Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
16.453
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Lentera Hukum Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Novelty Prosiding Seminar Nasional INDOCOMPAC PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Akta International Journal of Law Reconstruction Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jurnal Selat Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Widya Yuridika Martabe : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Etika Demokrasi WAJAH HUKUM Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review Kosmik Hukum ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Jurnal Restorative Justice Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam JUSTISI ADIL : Jurnal Hukum SIGn Jurnal Hukum Prosiding National Conference for Community Service Project Journal of Law and Policy Transformation JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Yustisiabel Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Legal Spirit ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Paulus Law Journal LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Journal of Judicial Review POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Batulis Civil Law Review Jurnal Bedah Hukum PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Jurnal Legisia Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra Law Review Qonun Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Conference on Community Engagement Project (Concept) Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah SASI Syura: Journal of Law Abdurrauf Journal of Community Service Lex Scientia Law Review Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Journal of Law, Society and Living Norms Pamulang Law Review
Lu Sudirman
Universitas Internasional Batam
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 145 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 145 Documents
Search

 11   12   13   14   15 
Judicial Reasoning in Banking Contract Defaults: A Case Study from Indonesian District Courts Arifiyansyah, R. Muhammad Arfit; Sudirman, Lu; Situmeang, Ampuan; Fatihah, Nur
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v27i2.11243

Abstract

Banking customer default (wanprestasi) cases have increasingly dominated civil litigation in Indonesian district courts, particularly following the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. While debtors frequently acknowledge contractual breach, courts are often confronted with non-juridical arguments based on economic hardship, creating a tension between strict contractual enforcement and the pursuit of substantive contractual justice. This study aims to analyze judicial reasoning in adjudicating banking customer default by examining Decision No. 22/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Batam and assessing its conformity with the provisions of the Indonesian Civil Code. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches, relying on secondary legal materials including court decisions, statutory regulations, and legal doctrines. The findings reveal that the court consistently applied Articles 1239, 1243, and 1244 of the Civil Code, declaring the defendant in default due to failure to fulfill credit repayment obligations despite multiple formal warnings (somasi). Judicial reasoning was primarily grounded in written evidence and the debtor’s explicit acknowledgment of default, allowing the case to be resolved efficiently under the simplified lawsuit mechanism. The court ordered full repayment of the outstanding loan or, alternatively, authorized the auction of collateral through the State Assets and Auction Service Office (KPKNL). However, the analysis also indicates that the judgment predominantly emphasized legal certainty and contractual compliance while giving limited consideration to the debtor’s post-pandemic economic condition and request for installment relief. This study is significant as it demonstrates how simplified civil procedures reinforce creditor protection and procedural efficiency, yet simultaneously expose limitations in accommodating substantive contractual justice. The findings contribute to the development of default theory in banking law and provide critical insights for improving judicial responsiveness in contractual disputes involving socio-economic vulnerability.
Legal Certainty of the Electronically Integrated Business Licensing System: A Comparative Regulatory Analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia Bachtiar, Ronald Reagan Jap; Sudirman, Lu; Disemadi, Hari Sutra
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 8 No 1: April - September 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v8i1.626

Abstract

The electronic licensing transformation through the OSS system in Indonesia faces administrative dysfunction caused by the collision of institutional sectoralism and regional autonomy. This contradicts the governance efficiency of the MalaysiaBiz ecosystem in Malaysia, which operates more adaptively. This research aims to compare the electronic licensing regulatory framework in both countries and formulate a digital administrative governance reconstruction strategy in Indonesia. Employing a normative legal method with statute, comparative, historical, and conceptual approaches, this study examines primary legal materials comprising Law Number 6 of 2023 and the Companies Commission of Malaysia Act 2001. The research results indicate that Indonesia’s licensing architecture rests upon a rigid rule-based approach with ex-ante supervision. Conversely, Malaysia’s efficiency is based on a precise separation between centralized entity registration and local licensing authorities, supported by a strict ex-post compliance audit system. Addressing this gap, this research recommends the implementation of a hybrid regulatory approach for Indonesia’s licensing governance. In the upstream phase, reduce authority fragmentation and regional autonomy impediments by applying the deemed approval instrument. In the downstream phase, this policy must be counterbalanced by the establishment of a cross-authority sanction ecosystem between the OSS management and the Ministry of Law to execute the striking off the register sanction for spatial planning violating corporations. This hybrid approach, contingent on equalizing digital infrastructure, is expected to uphold the supremacy of the legal certainty principle while enhancing Indonesia’s investment competitiveness in the ASEAN economic integration era.
Restrictions on Individual Land Ownership for Residential Purposed in Indonesia: A Proposed Solution Febri Jaya; Lu Sudirman; Nurlaily Nurlaily; David Tan
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i2.5221

Abstract

The government has a responsibility to provide decent housing for all Indonesian people. The absence of legal regulations regarding the limitation of ownership of land rights for residential houses for individuals causes a person to freely and without limits buy a residential house. The purpose of housing purchases has shifted from the needs to be an investment does not protect the rights of all citizens to obtain a decent place to live in order to achieve prosperity and justice. To answer the problems in this research, the researcher uses a normative type of research with a legal approach to fill the lacuna of existing legal regulations in Indonesia since the object of the research is not yet legally regulated. The focus of attention on normative law as a practical science is to change the situation and offer solutions to concrete and potential social problems. The problems faced by each individual (especially people of the middle to lower income) to get a decent house are of course the responsibility of the government. This situation is constitutionally mandated under the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The answers to the problems, the researcher will approach the study by utilizing the approaches, in particular the Welfare State Theory of John Rawls, and the Law Development Theory of Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. As a conclusion, the solution proposed by the researcher is the application of the triple check system in the preparation of Government Regulations regarding the limitation of control over the land rights for residential houses for individuals in Indonesia.
Right to Be Forgotten in Indonesia and Thailand: Human Rights-Based Legal Reform Inspired by Korea, the U.S., and the European Union Ampuan Situmeang; Lu Sudirman; Ida Bagus Rahmadi Supancana; Nurlaily Nurlaily; Hari Sutra Disemadi
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i2.5224

Abstract

The central legal problem of this study lies in the normative inadequacy and weak enforcement construction of the right to be forgotten within the personal data protection regimes of Indonesia and Thailand amid escalating data breaches in Southeast Asia. This research aims to analyze and compare the normative framework governing the right to be forgotten in Indonesia and Thailand with selected global benchmarks, namely the European Union, South Korea, and the United States, in order to formulate ideal legal constructs adaptable to Southeast Asian contexts. This study employs a normative legal research method supported by a comparative legal approach, examining statutory regulations and secondary legal materials from Indonesia, Thailand, the EU (GDPR), South Korea (PIPA), and the United States (CCPA). The findings reveal that although Indonesia’s Personal Data Protection Law and Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act formally recognize deletion rights, both frameworks remain incomplete due to limited procedural clarity, weak dispute resolution mechanisms, insufficient third-party deletion obligations, and ambiguous safeguards against re-identification risks. In contrast, the EU’s GDPR mandates third-party takedown obligations and imposes severe financial sanctions, South Korea’s PIPA provides strict deletion duties combined with criminal penalties, and the CCPA establishes structured compliance and notification mechanisms. Consequently, strengthening enforcement pathways, clarifying procedural guarantees, and integrating stricter controller obligations are essential for Indonesia and Thailand to ensure effective realization of the right to be forgotten in rapidly expanding digital societies.
Legal protections against unfair competition in e-commerce: Analysis of Indonesian and Thailand framework adequacy Lu Sudirman; Nipon Sohheng; Agustianto; Shenti Agustini; Nurlaily
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jhn.v16i1.29157

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: Unfair competition threatens economic growth and is harder to detect in the digital era. For Indonesia and Thailand, growing digital economies depend on fair online marketplaces, yet these platforms face risks like price manipulation and visibility bias. Addressing these issues is crucial to unlocking their global trade potential. Purpose/Study Objectives: The purpose of this research is to analyze the normative potentials and challenges in enforcing antitrust laws in Indonesian and Thai online marketplaces, particularly in addressing antitrust challenges that are unique to the digital environment. Design/Methodology/Approach: This research utilizes normative legal research method and a comparative legal approach to examine the frameworks for protecting against unfair competition in online marketplaces in Indonesia and Thailand. Findings: Findings of this study highlight that the existing antitrust laws in Indonesia and Thailand are not equipped to address the unique challenges of digital markets, such as algorithm-driven price fixing, product visibility manipulation, and data monopoly. The study proposes a legal framework model focusing on enhancing algorithmic transparency, ensuring search neutrality, establishing robust market monitoring, and integrating data governance with antitrust measures. This model aims to bolster fair competition and consumer protection, positioning both nations to leverage their digital economy potentials effectively. Paper Type: Research Article
Comparison of Judges' Considerations in Land Dispute Settlement with the Same Case in Ensuring Legal Certainty Chandra Simbolon; Lu Sudirman; Triana Dewi Seroja
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 28 No. 1 (2026): June 2026 (Articles in Press)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v28i1.12208

Abstract

Land disputes constitute a significant issue in the relationship between the public and the government, particularly when administrative decisions affect land rights. This study examines a comparative analysis of judicial reasoning in two decisions of the Tanjung Pinang Administrative Court (PTUN) involving identical factual backgrounds, namely Decision No. 3/G/2024/PTUN.TPI and Decision No. 4/G/2024/PTUN.TPI. The study highlights the dynamics of judicial decisions across three levels of adjudication, namely the court of first instance, appellate review, and cassation, with the aim of assessing the consistency in the application of the principle of legal certainty. The findings reveal that although both cases involve similar objects and parties, the Supreme Court issued contradictory cassation rulings. This inconsistency gives rise to legal uncertainty and has the potential to undermine public trust in the judicial system. Employing a normative juridical approach combined with a case study method, this article emphasizes the importance of harmonizing legal interpretation and ensuring equal treatment in the resolution of land disputes in order to uphold justice and sustainable legal certainty.
Aligning Intellectual Property Rights with Climate Imperatives: A Comparative Study of Plant Variety Protection Lu Sudirman; Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk; Agustianto Agustianto; Nurlaily Nurlaily; Hari Sutra Disemadi
QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : FASYA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/qj.v10i1.12706

Abstract

Indonesia's agricultural sector has been ridden with stagnation and mismanagement, contrasting Singapore, which despite the lack of potential, has been able to facilitate its agricultural sector to thrive while aligning with sustainability. In this context, Indonesia's Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Law represents an IPR regime that can be analyzed further to explore the potential of helping Indonesia tackle climate change. This research analyzes the legal capacity of Indonesia’s PVP regime to integrate climate action initiatives, which provides a novel perspective by bridging intellectual property rights and sustainability, with the added comparative angle of Singaporean perspective. The findings of this research indicate that Indonesia's PVP regime is outdated and ill-equipped to accommodate the regime’s inherent potential in being a part of the climate action. In contrast, Singapore boasts a more robust legal framework that has facilitated the growth of its modern agricultural sector, despite resource constraints, along with the lack of direct normative connection between sustainability and the PVP regime, due to supporting normative architectures. The perspective from Singapore represents a potential model for Indonesia to consider as it seeks to enhance its PVP regime and align it with broader climate change mitigation strategies.
Dark Patterns and Consumer Welfare in Digital Banking Practices in Southeast Asia: A Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam Agustianto Agustianto; Nurlaily Nurlaily; Lu Sudirman; Nur Fatihah; Hari Sutra Disemadi
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.14531

Abstract

Consumer welfare in digital banking environment has become increasingly important, as dark patterns have been observed to have continued to emerge in many digital spaces. This subtle yet dangerous modern iteration of old unethical trade practices presents a serious threat to growing economies like Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, that are increasingly reliant on digital banking services in daily life activities. This study employs the normative legal research method and comparative approach to assess the key legal implications of dark patterns on banking consumers’ welfare and how the existing relevant frameworks are responding to this significant threat. Analyses made throughout the study highlight that all three jurisdictions exhibit a bifurcated inadequacy where general consumer protection laws lack digital-specific application mechanisms, while banking regulations prioritize prudential soundness over interface-level manipulation. Despite the divergent nature of the gaps found, UI/UX interface regulation remains the biggest gap that all three countries are dealing with, which is the primary manifestation of dark patterns. The study recommends establishing mandatory interface design standards supervised by regulatory authorities capable of imposing ex ante structural obligations on banks, to ensure that consumer welfare remains the paramount importance in ever-so-essential digital banking services.
Gamified Investment Apps and the Principle of Neutrality: A Comparative Legal Analysis of In-App Rewards and Badges in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines Lu Sudirman; Nadia Carolina Weley; Michael T. Sacramed; Antony Antony; David Tan
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.15223

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether in-app rewards and badges in investment applications constitute inducements or remain neutral engagement features, while assessing the adequacy of the legal frameworks in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines in addressing this issue. The research employs a doctrinal legal method with a comparative approach, analyzing statutes, regulations, and legal principles related to investment law, consumer protection, and financial services regulation in the three jurisdictions. The study also draws on relevant literature concerning gamification, investor behavior, and digital financial services to identify the normative position of app-based rewards and badges within the broader legal context. The findings show that in-app rewards and badges are not inherently neutral because they are designed to increase engagement, usage frequency, and trading activity among users. Although these features are not necessarily unlawful, they may function as subtle behavioral inducements that influence investor decision-making, particularly among novice retail investors. The comparative analysis reveals that the Indonesian legal framework contains limited and indirect provisions that may apply to such features, but it lacks a specific principle of neutrality for investment app design. Malaysia provides relatively broader consumer and capital market protections, yet still does not expressly regulate gamified inducements in investment apps. The Philippine framework similarly focuses on misleading statements and disclosure obligations, leaving a gap in addressing psychological manipulation through gamification. Overall, the study finds that the current legal frameworks in all three countries are not fully equipped to regulate the subtle but potentially harmful effects of gamification in investment applications. Therefore, the study recommends the incorporation of a limited neutrality principle for investment app providers, especially regarding features that may operate as inducements rather than genuine engagement tools.
Digital Advertising as a Threat to Consumer Privacy: A Comparative Legal Analysis Nurlaily Nurlaily; Lu Sudirman; Mimi Sintia Mohd Bajury; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Ninne Zahara Silviani
QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : FASYA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/qj.v9i2.12656

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital advertising as a key component of the digital economy has intensified concerns over the protection of personal data and privacy rights. The primary legal problem addressed in this research is the inability of Indonesia’s current data protection framework to adequately regulate data-driven digital advertising practices and prevent unlawful identification of individuals, particularly when compared to South Korea’s more advanced regulatory regime. This study aims to comparatively analyze the legal frameworks governing personal data and privacy protection in digital advertising in Indonesia and South Korea and to propose a legal development model for Indonesia. This research employs a normative legal research method using a comparative statutory approach, focusing on Indonesia’s Law on Personal Data Protection and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act, along with its enforcement regulations. Legal norms are examined through statutory provisions and supported by relevant legal and academic literature. The findings demonstrate substantial regulatory disparities between the two countries. South Korea has established a comprehensive and technologically responsive legal framework, incorporating detailed data classification, recognition of pseudonymized data, strict profiling limitations, and strong institutional enforcement. In contrast, Indonesia’s legal framework remains structurally limited, relies heavily on undelivered implementing regulations, and insufficiently addresses indirect identification and advanced data-processing practices in digital advertising. This study proposes targeted legal reforms for Indonesia, including the integration of pseudonymization, enhanced data classification, criminalization of unlawful identification, and mandatory tracking notifications to strengthen privacy protection in the digital advertising ecosystem.
Co-Authors ., Jane Abao, Grace Angela Adristy, Baiq Shefania Agustianto Agustianto Agustianto, Agustianto Agustini, Shenti Ahmad, Faradina Alamsyah Alamsyah Alhakim, Abdurrakhman Amboro, F. Yudhi Priyo Ampuan Simatupang Ang Terina Angel Tng Angelina Christini Anjany Nabilah Sugandhi Silaban Antony Antony Antony Arifiyansyah, R. Muhammad Arfit Arwa Meida Aninda Ayunda, Rahmi Bachtiar, Ronald Reagan Jap Bago, Ester Intensis Bayu Anggara, Sultan Celline, Celline Cendy Glaksy Chairunnisa Chairunnisa Chandra Simbolon Charly Marshella Ong Christine Christine Cynthia Putri Guswandi David Tan Della Hervi Syahputri Delvin Delvin Denygianto Halim Desy Crisyanti Devita Citra Ayu Dhani, Ayen Sephia Diny Safriani Disemadi, Hari Sutra Dorene Lee Dwiki Surya Pratama Elvin Elvin Elza Syarief, Elza Eny Eny Eny, Eny Eric Hansen Eva Dian Sari Excel Brayen Sandoval Farahdilah Ghazali Farahdina, Farahdina Fatihah, Nur Febri Jaya Febriyani, Emiliya Fernando Fernando Ferryanto, Justitia Fiona Fiona Fiorentine, Jasisca Fitri, Winda FL. Yudhi Priyo Amboro, FL. Yudhi Priyo Fraiskam, Natasha Galvin Galvin Girsang, Junimart Gita Aulia Guswandi, Cynthia Putri Haris, Muhammad Tan Abdul Rahman Haryati, Lily Hendry Naga Wijaya Hendryani Hendryani Hendryani, Hendryani Henry Soelistyo Budi Henry Soelistyo Budi, Henry Soelistyo Heru Susetyo Hutahuruk, Rufinus Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana Ida Bagus Rahmadi Supancana Insti, Putri Deviana Intan Manurung Irawati, Jovita Iswara, Vizta Dana Jacelyn Jacelyn Jacelyn, Jacelyn Jaya, Febri Jerryen, Jerryen Jessca Jessca Jessca, Jessca Jessica Wijaya Jessie Limmousine Jessy Wijaya Jihyun Park Joel Jordan Tobing Jonathan P. Binaluyo Jonkarlo, Edson Jonker Sihombing Josevin Wijaya Julvina, Julvina Junimart Girsang Junimat Girsang Jur. M. Udin Silalahi Karim, Justin Joy Kevin Charles Khristallina Khristallina Lee, Michelle Lendrawati Lendrawati, Lendrawati Leonardo, Steven Lie, Cindy Maharani Siregar, Ghea Regita Malau, Hotmaulina Manurung, Intan Manurung, Kevin John Paul Marfin Timu Apy Phymma Mega Tri Astuti Michael T. Sacramed Mimi Sintia Mohd Bajury Mrs. Feronica Mrs. Feronica Muhamad Anugrah Wahyu Saputra Muhidin Nadia Carolina Weley Naga Wijaya, Hendry Nelson Tan Nipon Sohheng Nipon Sohheng Nisa Nurfitri Nur Ezan Nur Fatihah Nurfitri, Nisa Nuria Fazrina Nurjanah, Listia Nurlaily Nurlaily Nurlaily NURLAILY, NURLAILY Oktavia, Ariani Park, Jihyun Prastiyo, La Ode Agung Pratama, Dwiki Surya Priyo Amboro, Florianus Yudhi Priyo Sambodo Raka Rashid Rudanto Raziansyah, Reza Philafi Retno Andarini Reva Masayu Khoriah Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah Rini Astuti Riska Amallia Liberta Ritonga, Moehammad Mahastar Rizka Salsabilah Romadona, Hanifah Ghafila Royce Royce Rudolf Haiti Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutahuruk Sahputra, Rendi Santoso, Deddy saputra tanwir, yopta eka Saputra, Dedi Eka Sari, Rayon Sausan Zharifa Seroja, Triana Dwi Setiawan, Marthalia Shafaluna Aulia Rachman Syah Sherlin Sherlin Shinta . Shira Faiza Putri Siahaan, Hervyan Siburian, Hasoloan Silviani, Ninne Zahara Sirait, Regina Ulianna Siregar, Zulhirdan Situmeang, Ampuan Stella Theo Steven Steven Steven Steven Sulastri Sulastri Sultan Bayu Anggara Syamsiar, Syamsiar Syrief, Elza Tan, David Tan, Winsherly Terina, Ang Tobing, Dian Riama L Tobing, Joel Jordan Tony Tony Triana Dewi Seroja Triana Dewi Seroja Triana Dewi Seroja Trisetyo, Muhammad Dhimas Udu, Jericho Utari Afnesia Vanessa Putri Dita Puspitasari Vizta Dana Iswara Wagiman, Wagiman Warianto, Wahyudi Widi Waisaka Windi Afdal, Windi Winnie Stevani Wisnu Yuwono Yan Pin Zulfi, Natasya Artameivia Zulhirdan Siregar