Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

3.892

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

Budi Usodo

Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Author-ID : 408357

Arts Humanities Education Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 152 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

4 5 6 7 8

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VII DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS Fadlilah, Umi; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (249.351 KB)

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from anxiety mathematics learning. The learning models compared were direct, PBL with scientific approach, and DL with scientific approach. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Banyumas. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Patikraja, SMPN 2 Patikraja, and SMPN 2 Kalibagor, taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and anxiety mathematics learning. The data analysis technique used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students receiving PBL with scientific approach to DL with scientific approach achievement than those receiving direct learning model. The students receiving PBL with scientific approach and DL with scientific approach had the same learning outcome. (2) Students with lower levels of mathematics anxiety learning had better learning outcome than students with medium and high anxiety level. Studentsâ learning anxiety level on math was better in their learning outcome than students with high levels of learning anxiety mathematics. (3) In each group, the anxiety level of students learning mathematics, learning model PBL with scientific approach and learning model DL with scientific approach provides better performance than direct learning model, learning model PBL with scientific approach produces the same learning outcome with learning model DL with scientific approach. (4) In each of the learning model, students with lower levels of anxiety level of mathematics learning outcome had better math outcome than students with medium and high math anxiety level learning, students learn math anxiety levels were to have better learning outcome than students with high levels of anxiety learn mathematics.Keywords: Direct learning model, PBL learning model with scientific approach, DL learning model with scientific approach, Math Anxiety Learning

EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI DAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN NGAWI Rizal, Ony Syaiful; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the students with inquiry learning, problem based learning model, or direct instruction; (2) which one having better mathematics learning achievement, the students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style; (3) at each learning model, are there any difference in mathematics learning achievement between the students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style; (4) at each type of learning style, are there any difference in mathematics learning achievement between students taught using inquiry learning model, problem based learning model, or direct instruction. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The hypotheses testing used two ways ANOVA with unequal cell. From the research, it could be concluded as follows. (1) The students taught with problem based learning model had better learning achievement than those taught with both inquiry learning model and direct instruction. The students taught with inquiry learning model had better learning achievement than direct instruction. (2) The learning achievement of the students with auditory learning style was better than that of those with visual and kinesthetic learning style. The learning achievement of the students with visual learning style was better than that of those with kinesthetic learning style. (3) In inquiry learning model, problem based learning model and In the direct instruction, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning style. (4) In the students with visual learning style, the use of problem based learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the use of inquiry learning model and direct instruction. The use of inquiry learning model provided the mathematics learning achievement as good as the use of direct instruction. In the students with auditory and kinesthetic learning style, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning model.Keywords: Problem Based Learning Model, Inquiry Learning, Mathematics LearningÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Achievement

PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS INTUISI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 2 SRAGEN Lestari, Mulyaningrum; Riyadi, Riyadi; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.938 KB)

Abstract: This research aimed to product model of learning based on intuition to improve the creative thinking ability in solving mathematics problems in the students of SMA N 2 Sragen validly, practically, and effectively. The learning model produced included syntax and learning tools such as teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet. This type of the research was a Research and Development (R&D). Subjects of this research were students class of X MS (Mathematic Science) 4 and class X MS 5 of SMA N 2 Sragen, Central Java. The process of developing an learning model based on intuition referred to development model of Plomp and Borg & Gall including : (1) studying and collecting information in preliminary investigation stage, (2) designing an learning model based on intuition, created learning tools (teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet), (3) realizing model and learning tools organized into first draft, (4) validating the first draft against validator, revising, and then trying out the model, and revising again, and (5) holding FGD to evaluate the results of tryout that had been conducted and revising it for the next tryout. This researchÂ produced syntax and learning tools (teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet) of learning model based on intuition to improve the creative thinking ability in solvingÂ mathematics problems of students validly, practically, and effectively. The procedure of syntax in an learning model based on intuition: (1) The teacher made introduction such as preparing the students psychically and physically, apperception, providing motivation and learning objectives, (2) Teacher divided the students heterogeneously into some groups of two, (3)The students were given worksheet to discuss in group and there were five activities observing; questioning; exploring; associating; and communicating, (4) The students were given problems individually in the problem sheet to work on with stages that could appear intuition and improve their creative thinking ability including beginning, incubation, illumination, and verification, (5) Closing such as included reflection and homework.Keywords : model development, learning model, intuition, creative thinking ability

SPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI SELF-EFFICACY Shalikhah, Maratu; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (238.142 KB)

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement and learning interest viewed from students self-efficacy. The learning model compared were NHT with scientific approach, SNH with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Bantul regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMPN 1 Pleret, SMPN 2 Sewon, and SMPN 2 Imogiri. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self-efficacy questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusion were as follows. (1) SNH with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with scientific approach, and both gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Mathematics achievement of students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have medium and low self-efficacy, and both (medium and low) have the same mathematics achievement. (3) For NHT with scientific approach, students who have high and medium self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have low self-efficacy. Students who have medium and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. For SNH with scientific approach, mathematics achievement of students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have medium and low self-efficacy, and both (medium and low) have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students who have high, medium, and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have high self-efficacy, SNH with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. NHT with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement. For students who have medium and low self-efficacy, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Structured Numbered Heads (SNH), classical, scientific approach, self-efficacy.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA SMP DI KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2014/2015 Astutik, Dian Dwi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.661 KB)

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model of Numbered Heads Together (NHT) or Think Pair Share (TPS) type or clasical learning model. (2) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or low self-directed learning. (3) which one gives better in mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model of Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Think Pair Share (TPS) type or clasical learning model, in each of self-directed learning. (4) which one better Â mathematics achievement among students who have high, medium, or low self-directed learning, on each learning models. This research was quasi experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Surakarta City. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling. The sample of research consisted of 273 students: 96 students for the experiment I, 93 students for experiment II and 84 students for experiment III. The instruments used for collecting data were mathematics learning achievement test and student learning style questionnaire. Testing of hypothesis used unbalanced two-ways analysis of variance using significance level ofÂ Î± = 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, the conclusions were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of NHT type have better mathematics achievement than students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type and classical learning model. On the other side, students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type produced the same mathematics achievement as using classical learning model. (2) Students with high self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low self-directed learning, while students with medium self-directed learning produced the same mathematics achievement as with low self-directed learning. (3) In aech category high, medium and low self-directed learning, students who taught by cooperative learning model of NHT type have better mathematics achievement than students who teach by cooperative learning model of TPS type and classical learning model. On the other side, students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type have better mathematics achievement than classical learning model. (4) On each model of learning, cooperative learning model of NHT type, TPS type and classical learning model, students with high self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low self-directed learning, while students with medium self-directed learning had mathematics achievement better than students with low self-directed learning.Keywords: Cooperative Learning of NHT, TPS, Self-Directed Learning, Mathematics Achievement.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Maharani, Rizqona; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (478.368 KB)

Abstract: The purpose of this study wasÂ to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the studentsâ multiple intelligences. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of the three steps interview (TSI) type with scientific approach, think pair share (TPS) model type with scientific approach, and classical learning withÂ scientific approach. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade 8 students of Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and multiple intelligences questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on the hipothesis, the results of the study could be concluded as follows. (1) TSI with scientific approach got better learning achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. In addition, TPS with scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Students with logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence, students with linguistic intelligence got better achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. (3) Viewed from learning models, students with logical mathematical intelligence got better achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence. However, students with linguistic intelligence got better achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. (4) Viewed multiple intelligencesâ categories, TSI model with scientific approach got better achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach. However, TPS with scientific approach got better achievement than classical with scientific approach.Keywords: Three Steps Interview (TSI), Think Pair Share (TPS), Classical Learning, Scientific Approach, and Multiple Intelligences.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BOYOLALI Adiningsih, Sri; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (620.499 KB)

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from studentâs AQ. The learning models compared were TPS with scientific approach, NHT with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were all students of Junior High School in Boyolali. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Boyolali, SMPN 1 Sawit and SMPN 3 Sawit, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and AQ questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TPS with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with scientific approach, and both gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Climbers students have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters students,Â campers students have better mathematics achievement than quitters students. (3) For TPS with scientific approach, climbers students have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters students. Campers and quitters students have the same mathematics achievement. For NHT and classical with scientific approach, climbers students have better mathematics achievement than quitters students. Climbers and campers students have the same mathematics achievement. Campers and quitters students have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For climbers students, TPS with scientific approach and NHT with scientific approach give the same mathematics achievement. NHT with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach give the same mathematics achievement. TPS with scientific approach gives the better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For campers and quitters students, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TGT, NHT, Classical, Scientific Approach, AQ.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DAN PAIRS CHECK DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (375.269 KB)

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the knowledge and skill aspect viewed from adversity quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were learning model of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) with scientific approach, Pairs Check (PC) with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. This research was a quasi-experimental research. The population of the research was all of the eighth grade students of the State Junior High School in Sukoharjo. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics knowledge aspect test, mathematics skill aspect test and adversity quotient questionnaire. Technique of analyzing data that used was unbalanced two ways multivariat analysis of variance. From the research, it can be concluded that: (1) learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, (2) students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (3) on each learning model, students who have adversity quotient of Climber gave better knowledge and skill aspect than students who have adversity quotient of Camper and Quitter, students who have adversity quotient of Camper gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with the students who have adversity quotient of Quitter, (4) on each adversity quotient, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of NHT with scientific approach gave the same knowledge and skill aspect with learning by using classical learning with scientific approach, learning by using cooperative learning model of PC with scientific approach gave better knowledge and skill aspect than learning by using classical learning with scientific approach.Keywords: cooperative learning model, NHT, PC, classical learning, scientific approach, knowledge aspect, skill aspect.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP KELAS VIII DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Cahyani, Apri Winar; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.66 KB)

Â Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the learning style. The learning models compared were Numbered Heads Together, Problem Based Learning, and classical with saintific approach (NHT, PBL, Classical). This research was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3Ã3. The population of this research was all of students in second Â grade of Junior High Schools of Karanganyar regency in academic year 2014/2015. The samples of the research consisted of 245 students and were gathered through stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments consisted of Â pre test, test of learning achievement and learning style questionnaire. Hypotheses testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the results of hypotheses testing, it were concluded as follows. 1) NHT and PBL learning models gave the same mathematics achievement. Both learning models give a better mathematics learning achievement than classical model. 2) Students with visual and auditory learning style have better mathematics achievement than students with kinesthetic ones. On the other hand, students with visual and auditory learning style have equal mathematics learning achievement. 3) On all learning models, cooperative learning NHT type, problem based learning, and classical models, students with visual learning style have an equal mathematics learning achievement with auditory. Both learning style have a better mathematics learning achievement than kinesthetic ones, (4) On all visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style, cooperative learning with NHT type gives an equalÂ mathematics learning achievement with PBL. Both learning models give a better mathematics learning achievement than classical model.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Problem Based Learning, learning style, Scientific Mathematics learning achievement

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY DENGAN CONCEPT MAPPING PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KABUPATEN KEBUMEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Sasongko, Anggi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (502.952 KB)

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of the learning models TSTS with Concept Mapping (TSTS CM) on mathematics learning achievement viewed from students Mathematical Reasoning Ability (MRA). This research was quasi experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were the eighth-grade students of junior high schools in Kebumen Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and MRA test. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unbalanced cell. Based on the hypothesis test, it was concluded as follows. 1) The mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TSTS CM was better than the students who were treated by TSTS and Direct Learning (DL), the mathematics learning achievement of the students who were treated by TSTS was better than the students who were treated by DL; 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with high MRA was better than the students with moderate or low MRA, and the mathematics learning achievement of the students with moderate MRA was better than the students with low MRA; 3) In TSTS CM, the mathematics learning achievement of the students who had high MRA was better than the students who had moderate or low MRA, while the mathematics learning achievement of the students who had moderate MRA was same as the students who had low MRA; in TSTS, the mathematics learning achievement of the students who hadÂ high MRA was same as the students who had moderate MRA and was better than the students who had low MRA, while the mathematics learning achievement of the student who had moderate MRA was better than the students who had low MRA; in DL, the mathematics learning achievement of the students who had high MRA was better than the students who had moderate or low MRA, while the mathematics learning achievement of the students who had moderate MRA was same as the students who had low MRA; 4) The high MRA students who were treated by TSTS CM, TSTS, and DL had same mathematics learning achievement; the moderate MRA students who were treated by TSTS CM had same mathematics learning achievement as the students were treated by TSTS but had better than the students were treated by DL, while the students were treated by TSTS had better mathematics learning achievement than the students were treated by DL; The low MRA students who were treated by TSTS CM had better mathematics learning achievement than the students were treated by TSTS or DL, while the students were treated by TSTS had same mathematics learning achievement as the students were treated by DL.Keywords: Two Stay Two Stray, Concept Mapping, Direct Learning, Mathematical Reasoning Ability

Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Adi Nurcahyo Adwitiya Sarwahita, Salsabila Agnes Reswari Ingkansari Ahmad, Ahmad Ahmad, Ahmad Al Firdaus, Nabila Uristu Andhika, Niken Dwi Ardelia, Nadia Rizki Ardiyanto, David Ardiyanto, David Arianti Puspita Dewi Aritsya Imswatama Asrowi Asrowi Astri Wahyuni AsyÃ¢Â€Â™ari AsyÃ¢Â€Â™ari Asyâ€™ari, Asyâ€™ari Auliya, Anisa Rima Binti Anisaul Khasanah Brilliyanti, Fanny Brilliyanti, Fanny Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Cahyani, Apri Winar Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chumdari Chumdari, Chumdari Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Devita Yohanie Yohanie Dian Dwi Astutik, Dian Dwi Dian N Safitri Dian Panji Wicaksono Dian Ratna Puspananda Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edwin Latif Hardiyanto Eka Nur Azizah Endang Hariyati Ersam Mahendrawan Fahimah Andini Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Farida Nurhasanah Ferri Ardianzah Fida Rahmantika Hadi, Fida Rahmantika Fitriana, Laila Fuany, Anggun Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Haniah, Wahyu Nur Harjati, Juliana Kristin Hendriyanto, Agus Henny Ekana Chrisnawati Heribertus Soegiyanto, Heribertus Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ilham Rais A Imam Sujadi Ira Kurniawati Irene Endah Tri Winihati Isnaeni Umi Machromah Isnandar Iswanti, Partia Juniarto, Suci Juniati Juniati Karina Pramitasari, Karina Kartikaningtyas, Nafiqoh Elsa Kristiani, Theresia Kurniawati, Ira Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kuswardi, Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Labiba Zahra, Labiba Lingga Nico Pradana Maghfiroh Yanuarti Manora, Yupi Ayu Maratu Shalikhah, Maratu Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Maullina, Eka Siti Mishbahul Huda, Mishbahul Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Munawaroh Munawaroh Munzayanah, Nurul Murdoko, Yustinus Nada, Yusrina Qotrun Nahdiya, Nikmah Alfi Nansiana, Millenia Nadhea Nelly Indriastuti P Nindia Elisie Anggraini Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Novia Dwi Rahmawati Novia Fajar Utami Nugrohorini, Parwo Nunung Juwariah, Nunung Nur Anida Laila Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti NURUL AZIZAH Nuryani Destiningsih, Nuryani Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Ony Syaiful Rizal, Ony Syaiful Paryatun, Suji Paryatun, Suji Permataari, Desty Ratna Pinilih, Anggoro Canggih Pramesthi, Getut Pramesti, Getut Pramudya, Ikrar Puput Suriyah Purnama, Agung Eka Purwaningsih, Tri Purwaningsih, Tri Rachmawati, Intan Rahayu, Heni Septi Rahayu, Nastiti Rahmat Winata Rahmawati, Retno Dwi Putri Rany Widyastuti Ratna Herawati Ratnasari Ratnasari Reka Pramukti, Reka Retnowati, Evi Riswandha, Septian Henry Rivia J, Hefin Dwi Riyadi . Riyadi Riyadi Rizqona Maharani, Rizqona Robia Astuti S Siswanto Sa'idah, Ulya Safitri, Rini Dewi Saki, Saki Salistiyani, Salistiyani Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan, Sandhy Prasetyo Santosa, Eka Budhi Sarnoko Sarnoko, Sarnoko Sasongko, Anggi Setiaputra, Felix Indra Sholeh Muntasyir Sigit Pamungkas Siswanto Sri Adiningsih Sri Indayani, Sri Sri Subanti Sri Yamtinah Sudiyanto Sujadi, Imam Suryanto, Suryanto Susilawati, Dyah Sutopo Sutopo Sutopo, Sutopo Sutrisno Sutrisno Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus Tien Syarifah Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Triyanto, Triyanto Tuti, Dewi Setyas Umi Fadlilah, Umi Veva, Ervina Yulias Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahartojo, Sri Wahyu Kusumaningtyas Wicaksana, Hafid Wicaksana, Hafid Wulandari, Lina Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Yolan Kusumaningtyas, Yolan

Title

Found 152 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 152 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 152 Documents
Search