Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
14.775
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Hukum Progresif Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Konstitusi Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Law, Development and Justice Review Jurnal Al-Dustur Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Hukum Adigama Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review El-Iqtishady Law Development Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Bina Hukum Lingkungan Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities RechtIdee Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Ade Adhari
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 118 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 118 Documents
Search

 8   9   10   11   12 
Criminal Liability of Defendants with Bipolar Disorder from the Perspective of Justice in Supreme Court Decision No. 1209 K/Pid.Sus/2023 Virriantaka; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.359

Abstract

In Indonesia, criminal law stipulates that a person can only be held accountable for their actions if there is an element of fault, in addition to meeting the principle of legality. Criminal liability aims to determine whether the perpetrator should indeed bear the consequences of their actions. On the other hand, Bipolar Disorder is a serious mental condition that causes drastic mood changes, which can affect a person’s ability to control their behavior and actions. This study aims to examine the extent to which the principle of justice is applied in determining criminal liability for defendants suffering from Bipolar Disorder, as illustrated in Supreme Court Decision Number 1209K/Pid.sus/2023. The methods used include the Statute Approach and the Case Approach. The findings show that the provisions regarding criminal liability are contained in Article 44 of the former Criminal Code (KUHP) as well as Articles 38 and 39 of the new Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023). However, in practice, the judges’ decision has not been entirely fair, as the defendant’s Bipolar Disorder was not taken into consideration. In fact, criminal law should not only focus on punishment but also take into account the condition of the perpetrator, including the defendant’s mental state. By doing so, the imposed sentence can be more humane and appropriately targeted.
Policy Framework for Crime Prevention Based on the Modus Operandi of Human Trafficking in Cibadak District Court Decision No. 92/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.CBD Sherlyn, Sherlyn; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.374

Abstract

This study investigates the increasing prevalence of human trafficking in Indonesia facilitated through social media platforms as a mechanism for recruiting illegal migrant workers, as illustrated by the Cibadak District Court Decision No. 92/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Cbd. In this case, the defendant, Clara Emilia Yulianti, and her network recruited prospective migrant workers without official authorization by offering high-paying jobs abroad, thereby exposing significant gaps in state oversight and digital protection for prospective migrants. The objective of this study is to analyze the modus operandi of the illegal recruitment scheme in this case and to evaluate existing prevention policies to address the legal loopholes exploited by the perpetrators. Employing normative legal methods alongside legislative, conceptual, and case study approaches, the study finds that the perpetrators used social media to lure victims, collect fees, and engage in unlawful sheltering and deployment activities in violation of Article 2(1) of Law No. 21/2007 in conjunction with Law No. 18/2017. Preventive efforts should prioritize strengthening oversight of online recruitment through enhanced cooperation between the government and digital platforms to enable detection, verification, and removal of illegal recruitment content.
Construction of Criminal Liability in Single Indictment of Obstruction of Justice under the Corruption Law Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.380

Abstract

This study examines obstruction of justice in Indonesia’s positive law as well as criminal liability in the application of single charges based on the Corruption Law. With normative juridical methods through legislative and case approaches, the research analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that Indonesian law does not yet have a comprehensive definition of obstruction of justice, thus opening up a wide space for interpretation. The application of a single indictment in corruption cases also creates legal uncertainty, especially in proving the element of “obstructing the legal process” when the act is closely related to the main offense. This study emphasizes the need for harmonization of norms and a clearer formulation of criminal offenses to increase the effectiveness of obstruction of justice as an instrument for eradicating corruption.
Who Executes Justice? Comparative Institutional Paths from Verdict to Prison Widyawati, Anis; Adhari, Ade; Arifin, Ridwan
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 8 NO. 1 JANUARY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v1i1.31642

Abstract

This article examines sentence-execution control in Indonesia, Thailand, and Tajikistan through the distinction between the Verdict Executor and the Criminal Executor as a basis for penitentiary law reform. It starts from the premise that the post-trial stage, particularly the enforcement of imprisonment, remains one of the least theorized yet most crucial parts of criminal procedure, with direct implications for legal certainty, institutional accountability, and prisoners’ human rights. Using normative legal research and a functional comparative approach, the study analyzes criminal sentence-execution systems, justice and imprisonment frameworks, relevant laws and regulations, institutional structures, and supervisory mechanisms in the three countries. The findings show important differences in the allocation of powers and functions between supervisory and executive bodies. Indonesia reflects an integrated model in which prosecutorial authority extends to the admission of convicts and the administration of sentences. By contrast, Thailand and Tajikistan adopt more differentiated institutional arrangements, with specialized and relatively independent bodies responsible for penitentiary supervision. The analysis concludes that judicial supervision of sentence enforcement and the execution of criminal punishment involve distinct doctrinal functions that should be institutionally separated. Such separation would reduce overlapping authority, minimize conflict, and improve systemic order and efficiency. In this context, the article argues that autonomous supervision of sentence execution should be recognized as a doctrinal category within criminal procedure law. It further proposes electronic supervision as a regulatory and procedural instrument to strengthen transparency, proportionality, and human rights compliance during the execution stage. Overall, the research demonstrates that without effective supervision of sentence execution, meaningful reform of the sentence-enforcement system and the rule of law remains unattainable.
MENYELAMI INTERPRETASI DEMONSTRAN AKSI REFORMASI DIKORUPSI TERHADAP RUU KUHP Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 9, No 1 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (673.975 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/jhp.9.1.16-24

Abstract

RKUHP merupakan salah satu rancangan undang-undang yang ditolak pada saat aksi demonstrasi “Reformasi Dikoupsi”. Mereka yang menolak RKUHP tentu dilakukan atas dasar suatu alasan (reason). Tulisan ini berupaya menjawab pertanyaan alasan mendasar mengapa penolakan tersebut terjadi dan langkah apa yang dapat dipilih untuk mengatasi penolakan. Hasil kajian menunjukan, pertama, Alasan penolakan yang dikemukakan oleh masyarakat adalah karena RKUHP dipandang telah memasuki arena private¾hak asasi manusia. Kedua, untuk menjembatani masalah penolakan tersebut, maka perlu dilakukan dialog aktif mengenai RKUHP. masyarakat diberikan kesempatan untuk menyampaikan alasan mengapa mereka menolak.. Kemudian, pemerintah harus mampu menjelaskan HAM dan keragaman pandangan dalam melihatnya, antara lain adanya pandangan universal-absolute, pandangan universal-relatif, pandangan partikularistik-absolute dan pandangan partikularistik-relatif. Serta menjelaskan bahwa berdasarkan Pancasila dan UUD 1945, Indonesia menganut partikularistik-relatif.
The Implications of Implementing the Global Minimum Tax on Fiscal Incentive Schemes in Indonesia Aditya Pradana, Yudha; Adhari, Ade
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.66373

Abstract

The implementation of the Global Minimum Tax (GMT), initiated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the G20, has brought significant changes to the effectiveness of fiscal incentive schemes in Indonesia, particularly those based on tax rate reductions, thereby requiring adjustments to national policies to remain aligned with global tax standards. This study aims to analyze the implications of the GMT’s implementation on the design and effectiveness of fiscal incentive schemes in Indonesia, while also assessing the suitability of the GMT policy in influencing the structuring of fiscal incentives and strengthening the government’s legal policy within the framework of tax policy reform. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach, to examine the compatibility of GMT norms with the national legal system, as well as a conceptual approach to understand the paradigm shift from tax rate competition to global tax coordination. The research findings indicate that the top-up tax mechanism under the GMT regime significantly reduces the effectiveness of tariff-based fiscal incentives, thereby requiring Indonesia to restructure its fiscal incentive policies toward non-tariff incentives, enhanced legal certainty, and strengthened investment competitiveness. These findings confirm that the GMT policy is, in principle, aligned with the global tax reform agenda and reinforces the government’s legal policy direction in building a fair and equitable tax system, as well as promoting a restructuring of fiscal incentives that is more selective, transparent, and oriented toward investment quality and legal certainty, thereby providing conceptual and normative contributions to the development of national tax law and fiscal policy formulation practices in Indonesia.
Reformulating the Una Via Principle in the Law on Financial Sector Development and Strengthening Djayanti; Adhari, Ade
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.66568

Abstract

Capital market law enforcement in Indonesia faces a major legal issue in the form of uncertainty regarding the application of the una via principle in determining the appropriate enforcement pathway between administrative and criminal sanctions, particularly following Constitutional Court Decision No. 59/PUU-XXI/2023, which revoked the Financial Services Authority’s (OJK) exclusive investigative authority. This situation raises issues of legitimacy as well as a disparity in evidentiary standards between the administrative and criminal legal regimes. The study’s key findings indicate that the current formulation of the “una via” principle risks creating legal defects due to an imbalance in evidentiary standards. The dominance of administrative assessments by the OJK as the initial basis for determining criminal offenses is not always aligned with criminal evidentiary standards, thereby implicating issues of proof and the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement in the capital market sector. As normative and institutional recommendations, this study proposes reformulating the una via principle through strengthening the administrative sanctions regime, developing formal coordination mechanisms between the OJK and the Police, and institutionalizing a Joint Case Assessment Committee. Additionally, the adoption of a civil penalty system based on practices in Singapore, Malaysia, and the Netherlands is recommended to enhance legal certainty and the effectiveness of capital market law enforcement.
Penerapan Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Mekanisme Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Amin, Naufal Sakti Ramadhani; Adhari, Ade
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.139-161

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia mengakibatkan kerugian negara yang besar, sementara mekanisme pemulihan aset berbasis conviction-based hanya mampu memulihkan sekitar 30–35% aset. Kondisi ini menimbulkan kebutuhan untuk mengadopsi Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB-AF) yang memungkinkan pemulihan aset tanpa putusan pidana. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana NCB-AF dapat diterapkan untuk memulihkan kerugian negara, dan kesesuaiannya dengan sistem peradilan Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui analisis peraturan dan instrumen internasional. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa NCB-AF tidak bertentangan dengan asas legalitas maupun presumption of innocence karena bersifat tindakan terhadap objek kejahatan. Implementasi efektif memerlukan pengesahan RUU Pemulihan Aset serta harmonisasi dengan KUHAP 2026. Penerapan NCB-AF dinilai strategis untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pemulihan aset dan memperkuat pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia.
Co-Authors Aditya Pradana, Yudha Adityo Saputra Ahmad Redi, Ahmad Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang Ali Masyhar Allyssa, Allyssa Alvira Damayant Amelia Elisabeth Putri Kusuma Amin, Naufal Sakti Ramadhani Amri, Ibra Fulenzi Andriano, Raphael Anggi Octavelia Putri N Anis Widyawati Anjani, Isabella Merlin Aprilia, Indah Siti Arif Al Jibran, Farel Arifin, Alfredo Juniotama arrifa, Reisa Arya Sulistiawan Audrey, Jessica Aurellia, Chyntia Axel Putra, Muhammad Belicia Widhyana Yulia Putri Bryan Bryan Calvin Rafly Hadi Pradana Daniel Hasudungan Nainggolan Dave Hamonangan Deo Syahputra, Bearlly Devi Ulan Dari Dian Latifiani Didik Purnomo, Didik Djayanti Edo Bintang Joshua Eliza Della Kanaya Elizabeth, Vivi Ferdian Soni Ferdinand De Lapasha Gen Yaish Ibrahim Gilbert Winata Goce, Azzahra Natazia Ristina Hans Poliman Helda Rahmasari Hermawan, Nabila Tasya Husen, Nur Afni Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida Ilham, Rianza Naufalfalah Indah Siti Aprilia Indra Dohara Siburian Jeremy Nicholas Joshua Steven Ongaran Julian Devara Asyraf Julita, Marcella Junior, Austin Kaendo, Karen Eklesia Gabriella Lambertus Josua Tallaut Leona Citra Maranatha Lin Yan Che Mahabar, Regina Victoria Rambu Ngana Margamu Desy Putri Dewi Margaret Mutiara Manurung Marsel Mulyadi Milenia, Angelica Christin Nainggolan, Daniel Hasudungan Naomi, Sherryl Natashya, Jasmine Niella Tasya Ullie Niken Febriana Dwi Nurizki, Andhika Raka Ongaran , Joshua Steven Ongaran, Joshua Steven Pujiyono Pujiyono Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma Rannu, Delycia Anwar Renardi Idfidian, Teuku Richard Janwardo Ridwan Arifin Rionardo Farlus Patitan Rizky Setiawan Sanjaya, Dixon Saputra, Rama Adi Sherlyn, Sherlyn Sherryl Naomi Sheryn Lawrencya Sidharta, Sidharta Sihaloho, Afpryanto Silviana Putri, Szyva Simanjuntak, Irene Gracia Sindi Fitria Singhs, Arief Dermawan Sitabuana, Tundjung Suryani, Leony Sondang Tania, Neysa Tasya Renwarin, Chrisjane Thie, Naysa Andrea Trayama, Yoga Tundjung Herning Sitabuana Viano Lewi Kong Ateng, Kenny Vincent Trauman Virriantaka Wayan P. Windia Wijaya, Natasya Winata, Tania wong, Sherryl naomi Yohen, Samantha Maria Yuwono Prianto Zebua, August Delta