p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.398
P-Index
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal Evidence Of Law

Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu terhadap Penetapan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Dananjaya, Adhitya Arum; Hadi, Syofyan
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (April)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i1.1052

Abstract

This research discusses the legal strength of the decision of the Election Organizer Honorary Council (DKPP) regarding the determination of presidential and vice presidential candidates by the General Election Commission (KPU). DKPP is an institution tasked with enforcing the code of ethics for election organizers by issuing final and binding decisions. However, this "final and binding" nature is often questioned in the context of whether DKPP decisions are equivalent to decisions of formal judicial institutions. This research highlights the legal strength of DKPP decisions in the context of determining presidential and vice presidential candidates, especially in cases of violations of the code of ethics by the KPU. Through normative research methods that examine statutory regulations and juridical analysis, this research finds that although DKPP decisions are binding for election management institutions such as the KPU and Bawaslu, these decisions do not have permanent legal force like formal judicial decisions and can become the object of a lawsuit in court. State Administration (PTUN). The research results show that although the DKPP decision is final and binding on the relevant agencies, it is limited in nature as part of internal supervision and can become the object of a lawsuit in the state administrative court. This confirms that the DKPP does not have the same legal power as formal justice, even though its decisions must be implemented by the parties involved in holding elections.
Reformulasi Konsep Pengampuan Melalui Penguatan Pengawasan oleh Pengampu Pengawas Fouziah, Resti; Hadi, Syofyan
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1301

Abstract

The concept of guardianship in the Civil Code (KUH Perdata) has so far contained a discriminatory approach towards people with mental and/or intellectual disabilities. This is reflected in the use of terms such as "stupid", "brain disease", and "dark eyes", as well as the provisions of Article 433 of the Civil Code which require the determination of guardianship without considering individual capacity. Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-XX/2022 is present as a constitutional correction that encourages a change in approach, from a generalized guardianship model to an assessment based on personal capacity. This study aims to analyze the urgency of reformulating the concept of guardianship so that it is in line with the principles of non-discrimination and respect for the rights of people with disabilities as regulated in Law Number 8 of 2016 and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Through a normative legal approach, this article recommends strengthening the role of supervisory guardians in guardianship institutions consisting of various professional elements to realize protection for people under guardianship/ curandus. The results of this study indicate that the concept of guardianship, as regulated by the laws and regulations in Indonesia, still has weaknesses in terms of oversight of the actions and policies taken by guardians toward the individuals under their care. The absence of a strong supervisory mechanism opens opportunities for abuse of authority, both administratively and financially, which can harm the interests of the protected individuals.
Co-Authors ', Monica Abdul Aziz Alfadilah, Alfadilah Ali Fahrudin, Ali Amelia, Mays Anang Pratama Widiarsa Anugrah, Narendra Putra Arie Mangesti, Yovita Asrina Asrina Asrina Bravestha, Rio Chairul Farid, Achmad Dahlan, Rudiyanto Dananjaya, Adhitya Arum Djinarto, Bambang Farisi, Salman Febriadi, Herry Febriyan, Muhammad Alvin Fikri alhamdi Fikri, Sultoni Firdaus, Salsabila Fitrah, Azizah Fouziah, Resti Frans Simangunsong Gilang Ramadhan Guntur, Sundaru Gustian, Nabil Hikam, Reza Maulana Hufron Hufron, Hufron Ilyas, Erizal Imron, Muhamad Khairunnisa, Annisa Krisnadi Nasution Lovitya Trisnanti, Ines Mahyudin Ritonga Mangesti, Yovita Arie Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad Dwi Mohammad Mohammad MUCHAMMAD FAIZIN Murtadlo, Aly Nandini, Nova Mawar Lailatul Adawiyah Nickalus, Juan Noviekayati, IGAA. Nurlaila Nurul Zuhriyah Partomuan Harahap Pohan, M. Riduan Pratiwi, Aulia Priyambodo, Bagus Adam Puji Utomo, Sutrisno Putra Samudra, Kaharudin Putra, Arifdo Qolyubby, Bayu Kurnia Nazarrudin Rahma, Suci Salsa Aulia Rahman, Habibur Rahmawati, Rahmawati Rahmi, Awliya Reflinaldi, Reflinaldi Rezi, Melisa Rimbawani Sushanty, Vera Riqiey, Baharuddin Ronny Ronny Rustambekov, Islambek Rusydi Rusydi S Endang Prasetyawati Saputri, Yosi Rani Sari, Yanofita Sesung, Rusdianto Setyadji, Sri Shodikin, Miftakhul Shulga, Ievgenii Sibarani, Tagor Slamet Suhartono Soma, Nara Sukardi Sukardi Sutra, Heni Syahrizal, Fauzan Fitra Tafiati, Tafiati Tri Budiman, Nanang Triana, Hetti Waluati Walujo Tjahjono, Agus Wartiman, Wartiman Wati, Tan Hana Darma Mangruwa Wibowo, Agung Satryo Wibowo, Tulus Yudi Widodo Yufni Faisol, Yufni Yunita, Asti