Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.892
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika SoLuSi ( Tersohor Luas dan Berisi ) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Basicedu Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation International Journal of Elementary Education M A T H L I N E : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika jurnal dikdas bantara Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi Mamangan Social Science Journal International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (IJMME) JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Proceeding International Conference on Mathematics and Learning Research Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Journal on Mathematics Education
Budi Usodo
Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Education Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 152 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 152 Documents
Search

 7   8   9   10   11 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS (TGT) YANG DIMODIFIKASI DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AFL) PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK TEKNIK DI KABUPATEN MADIUN Suryanto, Suryanto; Usodo, Budi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (509.11 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from creativity of the student. The learning models compared were Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) The Modified By Assessment For Learning (AfL), Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) an direct model. This research is a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research is all class 11th student of Vocational High School in Madiun. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling of the sample totaled 266 students, with details of 87 students in the experimental class of 90 students in two experimental classes and 89 students in the control class. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and test creativity in learning. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unequal cells. The results of research showed that: (1) The model of cooperative learning TGT modified AfL provides mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model TGT and direct learning. TGT cooperative learning model provides mathematics learning achievement as well as direct learning model; (2) Students who have a high learning creativity gives better mathematics learning achievement than students who have studied creativity medium and low. Students who have studied creativity is giving mathematics learning achievement as well as students with low learning creativity; (3) For each learning model show that, the prestige mathematics students with high creativity learning are better than the student who have medium or low, and students who have the creativity learning is giving better mathematics learning achievement than students with low learning creativity. (4) For each students level of creativity show that, cooperative learning model TGT modified AfL provides mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model TGT and direct learning. TGT cooperative learning model provides better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning model.Keywords: cooperative learning, TGT modified AfL, TGT, creativity in learning, academic achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI BERBASIS AFL PADA PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA Nurcahyo, Adi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (245.067 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student attitude toward mathematics. The learning models compared were Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) based Assessment for Learning (AfL), TAI, and conventional learning model. The research was quasi experimental. The population of this research was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School of the District Karanganyar, academic year 2013/2014. The samples in this research were SMPN 1 Tasikmadu, SMPN 2 Jaten, and SMPN 2 Colomadu taken by stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement instrument test and questionnaires students toward mathematics instrument. Data analysis technique used hypothesis test with two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. From the results of the analysis, can be concluded that: 1) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL were better than the ones who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI and conventional learning model, however the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI were better than the ones who were learning mathematics with conventional learning model, 2) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high attitude toward mathematics were better than the ones with the medium and low attitude toward mathematics, however the students with the medium  attitude toward mathematics were better  than the ones with the low attitude toward mathematics, 3) in the cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with ones who have the high attitude toward mathematics were better than the students with the low attitude toward mathematics, and students with the medium attitude toward mathematics were as good as the ones who have low attitude toward mathematics as well. In the cooperative learning model TAI and conventional learning model, the students with the high, medium, and low attitude toward mathematics had the same achievement in learning mathematics, 4) in the students with the high attitude toward mathematics, the learning achievement of the students who were learning mathematics with ones who have cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL were better than the students were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI, the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI had the same achievement in learning mathematics with conventional learning model, and the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL had the same achievement in learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI. The students with the medium and low attitude toward mathematics had the same achievement in learning mathematics among the ones who were given the cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL, TAI, and conventional learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Assessment for learning (AfL), students attitude toward mathematics, achievement learning mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW YANG DIMODIFIKASI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN GROBOGAN TAHUN 2010/2011 E.P.U, Moertiningsih; Riyadi, Riyadi; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (456.96 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRAK             Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) Apakah pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw, dan keduanya lebih baik daripada pembelajaran konvensional. (2) Apakah siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent mempunyai prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent. (3) Apakah penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional pada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent maupun field independent.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan desain eksperimen 32. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII (delapan) SMP Negeri di Grobogan semester dua tahun pelajaran 2010/2011. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan stratified cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini berasal dari SMP Negeri 1 Purwodadi, SMP Negeri 2 Grobogan, dan SMP Negeri 6 Purwodadi yang berjumlah 307 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar matematika dan tes gaya kognitif siswa. Uji instrumen meliputi validitas isi instrumen tes dilakukan oleh validator dan uji reliabilitas instrumen tes menggunakan rumus KR-20. Uji keseimbangan menggunakan uji anava satu jalan dengan sel tak sama. Uji prasyarat meliputi uji normalitas dengan menggunakan metode uji Lilliefors dan uji homogenitas menggunakan metode Bartlett dengan statistik uji Chi Kuadrat. Uji hipotesis menggunakan uji anava 2 jalan dengan sel tak sama.Hasil analisis data dengan anava dua jalan sel tak sama menunjukkan (1) Terdapat perbedaan rataan antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw  yang dimodifikasi, tipe Jigsaw dan konvensional  terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fa = 26,749  > F0,05;2;301 = 3,026). (2) Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan gaya kognitif siswa terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fb = 22,652 > F0,05;1;301 = 3,026). (3) Tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan gaya kognitif terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fab = 1,618 < F0,05;2;301 = 3,026).Berdasarkan uji hipotesis dan uji pasca anava diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa: (1) Pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi menghasilkan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw, dan keduanya menghasilkan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. (2) Siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent mempunyai prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent. (3) Pada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent maupun field dependent yang diberikan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi mempunyai prestasi belajar lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan keduanya lebih baik daripada pembelajaran konvensional. Kata kunci:  Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi, Jigsaw, Gaya Kognitif, Field Independent, Field Dependent.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL KOOPERATIF MODIFIED JIGSAW PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT PERCAYA DIRI SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA (SMP) NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BOJONEGORO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/2012 Puspananda, Dian Ratna; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (464.505 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini diadakan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui : (1) Manakah yang menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, antara model pembelajaran Modified Jigsaw, Jigsaw atau Konvensional, (2) Manakah yang menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, siswa dengan tingkat percaya diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah, (3) Pada model pembelajaran  Modified Jigsaw, manakah yang menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, tingkat percaya diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah, (4) Pada model pembelajaran Kooperatif Jigsaw, manakah yang menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, tingkat percaya diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah, (5) Pada model pembelajaran  konvensional, manakah yang memberi prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, tingkat percaya diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah, (6) Pada tingkat percaya diri tinggi, manakah yang memberi prestasi belajar matematika  lebih baik, model pembelajaran konvensional, Jigsaw atau Modified Jigsaw, (7) Pada tingkat percaya diri sedang, manakah yang memberi prestasi belajar matematika  lebih baik, model pembelajaran konvensional,  Jigsaw atau Modified Jigsaw, (8) Pada tingkat percaya diri rendah, manakah yang memberi prestasi belajar matematika  lebih baik, model pembelajaran konvensional,  Jigsaw atau Modified Jigsaw.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan desain faktorial 3x3. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMPN se-Kabupaten Bojonegoro tahun pelajaran 2011/2012. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara  stratified cluster random sampling sehingga terpilih tiga sekolah yaitu SMPN 3 Bojonegoro, SMPN 6 Bojonegoro, dan SMPN 7 Bojonegoro. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah angket sikap percaya diri dan tes prestasi belajar.Dalam penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Siswa-siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw mempunyai prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada siswa-siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional. Sedangkan siswa-siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw mempunyai prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada siswa-siswa dengan pembelajaran konvensional, (2) Prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang mempunyai percaya diri tinggi lebih baik daripada prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang mempunyai percaya diri sedang dan rendah. Tidak ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara siswa yang mempunyai percaya diri sedang dan rendah, (3) Pada pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw, tidak ada perbedaan antara prestasi belajar matematika pada masing-masing tingkatan percaya diri, (4) Pada pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw, tidak ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara siswa-siswa dengan tingkat percaya diri tinggi dan sedang. Begitu pula dengan prestasi belajar matematika siswa-siswa dengan tingkat percaya sedang dan rendah juga tidak mempunyai perbedaan. Tetapi untuk prestasi belajar matematika siswa-siswa dengan percaya diri tinggi lebih baik daripada prestasi belajar matematika siswa-siswa dengan percaya diri rendah, (5) Pada pembelajaran konvensional, tidak ada perbedaan antara prestasi belajar matematika pada masing-masing tingkatan percaya diri, (6) Pada siswa  yang memiliki percaya diri tinggi, tidak ada perbedaan antara prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw dan pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw. Akan tetapi prestasi belajar matematika siswa dengan percaya diri tinggi yang diberi pembelajaran jigsaw dan modified jigsaw lebih baik daripada siswa dengan percaya diri tinggi yang diberi pembelajaran konvensional, (7) Pada siswa  yang memiliki percaya diri sedang, prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw lebih baik daripada siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional. Prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw lebih baik daripada siswa yang diberi pembelajaran konvensional, (8) Pada siswa  yang memiliki percaya diri rendah, tidak ada perbedaan antara prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional. Akan tetapi prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw lebih baik daripada siswa dengan yang diberi pembelajaran jigsaw dan konvensional.Kata kunci:     Modified Jigsaw, Jigsaw, Konvensional, Percaya Diri Siswa, dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika
PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN TEAMS GAME TOURNAMENTS (TGT) PADA MATERI LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP DI KABUPATEN WONOGIRI Murdoko, Yustinus; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (493.096 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student learning style. The learning models compared were TAI (Team Assisted Individualization), TGT (Teams Games tournament) and direct teaching learning. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of junior high school  in Wonogiri regency on academic year 2013/2014. The size of sample was 234 students consisted of 77 students in the first experimental group, 76 students on the second experimenta groupl, and 81 students on the tirth experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test, questioner, and the likert scale instrument. The data was analyzed using analisis of variance two way.  Conclusions of the research were as follow. (1) the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievements of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model; (1) the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievements of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model; (2) the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic styles have the same learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have the same learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) in each learning style, the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model is the same as that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model, and the learning achievement of the students instructed with the TAI learning model and that of the students instructed with the TGT learning model are better than that of the students instructed with the direct learning model.Keywords: TAI, TGT, direct learning, learning style, achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN PAIRS CHECK (PC) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Andini, Fahimah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at determining the effect of models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the students’ logical mathematical intelligence. The learning models compared were learning model of the scientific Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), scientific Pairs Check (PC), and scientific classical. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Junior High Schools in Surakarta. The instruments used for the data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the hypothesis, the results of the study can be summarized as follows. (1) The use of Scientific PC resulted better achievement than that of scientific TAI and with scientific classical, the use of scientific TAI resulted better achievement than that of scientific classical. (2) The students’ achievement who have high logical mathematical intelligence was better than those who have middle or low logical mathematical intelligence, and students who have middle logical mathematical intelligence were better than those who have low logical mathematic intelligence. (3) At the students with high logical matematical intelligence, scientific TAI, scientific PC, and scientific classical gave the same achievement. At the students with middle logical matematical intelligence, scientific PC gave the better achievement than that with scientific TAI and scientific classical. At the students with low logical matematical intelligence, scientific TAI gave the better achievement than that with scientific PC and scientific classical. (4) In scientific TAI, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement was better than the middle one, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the lower one. In scientific PC, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement have equal achievement to the middle one students, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the low one. In scientific classical, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement was better than the middle one, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the students with low logical mathematical intelligence.Keywords: Scientific TAI, Scientific PC, Scientific Classical, Scientific Approach, Logical Mathematical Intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VII DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS Fadlilah, Umi; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from anxiety mathematics learning. The learning models compared were direct, PBL with scientific approach, and DL with scientific approach. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Banyumas. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Patikraja, SMPN 2 Patikraja, and SMPN 2 Kalibagor, taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and anxiety mathematics learning. The data analysis technique used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students receiving PBL with scientific approach to DL with scientific approach achievement than those receiving direct learning model. The students receiving PBL with scientific approach and DL with scientific approach had the same learning outcome. (2) Students with lower levels of mathematics anxiety learning had better learning outcome than students with medium and high anxiety level. Students’ learning anxiety level on math was better in their learning outcome than students with high levels of learning anxiety mathematics. (3) In each group, the anxiety level of students learning mathematics, learning model PBL with scientific approach and learning model DL with scientific approach provides better performance than direct learning model, learning model PBL with scientific approach produces the same learning outcome with learning model DL with scientific approach. (4) In each of the learning model, students with lower levels of anxiety level of mathematics learning outcome had better math outcome than students with medium and high math anxiety level learning, students learn math anxiety levels were to have better learning outcome than students with high levels of anxiety learn mathematics.Keywords: Direct learning model, PBL learning model with scientific approach, DL learning model with scientific approach, Math Anxiety Learning
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi; Ardianzah, Ferri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of cooperatif learning models viewed from the attitude of students. The learning model compared were TAI-CTL, TAI and direct instruction. This was quasi-experimental research designed by factorial 3x3. The population was 8th grade students of junior high school even semester academic year 2013/2014 in Magetan regency. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Total sample was 231 students, consisted of 77 students as TAI-CTL class, 78 students as TAI class, and 76 students as direct instruction class. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it is concluded that: (1) students learns using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, students learnt using TAI-CTL had better achievement than students learnt using TAI  (2) positive attitude students had better achievement than those of neutral and negative attitudestudents, neutral attitude students had better achievement than negative attitude students (3) for TAI-CTL and TAI, students with positive attitude had better achievement than neutral and negative attitude, however neutral attitude students had the same achievement as negative attitude students, for direct instruction, positive attitude students had the same achievement as neutral attitude students, meanwhile positive attitude students had better achievement than negative attitudeand students with neutral attitude had the same achievement as negative attitude students (4) for  positive attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL had the same achievement as students learnt using TAI, meanwhile students learnt using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, for neutral and negative attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL, TAI, and direct instruction had the same achievement.Keywords: TAI-CTL, TAI, Direct Instruction, Attitude 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Wicaksana, Hafid; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of thelearning models give a better achievement between PBL, DL, or classical with scientific approach, (2) which one has a better achievement between the student categorization, climbers, campers, or quitters, (3) at adversity quotient categorization, which one of the learning models give a better achievement between PBL, DL, or classical with scientific approach, and 4) at each the learning models, which one of the adversity quotient have a better achievement between student categorization, climbers, campers, or quitters. This was a quasi-experimental study. The research population were the seventh-grade students of all state junior high schools in Sukoharjo Regency in the academic year of 2014/2015. The data were analyzed through hypothesis testing using two-way ANOVA with unequal cells.Based on the analysis, the following conclusions are drawn. 1) The PBL model generates better learning outcomes than the DL model and the classical learning model using scientific approaches. The DL model generates better learning outcomes than the classical learning model using scientific approaches. 2) The students in the climber category have better learning outcomes than those in the camper category and the ones in the quitter category. The students in the camper category have better learning outcomes than those in the quitter category. 3) In the climber category, the students taught using the scientific PBL model have better learning outcomes in mathematics than those taught either using the scientific DL model or the classical learning model with scientific approaches. In the camper category, the students taught using the scientific PBL model have equal learning outcomes in mathematics to those taught using the scientific DL model but they have better learning outcomes than the students of the same category taught using the classical learning model with scientific approaches. 4) In relation to the PBL model using scientific approaches, the learning outcomes of the students in the climber category are better than those in the categories of campers and quitters. The students in the camper category have equal learning outcomes to those in the quitter category. In relation to the DL model using scientific approaches, the learning outcomes of the students in the climber category are equal to those in the camper category and better than those in the quitter categories.Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Discovery Learning, Classical, Scientific Approaches, Adversity Quotient, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA SMP DI KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2014/2015 Astutik, Dian Dwi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model of Numbered Heads Together (NHT) or Think Pair Share (TPS) type or clasical learning model. (2) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or low self-directed learning. (3) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model of Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Think Pair Share (TPS) type or clasical learning model, in each of self-directed learning. (4) which one better  mathematics achievement among students who have high, medium, or low self-directed learning, on each learning models. This research was quasi experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Surakarta City. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 273 students: 96 students for the experiment I, 93 students for experiment II and 84 students for experiment III. The instruments used for collecting data were mathematics learning achievement test and student learning style questionnaire. Testing of hypothesis used unbalanced two-ways analysis of variance using significance level of  α = 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, the conclusions were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of NHT type have better mathematics achievement than students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type and classical learning model. On the other side, students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type produced the same mathematics achievement as using classical learning model. (2) Students with high self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low self-directed learning, while students with medium self-directed learning produced the same mathematics achievement as with low self-directed learning. (3) In aech category high, medium and low self-directed learning, students who taught by cooperative learning model of NHT type have better mathematics achievement than students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type and classical learning model. On the other side, students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type have better mathematics achievement than classical learning model. (4) On each model of learning, cooperative learning model of NHT type, TPS type and classical learning model, students with high self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low self-directed learning, while students with medium self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with low self-directed learning.Keywords: Cooperative Learning of NHT, TPS, Self-Directed Learning, Mathematics Achievement.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Adi Nurcahyo Adwitiya Sarwahita, Salsabila Agnes Reswari Ingkansari Ahmad, Ahmad Ahmad, Ahmad Al Firdaus, Nabila Uristu Andhika, Niken Dwi Ardelia, Nadia Rizki Ardiyanto, David Ardiyanto, David Arianti Puspita Dewi Aritsya Imswatama Asrowi Asrowi Astri Wahyuni Asy’ari Asy’ari Asy’ari, Asy’ari Auliya, Anisa Rima Binti Anisaul Khasanah Brilliyanti, Fanny Brilliyanti, Fanny Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Cahyani, Apri Winar Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chumdari Chumdari, Chumdari Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Devita Yohanie Yohanie Dian Dwi Astutik, Dian Dwi Dian N Safitri Dian Panji Wicaksono Dian Ratna Puspananda Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edwin Latif Hardiyanto Eka Nur Azizah Endang Hariyati Ersam Mahendrawan Fahimah Andini Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Farida Nurhasanah Ferri Ardianzah Fida Rahmantika Hadi, Fida Rahmantika Fitriana, Laila Fuany, Anggun Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Haniah, Wahyu Nur Harjati, Juliana Kristin Hendriyanto, Agus Henny Ekana Chrisnawati Heribertus Soegiyanto, Heribertus Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ilham Rais A Imam Sujadi Ira Kurniawati Irene Endah Tri Winihati Isnaeni Umi Machromah Isnandar Iswanti, Partia Juniarto, Suci Juniati Juniati Karina Pramitasari, Karina Kartikaningtyas, Nafiqoh Elsa Kristiani, Theresia Kurniawati, Ira Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kuswardi, Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Labiba Zahra, Labiba Lingga Nico Pradana Maghfiroh Yanuarti Manora, Yupi Ayu Maratu Shalikhah, Maratu Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Maullina, Eka Siti Mishbahul Huda, Mishbahul Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Munawaroh Munawaroh Munzayanah, Nurul Murdoko, Yustinus Nada, Yusrina Qotrun Nahdiya, Nikmah Alfi Nansiana, Millenia Nadhea Nelly Indriastuti P Nindia Elisie Anggraini Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Novia Dwi Rahmawati Novia Fajar Utami Nugrohorini, Parwo Nunung Juwariah, Nunung Nur Anida Laila Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti NURUL AZIZAH Nuryani Destiningsih, Nuryani Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Ony Syaiful Rizal, Ony Syaiful Paryatun, Suji Paryatun, Suji Permataari, Desty Ratna Pinilih, Anggoro Canggih Pramesthi, Getut Pramesti, Getut Pramudya, Ikrar Puput Suriyah Purnama, Agung Eka Purwaningsih, Tri Purwaningsih, Tri Rachmawati, Intan Rahayu, Heni Septi Rahayu, Nastiti Rahmat Winata Rahmawati, Retno Dwi Putri Rany Widyastuti Ratna Herawati Ratnasari Ratnasari Reka Pramukti, Reka Retnowati, Evi Riswandha, Septian Henry Rivia J, Hefin Dwi Riyadi . Riyadi Riyadi Rizqona Maharani, Rizqona Robia Astuti S Siswanto Sa'idah, Ulya Safitri, Rini Dewi Saki, Saki Salistiyani, Salistiyani Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan, Sandhy Prasetyo Santosa, Eka Budhi Sarnoko Sarnoko, Sarnoko Sasongko, Anggi Setiaputra, Felix Indra Sholeh Muntasyir Sigit Pamungkas Siswanto Sri Adiningsih Sri Indayani, Sri Sri Subanti Sri Yamtinah Sudiyanto Sujadi, Imam Suryanto, Suryanto Susilawati, Dyah Sutopo Sutopo Sutopo, Sutopo Sutrisno Sutrisno Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus Tien Syarifah Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Triyanto, Triyanto Tuti, Dewi Setyas Umi Fadlilah, Umi Veva, Ervina Yulias Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahartojo, Sri Wahyu Kusumaningtyas Wicaksana, Hafid Wicaksana, Hafid Wulandari, Lina Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Yolan Kusumaningtyas, Yolan