Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
14.832
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Hukum Progresif Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Spektrum Hukum Jurnal Daulat Hukum INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Konstitusi Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Jurnal Al-Dustur Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Hukum Adigama Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review El-Iqtishady Law Development Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Bina Hukum Lingkungan Asas wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan, dan Sosial Keagamaan Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities RechtIdee Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Lex Scientia Law Review Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Ade Adhari
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 120 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 120 Documents
Search

 8   9   10   11   12 
The Urgency of Policy Formulation in the Criminalization of Online Gambling: Urgensi Kebijakan Formulasi dalam Tindak Pidana Judi Online Wong, Sherryl Naomi; Adhari, Ade
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i1.1405

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed traditional forms of crime into sophisticated cyber-based offenses, including online gambling, which has become increasingly prevalent in Indonesia. Specifically, the application of Article 303 of the Criminal Code—designed for conventional, physical gambling—proves inadequate for addressing the borderless, anonymous, and technologically complex nature of digital gambling. The knowledge gap lies in the absence of explicit legal provisions regulating online gambling, resulting in inconsistent interpretations, reliance on prohibited analogical reasoning, and weakened legal certainty. This study aims to analyze current punishment practices for online gambling and assess the urgency of reformulating criminal law policies that align with contemporary technological realities. The results reveal that enforcement often stretches Article 303 beyond its intended scope, violating the principle of legality and producing ineffective sanctions that fail to reflect the social and economic harms of digital gambling. The novelty of this research lies in its integrated evaluation of doctrinal deficiencies, judicial practices, and theoretical foundations of criminalization within Indonesia’s evolving cybercrime landscape. The implications underline the urgent need for explicit statutory regulation of online gambling to ensure legal certainty, enhance law-enforcement effectiveness, and strengthen societal protection in the digital era. Highlights: Online gambling grows rapidly while outdated laws fail to regulate digital mechanisms. Applying Article 303 KUHP to cyber-based gambling often violates the legality principle. Urgent legal reform is needed to ensure clarity, effectiveness, and proportional sanctions. Keywords: Online Gambling, Criminal Policy, Legality Principle, Cybercrime Regulation, Legal Reform
Proof of Intent in Aiding and Abetting a Criminal Act in Medan District Court Decision Number 882/Pid.B/2024/PN Mdn: Pembuktian Pemenuhan Unsur Kesengajaan Pembantuan Tindak Pidana Pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 882/Pid.B/2024/PN Mdn Arrifa, Reisa; Adhari, Ade
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i1.1409

Abstract

General Background: Accomplice liability under Article 56 of the Indonesian Criminal Code requires proof of intent, reflected in the accomplice’s knowledge and will to facilitate a crime. Specific Background: In Decision No. 882/Pid.B/2024/PN Mdn, the court concluded that intent in accomplice liability was not established, despite evidence showing the defendant knowingly created and transferred mobile banking accounts to a fraud perpetrator for financial gain. Knowledge Gap: Existing studies rarely examine inconsistencies between doctrinal constructions of intent and their judicial application in accomplice liability within fraud cases. Aims: This study analyzes how the element of intent in accomplice liability was assessed and whether the court’s reasoning aligns with criminal law doctrine. Results: Findings indicate that the defendant’s conduct demonstrates knowledge and purposeful assistance fulfilling the subjective elements of fraud under Article 378 KUHP and the intent requirement of Article 56 KUHP. Novelty: This study provides a doctrinal–case analysis showing that judicial misinterpretation of intent can blur the distinction between neutral acts and intentional facilitation. Implications: The results highlight the need for consistent judicial application of mens rea principles to maintain the integrity of criminal responsibility and prevent erroneous exclusions of accomplice liability. Highlights: The case reveals a doctrinal inconsistency in assessing intent for accomplice liability. Evidence shows the defendant’s actions met the subjective elements of fraud. Misinterpretation of mens rea risks weakening the boundaries of criminal responsibility. Keywords: Accomplice Liability, Intent, Article 378 KUHP, Proof, Participation in Crime
A Critical Analysis of the Fulfillment of the Intent Element in the Dissemination of Private Content under the Electronic Information and Transactions Crime, Based on Decision No. 805/Pid.Sus.2024/PN.Jkt.Sel.: Analisis Kritis Pemenuhan Unsur Kesengajaan Penyebarluasaan Konten Pribadi Dalam Tindak Pidana ITE Studi Putusan Nomor 805/Pid.Sus.2024/PN.Jkt.Sel Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen; Adhari, Ade
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i1.1410

Abstract

General Background: The rapid advancement of digital technology has increased legal challenges related to electronic information misuse, particularly within Indonesia’s Special Criminal Law governing Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT). Specific Background: Cases involving the dissemination of private content frequently raise questions regarding the fulfillment of intent or dolus as a requirement for criminal liability. Knowledge Gap: Judicial inconsistencies in assessing intent—especially in distinguishing intentional acts from negligence—indicate the need for deeper doctrinal analysis. Aims: This study critically examines the fulfillment of intent in the dissemination of private content under Article 27 ayat 1 jo. Article 45 ayat 1 of the EIT Law, based on Decision No. 805/Pid.Sus.2024/PN.Jkt.Sel. Results: The findings show that the court’s analysis relied on three key elements: actus reus, the absence of rights or consent, and mens rea reflected in the perpetrator’s awareness of wrongdoing, while also considering the defendant’s negligence or culpa. Novelty: This study exposes discrepancies between courtroom facts and judicial reasoning, revealing conceptual misalignment in applying intent within EIT cases. Implications: The research provides a clearer analytical framework for judges and legal practitioners to differentiate intentional wrongdoing from negligence in future EIT adjudications. Highlights: The study clarifies how intent is assessed in private-content dissemination cases under the EIT Law. Findings show discrepancies between courtroom facts and the court’s interpretation of intent. The research offers a clearer framework for distinguishing intent from negligence in future cases. Keywords: Intent, Negligence, EIT Law, Private Content, Criminal Liability
Criminal Liability of Defendants with Bipolar Disorder from the Perspective of Justice in Supreme Court Decision No. 1209 K/Pid.Sus/2023 Virriantaka; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.359

Abstract

In Indonesia, criminal law stipulates that a person can only be held accountable for their actions if there is an element of fault, in addition to meeting the principle of legality. Criminal liability aims to determine whether the perpetrator should indeed bear the consequences of their actions. On the other hand, Bipolar Disorder is a serious mental condition that causes drastic mood changes, which can affect a person’s ability to control their behavior and actions. This study aims to examine the extent to which the principle of justice is applied in determining criminal liability for defendants suffering from Bipolar Disorder, as illustrated in Supreme Court Decision Number 1209K/Pid.sus/2023. The methods used include the Statute Approach and the Case Approach. The findings show that the provisions regarding criminal liability are contained in Article 44 of the former Criminal Code (KUHP) as well as Articles 38 and 39 of the new Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023). However, in practice, the judges’ decision has not been entirely fair, as the defendant’s Bipolar Disorder was not taken into consideration. In fact, criminal law should not only focus on punishment but also take into account the condition of the perpetrator, including the defendant’s mental state. By doing so, the imposed sentence can be more humane and appropriately targeted.
Policy Framework for Crime Prevention Based on the Modus Operandi of Human Trafficking in Cibadak District Court Decision No. 92/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.CBD Sherlyn, Sherlyn; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.374

Abstract

This study investigates the increasing prevalence of human trafficking in Indonesia facilitated through social media platforms as a mechanism for recruiting illegal migrant workers, as illustrated by the Cibadak District Court Decision No. 92/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Cbd. In this case, the defendant, Clara Emilia Yulianti, and her network recruited prospective migrant workers without official authorization by offering high-paying jobs abroad, thereby exposing significant gaps in state oversight and digital protection for prospective migrants. The objective of this study is to analyze the modus operandi of the illegal recruitment scheme in this case and to evaluate existing prevention policies to address the legal loopholes exploited by the perpetrators. Employing normative legal methods alongside legislative, conceptual, and case study approaches, the study finds that the perpetrators used social media to lure victims, collect fees, and engage in unlawful sheltering and deployment activities in violation of Article 2(1) of Law No. 21/2007 in conjunction with Law No. 18/2017. Preventive efforts should prioritize strengthening oversight of online recruitment through enhanced cooperation between the government and digital platforms to enable detection, verification, and removal of illegal recruitment content.
Construction of Criminal Liability in Single Indictment of Obstruction of Justice under the Corruption Law Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.380

Abstract

This study examines obstruction of justice in Indonesia’s positive law as well as criminal liability in the application of single charges based on the Corruption Law. With normative juridical methods through legislative and case approaches, the research analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that Indonesian law does not yet have a comprehensive definition of obstruction of justice, thus opening up a wide space for interpretation. The application of a single indictment in corruption cases also creates legal uncertainty, especially in proving the element of “obstructing the legal process” when the act is closely related to the main offense. This study emphasizes the need for harmonization of norms and a clearer formulation of criminal offenses to increase the effectiveness of obstruction of justice as an instrument for eradicating corruption.
Pemberatan Pidana Berbasis Doktrin Erfolgshaftung terhadap Kasus Penganiayaan Hewan Kolektif (Putusan PN No. 247/Pid.B/2023/PN Nnk) Cheung, Sherlyn Nathalia; Adhari, Ade
SPEKTRUM HUKUM Vol 22, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Spektrum
Publisher : PMIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/sh.v22i2.6702

Abstract

Seringnya kasus penyiksaan hewan di Indonesia menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap hewan belum efektif meskipun ketentuan pidana telah tersedia. Pasal 302 ayat (2) KUHP mengatur bahwa setiap orang yang dengan sengaja menyakiti atau memperlakukan hewan secara tidak adil sehingga mengakibatkan penderitaan atau kematian dapat dihukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kepastian pemberatan pidana dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 247/Pid.B/2023/PN Nnk melalui teori syarat pidana dan doktrin Erfolgshaftung. Metode yang digunakan adalah hukum normatif dengan mengkaji peraturan, kepustakaan, dan putusan pengadilan melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa semua unsur pemberatan pidana terpenuhi, meliputi perbuatan, kesengajaan, kemampuan bertanggung jawab, dan sifat melawan hukum. Analisis dengan menggunakan doktrin Erfolgshaftung menegaskan bahwa akibat kematian hewan melalui cara yang kejam seharusnya menjadi dasar pemberatan pidana. Namun, hukuman satu bulan yang dijatuhkan hakim tidak mencerminkan proporsionalitas atau kepastian pemberatan hukuman. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa hukuman pidana belum diterapkan secara tepat, dan paradigma penjatuhan hukuman yang lebih responsif terhadap konsekuensinya diperlukan untuk memperkuat perlindungan hukum bagi hewan.
Who Executes Justice? Comparative Institutional Paths from Verdict to Prison Widyawati, Anis; Adhari, Ade; Arifin, Ridwan
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 8 NO. 1 JANUARY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v1i1.31642

Abstract

This article examines sentence-execution control in Indonesia, Thailand, and Tajikistan through the distinction between the Verdict Executor and the Criminal Executor as a basis for penitentiary law reform. It starts from the premise that the post-trial stage, particularly the enforcement of imprisonment, remains one of the least theorized yet most crucial parts of criminal procedure, with direct implications for legal certainty, institutional accountability, and prisoners’ human rights. Using normative legal research and a functional comparative approach, the study analyzes criminal sentence-execution systems, justice and imprisonment frameworks, relevant laws and regulations, institutional structures, and supervisory mechanisms in the three countries. The findings show important differences in the allocation of powers and functions between supervisory and executive bodies. Indonesia reflects an integrated model in which prosecutorial authority extends to the admission of convicts and the administration of sentences. By contrast, Thailand and Tajikistan adopt more differentiated institutional arrangements, with specialized and relatively independent bodies responsible for penitentiary supervision. The analysis concludes that judicial supervision of sentence enforcement and the execution of criminal punishment involve distinct doctrinal functions that should be institutionally separated. Such separation would reduce overlapping authority, minimize conflict, and improve systemic order and efficiency. In this context, the article argues that autonomous supervision of sentence execution should be recognized as a doctrinal category within criminal procedure law. It further proposes electronic supervision as a regulatory and procedural instrument to strengthen transparency, proportionality, and human rights compliance during the execution stage. Overall, the research demonstrates that without effective supervision of sentence execution, meaningful reform of the sentence-enforcement system and the rule of law remains unattainable.
MENYELAMI INTERPRETASI DEMONSTRAN AKSI REFORMASI DIKORUPSI TERHADAP RUU KUHP Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 9, No 1 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (673.975 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/jhp.9.1.16-24

Abstract

RKUHP merupakan salah satu rancangan undang-undang yang ditolak pada saat aksi demonstrasi “Reformasi Dikoupsi”. Mereka yang menolak RKUHP tentu dilakukan atas dasar suatu alasan (reason). Tulisan ini berupaya menjawab pertanyaan alasan mendasar mengapa penolakan tersebut terjadi dan langkah apa yang dapat dipilih untuk mengatasi penolakan. Hasil kajian menunjukan, pertama, Alasan penolakan yang dikemukakan oleh masyarakat adalah karena RKUHP dipandang telah memasuki arena private¾hak asasi manusia. Kedua, untuk menjembatani masalah penolakan tersebut, maka perlu dilakukan dialog aktif mengenai RKUHP. masyarakat diberikan kesempatan untuk menyampaikan alasan mengapa mereka menolak.. Kemudian, pemerintah harus mampu menjelaskan HAM dan keragaman pandangan dalam melihatnya, antara lain adanya pandangan universal-absolute, pandangan universal-relatif, pandangan partikularistik-absolute dan pandangan partikularistik-relatif. Serta menjelaskan bahwa berdasarkan Pancasila dan UUD 1945, Indonesia menganut partikularistik-relatif.
State Loss as the Basis for Criminalizing Corruption by State-Owned Enterprise Employees Harmono, Harry; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.51847

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the legal certainty of the sentencing basis in the cassation ruling of Supreme Court Decision Number 283 K/Pid.Sus/2021, and to formulate the ideal sentencing model for determining the legal basis for imposing sanctions on corruption committed by State-Owned Enterprise (BUMN) employees. The research method used was normative legal research with a statutory approach and case approach, analyzing court decisions through library research and qualitative-prescriptive analysis. The novelty in this research lies in the identification of a structural normative weakness in the Supreme Court's reasoning, where the choice of article was based on the magnitude of state losses rather than systematic proof of the elements of the offense a practice that creates legal uncertainty and potential double standards in law enforcement. Based on the research, it was concluded that the cassation decision contained argumentation weaknesses from the standpoint of Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty, and the ideal sentencing model must build juridical qualification in a structured manner, concretely prove formal unlawfulness, and integrate the principle of proportionality combining retributive, preventive, and restorative dimensions in a balanced manner.
Co-Authors Adityo Saputra Ahmad Redi, Ahmad Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang Ali Masyhar Allyssa, Allyssa Alvira Damayant Amad Sudiro, Amad Amelia Elisabeth Putri Kusuma Amri, Ibra Fulenzi Andriano, Raphael Anggi Octavelia Putri N Anis Widyawati Anjani, Isabella Merlin aprilia, indah Aprilia, Indah Siti Arif Al Jibran, Farel Arifin, Alfredo Juniotama arrifa, Reisa Arya Sulistiawan Audrey, Jessica Aurellia, Chyntia Axel Putra, Muhammad Belicia Widhyana Yulia Putri Bryan Bryan Calvin Rafly Hadi Pradana Cheung, Sherlyn Nathalia Daniel Hasudungan Nainggolan Dave Hamonangan Deo Syahputra, Bearlly Devi Ulan Dari Dian Latifiani Didik Purnomo, Didik Edo Bintang Joshua Eliza Della Kanaya Elizabeth, Vivi Ferdian Soni Ferdinand De Lapasha Gen Yaish Ibrahim Gilbert Winata Goce, Azzahra Natazia Ristina Haga, Christian Samuel Lodoe Hans Poliman Harmono, Harry Helda Rahmasari Hermawan, Nabila Tasya Husen, Nur Afni Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida Ilham, Rianza Naufalfalah Indah Siti Aprilia Indra Dohara Siburian Jeremy Nicholas Joshua Steven Ongaran Julian Devara Asyraf Julita, Marcella Junior, Austin Kaendo, Karen Eklesia Gabriella Lambertus Josua Tallaut Leona Citra Maranatha Lin Yan Che Mahabar, Regina Victoria Rambu Ngana Margamu Desy Putri Dewi Margaret Mutiara Manurung Marsel Mulyadi Milenia, Angelica Christin Nainggolan, Daniel Hasudungan Naomi, Sherryl Natashya, Jasmine Niella Tasya Ullie Niken Febriana Dwi Nurizki, Andhika Raka Ongaran , Joshua Steven Ongaran, Joshua Steven Pujiyono Pujiyono Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma Rannu, Delycia Anwar Renardi Idfidian, Teuku Richard Janwardo Ridwan Arifin Rio Kurniawan Rionardo Farlus Patitan Rizky Setiawan Sanjaya, Dixon Saputra, Rama Adi Sherlyn, Sherlyn Sherryl Naomi Sheryn Lawrencya Shidarta Shidarta Sidharta, Sidharta Sihaloho, Afpryanto Silviana Putri, Szyva Simanjuntak, Irene Gracia Sindi Fitria Singhs, Arief Dermawan Sitabuana, Tundjung Suryani, Leony Sondang Tania, Neysa Tasya Renwarin, Chrisjane Thie, Naysa Andrea Trayama, Yoga Tundjung Herning Sitabuana Viano Lewi Kong Ateng, Kenny Vincent Trauman Virriantaka Wayan P. Windia Wijaya, Natasya Winata, Tania wong, Sherryl naomi Yohen, Samantha Maria Yuwono Prianto Zebua, August Delta