Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.398
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Humanus: Jurnal ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora Buletin Al-Turas STUDIA ISLAMIKA MANUSKRIPTA Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Mimbar Keadilan Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus An Nabighoh Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Unes Law Review BAHTERA : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli AL-AF'IDAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Pengajarannya COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ikhtisar: Jurnal Pengetahuan Islam Jurnal Al-Fawa'id : Jurnal Agama dan Bahasa Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal Evidence Of Law Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Studies in English Language and Education Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Baileo: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Jiluna Arabiyah Journal of Law and Legal Reform Lex Scientia Law Review Al-Irfan: Journal Of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies Studia Islamika
Syofyan Hadi
Dosen Fakultas Hukum Untag Surabaya
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Mimbar Keadilan

 1 
Kedudukan Pengadilan Pajak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia Bravestha, Rio; Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Februari 2017
Publisher : Mimbar Keadilan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kedudukan Pengadilan Pajak menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak adalah pengadilan yang melaksanakan kekuasaan kehakiman. Kemandirian Hakim dalam Pengadilan Pajak masih menggunakan “dual roof system” dimana di berbagai peradilan telah menganut “one roof system”. Sehingga dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua rumusan masalah yakni: 1) Bagaimana kedudukan pengadilan pajak menurut UU Pengadilan Pajak? 2) Bagaimana kemandirian hakim dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pajak? Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan dua metode pendekatan yakni pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Dan hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa 1) Kedudukan Pengadilan Pajak menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 48 tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasal 27 ayat (1) jo Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara bahwa Pengadilan Pajak sebagai pengadilan khusus yang berada di lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. 2) Kemandirian hakim dalam Pengadilan Pajak masih menganut “dual roof system” yakni disatu sisi berada dalam Kementerian Keuangan sedangkan disisi lain berada dalam Mahkamah Agung, hal demikian dapat menyebabkan tidak ada kemandirian hakim dalam memutus sengketa dibidang pajak.Kata kunci: kedudukan, pengadilan pajak, kemandirian hakim.
Upholding the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Through the Difference Principle Shodikin, Miftakhul; Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i1.12135

Abstract

The right to work is a right for every citizen to earn a decent living for humanity. However, injustice is still often felt by people with disabilities who often face challenges in accessing this right. The difference principle asserts that inequality is only acceptable if it provides the greatest benefit to the most disadvantaged. This principle is an appropriate analytical tool to evaluate how employment policies in Indonesia have succeeded in minimizing the inequalities faced by persons with disabilities. Therefore, this research aims to explain the difference principle prioritizes the well-being of those who are most disadvantaged or marginalized. This study aims to analyze the legal issues through a normative legal lens, incorporating both statutory and conceptual analysis. Through normative analysis and deductive reasoning, the result of this research is that the regulation of the right to work for persons with disabilities is not yet optimal in accordance with the difference principle. Such as special quota policies that are not accompanied by strict sanctions, training, and job fairs that are still general and have yet to fully meet the unique requirements of individuals with disabilities. The inclusive recruitment process, which should be a must, is a phrase in the article that regulates the possibility (optional) instead of an obligation (mandatory). Meanwhile, the limited authority of the Disability Service Unit (ULD) in the employment sector and the weak institutional structure of the National Commission on Disability (KND), which is far from independent, include the barriers that individuals with disabilities encounter in accessing their right to employment.
Justice in the Internet Context: The Protection of Freedom of Expression Online Post Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024 Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i2.131947

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze justice on the Internet post Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XII/2024 which provide strengthening of protection of freedom of expression on the Internet. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of the study found that restrictions on freedom of expression on the Internet in the Law on Electronic Information and Transaction are problematic because they are irrational, unfair, disproportionate, and tend to conflict with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Through Decision Number 105/PUU-XII/2024, the Constitutional Court has realized justice on the Internet by providing proportional protection of freedom of expression on the Internet. The decision provides freedom for everyone to express themselves on the Internet, such as conveying criticism, provided that their expression does not degrade the dignity or good name of others. Government institutions, professions, or positions are excluded from subjects that can be victims of defamation. The government can no longer prosecute citizens who criticize the policies it has taken. The decision provides guidelines for enforcing the law against violations of freedom of expression on the Internet.
Constitutional Imperatives: Examining the Urgency of Term Limits for Members of the House of Representatives Riqiey, Baharuddin; Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024): Februari 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v17i2.9635

Abstract

UUD NRI 1945 is the highest law in Indonesia's hierarchy of rules and regulations. One of the principles adopted by the UUD NRI 1945 is the principle of constitutionalism. Proof that the UUD NRI 1945 adheres to the principle of constitutionalism can be proven by the existence of Article 7, Article 23E, Article 24A, Article 24B, and Article 24C of the UUD NRI 1945. Meanwhile, the DPR, one of the state institutions mentioned in Chapter VII of the UUD NRI 1945, does not regulate term limits. This research explains the urgency of regulating term limits for DPR members from a constitutionalism perspective. This research is normative legal research using a statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approach. The results of this research show that the absence of regulations regarding term limits for members of The House of Representative in the UUD NRI 1945 is not in accordance with the principles of constitutionalism adopted by the UUD NRI 1945. The urgency of limiting the terms for members the House of Representative is to: (1) uphold the principles of constitutionalism, (2) prevent arbitrary actions, (3) realize legal certainty, (4) improve the implementation of democracy in Indonesia, (5) prevent authoritarianism, and (6) Carrying out regeneration.
Redesigning the Authority of Autonomous Region in Geothermal Management: a Constitutional Justice Perspective Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v19i1.132755

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the authority of autonomous regions in geothermal management and to find a fair redesign of the division of geothermal management authority to autonomous regions. This study is a legal study with a statute, conceptual, and case approach. The primary and secondary legal materials that have been collected are then analysed normatively. The results of the study found that through the principle of the broadest possible autonomy, the central government decentralizes some concurrent government affairs to autonomous regions. One of the concurrent affairs is geothermal affairs. However, Law No. 23 of 2014 regulates the centralization of geothermal permit issuance, so that it only becomes the authority of the Central Government. In fact, this centralization is strengthened by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 11/PUU-XIV/2016. In fact, this causes injustice to autonomous regions. After all, it is contrary to Article 18 paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) and Article 18A paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and is inconsistent with Law No. 23 of 2014 because it only uses the principle of national strategic interests. Therefore, as an effort to provide justice for the regions, the regulation needs to be redesigned by dividing the authority to grant geothermal permits among the regions. The division of authority is carried out using the principles of accountability, externality, and efficiency by considering the location/place of the geothermal permit, users, and benefits/negative impacts of granting geothermal permits, as well as efficiency in the implementation of granting geothermal permits.
Co-Authors ', Monica Abdul Aziz Alfadilah, Alfadilah Ali Fahrudin, Ali Amelia, Mays Anang Pratama Widiarsa Anugrah, Narendra Putra Arie Mangesti, Yovita Asrina Asrina Asrina Bravestha, Rio Chairul Farid, Achmad Dahlan, Rudiyanto Dananjaya, Adhitya Arum Djinarto, Bambang Farisi, Salman Febriadi, Herry Febriyan, Muhammad Alvin Fikri alhamdi Fikri, Sultoni Firdaus, Salsabila Fitrah, Azizah Fouziah, Resti Frans Simangunsong Gilang Ramadhan Guntur, Sundaru Gustian, Nabil Hikam, Reza Maulana Hufron Hufron, Hufron Ilyas, Erizal Imron, Muhamad Khairunnisa, Annisa Krisnadi Nasution Lovitya Trisnanti, Ines Mahyudin Ritonga Mangesti, Yovita Arie Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad Dwi Mohammad Mohammad MUCHAMMAD FAIZIN Murtadlo, Aly Nandini, Nova Mawar Lailatul Adawiyah Nickalus, Juan Noviekayati, IGAA. Nurlaila Nurul Zuhriyah Partomuan Harahap Pohan, M. Riduan Pratiwi, Aulia Priyambodo, Bagus Adam Puji Utomo, Sutrisno Putra Samudra, Kaharudin Putra, Arifdo Qolyubby, Bayu Kurnia Nazarrudin Rahma, Suci Salsa Aulia Rahman, Habibur Rahmawati, Rahmawati Rahmi, Awliya Reflinaldi, Reflinaldi Rezi, Melisa Rimbawani Sushanty, Vera Riqiey, Baharuddin Ronny Ronny Rustambekov, Islambek Rusydi Rusydi S Endang Prasetyawati Saputri, Yosi Rani Sari, Yanofita Sesung, Rusdianto Setyadji, Sri Shodikin, Miftakhul Shulga, Ievgenii Sibarani, Tagor Slamet Suhartono Soma, Nara Sukardi Sukardi Sutra, Heni Syahrizal, Fauzan Fitra Tafiati, Tafiati Tri Budiman, Nanang Triana, Hetti Waluati Walujo Tjahjono, Agus Wartiman, Wartiman Wati, Tan Hana Darma Mangruwa Wibowo, Agung Satryo Wibowo, Tulus Yudi Widodo Yufni Faisol, Yufni Yunita, Asti