Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

MORALITY IN LAW: AN ANALYSIS TOWARDS THE LEGAL PHILOSOPHY AND INDONESIA NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM Adhari, Ade; Sitabuana, Tundjung; Aprilia, Indah Siti
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 13, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The philosophy of law schools, such as positivism and naturalism, always have opposing arguments about moral and law separation. Positivism on one side, believes that morality is a non-law element that has to be strictly separated from the law, while on the other side, naturalism says moral can not be separated from the law and that moral has to become the basis of every law. However, the positivism idea is arduous to be implemented in the current situation as the legal product is constantly managed to conform with the moral values. The objectives of this paper are to study: (1) the moral position according to naturalism, positivism, and interpretivism perspective along with the adjustment of positivism view in morality within the law; and (2) the moral position in Indonesia national legal system as every country has its own legal reasoning pattern about moral in the law. The content of this paper is analyzed using the normative juridical legal research method. The result shows that: (1) Each naturalism, positivism, or interpretivism has its own argument on how morals are found, why morals are important to be incorporated in the law, and what legal goals they most upheld; and (2) Indonesia reasoning pattern exhibits the combination of several philosophy of law schools characteristics. The position of morals in Indonesia alone, has a similarity to naturalism and interpretivism because from the very beginning of law-making process up to the implementation, Indonesia can not separate moral from the law.
DYNAMICS OF THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM, TRANSPARENT AND ACCOUNTABLE HANDLING OF CRIMINAL CASES IN CRIMINAL EXECUTION LAW IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: CONVERGENCE AND DIVERGENCE OF INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES Widyawati, Anis; Adhari, Ade; Masyhar, Ali; Deo Syahputra, Bearlly; Purnomo, Didik
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research examines the dynamics of the penitentiary system transparent, and accountable criminal case handling in criminal execution law in Southeast Asia, focusing on the convergence and divergence of international perspectives. These countries have diverse approaches to the penitentiary system and criminal law enforcement, including in terms of the implementation of the death penalty and the treatment of prisoners. Some countries, such as Singapore and Malaysia, maintain strict death penalty practices, which often contradict international human rights standards, while others such as the Philippines show inconsistencies in implementing criminal execution laws. This research also examines the three main stages in the enforcement of the penitentiary system, namely the formulation stage, the application stage and the execution stage, which vary across Southeast Asian countries. Historical, political and cultural factors contribute to these variations, affecting the conformity of national legal systems with transparent and accountable international criminal law. In addition, this study highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in criminal case handling, as well as the role of rehabilitation in the penitentiary system, as an effort to align with international standards, especially regarding the treatment of death row prisoners. Understanding these dynamics is expected to provide insight into the differences and similarities in criminal execution laws in Southeast Asia as well as efforts towards better integration with international perspectives on human rights and criminal executions.
THE ULTIMUM REMEDIUM PRINCIPAL FORMULATION POLICY IS PARTIAL IN NATURE IN CORPORATE CRIMINALITY IN INDONESIA Adhari, Ade; Pujiyono, Pujiyono; Sidharta, Sidharta; Aprilia, Indah Siti
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article identifies and examines the policy formulation of the ultimum remedium principle in criminalizing corporations in Indonesia. The source of criminal law is found in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and laws outside the Criminal Code. The principle of ultimum remedium in corporate punishment is not recognized in the Criminal Code. Limited ultimum remedium-based corporate penalties are found in various laws containing offenses in the fields of taxation, customs, excise and the environment. Normatively, the process of prosecuting a corporation is a last resort, and the main step required is fulfilling the obligation to pay off losses to state revenue, paying off import duties that are not or underpaid or after paying off excise that is not and/or underpaid. From this policy formulation, it can be seen that the principle of ultimum remedium in corporate punishment is partial.
ASSESSING LEGAL CERTAINTY IN SENTENCING AGGRAVATION IN THE DECISION OF THE CENTRAL JAKARTA DISTRICT Natashya, Jasmine; Adhari, Ade
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i1.1906

Abstract

One crime that cannot be avoided is violence. Joint criminal acts of violence as regulated in Article 170 of the Criminal Code often result in serious injury and can even cause death to the victim. This study analyzes the application of aggravated punishment in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 200/Pid.B/2025/Pn.Jkt.Pst through the effects of the perpetrator's use of acid, which caused third-degree burns covering 4.5% of the total surface area of the victim's face. The research method used by the author is normative legal research using a legislative approach to examine laws and regulations. The result of the research on Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 200/Pid.B/2025/Pn.Jkt.Pst is that the sentence imposed was one year and two months in prison, far below the maximum penalty of nine years specified in the Criminal Code. This condition shows an imbalance between the severity of the consequences and the lightness of the punishment, which ultimately causes legal uncertainty in the application of Article 170 of the Criminal Code.
MENCEGAH LEGALISASI TINDAKAN ULTRA VIRES MELALUI STRUKTUR HIERARKIS: HUBUNGAN PRESUMPTIO IUSTAE CAUSA DAN PRINSIP LEGALITAS DALAM HUKUM ADMINISTRASI INDONESIA Joshua Steven Ongaran; Ade Adhari
El-Iqthisadi Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/el-iqthisady.v7i2.63250

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini mengkaji posisi hierarkis asas Presumptio Iustae Causa terhadap Prinsip Legalitas dalam hukum administrasi Indonesia dengan menggunakan struktur teori hukum Gabriel Hallevy. Permasalahan muncul akibat penerapan presumption yang mengesampingkan uji legalitas, yang mengakibatkan legalisasi tindakan ultra vires dalam praktik pengadilan tata usaha negara (PTUN). Metode penelitian yang digunakan bersifat normatif yuridis, dengan analisis putusan PTUN dan kajian literatur relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas Presumptio Iustae Causa harus dipahami sebagai prinsip sekunder di bawah Prinsip Legalitas sebagai prinsip fundamental. Penempatan hierarkis yang benar ini penting untuk mencegah pengesampingan legalitas, menjaga koherensi sistem hukum administrasi, dan memperkuat supremasi hukum. Rekomendasi penelitian ini mencakup penerapan prinsip “uji legalitas terlebih dahulu, baru presumption” dalam praktik PTUN dan pengkodifikasian hierarki prinsip untuk mempertegas kedudukan asas tersebut. Kata Kunci: Hukum Administrasi, Presumptio Iustae Causa, Prinsip Legalitas, Struktur Hierarkis, Ultra Vires.   Abstract                                                                                         This study examines the hierarchical position of the Presumptio Iustae Causa principle in relation to the Principle of Legality within Indonesian administrative law using Gabriel Hallevy’s legal theory framework. Problems arise from the application of presumption overriding legality tests, resulting in the legalization of ultra vires acts in administrative court (PTUN) practice. The research employs normative juridical methods with analysis of court decisions and relevant literature. Results show that Presumptio Iustae Causa should be understood as a secondary principle subordinate to the fundamental Principle of Legality. Correct hierarchical positioning is crucial to prevent the overriding of legality, maintain coherence in the administrative law system, and strengthen the rule of law. Recommendations include applying the principle of "legality test first, then presumption" in PTUN practice and codifying the hierarchy of principles to clarify the position of the doctrine. Keywords: Administrative Law, Hierarchical Structure, Presumptio Iustae Causa, Principle of Legality, Ultra Vires,
Penghapusan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara: Sinkronisasi Undang-Undang Tipikor dengan UNCAC Haga, Christian Samuel Lodoe; Adhari, Ade
Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47200/awtjhpsa.v5i1.3237

Abstract

The current Corruption Law still uses the element of "causing loss to state finances" as the main element of the crime, thus creating legal uncertainty and limiting the effectiveness of corruption eradication. This study uses a normative juridical method with a comparative legal approach between the Corruption Law and the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) to analyze the direction of synchronization between the two. The results show that the UNCAC does not require state losses, but rather emphasizes the corrupt act itself, such as abuse of office, bribery, and illicit acquisition of wealth. In conclusion, the removal of this element is an important step in synchronizing the Corruption Law with the UNCAC. Therefore, the recommendation for its removal should focus on unlawful acts and asset recovery.
Efektivitas Pemidanaan Perjudian Daring dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Saputra, Rama Adi; Adhari, Ade
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.51271

Abstract

Perjudian daring telah berkembang menjadi salah satu bentuk kejahatan digital yang paling kompleks di Indonesia, seiring meningkatnya penetrasi teknologi informasi dan akses internet. Meskipun pemidanaan terhadap pelaku perjudian daring masih mengandalkan ketentuan Pasal 303 dan Pasal 303 bis KUHP sebagai dasar hukum utama, efektivitas pemidanaan tersebut dipengaruhi oleh keterbatasan regulasi, hambatan penegakan hukum, serta dinamika sosial masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis efektivitas pemidanaan terhadap pelaku perjudian daring dalam perspektif kebijakan hukum pidana, khususnya dalam upaya pencegahan dan penanggulangan kejahatan berbasis digital di Indonesia. Melalui pendekatan normatif dan analisis kebijakan pidana, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas pemidanaan masih lemah pada aspek normatif karena belum adanya aturan khusus yang mengatur perjudian daring secara komprehensif. Pada aspek yuridis, keterbatasan forensik digital, persoalan yurisdiksi lintas negara, serta kurangnya koordinasi antarlembaga menghambat penegakan hukum. Pada aspek sosiologis, rendahnya literasi digital dan kondisi ekonomi masyarakat mendorong tingginya partisipasi dalam judi daring sehingga pemidanaan tidak memberikan efek jera yang signifikan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemidanaan yang efektif hanya dapat dicapai melalui penguatan kebijakan hukum pidana secara holistik, mencakup pembaruan regulasi, peningkatan kapasitas aparat, serta implementasi strategi non-penal yang bersifat preventif dan rehabilitatif.
Upaya Penanggulan Berbasis Akar Penyebab Overkapasitas pada Lapas Kelas IIA di Kerobokan Bali Mahabar, Regina Victoria Rambu Ngana; Adhari, Ade
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.51020

Abstract

Overkapasitas pada Lapas Kelas IIA Kerobokan Bali merupakan persoalan kompleks yang mencerminkan ketidakseimbangan antara pertumbuhan populasi warga binaan dan kemampuan institusi pemasyarakatan menyediakan ruang pembinaan yang layak. Data menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan jumlah penghuni dari tahun 2022 hingga 2025, sementara kapasitas riil lapas menurun akibat proses pembangunan blok baru yang mengharuskan pengosongan beberapa area hunian. Kondisi ini tidak hanya menciptakan kesenjangan antara kapasitas administratif dan kapasitas fungsional, tetapi juga berdampak pada efektivitas layanan pembinaan, kesehatan, keamanan, serta pemenuhan hak dasar warga binaan. Penelitian ini menelaah akar penyebab overkapasitas yang tidak semata bersumber pada aspek teknis, tetapi juga dipengaruhi oleh kebijakan pemidanaan yang masih berorientasi pada pemenjaraan, tingginya tingkat penahanan pra-persidangan, serta kurang optimalnya implementasi alternatif pemidanaan non pemenjaraan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur akademik, dan data resmi Lapas Kerobokan. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa upaya penanggulangan overkapasitas yang bersifat fisik dan administratif belum memadai karena tidak menyentuh faktor struktural. Oleh sebab itu, diperlukan reformasi kebijakan pemidanaan, harmonisasi antar lembaga penegak hukum, serta penguatan instrumen integrasi agar penanganan overkapasitas bersifat berkelanjutan.
Rehabilitasi sebagai Upaya Pemulihan Trauma bagi Perempuan Disabilitasi Korban Kekerasan Seksual Simanjuntak, Irene Gracia; Adhari, Ade
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50937

Abstract

Kekerasan seksual di Inonesia masih menunjukan angka yang tinggi, termasuk kekerasan seksual terhadap perempuan penyandang disabilitas menimbulkan dampak yang berat dan membuthkan rehabilitasi yang menyeluruh. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normative untuk mengkaji pengaturan hak rehabilitasi dalam Undang- Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual, Undang- Undang Penyandang Disabilitas, dan aturan terkait kekerasan seksual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa meskupun landasan hukum sudah tersedia, pelaksanaan di lapangan masih belum optimal karena terbatasnya fasilitas rehabilitasi, kurangnya tenaga profesional serta koordinasi layanan yang belum terpadu. Penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya penguatan layanan rehabilitas yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan khusus korban.
Urgensi Pembiayaan Pengobatan dalam Pemenuhan Pemulihan Kerugian Konsumen Korban Produk Obat Sirup yang Mengakibatkan Gagal Ginjal Yohen, Samantha Maria; Adhari, Ade
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50850

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas urgensi pembiayaan pengobatan dalam pemenuhan pemulihan kerugian konsumen korban produk obat sirup yang mengakibatkan gagal ginjal akut (Acute Kidney Injury/AKI) di Indonesia. Kasus keracunan massal akibat cemaran etilen glikol (EG) dan dietilen glikol (DEG) pada obat sirup anak telah menimbulkan dampak kesehatan yang sangat serius, termasuk kerusakan ginjal permanen, kebutuhan terapi dialisis jangka panjang, dan tingginya angka kematian. Beban biaya perawatan yang meliputi perawatan darurat, rawat inap intensif, terapi lanjutan, serta rehabilitasi medis dan psikologis memerlukan pembiayaan yang besar dan berkelanjutan. Kondisi tersebut memperlihatkan bahwa pemulihan tidak dapat dicapai hanya melalui penghukuman pelaku, melainkan melalui pemenuhan biaya pengobatan sebagai hak fundamental korban. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual untuk menganalisis efektivitas mekanisme restitusi sebagai instrumen pemulihan dalam hukum pidana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara ketentuan normatif yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban dengan implementasi di lapangan, sebagaimana tergambar dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang Nomor 850/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Tng yang belum sepenuhnya mengakomodasi kebutuhan pengobatan korban. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa diperlukan penguatan mekanisme restitusi dan pembentukan skema dana kompensasi nasional untuk menjamin kepastian pemulihan, serta mendorong penerapan keadilan restoratif yang berorientasi pada kebutuhan korban secara komprehensif.
Co-Authors Adityo Saputra Ahmad Redi, Ahmad Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang Ali Masyhar Allyssa, Allyssa Alvira Damayant Amad Sudiro, Amad Amelia Elisabeth Putri Kusuma Amri, Ibra Fulenzi Andriano, Raphael Anggi Octavelia Putri N Anis Widyawati Anjani, Isabella Merlin aprilia, indah Aprilia, Indah Siti Arif Al Jibran, Farel Arifin, Alfredo Juniotama arrifa, Reisa Arya Sulistiawan Audrey, Jessica Aurellia, Chyntia Axel Putra, Muhammad Belicia Widhyana Yulia Putri Bryan Bryan Calvin Rafly Hadi Pradana Cheung, Sherlyn Nathalia Daniel Hasudungan Nainggolan Dave Hamonangan Deo Syahputra, Bearlly Devi Ulan Dari Dian Latifiani Didik Purnomo, Didik Edo Bintang Joshua Eliza Della Kanaya Elizabeth, Vivi Ferdian Soni Ferdinand De Lapasha Gen Yaish Ibrahim Gilbert Winata Goce, Azzahra Natazia Ristina Haga, Christian Samuel Lodoe Hans Poliman Harmono, Harry Helda Rahmasari Hermawan, Nabila Tasya Husen, Nur Afni Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida Ilham, Rianza Naufalfalah Indah Siti Aprilia Indra Dohara Siburian Jeremy Nicholas Joshua Steven Ongaran Julian Devara Asyraf Julita, Marcella Junior, Austin Kaendo, Karen Eklesia Gabriella Lambertus Josua Tallaut Leona Citra Maranatha Lin Yan Che Mahabar, Regina Victoria Rambu Ngana Margamu Desy Putri Dewi Margaret Mutiara Manurung Marsel Mulyadi Milenia, Angelica Christin Nainggolan, Daniel Hasudungan Naomi, Sherryl Natashya, Jasmine Niella Tasya Ullie Niken Febriana Dwi Nurizki, Andhika Raka Ongaran , Joshua Steven Ongaran, Joshua Steven Pujiyono Pujiyono Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma Rannu, Delycia Anwar Renardi Idfidian, Teuku Richard Janwardo Ridwan Arifin Rio Kurniawan Rionardo Farlus Patitan Rizky Setiawan Sanjaya, Dixon Saputra, Rama Adi Sherlyn, Sherlyn Sherryl Naomi Sheryn Lawrencya Shidarta Shidarta Sidharta, Sidharta Sihaloho, Afpryanto Silviana Putri, Szyva Simanjuntak, Irene Gracia Sindi Fitria Singhs, Arief Dermawan Sitabuana, Tundjung Suryani, Leony Sondang Tania, Neysa Tasya Renwarin, Chrisjane Thie, Naysa Andrea Trayama, Yoga Tundjung Herning Sitabuana Viano Lewi Kong Ateng, Kenny Vincent Trauman Virriantaka Wayan P. Windia Wijaya, Natasya Winata, Tania wong, Sherryl naomi Yohen, Samantha Maria Yuwono Prianto Zebua, August Delta