Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
15.538
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Yustisia Lentera Hukum LAW REVIEW PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) YUSTISI Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora JURNAL MERCATORIA Jurnal Yuridis Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora ACTA DIURNAL : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Media Iuris JUSTISI Cepalo Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Eksekusi : Journal Of Law JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Cakrawala Repositori Imwi jurnal syntax admiration LEGAL BRIEF CITRA JUSTICIA : Majalah Hukum dan Dinamika Kemasyarakatan Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam Indonesia Private Law Review Keadilan Jurnal PADMA: Pengabdian Dharma Masyarakat Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Hukum Malahayati International Journal of Social Service and Research Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Jurnal Impresi Indonesia COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian PATTIMURA Legal Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Journal of Sharia (JOSH) Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Sharia and Legal Science Journal of Innovative and Creativity Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora COSMOS Keadilan Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Binamulia Hukum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Media of Law and Sharia Solusi Bersama : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Elisatris Gultom
FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS PADJAJARAN
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 129 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 129 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Legal Aspects of Business Competition in the Procurement of Covid-19 Vaccine by Bio Farma Ltd Tri Utomo Wiganarto; Asenar Asenar; Elisatris Gultom
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2021): Vol. 23, No. 2, August 2021
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v23i2.20416

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the exclusion of monopoly by State Owned Enterprises (BUMN) based on the provisions of business competition law in the procurement of the Covid-19 vaccine by Bio Farma (Persero) Ltd. Indonesia is being hit by the Covid-19 outbreak. This condition has had a negative impact in various fields. To overcome this, one of the government's efforts is to bring in vaccines to prevent the spread, and the procurement of vaccines is given to Bio Farma Ltd. There are indications of monopoly actions in the procurement of Covid-19 vaccines by Bio Farma Ltd. This research uses the approach statute approach and conceptual approach. The technique of tracing legal materials uses field study techniques and document studies (library research), as well as study analysis is using qualitative analysis. The results of the research and the discus-sion show that the procurement process for the Covid-19 vaccine is strictly regulated by the government. Even the quantity, procurement, and distribution are coordinated by the government in this case through the assignment of SOEs (BUMN) as regulated in Presidential Regulation Number 99 of 2020 as amended by Presidential Regulation Number 14 of 2021. The results of the study show that the actions taken by SOEs (BUMN) in this case Bio Farma (Persero) Ltd in procuring the Covid-19 vaccine is included in the excluded monopoly category, because it meets the elements of the provisions in Article 50 paragraph a. Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
THE AUTHORITY OF THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGENCIES IN THE INSURANCE SECTOR UNDER INDONESIAN LAWS Elisatris Gultom; Siti Rohani; Huta Disyon; Savirra Satriadi
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 25, No. 3, December 2023: Law and Justice in Various Context in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v25i3.28265

Abstract

This study examines the mechanism and authority involved in resolving consumer disputes within the insurance sector. The study adopts a normative juridical method to analyze the topic comprehensively. Initially, it provides an overview of the mechanism employed to address consumer disputes in the insurance sector. Subsequently, it delves into an examination of the authority responsible for handling such disputes in Indonesia, particularly focusing on out-of-court alternative dispute resolution methods. The findings of the study reveal that insurance customers resort to various dispute resolution measures when faced with claim defaults by insurance companies. These measures include initiating civil lawsuits in the District Court and filing reports through either the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency or the Indonesian Insurance Mediation Agency. It is important to note that the resolution of insurance disputes should adhere to the terms and conditions outlined in the Insurance Policy, as it represents a binding agreement between the insurer and the insured
Tinjuan Yuridis Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Atas Tindakan Hukum Anak Perusahaan Yang Merugikan Pihak Ketiga Oleh Induk Perusahaan Holding BUMN Andwia Maharani; Elisatris Gultom
Hakim Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i1.1561

Abstract

This research aims to study and determine the responsibilities of Holding as the parent company of SOE, if there is legal action taken by the subsidiary holding company which results in losses to third parties. Then, it is hoped that this research can be used as a reference for Holding as the parent company of SOE to see the limits of liability for losses to third parties resulting from legal actions of subsidiaries and also the solutions to resolve for similar problems. SOE has an important position in terms of supporting government programs that seek to realize prosperity and independence in balanced development. The method in this research was carried out in a normative juridical manner, so the research was based on applicable legal norms and carried out a review of the explanations contained in the library materials. It can be concluded from this research that the parent holding company will be responsible if the parent company participates in decision making.
Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik: Sebagai Upaya Penguatan BUMN Vidya Kartika Ayuningtias; Elisatris Gultom
Hakim Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i1.1569

Abstract

This paper aims to see the application of Good Corporate Governance principles as an effort to strengthen SOEs. The Principles of Good Corporate Governance are the principles that underline a company's management processes and mechanisms based on laws and regulations and business ethics. SOEs as a business entity have so far only played a development role in their journey so that they often ignore the role of SOEs as a business entity or business operator, which causes the management of SOEs to be considered less successful. Therefore, the implementation of Good Corporate Governance principles is expected to strengthen SOEs as a Business Entity. This research uses normative juridical approach method of analytical descriptive research specification. The data is collected through literature and refers to the provisions of laws and regulations. This study concludes that the Principles of Good Corporate Governance are needed to be applied as an effort to link SOEs as Business Entities which includes application in several aspects, namely especially shareholder rights, equal treatment of shareholders, the role of shareholders that must be recognized, accurate and timely disclosure, and board responsibility.
Putusan Penolakan Pengesahan Perdamaian Debitor Atas Dasar Belum Dibayarnya Imbalan Jasa Pengurus Intan Zahirah; Elisatris Gultom; Aam Suryamah
COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 10 (2024): COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/comserva.v3i10.1202

Abstract

PKPU merupakan proses bagi debitor untuk mengajukan rencana perdamaian. Rencana perdamaian yang telah disetujui oleh kreditor akan disahkan oleh hakim. Adanya rencana perdamaian yang telah disetujui oleh para kreditornya tetapi pengesahannya ditolak oleh hakim, karena imbalan jasa tim pengurus belum dibayar dan tidak ada jaminan pembayarannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) serta rencana perdamaian dalam konteks perjanjian utang-piutang di RS X. Penelitian ini akan menganalisis permasalahan hukum mengenai imbalan jasa tim pengurus yang harus dibayarkan oleh debitor dan pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan melakukan analisis bahan pustaka atau data sekunder sebagai sumber utama. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan undang-undang dengan meninjau UU KPKPU. Pendekatan kasus juga diterapkan, merujuk pada kasus penolakan pengesahan perdamaian oleh hakim. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama bahwa imbalan jasa tim pengurus merupakan kreditor preferen yang pembayarannya harus didahulukan. Kedua, bahwa pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara tidak tepat karena imbalan jasa tim pengurus merupakan kesepakatan antara debitor dan pengurus. Adanya peran pengurus dan hakim pengawas dalam menentukan imbalan jasa tim pengurus. Apabila tidak ada kesepakatan imbalan jasa tim pengurus antara debitor dan pengurus, hal ini dapat ditetapkan oleh hakim pengawas.
Determination of Fares for Online Transportation Applications with A Fare Bargaining System is Linked to Business Competition Law in Indonesia Bernadetta Satyaayu Regitaningtyas Kalaj; Elisatris Gultom; Deviana Yuanitasari
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 5 No. 07 (2024): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v5i07.1180

Abstract

This research aims to understand the practice of fare determination through a bidding system on online transportation applications based on Competition Law in Indonesia and to examine the supervision of fare determination actions through a bidding system on online transportation applications based on the applicable laws and regulations. This research employs a normative juridical analysis with a descriptive-analytical method by explaining the practice of fare determination using a bidding system and subsequently analyzing it using existing legal theories and norms. The results of this research indicate that the fare determination actions taken by online transportation business operators using a bidding system potentially violate the provisions of Article 20 of the Business Competition Law regarding the prohibition of predatory pricing and the Decree of the Minister of Transportation Number KP 667 in conjunction with the Decree of the Minister of Transportation Number KP 1001 concerning the Guidelines for Calculating Service Costs for Motorcycles Used with Applications, as well as the Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 12 of 2019 on the Protection of Safety for Motorcycle Users Used for Community Interests. Supervision of the actions of online transportation business operators in setting prices using a bidding system is conducted by two institutions, namely KPPU (Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition) and the Ministry of Transportation, both preventively and repressively.
Kepastian Hukum Transaksi Direksi Yang Memuat Benturan Kepentingan Ditinjau Dari Good Corporate Governance Dian Priharyanti; Elisatris Gultom
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i1.2199

Abstract

Directors have a crucial role in the company, with the potential for actions that are not in accordance with corporate governance that can be detrimental and cause conflicts of interest, threatening the company's growth. In this context, Good Corporate Governance becomes crucial as a supervision to prevent detrimental actions. This article discusses Directors' Transactions involving Conflicts of Interest and legal certainty of director actions. The research uses normative juridical methods, with a statutory regulatory approach as the basis. Actions or transactions with a conflict of interest are considered not to be a legal problem if they are carried out in good faith, in accordance with KEP-412/BL/2009. However, a different view emerges from the principles of good corporate governance which suggest avoiding transactions with conflicts of interest. The research conclusion confirms that directors, as holders of trust, cannot be held responsible for losses if they act in good faith. Although the law allows transactions with conflicts of interest, the principles of good corporate governance emphasize the importance of avoiding actions that involve conflicts of interest in order to maintain the principles of good corporate governance.
Permohonan Pailit Terhadap Anak Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara : (Studi Kasus PT Indonesia Power) Nabilla Syafira; Elisatris Gultom; Deviana Yuanitasari
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i1.2084

Abstract

In debt and credit problems, bankruptcy is often the last solution to resolve the problem. State-Owned Enterprises or SOEs are also not immune from debt and credit problems that lead to bankruptcy. The regulation regarding the bankruptcy of SOEs itself is regulated in Article 2 Paragraph (5) of the Bankruptcy Law and its explanation. However, problems then arise when the subsidiaries of SOEs become bankruptcy respondents. There is no legislation that specifically regulates the bankruptcy of SOEs Subsidiaries, so this has led to confusion and debate in the community regarding the status of SOEs Subsidiaries in terms of bankruptcy. The ambiguity and debate can be seen in the implications of the bankruptcy petition case filed by the Kinarya Liman Margaseta Consortium against PT Indonesia Power, which is a Subsidiary of SOEs, namely PT PLN. This research aims to find out how the position of a SOEs Subsidiary in terms of bankruptcy is reviewed from the Bankruptcy Law and SOEs Law. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The research specifications used in this research are descriptive analysis. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and case approach. Based on the results of this case study, it can be seen that when viewed from the Bankruptcy Law and the SOEs Law, basically the subsidiaries of SOEs and SOEs cannot be equated in status and position. This is supported by several theories and strengthened by the Constitutional Court Decision and the Supreme Court Decision. Thus, PT Indonesia Power's bankruptcy petition should be filed by its creditors in addition to the Minister of Finance.
Tinjauan Hukum Dan Kepatuhan Terhadap Good Corporate Governance Pada Perusahaan BUMN: Studi Kasus PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero) Tubagus Kudrat Kun; Elisatris Gultom
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.871

Abstract

The Good Corporate Governance in Insurance company of the state-owned company refers to the principles, regulations, and best practices in the insurance industry. The implementation of GCG put forward the principles which gives certainty in running the company. The purpose of this research is to analyze and review for legal and compliance aspect to the GCG in the insurance state-owned company. This research using normative-juridical method. The result of this research are some aspect in GCG implementation which is not correct thus resulting weak-based decision making and failed to protect the interest of stakeholders. Matters that faced by PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero) becomes a landmark case for the ineffective and not correct GCG implementation on insurance state-owned company.
Privatisasi Dalam Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik Untuk Kepentingan Umum Dian Handayani; Elisatris Gultom
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.876

Abstract

With the establishment of electricity as a branch of production that controls the lives of many people by the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 30 of 2009 concerning Electricity, the provision of sufficient and reliable electricity is the government's obligation. In the implementation of Law Number 30 of 2009 where the government stipulates that the provision of electricity for the public interest can also be carried out by private business entities, the focus of this research is (1) to find out whether the provision of electricity for the public interest is provided by private business entities. is a form of privatization of electricity as a branch of production that controls the lives of many people, and (2) to find out what the Government's authority is in setting electricity tariffs, especially electricity tariffs provided by private business entities. The method used in this journal is the normative juridical method, which takes the form of research on applicable laws and regulations, legal principles, court decisions, expert opinions and writings related to this journal. From the research results, it was found that the provision of electric power for public purposes is not only carried out by the government through PT PLN (Persero) but is also carried out by private business entities, namely by providing the same role. By giving this role, it can be concluded that there has been privatization in the supply of electricity for the public interest. The provision of electricity by private business entities is intended to assist the Government in providing sufficient and reliable electricity, especially for the business and industrial sectors, so that it can attract foreign investors to do business in Indonesia and the community's economy can develop. However, the government has the authority to set electricity tariffs for consumers or customers in each business area managed by private business entities and can be set differently, but this has consequences for household customers who in fact usually pay more than the tariff for home customers. stairs located within the PT PLN (Persero) business area. As a consequence, it is recommended that the government set tariffs for household and social customers in business areas managed by private business entities the same as rates for household and social customers in PT PLN (Persero) business areas. Electricity used by households and social groups still functions as a public good that controls the livelihoods of many people, which is different from electricity for business and industrial needs.
Co-Authors A.A.P*, Karina Widyadhari Aam Suryamah Aam Suryamah Adi Kristian Silalahi Adinda Marianti Adinda Marianti Adinda Shafiyah Adristi, Dhia Novita Adzkia, Iqta Agustus Sani Nugroho & Ema Rahmawati Heryaman, Agustus Sani Nugroho & Al-Ghiffari, Fakhruddin Aleksander, Aleksander Amalina, Filzah Risky Aman Wibawa Ginting Andreas Paskal Silalahi Andwia Maharani Anita Afriana Anita Afriana Anita Afriana Anita Afriana Ardiansyah, Erpan Ari Mariyana Angriyani Aria Wirajuna Arief, Deswal Ariman, Renaldi Arizal Pahlawan Arrisman, Arrisman Artaji, Artaji Asenar Asenar Audrey Adyuta Putri Azzahra, Shadrina Ghaisani B., Trifena Jessica Bainal Munthaha, Alif Baraba, Badar Beny Anang Prihantoro Bernadetta Satyaayu Regitaningtyas Kalaj Bonita Chika Angelica Boy Aditya Prakasa Buala Jefry Cindi Elvina Azarine Claude Makasuci, Fially Damos Wiratua Tampubolon David Parulian Sinurat Deviana Yuani Deviana Yuanitasari Deviani Yuanitasari Dian Handayani Dian Priharyanti Diandra Syifa Rahman Disyon, Huta Diva Davina, Nathania Elfrieda Aysha Javin Ema Rahmawati Emma Yovela Sipahutar Erna Rahmawati Eureka Inola Kadly Fachrurozi, Aal Fajar Nugraha Feira Wafi Sakina Fially Claude Makasuci Fikri Fadhil, Muhammad Gani Munggaran Genias, Kriffirgy Valian Giani Prani Putri Prasasti Gitta Nurvy Auliya Handayani, Marini Tri Handryas Prasetyo Utomo Hania Arvalia Hardiyanti, Talitha Kirana Hatami, Raka Fauzan Hazar Kusmayanti Helza Nova Lita Hessy Oktiarifadah Hilmawan, Edi Humam Putra Hurruzia, Khansa Huta Disyon Huta Disyon Huta Disyon Huta Disyon Ikhwan Nul Yusuf Maulana Intan Zahirah Januar, Marcelino Jeffrey Thomas Lubis Jefry, Buala Jofit, Jhaviera Latifa Joshua Alexander Kalaj, Bernadetta Satyaayu Regitaningtyas Kalila, Sheza Vanisha Kamillah, Ananda Syifa Karina Widyadhari A.A.P* Karnosaputra, Yanto Liasta Dewi, Reza Lina, Alya Louis Alfred Hasudungan Lubis, Muhammad Azmi Farid Luh Widya Saraswati Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah Maulana, Ikhwan Nul Yusuf Mia Yulia Fitrianti Miranda, Maudy Mirza Marali Mochamad Ramdhan Pratama Muhamad Amirulloh, Muhamad Muhammad Agung Muhammad Akram Rafii Latuconsina Muhammad Rafli Aprideano Muhammad Ridwan Mulyana, Silvia Sofiatunnisa Nabilla Syafira Nadela Angelina Nadia Tuljanah Nianda Dinilah Arifah Niken Febriani Safitri Nisrina Hanun Nun Harieti Nur Abdul Rahman Roy Nurjannah, Mira Nyulistiowati Suryanti Pahlawan, Arizal Permana, Sudaryat Permatasari, Yanti Pratiwi, Aulia Wira Pujiyono Pujiyono Pupung Faisal Puteri Nurjanah Puteri Nurjanah Puteri Nurjanah Putra, Nouval Rivaldi Putri, Zakiyah R., Bismo Irmanendra Rahmah, Siti Marsha Zahida Rai Mantili Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam Ramadanni, Manisha Ranti Fauza Mayana Razaqa Dhafin Reza Liasta Dewi Rezki Mulya Risya Ainun Rohaedi, Rosalia Alima Utami Rosa Darman Roy, Nur Abdul Rahman Rukmana, Yenni Yunithawati S., Afifah Dara S., Jose Jeremy Safitri, Niken Febriani Salsa Nabila Arimbi Putri Salsabil Qodrunnada Salsabila, Raddine Samosir, Tony Richard Alexander Saputra, Febrianto Sarah Faizurah Khairunisa Saskia Kusumawardani Savirra Satriadi Sela, Natalie Siagian, Afrialdo Silitonga, Yoas Panggawa Sinta Dewi Sinta Dewi Rosadi Siti Rohani Siti Rohani Somawijaya -, Somawijaya Sudaryat Sudaryat Sudaryat Permana Sudaryat Sudaryat, Sudaryat Sukma Fadila Sumayyah Suryamah , Aam Susilowati Suparto Susilowati Suparto Susilowati Suparto Susilowati Suparto Syafira Aisya Kamila Syahbaniar, Alia Putri Syaqira Putri Tarsisius Murwadji Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Tony Richard Alexander Samosir Tony Richard Alexander Samosir Tri Utomo Wiganarto Tsary Arrofi, Dinda Yusuf Tubagus Kudrat Kun Ulkhaq, M Rifqy Dhiya Veronica Dwi Widianti Vidya Kartika Ayuningtias Wiganarto, Tri Utomo Yorika, Muhammad Syarafi Izazi Yuanitasari, Deviani Yuliana Yuliana Yupi Nurul Azizah Zahirah, Intan ⁠Sudaryat, ⁠Sudaryat