Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.892
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika SoLuSi ( Tersohor Luas dan Berisi ) Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Basicedu Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation International Journal of Elementary Education M A T H L I N E : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika jurnal dikdas bantara Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Basicedu Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi Mamangan Social Science Journal International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (IJMME) JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Proceeding International Conference on Mathematics and Learning Research Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Journal on Mathematics Education
Budi Usodo
Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Education Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 152 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 152 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
POLA PIKIR (MINDSET) GURU DALAM MENERAPKAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GENDER Juwariah, Nunung; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (234.976 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to describe the mindset of female and male teachers in implementing the scientific approach to the study of mathematics. It was a qualitative research. The subjects were taken by purposive sampling. The subjects of this research were mathmatics teachers of class X SMAN 3 Madiun. The subject of the research as much as 2 teachers consisted of 1 male teacher and 1 female teacher.Data collection techniques in this research were  interviews and observation. Techniques to validate the data source triangulation and time triangulation. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The research findings are as follows (1) the female teacher do not always apply a scientific approach. During observation process, female teacher used abstract mathematic object. During question activity female teacher had obstacles. To solve this obstacle, female teacher usually persuades students with statements. During experiment activity, female teacher created guidance question. During mobilization activity, female teacher provide questions that provoke and leads to mathematics concepts. During communication activity, female teacher using presentation although it require long time. (2) during observation male teacher used approach from learned students. during question activity, the male teacher of dividing students became some group then provide opportunitie for students to ask on a friend in the group. During mobilization activity, teacher must have perfected mathematical concepts which belongs to the students. During communication activity, male teacher asked the students to present the result of that has accured. Keywords: Mindset, scientific approach, gender.
PROFIL PEMAHAMAN SISWA TERHADAP LUAS DAN KELILING BANGUN DATAR YANG DIGUNAKAN DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL ( Penelitian Pada Kelas VII MTsN Ketanggung Ngawi Semester Genap Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014 ) Indayani, Sri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (212.982 KB)

Abstract

Abstract :  Area and perimeter in plane gometry are one of the subjects in the study of mathematics in class VII of SMP / MTs. The mathematics learning system in Indonesia  generally is not emphasized in solving the problem, but on procedural matters. Students are trained to memorize formulas, but less understood and mastered its application in solving a problem. This study aimed to describe the profile of students understanding of area and perimeter which are used in solving mathematical problems in terms of the level of emotional intelligence. The big difference in emotional intelligence on each student, it is possible to affect the level of student understanding. This research was conducted in class VII MTsN Ketanggung Ngawi. Research subjects consisted of 3 students were selected from the results of the questionnaire of emotional intelligence, which is one students with a high level of emotional intelligence, one students with the level of emotional intelligence is and one student with a low level of emotional intelligence. This study is a descriptive qualitative research. Data collection in this study was done by using a questionnaire, the results of the written test and interview-based tasks. The validity of the data is done by time triangulation. The main instrument in this study is the researchers themselves who aim to seek and collect data directly from the data source, and Insrument help in this research is the emotional intelligence questionnaire instruments, sheet student comprehension task, and interview guides. The results showed that students with high emotional intelligence and are entered on a relational level of understanding, and students with low entry level of emotional intelligence on the level of instrumental understanding. Keywords: student understanding, problem solving,  emotional intelligence
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN MAKE A MATCH TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DITINJAU DARI KETERAMPILAN SOSIAL SISWA PADA KELAS X SMK DI KABUPATEN WONOGIRI TAHUN AJARAN 2012/2013 Destiningsih, Nuryani; Usodo, Budi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
JIPM Vol 2, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : JIPM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui : ( 1 ) yang memberikan matematika yang lebih baik prestasi belajar , penggunaan kooperatif tipe model pembelajaran NHT , Membuat Pertandingan atau pembelajaran langsung , ( 2 ) yang memberikan matematika yang lebih baik prestasi belajar , peserta didik dengan tinggi, sedang , atau rendah tingkat keterampilan sosial, ( siswa dengan tinggi , sedang, atau rendahnya tingkat keterampilan sosial , ( 3 ) di masing-masing keterampilan sosial , mana yang memberikan matematika yang lebih baik prestasi , model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT , Membuat Match . atau pembelajaran langsung , ( 4 ) masing-masing model pembelajaran , mana yang memberikan matematika yang lebih baik prestasi , siswa yang memiliki tinggi, sedang , atau keterampilan sosial yang rendah penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi - eksperimental kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah : . ( 1 ) prestasi matematika siswa yang menggunakan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe model NHT lebih baik daripada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif Membuat Jenis pencocokan atau instruksi langsung , sedangkan siswa matematika prestasi yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif Membuat Jenis pencocokan lebih baik daripada belajar langsung , ( 2 ) siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang tinggi dan menengah , sehingga prestasi matematika yang sama , sedangkan siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang tinggi dan menengah memiliki prestasi matematika yang lebih baik adalah dari siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang rendah , ( 3 ) pada setiap keterampilan sosial ( tinggi, menengah , dan rendah ) , siswa matematika prestasi yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT lebih baik dari siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif Membuat Jenis pencocokan atau instruksi langsung , dan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif Membuat Jenis pencocokan memiliki lebih baik daripada prestasi matematika hands- on belajar , ( 4 ) pada masing-masing model pembelajaran ( NHT , Membuat Match, dan belajar langsung ) , siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang tinggi dan menengah , memiliki prestasi matematika yang sama , sedangkan siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang tinggi dan menengah matematika yang lebih baik daripada prestasi siswa yang memiliki keterampilan sosial yang rendah belajar .Kata kunci : Numbered Head Together ( NHT ) , Membuat Match, pembelajaran langsung , dan keterampilan sosial.
ANALISIS PROSES PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PADA ANAK BERKEBUTUHAN KHUSUS (ABK) SLOW LEARNERS DI KELAS INKLUSI (Penelitian Dilakukan di SD Al Firdaus Surakarta) Hadi, Fida Rahmantika; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (173.865 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to find out: (1) the mathematics learning process in inclusive class includes readiness of teacher before learning process, implementation and evaluation and follow up; (2) the inhibiting factors encountered of slow learners child during mathematics learning process in inclusive class and the solution to them. It was a qualitative research. The subjects were taken by purposive sampling.The subjects of this research were mathematics teacherand special assistant teacher.Data collection techniques in this research were interviews and observation. Techniques to validate that the data triangulation time. The data analysis technique used was consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results of this study were: (1) preparation of Lesson Plan has done after one basic competence finished and any Lesson Plan modified for slow learners child. Before learning proses began, specific media teachers has been prepared for slow learners child. In evaluation and follow-up stage, teachers planned follow-up activities in remedial learning, enrichment programs, counseling services for reguler students or special needs children with the help of a special assistant teacher. (2) Factors or the difficulties which have been slow learners child was difficult about mathematics concepts, beside of that also may lost interest in the task and refused to resume the task when they was bored. The teacher resolve problems by providing mathematical concepts step by step and intens, provide additional learning time, provide motivation and provide reward.Keywords: mathematics learning process, slow learners child, inclusive 
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL INTUITION BASED LEARNING (IBL) DENGAN SCIENTIFIC APPROACH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS XI SMA NEGERI 2 SRAGEN Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni; Riyadi, Riyadi; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (270.756 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to produce Intuition Based Learning (IBL) model and supporting learning with Scientific Approach in solving problems to increase mathematics students’ achievement that valid, practical and effective. The type of the research was a Research and Development (R&D). The subjects of the research were grade XI MS 6 and XI MS 4 students of SMAN 2 Sragen, Central Java on Academic year 2014/2015. IBL model development process was adopt from Plomp and Borg & Gall development model. They were (1) Collect the informations and studying of theories in Preliminary Investigations Phase, (2) Design of IBL model and supporting learning material (Lesson Plan, Worksheet, Problem sheet, and learning paper) and then design research instruments, (3) Realize the IBL model and supporting learning material that was design to be First Draft, (4) Do validation of the first draft, testing the IBL model in the classroom, and then do revisions, (5) Conduct Focus Group Discussion (FGD) to evaluate the result of IBL model testing in the classroom, then will be revised to the next IBL model testing. The results of the reasearch were produce IBL model and supporting learning material (Lesson Plan, Worksheet, Problem sheet, and learning paper) with scientific approach in solving problems to increase mathematics students’ achievement that valid, practical and effective. These are steps of IBL model in the classroom, (1) Opening with apperception, motivations and build students’ positif perceptions, (2) Students divided into several groups, (3) Teacher explains the material generally, (4) Group discussion with 5M activity (based on Scientific approach), (5) Exercise to solve open ended problem individually with steps that could appear students’ intuition: Preparations, Inkubation, Ilumination and Verification, (6) Closure with review of students have learned or giving homework.Keywords: Development of model, Learning model, intuition, scientific approach, students’ achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN BOYOLALI Bahktiar, Hidayat; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (244.452 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH (PBM) DAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH (PBM) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SRAGEN Pramukti, Reka; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.475 KB)

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from mathematic communication ability. The learning model compared were direct, PBM with scientific approach, and PBM. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Sragen. The samples are the students of SMPN 2 Gemolong, SMPN 1 Kedawung, and SMPN 2 Masaran, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and mathematic communication ability test. The data analysis technique was used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students receiving PBM learning model with scientific approach and PBM learning model had better learning achievement than those receiving direct learning model. The students receiving PBM learning model with scientific approach had equal learning achievement to those receiving PBM learning model. (2) The students with high mathematic communication ability had better learning achievement than those with medium and low mathematic communication abilities. Those with medium mathematic communication ability had equal learning achievement to those with low one. (3) In each groups of student mathematic communication ability PBM learning model with scientific approach and PBM learning model provided better learning achievement than direct learning model, PBM learning model with scientific approach provided equal learning achievement to PBM learning model. (4) In each learning model, the students with high mathematic communication ability had better learning achievement than those with medium and low mathematic communication abilities. Those with medium mathematic communication ability had equal learning achievement to those with low one.Keywords: Direct  learning  model,  PBM  learning  model with scientific approach, PBM learning model, Mathematic Communication Ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Ardianzah, Ferri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.071 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of cooperatif learning models viewed from the attitude of students. The learning model compared were TAI-CTL, TAI and direct instruction. This was quasi-experimental research designed by factorial 3x3. The population was 8th grade students of junior high school even semester academic year 2013/2014 in Magetan regency. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Total sample was 231 students, consisted of 77 students as TAI-CTL class, 78 students as TAI class, and 76 students as direct instruction class. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it is concluded that: (1) students learns using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, students learnt using TAI-CTL had better achievement than students learnt using TAI  (2) positive attitude students had better achievement than those of neutral and negative attitudestudents, neutral attitude students had better achievement than negative attitude students (3) for TAI-CTL and TAI, students with positive attitude had better achievement than neutral and negative attitude, however neutral attitude students had the same achievement as negative attitude students, for direct instruction, positive attitude students had the same achievement as neutral attitude students, meanwhile positive attitude students had better achievement than negative attitudeand students with neutral attitude had the same achievement as negative attitude students (4) for  positive attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL had the same achievement as students learnt using TAI, meanwhile students learnt using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, for neutral and negative attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL, TAI, and direct instruction had the same achievement.Keywords: TAI-CTL, TAI, Direct Instruction, Attitude 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (RME) DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP/MTs DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Nyoto, Nyoto; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (410.365 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which one had a better mathematics achievement, students instructed with the cooperative learning of Think Pair Share (TPS) type with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, the cooperative learning of TPS type, or the direct learning model; (2) which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had visual learning style, auditorial learning style, or kinesthetic learning style; (3) on each type of learning model, which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had visual learning style, auditorial learning style, or kinesthetic learning style; (4) on each learning style, which one had a better mathematics achievement, students instructed with the cooperative learning of TPS type with Realistic Mathematics Education approach, the cooperative learning of TPS type, or the direct learning model. This research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of the grade VIII State Junior High Schools/Islamic State Junior Secondary School in Sragen Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample consisted of 308 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test and questionnaire of students learning style. Balance test used unbalanced one way analysis of variance. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach had the same mathematics achievement as students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type. Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach and the cooperative learning model of TPS type had better mathematics achievement than students intructed with the direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with auditorial learning style. Students with visual learning style had better mathematics achievement than student with kinesthetic learning style, and students with auditorial learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with kinesthetic learning style. (3) On the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach, the cooperative learning model of TPS type, and the direct learning model, students with visual learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with auditorial learning style. Students with visual learning style had better mathematics achievement than student with kinesthetic learning style, and students with auditorial learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with kinesthetic learning style. (4) On students with visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style, students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach had the same mathematics achievement as students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type. Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach and the cooperative learning model of TPS type had better mathematics achievement than students intructed with the direct learning model.Keywords: TPS, RME, students learning style
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN PAIRS CHECK (PC) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Andini, Fahimah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (316.784 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at determining the effect of models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the students’ logical mathematical intelligence. The learning models compared were learning model of the scientific Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), scientific Pairs Check (PC), and scientific classical. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Junior High Schools in Surakarta. The instruments used for the data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the hypothesis, the results of the study can be summarized as follows. (1) The use of Scientific PC resulted better achievement than that of scientific TAI and with scientific classical, the use of scientific TAI resulted better achievement than that of scientific classical. (2) The students’ achievement who have high logical mathematical intelligence was better than those who have middle or low logical mathematical intelligence, and students who have middle logical mathematical intelligence were better than those who have low logical mathematic intelligence. (3) At the students with high logical matematical intelligence, scientific TAI, scientific PC, and scientific classical gave the same achievement. At the students with middle logical matematical intelligence, scientific PC gave the better achievement than that with scientific TAI and scientific classical. At the students with low logical matematical intelligence, scientific TAI gave the better achievement than that with scientific PC and scientific classical. (4) In scientific TAI, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement was better than the middle one, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the lower one. In scientific PC, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement have equal achievement to the middle one students, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the low one. In scientific classical, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement was better than the middle one, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the students with low logical mathematical intelligence.Keywords: Scientific TAI, Scientific PC, Scientific Classical, Scientific Approach, Logical Mathematical Intelligence.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Adi Nurcahyo Adwitiya Sarwahita, Salsabila Agnes Reswari Ingkansari Ahmad, Ahmad Ahmad, Ahmad Al Firdaus, Nabila Uristu Andhika, Niken Dwi Ardelia, Nadia Rizki Ardiyanto, David Ardiyanto, David Arianti Puspita Dewi Aritsya Imswatama Asrowi Asrowi Astri Wahyuni Asy’ari Asy’ari Asy’ari, Asy’ari Auliya, Anisa Rima Binti Anisaul Khasanah Brilliyanti, Fanny Brilliyanti, Fanny Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Cahyani, Apri Winar Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana Chumdari Chumdari, Chumdari Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno Dian Devita Yohanie Yohanie Dian Dwi Astutik, Dian Dwi Dian N Safitri Dian Panji Wicaksono Dian Ratna Puspananda Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa E.P.U, Moertiningsih Edwin Latif Hardiyanto Eka Nur Azizah Endang Hariyati Ersam Mahendrawan Fahimah Andini Farah Heniati Santosa, Farah Heniati Farida Nurhasanah Ferri Ardianzah Fida Rahmantika Hadi, Fida Rahmantika Fitriana, Laila Fuany, Anggun Gunarhadi Gunarhadi, Gunarhadi Haniah, Wahyu Nur Harjati, Juliana Kristin Hendriyanto, Agus Henny Ekana Chrisnawati Heribertus Soegiyanto, Heribertus Hidayat Bahktiar, Hidayat Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ilham Rais A Imam Sujadi Ira Kurniawati Irene Endah Tri Winihati Isnaeni Umi Machromah Isnandar Iswanti, Partia Juniarto, Suci Juniati Juniati Karina Pramitasari, Karina Kartikaningtyas, Nafiqoh Elsa Kristiani, Theresia Kurniawati, Ira Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo Kuswardi, Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Labiba Zahra, Labiba Lingga Nico Pradana Maghfiroh Yanuarti Manora, Yupi Ayu Maratu Shalikhah, Maratu Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Maullina, Eka Siti Mishbahul Huda, Mishbahul Mulyaningrum Lestari, Mulyaningrum Munawaroh Munawaroh Munzayanah, Nurul Murdoko, Yustinus Nada, Yusrina Qotrun Nahdiya, Nikmah Alfi Nansiana, Millenia Nadhea Nelly Indriastuti P Nindia Elisie Anggraini Nok Yeni Heryaningsih, Nok Yeni Novia Dwi Rahmawati Novia Fajar Utami Nugrohorini, Parwo Nunung Juwariah, Nunung Nur Anida Laila Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti Nurlaily, Vivi Astuti NURUL AZIZAH Nuryani Destiningsih, Nuryani Nyoto Nyoto, Nyoto Ony Syaiful Rizal, Ony Syaiful Paryatun, Suji Paryatun, Suji Permataari, Desty Ratna Pinilih, Anggoro Canggih Pramesthi, Getut Pramesti, Getut Pramudya, Ikrar Puput Suriyah Purnama, Agung Eka Purwaningsih, Tri Purwaningsih, Tri Rachmawati, Intan Rahayu, Heni Septi Rahayu, Nastiti Rahmat Winata Rahmawati, Retno Dwi Putri Rany Widyastuti Ratna Herawati Ratnasari Ratnasari Reka Pramukti, Reka Retnowati, Evi Riswandha, Septian Henry Rivia J, Hefin Dwi Riyadi . Riyadi Riyadi Rizqona Maharani, Rizqona Robia Astuti S Siswanto Sa'idah, Ulya Safitri, Rini Dewi Saki, Saki Salistiyani, Salistiyani Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan, Sandhy Prasetyo Santosa, Eka Budhi Sarnoko Sarnoko, Sarnoko Sasongko, Anggi Setiaputra, Felix Indra Sholeh Muntasyir Sigit Pamungkas Siswanto Sri Adiningsih Sri Indayani, Sri Sri Subanti Sri Yamtinah Sudiyanto Sujadi, Imam Suryanto, Suryanto Susilawati, Dyah Sutopo Sutopo Sutopo, Sutopo Sutrisno Sutrisno Syarifah, Triana Jamilatus Tien Syarifah Hafidhah, Tien Syarifah Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi Triyanto, Triyanto Tuti, Dewi Setyas Umi Fadlilah, Umi Veva, Ervina Yulias Vivi Fenty Anggraeny Wahartojo, Sri Wahyu Kusumaningtyas Wicaksana, Hafid Wicaksana, Hafid Wulandari, Lina Yemi Kuswardi, Yemi Yolan Kusumaningtyas, Yolan