Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
14.448
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Spektrum Hukum INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Konstitusi Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Jurnal Al-Dustur Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Hukum Adigama Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis El-Iqtishady Law Development Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Bina Hukum Lingkungan Asas wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan, dan Sosial Keagamaan Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities RechtIdee Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Lex Scientia Law Review Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Ade Adhari
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 118 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 118 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
PERAN PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI DELIK MEMPERDAGANGKAN PENGARUH (TRADING IN INFLUENCE) SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Adhari, Ade; Aprilia, Indah Siti; Widyawati, Anis
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corruption is a criminal act that is intrinsically a disgraceful act because of its destructive power not only to social welfare, but also to the moral values that have been agreed upon and implemented by the Indonesian nation. In all its types and forms, corrupt practices should be qualified as criminal acts through policy formulation of criminal law norms. The act of trading influence in a global perspective is a type of criminal act of corruption, and practically occurs a lot in Indonesia. This can be observed in the cases of sugar import quotas, construction of sports centers and cattle import quotas. Because the current policy formulation has not yet criminalized the act of trading influence, the rules for criminalizing bribery offenses are imposed as a basis for justification for imposing criminal penalties on acts that should constitute the offense of trading influence. This article examines the comparative role of criminal law in the policy formulation of the offense of trading influence as a criminal act of corruption. The results of the research show that through a comparison of criminal law with policy formulation of the offense of trading influence, the study acts as (1) the basis for harmonization of criminal law policies in overcoming criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia at the global level; and (2) finding the elements of the offense of trafficking in influence.
Reformulasi Rumusan Sanksi Pidana Mati dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Danurdara, Dewa Gede Agung Oka; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to examine and analyze the death penalty sanction in the law on the eradication of corruption against the perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia today and criminal sanctions in the future, which aims to increase efforts to prevent and eradicate corruption. The method used in this research uses a normative juridical approach, which focuses on looking at applicable legal standards. The results of this study indicate that the death penalty against perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia is regulated in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes which states that a person who commits corruption can be sentenced to death if the elements are accompanied by certain circumstances. The death penalty arrangement needs to be explicitly regulated again in a reform of the legislation so as not to cause uncertain interpretations in making a decision in sentencing suspected perpetrators of corruption. The need to make comparisons with other countries in the preparation of a regulation in order to produce a new regulation regarding the eradication of corruption is in accordance with what is expected both among law enforcers and in society. Future policies must consider the quality and amount of corruption as an indicator of the imposition of the death penalty.
Optimalisasi Penerapan Diversi dalam Penanganan Anak sebagai Kurir Narkotika; Revisi Regulasi dan Dukungan Sosial Audrey, Jessica; Adhari, Ade
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v9i1.10554

Abstract

This study aims to explore the optimization of the implementation of diversion in handling children involved as drug couriers, with a focus on the legal regulation revisions and social support required. The research uses a normative legal study methodology with a qualitative approach, relying on descriptive analysis of existing regulations and relevant scholarly journals. The primary data sources consist of laws and regulations on juvenile criminal justice, while secondary sources are derived from legal literature published in the last ten years. The findings conclude that diversion plays an important role in addressing cases of children involved as drug couriers, but its implementation in Indonesia is still hindered by insufficiently comprehensive legal policies and inadequate social support, thus requiring regulatory revisions and inter-agency coordination to ensure its effectiveness. Social support, such as rehabilitation programs, alternative education, and economic empowerment, is crucial to creating new opportunities for these children, while technology can strengthen monitoring and evaluation of the diversion process to ensure its continuity as a rehabilitation effort based on restorative justice principles.
Criminalizing Unauthorized Motor Vehicle Debt Transfers in Fiduciary Agreements Hermawan, Nabila Tasya; Adhari, Ade
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v8i1.12137

Abstract

The fiduciary system in Indonesia is a legal mechanism to protect the rights of creditors over objects that remain in the debtor's control. The basic principle of fiduciary transfer is trust, where the debtor gives ownership rights to an object, for example, a motor vehicle, to the creditor as collateral for debt repayment. Problems arise when debtors transfer debt obligations involving motor vehicles without the approval of fiduciary creditors. Criminalizing the transfer of debt without fiduciary approval provides legal protection for creditors, increases legal certainty in civil transactions, and prevents fraud or evasion of debt obligations. Criminalization applies criminal penalties for certain actions that are detrimental to others or society. This research aims to examine the causes and rationale behind the criminalization of transferring fiduciary collateral without the fiduciary holder's consent. The methodology used is a normative juridical approach, which focuses on the analysis of the legal regulations that apply in Indonesia. The research results show that transferring motor vehicle debt without written approval from the fiduciary creditor is an act punishable by crime. This research also recommends strengthening fiduciary regulations by providing stricter administrative or civil sanctions for debtors who commit violations. It is hoped that applying criminal sanctions in the context of criminalization can be an effective preventive measure to protect creditors' rights and prevent violations of fiduciary agreements, thereby providing better legal certainty in the fiduciary system in Indonesia.
Incompatibility of The PPAT Deed Numbering Period with The BPHTB Validation Period at BAPENDA Jakarta Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang; Adhari, Ade
Law Development Journal Vol 6, No 4 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.6.4.600-607

Abstract

Ownership of Rights to a person is proven by ownership of a Land Certificate that can be transferred to another person, one way is by Sale and Purchase between the Land Owner as the seller and the Buyer. In a transfer of such rights there are taxes that must be paid, one of which is the Land and Building Acquisition Tax or abbreviated as BPHTB and after payment, BPHTB Validation will be carried out with a Maximum Period of 30 Working Days based on the Governor's Regulation and requires a PPAT Deed Number for input. Meanwhile, based on Government Regulations, the PPAT Deed Number has a period of 7 working days from the time it is signed and must be registered with the National Land Agency. Therefore, this creates many multi-interpretations because there is no harmony between one regulation and another. The problem taken in this study is how the inconsistency of the PPAT Deed Number Period with BPHTB Validation. The method used is Normative Jurisprudence with Analytical Descriptive Specifications. The research results show that there is a mismatch between the PPAT Deed Number Period and the BPHTB Validation Period, this condition must be addressed by adjusting the Regulation of the Governor of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta Number 34 of 2022 with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 which based on the Hierarchy of Legislation is a higher regulation than the Governor's Regulation.
Certainty of Fulfilling the Subjective Requirements of an Agreement in the Case of PPJB; Analysis of Decision Number 697/PDT.G/2021/PN.TNG Husen, Nur Afni; Adhari, Ade
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 17 No 1 (2025): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i1.10155

Abstract

Ideally, the fulfillment of subjective conditions in an agreement, such as the competence of the parties and free will, serves as the basis for the legal validity of the agreement. However, in reality, as seen in Case Decision Number 697/PDT.G/2021/PN.TNG, non-formal factors such as unequal bargaining positions and emotional pressures also influence the annulment of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB). This study aims to analyze the legal certainty of fulfilling the subjective conditions of agreements and the judge's considerations in this case. A normative juridical approach was employed, analyzing the court's decision and contract law theory. The research findings indicate that while subjective conditions were formally met, the judge annulled the PPJB by considering substantive justice. Unequal bargaining positions and psychological pressures were the main reasons for the annulment. This study emphasizes that the protection of individual rights and balanced justice is the primary principle in contract annulments, surpassing the mere fulfillment of formal conditions.
Evidence of Authentic Deeds in Civil Disputes Related to Nominee Agreements on Ownership of Land Title Certificates Trayama, Yoga; Adhari, Ade
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 17 No 1 (2025): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i1.10550

Abstract

Ideally, in civil disputes related to nominee agreements regarding ownership of property certificates, the authentic deed can serve as a strong tool to ensure the validity of legal transactions. However, in reality, the implementation of authentic deeds is often hindered by doubts regarding their validity and compliance with applicable legal regulations, especially when involving foreign nationals (WNA) in land transactions. The aim of this research is to analyze the evidentiary power of authentic deeds in civil disputes involving nominee agreements on property ownership certificates and assess their effectiveness in the legal process. This article falls under normative juridical legal research with a statutory approach and case approach. The methodology used involves library research and qualitative analysis of regulations and relevant court decisions. The research concludes that authentic deeds have valid evidentiary power if they meet the formal, material, and external requirements, but can be canceled if they do not fulfill these conditions, and the notary who issues them may face sanctions. Notaries are responsible for ensuring the validity of the deeds they create, and if they cause harm to other parties, they can be held accountable according to applicable laws.
Optimizing Oversight: Developing an Ideal Framework for Supervision Prisoners’ Rights Allocation Widyawati, Anis; Latifiani, Dian; Rahmasari, Helda; Adhari, Ade
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2024)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v9i2.50313

Abstract

This study analyzes the problem of a prosecutor’s procrastination in executing a court judgment that delays the prisoners’ serving their sentences and causes some irregularities in the correctional facilities regarding the prisoners’ rights trade. The introduction of many prisons without a specific body to supervise the execution of the sentence, particularly the warded people’s freedom in Indonesia, appeared to have unfulfilled justice in the society. In this regard, this research aims to define the validity of the need to enhance the Supervision of prisoners’ rights protection in Central Java. It describes an optimal system relevant to such Supervision. The type of research that was utilized in this study is sociological juridical. Sociological juridical research serves to be the opposite of normative legal research. It is revealed that there have been ongoing infringements of prisoners’ rights, highlighting the further need to set a more comprehensive mechanism that would include the Police, the Prosecutors, the Courts, and the Correctional Institutions in the system of oversight and other management functions. Every level in the hierarchy system of the Criminal Justice System has its limit on including the human rights of prisoners containing adequate risks of intrusion, where checks and balances must be exercised. Formally and horizontally, these rights must be assured and upheld both legally and in their spirit by Justice and the Law. This study’s findings are that appropriate measures need to be applied to implement better Supervision policies aimed at safeguarding the human rights of prisoners and ensuring the justice system in Indonesia is not compromised.
Dasar Pemberat Dan Peringan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Anak Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Zebua, August Delta; Adhari, Ade
Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ekspose.v24i1.8842

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dasar hukum yang menjadi landasan bagi hakim dalam mempertimbangkan alasan pemberat dan peringan dalam tindak pidana narkotika, sebagaimana diatur dalam putusan pengadilan. Tindak pidana narkotika merupakan salah satu bentuk kejahatan yang memiliki dampak serius terhadap masyarakat dan memerlukan penanganan yang tegas namun tetap berkeadilan. Dalam menjatuhkan putusan, hakim mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor yang memberatkan, seperti peran pelaku dalam jaringan peredaran narkotika, dampak terhadap korban atau masyarakat, serta tingkat kerugian yang ditimbulkan. Sementara itu, alasan peringan dapat mencakup pengakuan bersalah, sikap kooperatif selama proses hukum, serta keadaan pribadi pelaku seperti usia muda atau tekanan ekonomi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, serta studi kasus terhadap putusan-putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dasar hukum alasan pemberat dan peringan diatur secara eksplisit dan implisit dalam undang-undang, namun implementasinya sering kali dipengaruhi oleh interpretasi hakim. Dalam hal tersebut, pemidanaan tindak pidana narkotika di Indonesia diatur dalam UU Narkotika dengan mempertimbangkan faktor pemberatan dan peringanan hukuman. Pemberatan diberikan jika pelaku berperan besar dalam peredaran narkotika, melibatkan anak-anak, atau menyebabkan dampak sosial luas. Sementara itu, peringanan diberikan untuk pelaku yang kooperatif, menyesali perbuatannya, atau dianggap korban yang membutuhkan rehabilitasi 
Legal Certainty Due To The Negligence Of The Public Prosecutor In Determining The Charges Elizabeth, Vivi; Adhari, Ade
Syiar Hukum Volume 21, No 1 (2023) : Syiar Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/shjih.v21i1.11403

Abstract

Legal certainty has an important role in upholding the law properly in accordance with the provisions used in the indictment. Seeing the important role of legal certainty, law enforcers should be careful in enforcing the law. However, this did not occur in the Decision of the Ngabang District Court Number 48/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Nba, where the Public Prosecutor failed to determine the charges according to the actions of the defendant. The purpose this research analyasis legal certainty negligene public prosecutor choice indictment  . In this study, primary and secondary legal materials were used and analyzed using qualitative techniques. The prosecutor's negligence in determining the charges in the indictment caused legal uncertainty which resulted in the law not being enforced consistently and with certainty. The prosecutor should be more careful in determining the indictment in his decision because legal uncertainty will cause chaos and the law will not benefit the community.
Co-Authors Adityo Saputra Ahmad Redi, Ahmad Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang Ali Masyhar Allyssa, Allyssa Alvira Damayant Amad Sudiro, Amad Amelia Elisabeth Putri Kusuma Amri, Ibra Fulenzi Andriano, Raphael Anggi Octavelia Putri N Anis Widyawati Anjani, Isabella Merlin aprilia, indah Aprilia, Indah Siti Arif Al Jibran, Farel Arifin, Alfredo Juniotama arrifa, Reisa Arya Sulistiawan Audrey, Jessica Aurellia, Chyntia Axel Putra, Muhammad Belicia Widhyana Yulia Putri Bryan Bryan Calvin Rafly Hadi Pradana Cheung, Sherlyn Nathalia Daniel Hasudungan Nainggolan Danurdara, Dewa Gede Agung Oka Dave Hamonangan Deo Syahputra, Bearlly Devi Ulan Dari Dian Latifiani Didik Purnomo, Didik Edo Bintang Joshua Eliza Della Kanaya Elizabeth, Vivi Ferdian Soni Ferdinand De Lapasha Gen Yaish Ibrahim Gilbert Winata Goce, Azzahra Natazia Ristina Haga, Christian Samuel Lodoe Hans Poliman Helda Rahmasari Hermawan, Nabila Tasya Husen, Nur Afni Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida Ilham, Rianza Naufalfalah Indah Siti Aprilia Indra Dohara Siburian Jeremy Nicholas Joshua Steven Ongaran Julian Devara Asyraf Julita, Marcella Junior, Austin Kaendo, Karen Eklesia Gabriella Lambertus Josua Tallaut Leona Citra Maranatha Lin Yan Che Mahabar, Regina Victoria Rambu Ngana Margamu Desy Putri Dewi Margaret Mutiara Manurung Marsel Mulyadi Milenia, Angelica Christin Nainggolan, Daniel Hasudungan Naomi, Sherryl Natashya, Jasmine Niella Tasya Ullie Niken Febriana Dwi Nurizki, Andhika Raka Ongaran , Joshua Steven Ongaran, Joshua Steven Pujiyono Pujiyono Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen Ramdhani, Dwi Sukma Rannu, Delycia Anwar Renardi Idfidian, Teuku Richard Janwardo Rio Kurniawan Rionardo Farlus Patitan Rizky Setiawan Sanjaya, Dixon Saputra, Rama Adi Sherlyn, Sherlyn Sherryl Naomi Sheryn Lawrencya Shidarta Shidarta Sidharta, Sidharta Sihaloho, Afpryanto Silviana Putri, Szyva Simanjuntak, Irene Gracia Sindi Fitria Singhs, Arief Dermawan Sitabuana, Tundjung Suryani, Leony Sondang Tania, Neysa Tasya Renwarin, Chrisjane Thie, Naysa Andrea Trayama, Yoga Tundjung Herning Sitabuana Viano Lewi Kong Ateng, Kenny Vincent Trauman Virriantaka Wayan P. Windia Wijaya, Natasya Winata, Tania wong, Sherryl naomi Yohen, Samantha Maria Yuwono Prianto Zebua, August Delta