Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Kepastian Hukum Akibat Kelalaian Jaksa Penuntut Umum Elizabeth, Vivi; Adhari, Ade
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 16 No 1 (2024): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.5735

Abstract

The presence of legal uncertainty in the Ngabang District Court Decision No. 48/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Nba raises questions about the impact of the Public Prosecutor's negligence in determining the charges. In this case, the prosecutor failed to establish charges that corresponded to the defendant's actions, necessitating a review of the legal certainty affected by such negligence. This research is categorized as a library study with a qualitative approach. The methodology used is normative analysis, focusing on analyzing and evaluating the impact of the prosecutor's negligence in establishing charges. The findings conclude that the Public Prosecutor's negligence in determining the appropriate charges leads to legal uncertainty, the violation of human rights, and disorder. It also limits the authority of the judicial panel. Therefore, the Public Prosecutor must exercise greater caution in selecting charges, as the indictment plays a crucial role in the judicial process.
Measuring The Effectiveness of Private Electronic System Organizers Regulations In Developing Social Media Equilibrium Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning; Adhari, Ade; Suryani, Leony Sondang; Sanjaya, Dixon; Amri, Ibra Fulenzi
LAW REFORM Vol 19, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v19i2.56534

Abstract

Technological developments, especially social media, potentially have a negative impact that pretend to social disintegration and instability. To prevent and create a healthy and conducive digital space, the Government issued the Minister of Communication and Information Regulation No.5/2020 concerning Private ESOs. This regulation gives the government authority to supervise Private ESOs and protect social media content. This research aims to examine ministerial regulation effectiveness in realizing social media equilibrium and its impact on digital democracy in Indonesia. This is a sociolegal research. The data was obtained from observation, expert interviews, and literature studies which were analyzed qualitatively. Normatively, restrictions and supervision to the right to use social media through private ESOs can be carried out to be in line with Pancasila’s Spirit. However, there are fundamental errors in ministerial regulation: (1) multiple interpretations norm; (2) unclear parameters of supervision; and (3) weak legal position of ministerial regulations in law enforcement. Sociologically, the presence of ministerial regulations is weak and ineffective because they are: (1) rejected by stakeholders; (2) easy to change; and (3) slowly responded in socialization process and community compliance. More comprehensive implementation regulation is required with, supervision through an electronic system approach to increase the role and participation of community.
Telaah Terhadap Alasan Memperingan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 813/K/PID/2023 Silviana Putri, Szyva; Adhari, Ade
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1972

Abstract

Considering Indonesia is a nation of laws, as stated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the Constitution of 1945, the rule of law, not man, should govern the state. But when we examine this issue, we find that an authority figure who is meant to lead by example and safeguard the public is still negligent and has an insufficient comprehension of the law. A senior police officer can nevertheless be included in the "Whoever" part of Article 340 of the Criminal Code when it comes to organized murder proceedings because he acknowledges that the person being assaulted is a human being with legal status. This paper aims to examine the legal importance of prohibiting high-ranking police personnel from committing intentional murder as a type of official crime. This paper applies a normative legal research methodology that involves a statutory approach and a literature review. After the data is gathered, it is processed and given a descriptive explanation to allow for a factual explanation of the correlation between the data. The outcomes of the research lead to the conclusion that office crimes are covered by Article 52 of the Criminal Code and that offenders who hold senior police positions may face sanctions to discourage their actions and punish them for their accountability.
Analisis Pembelaan Terpaksa dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 61 K/Pid/2020 Margaret Mutiara Manurung; Ade Adhari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1990

Abstract

Sebagai sebuah negara hukum, maka segala kegiatan yang terjadi di dalam negara harus dapat dilakukan dengan berlandaskan kepada hukum yang berlaku. Namun, dalam hal ini tidak menutup kemungkinan terhadinya pelanggaran hukum yang disebut juga dengan pelanggaran pidana. Salah satu pelanggaran hukum yang tidak sedikit terjadi adalah tindak pidana pembunuhan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 338 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Pada kasus ini, kerap kali terjadi individu korban yang dijadikan sasaran oleh pelaku akan melakukan perlawanan balik sebagai bentuk perlindungan diri karena merasa terancam, sehingga individu yang seharusnya menjadi seorang Korban dapat terancam dengan melakukan perlawanan balik sebagai bentuk perlindungan diri. Adapun, metode yang digunakan di dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan sumber yang diperoleh oleh studi kepustakaan dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) melalui data sekunder yang nantinya dianalisis secara deduktif. Apabila seluruh data tersebut telah terkumpul akan dijelaskan secara deskriptif agar dapat menjelaskan hal terkait secara sistematis di dalam penulisan. Muara dari penulisan ini adalah pentingnya pembuktian pembelaan terpaksa yang harus dilakukan di muka pengadilan sebagai pertimbangan bagi hakim untuk melakukan penalaran sebelum memberikan putusan atas tindak pidana yang terjadi. Di mana dalam hal ini hakim harus dapat memberikan keputusan dengan melakukan legal reasoning.
Analisis Pemenuhan Unsur Kesengajaan (Opzet) dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN KPN) Belicia Widhyana Yulia Putri; Adhari, Ade
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1995

Abstract

A criminal act is something committed by an individual who deliberately violates the provisions of the Criminal Code Book II Chapter XIX (Articles 338 to Article 350) due to the loss of someone's life. One example of this case is the murder incident in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN KPN. In this case, there was a child who murdered the victim with the motive of self-defense, because the victim asked for the perpetrator's belongings and had sex with the witness. The perpetrator was subject to a sentence based on Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code regarding abuse resulting in death by the Panel of Judges. However, this caused a polemic because the perpetrator committed the murder by stabbing a knife into the victim's vital organs in the chest. The author uses a normative juridical approach to examine the judge's views regarding the fulfillment of the element of intent (opzet) in the crime of murder using secondary data obtained through literature study. Based on the research results, the judge's consideration of the use of Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code in this decision was considered inappropriate because the judge simply did not review the jurisprudence, the opzet element in this incident, and only relied on the Criminal Code and subjective reasoning. In criminal law, it is important to consider the element of intent or opzet, even though the consequences are the same, namely the loss of the victim's life, the element of intent in each article is different. Article 338 of the Criminal Code requires the victim to lose their life, while Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code only wants the victim to feel pain without wanting the victim to die.
Penegakan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Unsur Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berencana Pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri MARISA 72/PID.B/2019/PN.MAR Arif Al Jibran, Farel; Adhari, Ade
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2011

Abstract

Enforcing legal certainty in criminal acts of serious abuse is an important aspect of a just justice system. This study analyzes the application of the elements "whoever" and "commits serious maltreatment" in the crime of serious maltreatment and their relevance to legal certainty in law enforcement. Clear provisions regarding actions that are considered serious abuse and who is responsible for these actions are the main key. With this clarity, justice can be better served because all parties are subject to the same laws. Apart from that, applying appropriate punishment is also a means of providing justice to victims and society as a whole. The research results show that the application of these two elements is in accordance with the principles of justice and legal certainty. Thus, legal certainty in enforcing criminal acts of serious ill-treatment is an important basis for creating a just and civilized society. Through normative juridical analysis research methods, and supported by the fact that clarity in the law provides certainty for society and upholds justice. So enforcing legal certainty in criminal acts of serious abuse is a crucial step in maintaining justice and public order. By understanding and applying the principles of legal certainty, the justice system can function effectively to protect individual rights and provide justice to all parties involved.
Optimalisasi Rehabilitasi Medis kepada Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Di Balai Pemasyarakatan (BAPAS) Kelas 1 Jakarta Barat dan BNN Jakarta Utara Guna Mengatasi Overkapasitas Allyssa, Allyssa; Adhari, Ade
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2018

Abstract

The rehabilitation system for narcotics abusers is implemented in correctional institutions, based on the provisions of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics serves as the legal basis for the prevention and combating of drug abuse in Indonesia. Despite the government's vigorous efforts through the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) This research aims to understand and analyze optimization in rehabilitation, the factors that cause rehabilitation to fail for addicts and victims of narcotics abuse. as well as to understand and analyze the efforts made so that rehabilitation of addicts and victims of narcotics abuse can be carried out to address this issue, drug abuse is estimated to affect 3.8 to 4.1 million people. This research adopts a field research approach with a socio-legal juridical perspective. In the context of overcrowding, the study highlights its impact on rehabilitation programs and emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach. In-depth analysis indicates that limited prisoner access to adequate services can hinder the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs. The integration of criminal law policy theory, prisonization theory, and rehabilitation theory becomes crucial in designing holistic and targeted solutions. Based on the research analysis, it can be concluded that overcrowding creates pressure on human resources, impedes rehabilitation programs, and potentially harms the well-being of prisoners. A profound understanding of criminal law policy theories, including prevention, punishment, rehabilitation, deterrence, utilitarianism, and restorative justice, forms the foundation for formulating policies that guide prisoners not only toward punishment but also towards recovery and social reintegration.
Unsur Direncanakan Pada Pasal 340 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang Nomor 145/Pid/2020/PT Tjk Niken Febriana Dwi; Ade Adhari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2019

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the fulfillment of the planned elements in Article 340 of the Criminal Code against the Tanjung Karang High Court Decision Number 145 / Pid / 2020 / Pt Tjk. Where the Judge in deciding this case explained that the planned element was not fulfilled on the grounds that the actions committed by the defendant were spontaneous. The research method used is: normative juridical legal research conducted with literature studies or secondary data as a basis for researching by conducting searches of regulations and literature related to the problem under study. The data collected is then processed and explained descriptively so that the relationship of data with one another can be described factually. The results of the study showed: that in the Tanjung Karang High Court Decision Number 145 / Pid / 2020 / PT Tjk, the judge decided the defendant Edi Antoni alias Edi Recing bin Kemis using Article 338 of the Criminal Code, which was previously the defendant through Kalianda District Court Decision Number 209 / Pid.B / 2020 / PN Kla the defendant received a verdict for participating in murder. In the appeal process at the Tanjung karang High Court, the defendant can be convicted using Article 340 of the Criminal Code concerning Premeditated Murder because of the fulfillment of the premeditated element in Article 340 of the Criminal Code, it can be proven by the defendant admitting he was conscious when committing his act and wanted the death of the victim and the defendant could not prove the origin of the knife used to commit the murder.
Dasar Pemikiran Kerahasiaan Identitas Korban Tindak Pidana Kesusilaan Leona Citra Maranatha; Ade Adhari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2020

Abstract

Cases of criminal acts of morality continue to occur in Indonesia coupled with legal protection of the confidentiality of the victim's identity that has not been fulfilled. Of the many victims who experience sexual violence, these victims will experience serious physical and mental trauma due to what has been experienced and the things that then happen afterwards. This research aims to explore the reasoning for the confidentiality of the victim's identity. By using normative-empirical research, this study found that the reason for the confidentiality of the victim's identity is due to several things, namely: Pancasila, social reaction and legislation.
Dasar Kriteria Dalam Menentukan Adanya Penipuan Dan Wanprestasi Dalam Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Nomor No.4/Yur/Pid/2018 Winata, Tania; Ade Adhari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2026

Abstract

Dalam praktik peradilan, seringkali terdapat kesulitan dalam membedakan antara Wanprestasi dan penipuan. Namun, perbedaan mendasar antara keduanya adalah bahwa Wanprestasi tidak melibatkan niat buruk, sementara penipuan melibatkan unsur itikad buruk sejak awal. Wanprestasi ditangani dalam kerangka keperdataan, sementara penipuan menjadi kasus pidana. Dalam beberapa kasus, Wanprestasi dapat dianggap sebagai penipuan jika terdapat indikasi itikad buruk dari salah satu pihak sejak awal perjanjian dibuat. Namun, dalam kebanyakan kasus, Wanprestasi dan penipuan dipertahankan sebagai dua konsep yang berbeda dan memiliki implikasi hukum yang berbeda pula. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui kepastian hukum terhadap kriteria penentu penipuan dan wanprestasi yang didasarkan pada yurisprudensi MA No. 4/Yur/Pid/2018. Metode penelitian yang penulis gunakan adalah yuridis normatif dan teknik pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan. Data-data yang telah diperoleh tersebut kemudian dianalisis dengan melalui pendekatan secara analisis kualitatif. Hasil pada peneliatan ini adalah jika suatu perjanjian didasari oleh iktitad buruk dengan tujuan merugikan orang lain, maka tindakan tersebut dapat dikatakan sebagai penipuan yang masuk dalam ruang lingkup pidana. Hal tersebut menjadi dasar kriteria dalam menentukan suatu tindakan termasuk ke dalam tindak pidana penipuan atau wanprestasi.
Co-Authors Adityo Saputra Ahmad Redi, Ahmad Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang Ali Masyhar Allyssa, Allyssa Alvira Damayant Amad Sudiro, Amad Amelia Elisabeth Putri Kusuma Amri, Ibra Fulenzi Andriano, Raphael Anggi Octavelia Putri N Anis Widyawati Anjani, Isabella Merlin aprilia, indah Aprilia, Indah Siti Arif Al Jibran, Farel Arifin, Alfredo Juniotama arrifa, Reisa Arya Sulistiawan Audrey, Jessica Aurellia, Chyntia Axel Putra, Muhammad Belicia Widhyana Yulia Putri Bryan Bryan Calvin Rafly Hadi Pradana Cheung, Sherlyn Nathalia Daniel Hasudungan Nainggolan Danurdara, Dewa Gede Agung Oka Dave Hamonangan Deo Syahputra, Bearlly Devi Ulan Dari Dian Latifiani Didik Purnomo, Didik Edo Bintang Joshua Eliza Della Kanaya Elizabeth, Vivi Ferdian Soni Ferdinand De Lapasha Gen Yaish Ibrahim Gilbert Winata Goce, Azzahra Natazia Ristina Haga, Christian Samuel Lodoe Hans Poliman Helda Rahmasari Hermawan, Nabila Tasya Husen, Nur Afni Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida Ilham, Rianza Naufalfalah Indah Siti Aprilia Indra Dohara Siburian Jeremy Nicholas Joshua Steven Ongaran Julian Devara Asyraf Julita, Marcella Junior, Austin Kaendo, Karen Eklesia Gabriella Lambertus Josua Tallaut Leona Citra Maranatha Lin Yan Che Mahabar, Regina Victoria Rambu Ngana Margamu Desy Putri Dewi Margaret Mutiara Manurung Marsel Mulyadi Milenia, Angelica Christin Nainggolan, Daniel Hasudungan Naomi, Sherryl Natashya, Jasmine Niella Tasya Ullie Niken Febriana Dwi Nurizki, Andhika Raka Ongaran , Joshua Steven Ongaran, Joshua Steven Pujiyono Pujiyono Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma Rannu, Delycia Anwar Renardi Idfidian, Teuku Richard Janwardo Rio Kurniawan Rionardo Farlus Patitan Rizky Setiawan Sanjaya, Dixon Saputra, Rama Adi Sherlyn, Sherlyn Sherryl Naomi Sheryn Lawrencya Shidarta Shidarta Sidharta, Sidharta Sihaloho, Afpryanto Silviana Putri, Szyva Simanjuntak, Irene Gracia Sindi Fitria Singhs, Arief Dermawan Sitabuana, Tundjung Suryani, Leony Sondang Tania, Neysa Tasya Renwarin, Chrisjane Thie, Naysa Andrea Trayama, Yoga Tundjung Herning Sitabuana Viano Lewi Kong Ateng, Kenny Vincent Trauman Virriantaka Wayan P. Windia Wijaya, Natasya Winata, Tania wong, Sherryl naomi Yohen, Samantha Maria Yuwono Prianto Zebua, August Delta