Wasilatul Murtafiah Wayan Indi Haidar Mufidah Widi Candika Pakaya Wulida Arina Najwa Yesy Puspitasari Yrbayanti Putri Zaekhah Yundari, Yundari Zana, Firdha Mahrifatul Zuliati, Sulis Dwi Zulnaidi, Hutkemri