p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.676
P-Index
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal

Ketidakpastian Hukum Keputusan Fiktif Positif Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan Tata Usaha Negara Wati, Tan Hana Darma Mangruwa; Hadi, Syofyan
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 11 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17953293

Abstract

Administrative Decisions of Government, also referred to as State Administrative Decisions (Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara/KTUN), are written decisions issued by Government Bodies and/or Officials in the administration of government affairs. This definition is stipulated in Article 1 point 7 of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration (UUAP). The regulation also amended the meaning of negative fictitious decisions as regulated in Article 3 of Law Number 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Courts (UUPTUN) into positive fictitious decisions as provided in Article 53 of the UUAP. A negative fictitious decision means that the silence of a government official regarding an application submitted by the public, after the lapse of the statutory time limit, is deemed as a rejection. Meanwhile, a positive fictitious decision means that the silence of a government official regarding an application submitted by the public, after the lapse of the statutory time limit, is deemed as an approval. Following the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into Law (UUCK), the regulation continues to recognize the concept of positive fictitious decisions. However, it abolishes the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) to adjudicate fictitious State Administrative Decisions, which consequently gives rise to legal certainty issues for the public, particularly since the implementing Presidential Regulation has not yet been issued.This research employs a normative legal research method with a prescriptive approach. The results are expected to provide prescriptions regarding the legal issues examined.
Co-Authors ', Monica Abdul Aziz Alfadilah, Alfadilah Ali Fahrudin, Ali Amelia, Mays Anang Pratama Widiarsa Anugrah, Narendra Putra Arie Mangesti, Yovita Asrina Asrina Asrina Bravestha, Rio Chairul Farid, Achmad Dahlan, Rudiyanto Dananjaya, Adhitya Arum Djinarto, Bambang Farisi, Salman Febriadi, Herry Febriyan, Muhammad Alvin Fikri alhamdi Fikri, Sultoni Firdaus, Salsabila Fitrah, Azizah Fouziah, Resti Frans Simangunsong Gilang Ramadhan Guntur, Sundaru Gustian, Nabil Hidayati, Sri Erna Hikam, Reza Maulana Hufron Hufron, Hufron Ilyas, Erizal Imron, Muhamad Khairunnisa, Annisa Krisnadi Nasution Lovitya Trisnanti, Ines Mahyudin Ritonga Mangesti, Yovita Arie Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad Dwi Mohammad Mohammad MUCHAMMAD FAIZIN Murtadlo, Aly Nandini, Nova Mawar Lailatul Adawiyah Nickalus, Juan Noviekayati, IGAA. Nurlaila Nurul Zuhriyah Partomuan Harahap Pohan, M. Riduan Pratiwi, Aulia Priyambodo, Bagus Adam Puji Utomo, Sutrisno Putra Samudra, Kaharudin Putra, Arifdo Qolyubby, Bayu Kurnia Nazarrudin Rahma, Suci Salsa Aulia Rahman, Habibur Rahmawati, Rahmawati Rahmi, Awliya Reflinaldi, Reflinaldi Rezi, Melisa Rimbawani Sushanty, Vera Riqiey, Baharuddin Ronny Ronny Rustambekov, Islambek Rusydi Rusydi S Endang Prasetyawati Saputri, Yosi Rani Sari, Yanofita Sesung, Rusdianto Setyadji, Sri Shodikin, Miftakhul Shulga, Ievgenii Sibarani, Tagor Slamet Suhartono Soma, Nara Sukardi Sukardi Sutra, Heni Syahrizal, Fauzan Fitra Tafiati, Tafiati Tri Budiman, Nanang Triana, Hetti Waluati Walujo Tjahjono, Agus Wartiman, Wartiman Wati, Tan Hana Darma Mangruwa Wibowo, Agung Satryo Wibowo, Tulus Yudi Widodo Yufni Faisol, Yufni Yunita, Asti