p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.507
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Awang Long Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Ilmu Hukum Prima Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Syntax Idea As-Syar'i : Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga jurnal syntax admiration Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis El-Iqtishady YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Interdisciplinary Social Studies International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Action Research Literate (ARL) Co-Value : Jurnal Ekonomi, Koperasi & Kewirausahaan Collegium Studiosum Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Jurnal Gagasan Hukum SETARA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Sosial dan Sains Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia IUS FACTI : Jurnal Berkala Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Karno Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Guruku: Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Tasyri' Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi Blantika : Multidisciplinary Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Global Ilmiah Jurnal Inovasi Global Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Technology and Economics Law Journal Jurnal Riksa Cendikia Nusantara
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

KEPASTIAN HUKUM CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBAYARAN DI INDONESIA Febrianto, Andre; Ismail; Iryani, Dewi
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i2.1897

Abstract

The rapid development of cryptocurrency as a global digital financial instrument has created legal challenges, particularly concerning its status as a medium of exchange. In Indonesia, the legal standing of cryptocurrency faces duality and ambiguity. On one hand, the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (BAPPEBTI) regulates and recognizes cryptocurrency as a tradable commodity on the futures exchange. On the other hand, Bank Indonesia (BI) strictly prohibits its use as a legal tender, based on Law Number 7 of 2011 concerning Currency, which affirms the Rupiah as the sole legal medium of payment. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of using cryptocurrency as a means of payment in Indonesia and to formulate a regulatory concept that can realize legal certainty. This research employs a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach. The data utilized includes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the use of cryptocurrency as a means of payment can result in the cancellation of a private agreement (based on Article 1337 of the Indonesian Civil Code), administrative sanctions from BI and BAPPEBTI, and potential criminal exposure related to Money Laundering Offenses (TPPU). To achieve legal certainty, an integrated regulatory framework is required, encompassing: (1) clear classification of cryptocurrencies (payment, utility, security tokens); (2) the establishment of a special law regarding digital assets; (3) coordination among regulatory institutions (BI, OJK, BAPPEBTI, Kominfo); (4) effective consumer protection and dispute resolution mechanisms; and (5) the integration of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) principles. Policy recommendations include strengthening socialization efforts, adopting a regulatory sandbox, and accelerating the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) project, the Digital Rupiah.
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan Elektronik Pada Dokumen PDF dalam Perspektif UU ITE Putu Ayu Masrini; Dewi Iryani; Nyoman Tio Rae
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 1 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i1.3715

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah mengubah paradigma hukum pembuktian di Indonesia, terutama dalam konteks tanda tangan elektronik sebagai pengganti tanda tangan manual. Di satu sisi, tanda tangan elektronik memberikan efisiensi dan kepastian hukum dalam transaksi elektronik. Namun di sisi lain, kemudahan manipulasi data digital menimbulkan potensi kejahatan baru berupa pemalsuan tanda tangan elektronik pada dokumen Portable Document Format (PDF). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pengaturan hukum terhadap pelaku pemalsuan tanda tangan elektronik dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) beserta perubahannya, serta menelaah mekanisme penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin, dan putusan pengadilan yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa walaupun UU ITE telah memberikan dasar hukum yang sah terhadap tanda tangan elektronik, mekanisme pembuktian dan penegakan hukum masih menghadapi tantangan, terutama dalam aspek keaslian identitas digital dan otentikasi sertifikat elektronik. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembaruan sistem verifikasi digital yang lebih kuat serta peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum dalam memahami forensik digital.
Optimalisasi Mutual Legal Assistance dan Urgensi Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) dalam Penanganan Aset Korupsi di Luar Negeri Belinda, Suci Fidia Fitriza; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Jurnal Riksa Cendikia Nusantara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Riksa Cendikia Nusantara - Januari 2026
Publisher : Jurnal Riksa Cendikia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18691194

Abstract

Korupsi lintas negara menimbulkan tantangan serius dalam upaya pemulihan aset hasil kejahatan yang disembunyikan di luar yurisdiksi nasional. Indonesia telah memiliki instrumen hukum berupa Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2006 serta ratifikasi United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). Namun demikian, praktik pemulihan aset masih menghadapi hambatan, terutama ketika pelaku tindak pidana tidak dapat dipidana karena melarikan diri, meninggal dunia, atau berada di luar wilayah hukum Indonesia. Dalam konteks tersebut, Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) menjadi mekanisme alternatif yang strategis untuk perampasan aset tanpa menunggu putusan pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis optimalisasi penerapan MLA serta urgensi pengaturan NCB dalam penanganan aset korupsi di luar negeri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sinergi antara MLA dan NCB sangat diperlukan untuk memperkuat efektivitas pemulihan aset korupsi lintas negara. Oleh karena itu, pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset menjadi kebutuhan mendesak dalam rangka memperkuat rezim pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia
Notary's Prudence Duty Effectiveness in Indonesian Financing Deeds: BPRS Rifat Case Salma Nur Azizah; Reka Dewantara; Dewi Iryani
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): June in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i1.352

Abstract

Marital property separation agreements are governed by Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage and Articles 139–148 of the Indonesian Civil Code, which originally restricted their execution to the period prior to marriage. The issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, however, permits postnuptial amendments with court approval, thereby generating legal uncertainty regarding the legal status of marital assets and inconsistencies in judicial decisions. This study aims to examine the legal status of joint property acquired prior to the amendment of a marital agreement following the Constitutional Court’s decision and to analyze the legal implications of amendments or annulments of marital agreements on the position and distribution of marital property. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, conducted through library research of primary legal materials, including marriage legislation, the Civil Code, and relevant court decisions, as well as secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical approach. The results indicate that marital property acquired prior to the amendment of a marital agreement is subject to prospective application and does not have retroactive effect, thereby maintaining its original legal status in accordance with the principle of legal certainty. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of implementing regulations to ensure uniformity in notarial and judicial practices and to promote distributive and corrective justice.
Co-Authors Abdillah, Ahmad Imaduddin Abdul Gani Abraham Prihadi Achmad Hidayat Adi Darmawansyah Adi Iksan Bureni Agustinus Darmanto Panjaitan Aji , Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan, Puguh amran rabani zubaidi Arbi Dalimunthe Arwan Arwan Aryasuta Faharsyah Setiawan Ayu Tresna Waty Baehaki, Imam Belinda, Suci Fidia Fitriza Bernadete Nurmawati Bernadete Nurmawati Bey Abwar, Irsyad Hamdie Binto Kusmadi Boas Parlindungan Panjaitan dadang dwi saputro David Ricardo, David Didik Suhariyanto Ellizabeth Febrianto, Andre Ferdian, Andri Fitria, Myrna G. Nyoman Tio Rae Gomulia Oscar Gradios Nyoman Tio Hamamudin, Hamamudin Handradjasa, Joshua Limanto Hari Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hartana Hartana Hartana , Hartana Hartana Hartana Hartana, Hartana Herman, KMS Hie, Hengky Himawan Ismail ISMAIL ,, ISMAIL ISMAIL - Ismail Ismail Ismail Ismail Ismail Ismail Jayawarsa, A.A. Ketut Josef Swisman, Andreas Juniarty, Santy Karima, Shifa Kirana Pungki Apsari KMS Herman Legi, Arfi Nofri Lemta , Benjamin Lisaldy, Ferdinand Listiyaningsih, Listiyaningsih Maharani Putri Handayani Martunas Sianturi Mohamad Rizki Irmansyah Myrna Fitria Natalia, Rachel Natassya Fachrina Nurmawati, Bernadete Nyoman Tio Rae Oscar, Gomulia Pandreadi, Kadek Permana, Mochammad Aditya Prasetyo Hadi Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan Putra, Erika Putri, Euginia Natania Putu Ayu Masrini Rae, Gradios Nyoman Tio Reka Dewantara russel butarbutar Russel Butarbutar Salma Nur Azizah Samsiah, Tuti Saputra, Ade Akhmad Sarwono, Sarif Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari Shifa Karima Sihite, Thomas Ericson Hadinata Sriulina, Maria Eva Sudarsono, Putut Heri Sudirgo, Tony Sujono, Salsabilla Susetyo Rohadi Tarmudi Tarmudi Tjahjadi, Hamdani Tresna Waty, Ayu Ummi Habsyah Umra, Alieffandy Unzur Jefri Tambunan Vic S, Binsar Jon