p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.592
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan AKSIOMA Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan JMPM: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika PRISMA IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Jurnal Tadris Matematika Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Humanities and Social Studies Math Educa Journal Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika Jurnal Karinov International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching (IJOIMT) Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang MATHEMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Research in Social Sciences and Technology Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI) Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI) Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M) Jurnal MIPA dan Pembelajarannya Nuris Journal of Education and Islamic Studies International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER) Indonesian Journal of Science, Technology, and Humanities PEDAMAS (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Jurnal Tadris Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education Jurnal Didaktik Matematika
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal on Mathematics Education

Exploring default-interventionist interaction of thinking activity types on probability problem-solving Susiswo; Darmawan, Puguh; Murtafiah, Wasilatul; Osman, Sharifah
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp295-316

Abstract

This research aims to determine the thinking activity types dominated by a mental process in producing answers characterized by automatic, unconscious, and subjective-empirical processes (system 1) in solving problems so that the default-interventionist interaction occurs. This research novelty is the formulation of the contents and thinking activity arrangement adapted to students' thinking when solving problems. The problem used in this research is a mathematical problem that triggers students to produce answers quickly with confidence that the answers are correct at a high level. Another problem is about probability because the mode of occurrence of students' learning difficulties at the secondary school level occurs when learning the concept of probability. This is qualitative research with a case study approach. The research subjects were students of Mathematics Education in semester 1. The results showed that thinking activity one could condition the occurrence of type 1 default-interventionist interaction. Thinking activity two could condition the occurrence of type 2 default-interventionist interaction. Thinking activity three could condition the occurrence of type 3 default-interventionist interaction. This research concluded that the default-interventionist interaction occurred because the content and arrangement of the thinking activity conditioned the subjects to pay attention to information gradually and change the subjects’ beliefs. Lecturers were recommended to produce, develop, and research thinking activities on topics other than probability at various levels of education. The default-interventionist interaction was essential to be conditioned when system one dominated students' thinking, causing difficulties.
Curriculum and teacher assessment practices in mathematics learning: Alignment with higher order thinking skills in Indonesian secondary schools Zana, Firdha Mahrifatul; Sa'dijah, Cholis; Susiswo; Anwar, Lathiful; Zulnaidi, Hutkemri
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 15 No. 4 (2024): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1311-1334

Abstract

Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) are an essential element in education that must be integrated into curricula and classroom assessments. In Indonesia, educational initiatives have increasingly emphasized the incorporation of HOTS into both curriculum design and assessment practices. However, prior research has primarily focused on the challenges faced by teachers in developing HOTS-based assessments and aligning their teaching with curriculum demands. This study aims to investigate how the Indonesian mathematics curriculum integrates HOTS and evaluate the alignment between the curriculum objectives and teacher-developed assessments in fostering HOTS. The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach and was conducted in two Indonesian high schools, one located in an urban area and the other in a regional setting. A total of 15 mathematics teachers from grades ten, eleven, and twelve participated in the research. Data collection methods included focus group discussions, document analysis of mathematics assessments, and semi-structured interviews. The analysis employed Anderson and Krathwohl’s Taxonomy to categorize cognitive levels. Findings reveal that the Indonesian Mathematics Curriculum predominantly emphasizes Low-Order Thinking Skills (LOTS), and teacher-developed assessments are largely aligned with these LOTS-focused objectives. Furthermore, even when curriculum indicators aim to target HOTS, teachers often struggle to design assessments that effectively evaluate students’ higher-order cognitive abilities. These findings highlight a significant gap between curriculum goals and the practical implementation of HOTS in assessments. The results provide valuable insights for curriculum developers, suggesting the need for a curriculum redesign that places greater emphasis on HOTS. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of professional development initiatives to equip teachers with the skills necessary to design and implement HOTS-based assessments. This research contributes to advancing educational practices and policies that prioritize the integration of HOTS into teaching and assessment frameworks.
Comparing model-building process: A model prospective teachers used in interpreting students’ mathematical thinking Sapti, Mujiyem; Purwanto; Irawan, Edy Bambang; As’ari, Abdur Rahman; Sa’dijah, Cholis; Susiswo; Wijaya, Ariyadi
Journal on Mathematics Education Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019): Journal on Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya in collaboration with Indonesian Mathematical Society (IndoMS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Mathematical thinking is an important aspect of mathematics education and, therefore, also needs to be understood by prospective teachers. Prospective teachers should have the ability to analyze and interpret students’ mathematical thinking. Comparing model is one of the interpretation models from Wilson, Lee, and Hollebrands. This article will describe the prospective teacher used the model of the building process in interpretation students' mathematical thinking. Subjects selected by considering them in following the students’ strategies in solving the Building Construction Problem. Comparing model is a model of interpretation in which a person interprets student thinking based on student work. There are two types comparing model building process prospective teacher use in interpreting students’ mathematical thinking ie. comparing work and comparing knowledge. In comparing works, prospective teachers use an external representation rubric. This is used to analyze student activities in order to provide an interpretation that is comparing the work of students with their own work. In comparing knowledge, prospective teachers use internal representation rubrics to provide interpretation by comparing the students' work with their knowledge or thought.
Co-Authors Abdillah, Rizka Abdur Rahman As’ari Adika Setyo Budi Lestari Adityawan, Tofan Agung, Citra Amelia Agus Alamsyah Akbar Sutawidjaja Alaiya, Syekha Vivi Alfiani Athma Putri Rosyadi Alkans Sofyawati Sutrisno Andika Setyo Budi Lestari Anies Fuady Anita Dewi Utami Annisa Andika Karisa Arilaksmi, Ni Putu Gita Ariyadi Wijaya Arlina Trie Cahyono As'ari, Aburrahman Azizah Azizah Azizah Azizah Barep Yohanes Bhakti Setya Budi Budi, Bhakti Setya Cholis Sa’dijah Dahliatul Hasanah Damayanti, Hanifah Devinta Reza Prasanti Dewi Astutik Dewi Astutik Dian Nastiti Utami Dian Putri Wulandari Diyo Kriswanto Dwi Rahmawati Utami Dyah Tri Wahyuningtyas Edy Bambang Irawan Edy Sutarto Eka Damayanti Eka Damayanti Eko Prasetyo Erika Arum Puspita Erry Hidayanto Ery Febrianto Falahi Nurmaulina Fatma Noordinar Rahma Firdha Mahrifatul Zana Firdha Mahrifatul Zana Firnanda Pradana Putra Firnanda, Ganis Irma Flavia Aurelia Hidajat, Flavia Aurelia Gatot Muhsetyo Hamidah, Dewi Harfin Lanya, Harfin Henny Rismawatie Yusmarina Hery Susanto Hery Susanto Hijriani, Lailin I Made Sulandra I Nengah Parta Iis Afidah Ikram, Muhammad Imam Rofiki Indrawatiningsih, Nonik Intan Ayu Maharani Intan Faraminda Putri Intan Syafitri Lathiful Anwar Latifah Mustofa Lestyanto Linda Ramadhanty Januar Lita Wulandari Aeli Lorenza, Nella Luluk Wahyu Nengsih Lydia Lia Prayitno Lydia Lia Prayitno, Lydia Lia Makbul Muksar Mamluatus Sa’adah Maulana, Hanief Maulidiyah Tutut Nurjanah Mila Sekar Ayu Mufidah, Wayan Indi Haidar Muhammad Ainur Rizqi Mujiyem Sapti Mujiyem Sapti Muliana Sari Nadia Nurudini Naela Nur Azizah Najwa, Wulida Arina Ni Putu Gita Arilaksmi Ninik Mutianingsih, Ninik Nursani Indah Pratiwi Nury Yuniasih, Nury Octavina Rizky Putri Utami Oktoviana, Lucky Tri Osman, Sharifah Pahrani, Andi Daniah Parameswari, Pradina Permadi, Hendra Permadi, Hendro Pradina Parameswari Prasanti, Devinta Reza Pratiwi, Enditiyas Pratiwi, Meira Indria Puguh Darmawan Purnomo, Purnomo Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Purwanto Puspitasari, Yesy Putri, Octavina Rizky Utami Putri, Reni Albertin Qohar, Abd. Ratna Titi Wulandari Ria Kurniawati Ria Norfika Yuliandari Rini Nurhakiki Risaldi Risaldi Risma Firda Diana Royyan Faradiba Rustanto Rahardi Samuntya, Fitri Sari, Ulum Rohma Sigmamitha Aghni Izzananda Sisworo Sitti Fithriani Saleh Subanji Subanji Sudirman Sudirman Suhartatik, Peni Surianastutiningtyas, Angela Maricilia Susilo, Claudya Zahrani Suwanti, Vivi Suwarman, Ramdhan F Swasono Rahardjo Syafitri, Intan Syaiful Hamzah Nasution Syamsul Hadi Tatik Retno Murniasih Tjang Daniel Chandra Toto Nusantara Trianingsih Eni Lestari Ulfa Ni'matil Hasanah umi faizah Wangguway, Yustinus Wasilatul Murtafiah Widi Candika Pakaya Wulida Arina Najwa Yesy Puspitasari Yrbayanti Putri Zaekhah Yundari, Yundari Zana, Firdha Mahrifatul Zuliati, Sulis Dwi Zulnaidi, Hutkemri