p-Index From 2020 - 2025
9.372
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Semaya E-Journal of Linguistics Linguistika Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran PRASI: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, dan Pengajarannya Lingua Scientia Journal Widya Winayata: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sains dan Humaniora (JPPSH) Jurnal IKA Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) LINGUAL: Journal of Language and Culture IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature EDULITE: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa English and Literature Journal ETERNAL(english, teaching, learning, and Research Journal) Aksara LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching Edu-Ling: Journal of English Education and Linguistics Kandai Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation WIDYA LAKSANA Journal of Education Technology International Journal of Elementary Education Mimbar Ilmu Jurnal EDUTECH Undiksha JOURNEY : Journal of English Language and Pedagogy Linguistik Indonesia ACITYA Journal of Teaching & Education PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Borneo Educational Journal (Borju) The Art of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TATEFL) Journal of Educational Study EDULIA: English Education, Linguistic and Art Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) TELL - US JOURNAL IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education KONSELOR SEAQIL Journal of Language Education Aksara Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa

TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXTS Elsie, Kadek Fredina; Adnyani, ni luh putu sri; Suarnajaya, I wayan
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa
Publisher : IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (308.917 KB) | DOI: 10.31571/bahasa.v9i1.1681

Abstract

This study aimed at identifying the process types that characterize the students’ recount texts, identifying the process types which are dominantly used, and identifying the circumstantial elements that characterize the students’ recount texts. This study applied a descriptive qualitative method with a case study research. The recount texts written by class XI Usaha Perjalanan Wisata (UPW) 2 at SMK Wira Harapan were used as the sources of data collection of the study. There were 26 students taken as the subjects of the study. The data of the study which are in the form of sentences and clauses were analyzed based on transitivity system, and the problems experienced by the students in writing the recount texts were discussed through focus group interview in order to determine whether the students made mistakes or errors in their texts. The study discovers that, first, the process types that characterize the students’ recount texts are material process, intensive attributive process, mental process, circumstantial attributive process, verbal process, possessive attributive process, intensive identifying process, existential process, circumstantial identifying process, and behavioral process, which respectively appears 566 times (60.66%), 149 times (15.97%), 100 times (10.72%), 35 times (3.75%), 29 times (3.11%), 21 times (2.25%), 17 times (1.82%), 9 times (0.96%), 4 times (0.43%), and 3 times (0.32%). Second, the process type which is dominantly used in the students’ recount texts is material process with the frequency of occurrence of 565 times (60.82%). The material process was used dominantly since the topics written by the students were related to past activities. Third, the circumstantial elements characterizing the students’ recount texts are location, cause, manner, extent, accompaniment, matter, and role. The results of the focus group interview and the text analysis show that the students made many mistakes and errors in their recount texts, such as the uses of past tense, article, spellings, modal auxiliary, capital letter, plurality, and preposition in a clause. The two aspects leading the deviations are interlingual and intralingual errors.  
TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXTS Kadek Fredina Elsie; ni luh putu sri Adnyani; I wayan Suarnajaya
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa
Publisher : IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31571/bahasa.v9i1.1681

Abstract

This study aimed at identifying the process types that characterize the students’ recount texts, identifying the process types which are dominantly used, and identifying the circumstantial elements that characterize the students’ recount texts. This study applied a descriptive qualitative method with a case study research. The recount texts written by class XI Usaha Perjalanan Wisata (UPW) 2 at SMK Wira Harapan were used as the sources of data collection of the study. There were 26 students taken as the subjects of the study. The data of the study which are in the form of sentences and clauses were analyzed based on transitivity system, and the problems experienced by the students in writing the recount texts were discussed through focus group interview in order to determine whether the students made mistakes or errors in their texts. The study discovers that, first, the process types that characterize the students’ recount texts are material process, intensive attributive process, mental process, circumstantial attributive process, verbal process, possessive attributive process, intensive identifying process, existential process, circumstantial identifying process, and behavioral process, which respectively appears 566 times (60.66%), 149 times (15.97%), 100 times (10.72%), 35 times (3.75%), 29 times (3.11%), 21 times (2.25%), 17 times (1.82%), 9 times (0.96%), 4 times (0.43%), and 3 times (0.32%). Second, the process type which is dominantly used in the students’ recount texts is material process with the frequency of occurrence of 565 times (60.82%). The material process was used dominantly since the topics written by the students were related to past activities. Third, the circumstantial elements characterizing the students’ recount texts are location, cause, manner, extent, accompaniment, matter, and role. The results of the focus group interview and the text analysis show that the students made many mistakes and errors in their recount texts, such as the uses of past tense, article, spellings, modal auxiliary, capital letter, plurality, and preposition in a clause. The two aspects leading the deviations are interlingual and intralingual errors.  
Co-Authors Abd. Syakur Agustini, Made Ari Dwita Anak Agung Sri Barustyawati Ayu Kadek Surya Maharani Blangsinga, Gede Wisma Krisna Ari Aditya Brenda Khanadi Dewa Ayu Novi Kusumawardani Dewa Gde Rudy Dewa Putu Ramendra Dewantara, Kadek Andre Karisma Dewi, Gusti Putu Rustika Dewi, Komang Putri Dewi, Ni Kadek Kasandra Dharma, Ketut Pande Bagus Wahyu Surya Drs. Wayan Sugiartha, M.Si. . Eka Anastasia Wijaya Elsie, Kadek Fredina Gede Aditra Pradnyana Gede Rasben Dantes Hutapea, Jesica Vanessa I Gede Budasi I Gusti Agung Sri Rwa Jayantini I Gusti Ayu Lokita Purnamika Utami I Gusti Ayu Puspawati I Gusti Bagus Wiksuana I Made Ardwi Pradnyana I Nyoman Adi Jaya Putra I Nyoman Pasek Hadisaputra I Nyoman Pasek Hadisaputra5 I NYOMAN SUPARWA I WAYAN PASTIKA I Wayan Suarnajaya I Wayan Swandana Jama, Karolus Budiman Jelimun, Maria Olga Jennet Senawati Kadek Eva Krishna Adnyani Kadek Eva Krishna Adnyani Kadek Fredina Elsie Kadek Puspa Ariantini Kadek Sintya Dewi Karisma, Made Arya Wira Kultsum, Ummi Lestari, Ni Putu Diana Eka Luh Putu Artini Luh Putu Artini M.Si Drs. I Ketut Margi . M.Si. Drs. Wayan Sugiartha . Made Astawa Kusuma Mandala Made Hery Santosa Mahardika, Kadek Mahendra, I Gede Agus Yuda Maheswari, Putu Ayu Masita Menggo, Sebastianus Menggo, Sebastianus Murniasih, Tri Ery Ni Komang Arie Suwastini Ni Komang Sri Mariati Ni Luh Devi Wimayanti Ni Luh Sutjiati Beratha Ni Luh Sutrisna Diyani Ni Made Rai Wisudariani Ni Made Ratminingsih Ni Nyoman Artini Ni Nyoman Padmadewi Ni Nyoman Padmadewi Ni Putu Era Marsakawati Ni Wayan Krismayani Ni Wayan Nilam Puspawati Ni Wayan Surya Mahayanti Nice Maylani Asril Paramarta, I Made Suta Prawira, Bagus Yuda Prawoco, Fajar Sandi Prof. Dr. Ni Nyoman Padmadewi,MA . Purniawati, Sang Ayu Putu Ari Purwanti, Ni Komang Ratna Puspawati, Ni Wayan Nilam Putra, I Nyoman Adi Jaya Putra Putra, Pande Agus Putu Dharma Putu Ayu Prabawati Sudana Putu Ayu Prabawati Sudana Putu Dika Pratiwi Putu Dita Marantika Putu Eka Dambayana Suputra Putu Kerti Nitiasih Putu Pande Novita Sari Putu Suarcaya Rima Andriani Sari Rima Andriani Sari Rizki Prasetya Rusnalasari, Zulidyana Dwi Sahrullah Sahrullah Sahrullah, Sahrullah Salma Aldarosa Anjani Sang Ayu Putu Ari Purniawati Sari, Putu Pande Novita Sri Rwa Jayantini, I Gusti Agung Suka, Eva Suryandani, Putu Dinia Veronika Genua Widiasmara, I Komang Widiastuti, Ni Putu Santhi Wiraningsih, Putu Xuan, Zhao Zulidyana Dwi Rusnalasari