Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

3.892

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

Budi Usodo

Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Author-ID : 408357

Arts Humanities Education Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 152 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

8 9 10 11 12

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BOYOLALI Adiningsih, Sri; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from studentâs AQ. The learning models compared were TPS with scientific approach, NHT with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were all students of Junior High School in Boyolali. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Boyolali, SMPN 1 Sawit and SMPN 3 Sawit, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and AQ questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TPS with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with scientific approach, and both gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Climbers students have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters students,Â campers students have better mathematics achievement than quitters students. (3) For TPS with scientific approach, climbers students have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters students. Campers and quitters students have the same mathematics achievement. For NHT and classical with scientific approach, climbers students have better mathematics achievement than quitters students. Climbers and campers students have the same mathematics achievement. Campers and quitters students have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For climbers students, TPS with scientific approach and NHT with scientific approach give the same mathematics achievement. NHT with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach give the same mathematics achievement. TPS with scientific approach gives the better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For campers and quitters students, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TGT, NHT, Classical, Scientific Approach, AQ.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Maharani, Rizqona; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students’ multiple intelligences. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of the three steps interview (TSI) type with scientific approach, think pair share (TPS) model type with scientific approach, and classical learning with scientific approach. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade 8 students of Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and multiple intelligences questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on the hipothesis, the results of the study could be concluded as follows. (1) TSI with scientific approach got better learning achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. In addition, TPS with scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Students with logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence, students with linguistic intelligence got better achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. (3) Viewed from learning models, students with logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence. However, students with linguistic intelligence got better achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. (4) Viewed multiple intelligences’ categories, TSI model with scientific approach got better achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. However, TPS with scientific approach got better achievement than classical with scientific approach.Keywords: Three Steps Interview (TSI), Think Pair Share (TPS), Classical Learning, Scientific Approach, and Multiple Intelligences.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIVEMENT DIVISIONS DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN KETRAMPILAN KOMPUTASI MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT Ardiyanto, David; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of the Problem Based Learning (PBL), Teams Assisted Individualization (TAI), and Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) with the scientific approach viewed from students Adversity Quotient (AQ). The results of the research were as follows. (1) Students who were subjected to the PBL have a better understanding of concepts than students with the TAI while students were subjected to TAI have the same understanding of concepts as students who with STAD (2) Students who were subjected to the PBL have the same computing skills as students with the TAI, and TAI have the same computing skills as students with STAD, but students who were subjected to the PBL have better computing skills than students with STAD. (3) Students with high AQ have better conceptual understanding than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (4) Students with high AQ has better computing skills than students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have the same computing skills as low AQ. (5) In each of the learning model, students with high AQ have a better understanding of concepts than students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better understanding of concepts than low AQ. (6) In each of the learning model, students who have high AQ have better computing skills than students who have medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have the same computing skills equally as students who have low AQ. (7) In each AQ, students were subjected to the PBL have better understanding of concepts than students who were subjected to the TAI while students who were subjected to TAI have the same understanding of concept as with students who were subjected to the STAD. (8) In each AQ, students with the PBL have the same computing skills as students with TAI, students with TAI have the same computation skills as students of STAD, but students who were subjected to the PBL has the computing skills has better than students with STAD.Keywords : Learning model of PBL, TAI, STAD, scientific approach, Adversity Quotient (AQ), conceptual understanding, computation skill.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRAN BELAJAR Brilliyanti, Fanny; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one gives better mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD), model Problem Based Learning (PBL), or model classical with scientific approach; (2) which one has better mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or low of self regulated learning; (3) for each learning model, which one has better mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or lowof self regulated learning; (4) For each category of self regulated learning, which one gives better mathematics achievement, STAD, PBL, or classical with scientific approach. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Surakarta City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMP N 2 Surakarta, SMP N 15 Surakarta and SMP N 24 Surakarta. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self regulated learning questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova. The conclusion were as follows. (1) PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than STAD with scientific approach, and STAD with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach have the same mathematics achievement. (2) Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have medium and low self regulated learning and students who have medium self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning (3) For STAD and PBL with scientific approach, students who have high and medium self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning. Students who have medium and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students who have high, medium, and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have high self regulated learning, STAD with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement with PBL and classical with scientific approach but PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For students who have medium and low self regulated learning, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Student Team Achievment Division (STAD), Problem Based Learning (PBL), classical, scientific approach, self regulated learning (SRL)

PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS INTUISI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 2 SRAGEN Lestari, Mulyaningrum; Riyadi, Riyadi; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: This research aimed to product model of learning based on intuition to improve the creative thinking ability in solving mathematics problems in the students of SMA N 2 Sragen validly, practically, and effectively. The learning model produced included syntax and learning tools such as teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet. This type of the research was a Research and Development (R&D). Subjects of this research were students class of X MS (Mathematic Science) 4 and class X MS 5 of SMA N 2 Sragen, Central Java. The process of developing an learning model based on intuition referred to development model of Plomp and Borg & Gall including : (1) studying and collecting information in preliminary investigation stage, (2) designing an learning model based on intuition, created learning tools (teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet), (3) realizing model and learning tools organized into first draft, (4) validating the first draft against validator, revising, and then trying out the model, and revising again, and (5) holding FGD to evaluate the results of tryout that had been conducted and revising it for the next tryout. This research produced syntax and learning tools (teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet) of learning model based on intuition to improve the creative thinking ability in solving mathematics problems of students validly, practically, and effectively. The procedure of syntax in an learning model based on intuition: (1) The teacher made introduction such as preparing the students psychically and physically, apperception, providing motivation and learning objectives, (2) Teacher divided the students heterogeneously into some groups of two, (3)The students were given worksheet to discuss in group and there were five activities observing; questioning; exploring; associating; and communicating, (4) The students were given problems individually in the problem sheet to work on with stages that could appear intuition and improve their creative thinking ability including beginning, incubation, illumination, and verification, (5) Closing such as included reflection and homework.Keywords : model development, learning model, intuition, creative thinking ability

EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING(PBL) DAN LEARNING CYCLE 5E DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI DI-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Paryatun, Suji; Usodo, Budi; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The research aims to know: 1) which learning model is better achievement LC 5E with scientific appraoach, PBL, or direct learning models : 2) the learning autonomy category giving a better achievement among the high, medium, and low level of learning autonomy; 3) the learning autonomy which yields a better achievement of each learning model ; and 4) learning model which yields a better achievement of each learning autonomy category. The type of the research is a quasi-experimental research. The research is carried out in Sukoharjo regency. The populations of research are all 10th students of in Sukoharjo regency in which school based curriculum applied in the academic year of 2014-2015. The sampling technique uses Stratified Cluster Random Sampling. The data collecting techniques use documents, questionnaires, and tests. The data analysis technique uses two-way variant analysis with unequal cells. The research concludes that; 1) the LC 5E learning model with scientific approach gives a better achievement in mathematics learning; 2) the students with high learning autonomy get better mathematics scores. The indicator is the average scores of students with high learning autonomy are better than those with low or medium level; 3) In each learning model, the students with high learning autonomy get better achievements than those with medium or low as well learning autonomy in general,whereas in high learning autonomy category, the LC 5E learning with scientific approach shows a better math achievement than PBL; and 4) For the classification of learning autonomy between the high level and the medium one, learning model LC 5E with scientific approach shows better achievement mathematics learning than the one with PBL or direct learning, whereas, the low learning autonomy has no different achivement LC 5E with scientific approach, PBL or the direct one.Keywords: Mathematics Learning Achievement, Learning Autonomy, Learning Model

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA Winata, Rahmat; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) Which one give better mathematicsâ learning achievement, learning model of NHT with CTL, TPS with CTL or direct learning, (2) Which one have better mathematicsâ learning achievement, students who have high, medium or low. (3) On each learning model, which one give better achievement on each emotional intelligence. (4) On each level of emotional intelligence, which one give better mathematicsâ learning achievement, learning model of NHT with CTL, TPS with CTL or direct learning. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3Ã3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Karanganyar. The samples were 308 students; consist of 104 students in the first experimental class, 104 in the second experimental class, and 100 students in control class. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows. (1) The NHT with CTL given learning achievement as good as the TPS with CTL. NHT and TPS with CTL provided better learning achievement than the direct learning, (2) The students with high emotional intelligence had better learning achievement than those with medium and low emotional intelligence. The students with medium emotional intelligence had better learning achievement than did those with low emotional intelligence, (3) Students taught by using NHT and TPS with CTL, students with high emotional intelligence had learning achievement as good as the medium emotional intelligence. The students with high emotional intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with low emotional intelligence. The students with medium emotional intelligence had learning achievement as good as the students with low emotional intelligence. Students taught by using direct learning had equal learning achievement in each level of emotional intelligence, (4) Students with high emotional intelligence taught by using the NHT with CTL had learning achievement as good as the TPS with CTL. Students with high emotional intelligence taught by using the NHT and TPS with CTL had better learning achievement than the direct learning. Students with medium and low emotional intelligence had equal learning achievement in each learning model.Keywords: NHT with CTL, TPS with CTL, learning achievement, emotional intelligence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN PROBLEM POSING DAN TIPE JIGSAW TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA PADA PECAHAN DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT PERCAYA DIRI SISWA KELAS VII SMP/MTs DI KOTA METRO LAMPUNG Kusumaningtyas, Wahyu; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better in giving the mathematical word problem solving ability among learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach, learning models of jigsaw, or direct instructional models, (2) which one is better in giving the mathematical word problem solving ability among students’ level of confidence, students having high, medium or low level, (3) in each level of confidence, which one is better in giving the mathematical word problem solving ability among learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach, learning models of jigsaw, or direct instructional models and (4) in each learning models, which one is better in giving the mathematical word problem solving ability among students’ level of confidence, students having high, medium or low level. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of the research was all grade VII students of Junior High School (SMP) in Metro, Lampung in academic year 2013/2014. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the test and questionnaire of student’s level of confidence. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of research showed as follows. (1) Learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach had mathematical word problem solving ability as good as learning models of jigsaw, learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach had better mathematical word problem solving ability than direct instructional models, and learning models of jigsaw had mathematical word problem solving ability as good as direct instructional models. (2) The students having high level of confidence had mathematical word problem solving ability as good as those having medium level of confidence. The students having high level of confidence had better mathematical word problem solving ability than those having low level of confidence. The students having medium level of confidence had mathematical word problem solving ability as good as those having low level of confidence. (3) In each level of confidence, learning models of jigsaw with problem posing approach had better mathematical word problem solving ability than direct instructional models. (4) In each learning models, the students having high level of confidence had better mathematical word problem solving ability than those having low level of confidence.Keywords : Jigsaw with Problem Posing Approach, Direct Instructional Models, Mathematical Word Problem Solving Ability, Confidence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DAN PAIRS CHECK DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the knowledge and skill aspect viewed from adversity quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) with scientific approach, Pairs Check (PC) with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. This research was a quasi-experimental research. The population of the research was all of the eighth grade students of the State Junior High School in Sukoharjo. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics knowledge aspect test, mathematics skill aspect test and adversity quotient questionnaire. Technique of analyzing data that used was unbalanced two ways multivariat analysis of variance. From the research, it can be concluded that: (1) learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, (2) students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (3) on each learning model, students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (4) on each adversity quotient, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach.Keywords: cooperative learning model, NHT, PC, classical learning, scientific approach, knowledge aspect, skill aspect.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD WITH GUIDED DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Suriyah, Puput; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract:Â The aims of thisÂ research were to know: (1) which one is providing better mathematics learning achievement, students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, STAD or direct learning, (2) which one is having better mathematics learning achievement, students with Adversity Quotient (AQ) climbers, students with AQ campers or students with AQ quitters, (3) at each learning model, whether there are any mathematics learning achievement difference between students with AQ climbers, students with AQ campers or students with AQ quitters, (4) at each type of Adversity Quotient (AQ), whether there are any mathematics learning achievement difference between students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, STAD or direct learning. This research was a quasi experimental research using 3x3 factorial designs. The hypotheses testing used two ways ANOVA with unbalanced cell. This research concludes that: (1) students taught using cooperative learning of STAD with Guided Discovery Learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the students taught using STAD and direct instruction, as well as students who were taught using STAD have better mathematics learning achievement than the group of students taught using direct instruction, (2) students achievement with the climbers type of AQ were better than the students with the campers and quitters type of AQ while the students with the campers type of AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than the students with the quitters type of AQ, (3) in the cooperative learning of STAD with guided discovery learning, there was no difference in learning achievement in each type of AQ, in the STAD, there was no difference in learning achievement in each type of AQ, in the direct instruction, students with climbers type of AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than students with quitters type of AQ, (4) for the students who have climbers type of AQ, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning models, for the students who have campers type of AQ, STAD with guided discovery learning produced better mathematics achievement than direct instruction, for the students who have quitters type of AQ, STAD with guided discovery learning produced better mathematics achievement than direct instruction.Keywords: STAD With Guided Discovery Learning, Adversity Quotient, Mathematics Learning Achievement

Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Adi Nurcahyo Adwitiya Sarwahita, Salsabila Agnes Reswari Ingkansari Ahmad, Ahmad Ahmad, Ahmad Al Firdaus, Nabila Uristu Andhika, Niken Dwi Ardelia, Nadia Rizki Ardiyanto, David Ardiyanto, David Arianti Puspita Dewi Aritsya Imswatama Asrowi Asrowi Astri Wahyuni AsyÃ¢Â€Â™ari AsyÃ¢Â€Â™ari Asyâ€™ari, Asyâ€™ari Auliya, Anisa Rima Binti Anisaul Khasanah Brilliyanti, Fanny Brilliyanti, Fanny Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Cahyani, Apri Winar Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chumdari Chumdari, Chumdari Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Devita Yohanie Yohanie Dian Dwi Astutik, Dian Dwi Dian N Safitri Dian Panji Wicaksono Dian Ratna Puspananda Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edwin Latif Hardiyanto Eka Nur Azizah Endang Hariyati Ersam Mahendrawan Fahimah Andini Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Farida Nurhasanah Ferri Ardianzah Fida Rahmantika Hadi, Fida Rahmantika Fitriana, Laila Fuany, Anggun Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Haniah, Wahyu Nur Harjati, Juliana Kristin Hendriyanto, Agus Henny Ekana Chrisnawati Heribertus Soegiyanto, Heribertus Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ilham Rais A Imam Sujadi Ira Kurniawati Irene Endah Tri Winihati Isnaeni Umi Machromah Isnandar Iswanti, Partia Juniarto, Suci Juniati Juniati Karina Pramitasari, Karina Kartikaningtyas, Nafiqoh Elsa Kristiani, Theresia Kurniawati, Ira Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kuswardi, Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Labiba Zahra, Labiba Lingga Nico Pradana Maghfiroh Yanuarti Manora, Yupi Ayu Maratu Shalikhah, Maratu Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Maullina, Eka Siti Mishbahul Huda, Mishbahul Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Munawaroh Munawaroh Munzayanah, Nurul Murdoko, Yustinus Nada, Yusrina Qotrun Nahdiya, Nikmah Alfi Nansiana, Millenia Nadhea Nelly Indriastuti P Nindia Elisie Anggraini Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Novia Dwi Rahmawati Novia Fajar Utami Nugrohorini, Parwo Nunung Juwariah, Nunung Nur Anida Laila Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti NURUL AZIZAH Nuryani Destiningsih, Nuryani Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Ony Syaiful Rizal, Ony Syaiful Paryatun, Suji Paryatun, Suji Permataari, Desty Ratna Pinilih, Anggoro Canggih Pramesthi, Getut Pramesti, Getut Pramudya, Ikrar Puput Suriyah Purnama, Agung Eka Purwaningsih, Tri Purwaningsih, Tri Rachmawati, Intan Rahayu, Heni Septi Rahayu, Nastiti Rahmat Winata Rahmawati, Retno Dwi Putri Rany Widyastuti Ratna Herawati Ratnasari Ratnasari Reka Pramukti, Reka Retnowati, Evi Riswandha, Septian Henry Rivia J, Hefin Dwi Riyadi . Riyadi Riyadi Rizqona Maharani, Rizqona Robia Astuti S Siswanto Sa'idah, Ulya Safitri, Rini Dewi Saki, Saki Salistiyani, Salistiyani Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan, Sandhy Prasetyo Santosa, Eka Budhi Sarnoko Sarnoko, Sarnoko Sasongko, Anggi Setiaputra, Felix Indra Sholeh Muntasyir Sigit Pamungkas Siswanto Sri Adiningsih Sri Indayani, Sri Sri Subanti Sri Yamtinah Sudiyanto Sujadi, Imam Suryanto, Suryanto Susilawati, Dyah Sutopo Sutopo Sutopo, Sutopo Sutrisno Sutrisno Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus Tien Syarifah Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Triyanto, Triyanto Tuti, Dewi Setyas Umi Fadlilah, Umi Veva, Ervina Yulias Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahartojo, Sri Wahyu Kusumaningtyas Wicaksana, Hafid Wicaksana, Hafid Wulandari, Lina Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Yolan Kusumaningtyas, Yolan

Title

Found 152 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 152 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 152 Documents
Search