Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.514
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syari'ah Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Bulletin of Community Engagement Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains IBLAM Law Review Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Jurnal Hukum Legalita Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Kasta: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum SEWAGATI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Hajairin
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 44 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 44 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Judicial Pardon: Repositioning Restorative Justice from The Perspective of The National Criminal Code Hajairin; Syamsuddin; Aman Ma’arij
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): on Progress
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i4.5414

Abstract

Judicial pardon in Article 54 paragraph (2) of the National Criminal Code still has an ambiguous nature and raises concerns about inconsistencies in legal interpretation. This research aims to clarify the principle of insignificance of judicial pardon in the National Criminal Code. The research method is normative legal research focused on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law. The results of this research indicate that, first, there has been a paradigm shift in sentencing post-enactment of the National Criminal Code, moving from imprisonment to restorative justice. Second, it emphasizes the principle of insignificance of Judicial Pardon as a repositioning of Restorative Justice within the perspective of the National Criminal Code by integrating a systematic approach to maintain the coherence of the National Criminal Code, contextual to meet social facts and dynamics, philosophical in the study of Judicial Pardon rooted in restorative justice, and practical guidelines for judges in applying Judicial Pardon. Some judicial pardon decisions post-enactment of the National Criminal Code and National Criminal Procedure Code include the Banjarnegara District Court Decision No. 97/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Bnr in early 2026 regarding Burhani Hasan in a gambling case, the Singaraja District Court Decision No. 1/Pid.C/2026/PN Sgl regarding Rahmat Riandy for petty theft, and the Mempawah District Court Decision No. 512/Pid.B/2025/PN Mpw regarding Hendrikus Bujang in February 2026 for negligence. Third, the synchronization of Judicial Pardon in the Judge's Procedural Guidelines, namely, the judge's pardon needs to consider the provisions of Article 54 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the National Criminal Code Jo. Article 1 number 19 and Article 246 of Law/20/2025/ Criminal Procedure Code as well as SEMA/1/2026/Implementation Guidelines for the 2023 Criminal Code and 2025 Criminal Procedure Code are very necessary to provide formal procedural legitimacy for judges in accommodating justice and humanity.
Tinjauan Konstitusional Terhadap Rehabilitasi Pengguna Narkoba Sebagai Pemenuhan Hak Atas Kesehatan Dediansyah; Damianus Wanda Ndapa; Syahrul; Suherman; Hajairin; Taufik Firmanto
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v8i1.2475

Abstract

Tujuan Penelitian ini: 1) untuk Menguraikan Jaminan konstitusional hak atas kesehatan bagi pengguna narkoba di Indonesia; 2) Pelaksanaan rehabilitasi pengguna narkoba telah sesuai dengan prinsip perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Metode Penelitian Dalam penelitian ini digunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual dan kasus. Data sekunder diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan studi dokumen, meliputi bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis dan penalaran deduktif untuk mengkaji rehabilitasi pengguna narkoba sebagai pemenuhan hak atas kesehatan menurut UUD 1945 dan instrumen hukum terkait. Hasil penelitian bahwa Jaminan konstitusional hak atas kesehatan bagi pengguna narkoba di Indonesia tercermin dalam Pasal 28H ayat (1) dan Pasal 34 ayat (3) UUD 1945, yang menegaskan hak atas kehidupan sehat dan pelayanan kesehatan layak bagi semua warga negara tanpa diskriminasi, termasuk pengguna narkoba. Meski Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika mengatur rehabilitasi bagi pecandu, pelaksanaannya masih terkendala keterbatasan fasilitas, sehingga banyak pengguna tetap dipidana tanpa rehabilitasi. Kondisi ini mencerminkan ketidaksesuaian antara prinsip perlindungan hak asasi manusia dalam UUD 1945 dan praktik kebijakan rehabilitasi di Indonesia.
Syarat Subjektif dan Objektif Perjanjian Jual Beli: Relevansi Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata dalam Praktik Modern Muhammad Kandriana; Sri Atika; Muslimin; Muhammad Wildan; Hajairin
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v8i1.2476

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas relevansi Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dalam menilai keabsahan perjanjian jual beli pada praktik hukum modern, khususnya dalam konteks transaksi elektronik. Pasal 1320 menetapkan empat syarat sah perjanjian yang terdiri dari dua syarat subjektif, yaitu kesepakatan para pihak dan kecakapan hukum, serta dua syarat objektif, yaitu objek tertentu dan sebab yang halal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana syarat-syarat tersebut diterapkan dalam praktik jual beli kontemporer, termasuk transaksi daring yang sering kali menimbulkan sengketa hukum. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa banyak perjanjian jual beli modern, terutama di platform digital, kerap mengabaikan syarat subjektif berupa kesepakatan yang sah dan syarat objektif berupa kejelasan objek. Kondisi ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan merugikan salah satu pihak. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya interpretasi adaptif terhadap Pasal 1320 serta penguatan regulasi pendukung agar mampu mengakomodasi dinamika transaksi modern secara adil dan legal.
Demokrasi Partisipatif Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah: Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Peran DPRD Kabupaten Bima dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Daerah yang Responsif Ramdin; Erham; Hajairin
Legalita Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Legalita
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47637/legalita.v8i1.2371

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation of participatory democracy in the formation of Regional Regulations and examine the role of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) of Bima Regency in realizing responsive local governance. The research employs an empirical juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and socio-legal approaches. The findings indicate that public participation in the formation of Regional Regulations has been normatively guaranteed under Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan and Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah; however, its implementation in Bima Regency has not been fully optimal. The DPRD of Bima Regency has implemented several mechanisms of public participation, including public consultations and public hearings, yet these mechanisms remain largely formalistic and have not fully provided substantive participatory space for the community. The study finds that obstacles to participatory democracy are influenced by juridical, structural, cultural, and technical factors, including weak technical regulations on public participation, domination of political elites, limited access to information, low public legal awareness, paternalistic political culture, limited participation forums, as well as budgetary and socialization constraints. Strengthening the role of the DPRD is necessary through optimizing public hearings, digitalizing local legislation, enhancing transparency in the Regional Legislative Program, involving vulnerable groups, and reinforcing transparency and accountability in local legislative processes to achieve more responsive, participatory, and democratic local governance.
Co-Authors Abbas Agus Awaluddin Aman Ma'arij Aman Ma’arij Aman Ma’arij Apriliani Rahmalillah Atis Ika Ernawati Burhanuddin Mohammad Chairul Fatihin Chandra, Tofik Yanuar Damianus Wanda Ndapa Dediansyah Dzul Fadli Erham Firmanto, Taufik Gufran Gufran Gufran Sanusi Hadijah Hendra Purwanto Hendra Purwanto Herman I Wayan Sukardiawan Ihlas, Ihlas ILHAM Ilham Ilham Jairin Abdullah Jumhuriah, Erlauli Kasmar Kasmar, Kasmar M. Jasuli Ramadhan Ma'arij, Aman Mahisa Mareati Mardiah, Radiatam Maria Alberta Liza Quintarti Mery Rohana Lisbeth Sibarani Miftahuddin Miftahuddin Muchamad Taufiq Muhamad Ajrin Muhammad Awaluddin Muhammad Kandriana Muhammad Mustofa Muhammad Rifaid Muhammad Wildan Muslimin Muslimin Musmuliadin Novita Sari Nur Mutmainnah Nuryani Puspita, Nuris Ramadhan, Sahrul Ramdin Ramli Ridwan Ridwan Ridwan Rusdin Sanusi, Gufran Sarbini, Ilyas Sri Atika Subhan Suherman Sukirman Sukirman Sulaiman Sulaiman Syahrul Syaifuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Taufik Firmanto Tofik Yanuar Chandra Tofik Yanuar Chandra Yanuar Chandra, Tofik