Articles
Asas Justitia oleh Hakim dalam Perkara Tata Usaha Negara (Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Nomor: 181/K/TUN/2016)
Hany Krisna Priratna;
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Yurispruden : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (179.749 KB)
|
DOI: 10.33474/yur.v1i2.961
Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara adalah suatu penetapan tertulis yang dikeluarkan oleh Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara yang menimbulkan akibat hukum yang bersifat individual, konkrit, dan final. Dalam memutus suatu keputusan tata usaha negara lembaga negara dalam hal ini yaitu Banwaslu serta DKPP ini harus sesuai prosedur dan tepat karena dapat menyebabkan kerugian bagi suatu badan hukum atau keperdataan seseorang apabila terjadi kesalahan. Selain itu, hakim sebagai pemutus suatu perkara dalam hal ini haruslah memuat salah satu tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan dan hakim tidak boleh memutus suatu perkara hanya dengan undang-undang saja karena hakim bukan hanya sebagai corong undang-undang saja tetapi juga penemu hukum yang mana dalam memutus perkaranya juga harus mendalami suatu perkara tersebut. Oleh karena itu, melalui analisis ini Penulis ingin mengkaji lebih dalam terkait asas keadilan oleh hakim dalam memutuskan Perkara Tata Usaha Negara ini. Kata kunci : Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara, Putusan Hakim, Prinsip Keadilan
Presidential Threshold in Indonesian Election: An Islamic Law Perspective
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih;
Fitria Esfandiari
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (3141.524 KB)
|
DOI: 10.33474/yur.v5i1.14145
Direct presidential election every five years is the embodiment of democracy in Indonesia. The issue of thresholds as a condition for nominating candidates for president and vice president has always not found a solution. Changes in the threshold which was initially 10% then the number changed to 20% until now. This study aims, among others, to evaluate disharmony in the process of determining the threshold. The approach method used is normative juridical, through literature study using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study conclude that the reconstruction of the presidential election threshold based on the perspective of Islamic law is very much needed because it is very vulnerable to friction and tug-of-war between political parties.
The Effectiveness of Administrative Efforts in Reducing State Administration Disputes
Ahmad Siboy;
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih;
Virga Dwi Efendi;
Nur Putri Hidayah
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 2, No 1 (2022): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (583.683 KB)
|
DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v2i1.23
Regulating administrative efforts as the mandatory procedure is expected to be able to filter and reduce the number of disputes that must be tried by the State Administrative Court. However, the position of administrative efforts is only interpreted as a formality. This study aims to analiyz the position of administrative efforts in the settlement of state administration disputes and to find out how effective the administration efforts in reducing the number of state administration disputes in the State Administrative Courts in East Java. The results indicated that administrative efforts were the embodiment of the state law of Pancasila, but the effectiveness of administrative efforts in East Java was still very low or ineffective in reducing the number of state administrative disputes in the State Administrative Court.
The Principle of Equality Before the Law in Indonesian Corruption Case: Is It Relevant?
Moh. Iqra Syabani Korompot;
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih;
David Pradhan
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 1, No 3 (2021): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (423.726 KB)
|
DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v1i3.13
Article 28D paragraph (1) of the NRI Constitution of 1945 states that "Everyone is entitled to the recognition, guarantee, protection, and certainty of fair law and equal treatment before the law". Unfortunately, the implementation of the article is not in accordance with the theory. Cases that go against the principle of equality before the law include cases of corruption convicts who get lavish facilities in poor prisons. The purpose of this research to find out the form of facilities obtained by corruption inmates is reviewed from the principle of equality before the law, as well as the extent of the government's efforts in dealing with cases like this. The methodology used to resolve this error uses empirical juridical research methods. Data collection techniques by conducting interviews, observations, documentation and re-analysis with qualitative methods that aim to understand phenomena occurring in the field. The results showed that the form of facilities obtained by corruption inmates such as televisions, cell phones, air conditioners made it easier to get in and out of prisons, and so on. The Government's efforts in dealing with this are to revitalize the coaching of inmates and the revised plan of Law no. 12 of 1995 on correctional with the aim of improving the personality quality of inmates until the presence of the intention to improve themselves and do not want to repeat the validity.
Moral Paradigm in the Establishment of Regulation on Parliamentary Thresholds: An Indonesian Implementation
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih;
Ahmad Siboy
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 16 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no1.2140
The moral paradigm in establishing legal norms about parliamentary thresholds in legislative elections is studied through historical, conceptual, and statutory approaches. Figures' perspectives on the moral paradigm and nature's laws are an analysis benchmark. This research is a legal analysis with a conceptual approach. The main objective of this research was to analyse the moral paradigm in the formation of laws regarding parliamentary thresholds in Indonesian elections. According to this research, the establishment and implementation of parliamentary threshold legal norms cannot meet the main legal objectives, namely justice, because parliamentary thresholds are designed to limit political parties' eligibility for parliament in subsequent elections. Therefore, the government canceled the application of the parliamentary threshold through lawmakers and the Constitutional Court in the next election.
The Constitutionality of the TAP MPR’s Decisions in the Legislative Hierarchy
Brillian Gustama;
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Journal of Morality and Legal Culture Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Journal of Morality and Legal Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jmail.v2i1.48204
This study aims to analyze the influence of TAP MPR in Indonesia. Placement of MPR Provisions in Law No. 12 of 2011 on the hierarchy of Legislation in Indonesia becomes one of the problematics that needs to be discussed, on the grounds of the position of MPR provisions that are under exactly the Constitution of 1945. This is based on the position of the MPR Decree itself which will automatically become a reference to the rules under it, in accordance with the theory of stairs put forward by Hans Kelsen. Although from the point of view of the position of MPR determination is still understandable if Hans Nawiasky theory is used as the basis. But in terms of testing itself of course this will raise a big question mark for all of us because in the Constitution of 1945 institutions or institutions that have the right to conduct a test of the Law is the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, but within its own scope the Provision of MPR is outside the juridical territory of the two Institutions themselves. Therefore, there needs to be a solution if at any time the MPR Decree is not in accordance with the basis of the 1945 Constitution so that there will be no defects in one of the legal sources of the State of Indonesia.
PEMBENTUKAN NORMA AMBANG BATAS PARLEMEN DALAM PERSPEKTIF TEORI KRITIS JURGEN HABERMAS
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Mei 2020
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (317.895 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22219/audito.v1i1.12783
This study tries to discuss the formation of parliamentary threshold norms in the perspective of Jurgen Habermas' critical theory. Through historical, conceptual and statutory approaches, this research attempts to examine prescriptively the dynamics of implementing parliamentary thresholds in legislative elections. This research makes the thinking of Jurgen Habermas and the thinkers around him as a benchmark and analysis. The results of this study indicate that the formation of norms and the application of parliamentary thresholds in elections based on the perspective of Jurgen Habermas's critical theory are appropriate because they do not only look at the legal aspect, but from the needs and interpretations based on other sciences. This research is expected to be able to help academics and legal practitioners, especially regarding electoral law, to be able to dig deeper into the perspective of law and its integration with other disciplines, not only from one or two experts, but from several other experts.
PENERAPAN THRESHOLD DALAM PEMILU MENURUT PERSPEKTIF GUSTAV RADBRUCH DAN HANS KELSEN
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): September 2020
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (250.873 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22219/audito.v1i2.13973
This study tries to discuss the tensions that occur between legal experts in formulating basic values that become the right legal objectives. Figures that are used as a comparison in the perspective of this legal objective are Gustav Radbruch and Hans Kelsen. Through a conceptual and case approach, this study tries to examine the concept of law based on contextual cases that occur in society, namely the application of the threshold in elections. In this study, the application of the threshold in elections is used as a measuring tool to determine legal objectives as stated by Gustav Radbruch and Hans Kelsen. The results of this study indicate that Gustav Radbruch sees and tends to the value of justice as a legal goal, like what Hans Kelsen found. The difference between Gustav Radburch's justice and Hans Kelsen lies in how to measure and realize this justice. This research is expected to be able to help academics and legal practitioners to dig deeper into the philosophical objectives of law in order to create laws that can answer the needs of society.
HOUSE OF ROLE AS AN EFFORT TO PROTECT CHILDREN FROM VIOLENCE: AN INDONESIAN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Januari 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (340.7 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22219/aclj.v2i1.15145
This research aims to discuss the children's violence that occur in Indonesia. This research using legal research, namely research conducted to produce arguments, new theories or concepts as a prescriptive in solving the problems faced. This research found that the number of cases of violence against children in Indonesia is very high and tends to increase from year to year. To overcome this, it is necessary to create a role model house, namely a house that involves 5 elements (parents, family, community, government, local and state governments) in fulfilling children's rights to prevent violence.
Accountability of Regional Officials of Sidoarjo Regency In The Distribution of Groceries During The Covid-19 Pandemic
Akmal Maulana N. M.;
Andre Purnairawan;
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih;
Jamil Jamil
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): January 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (164.321 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22219/aclj.v3i1.18901
This article aims to analyze the distribution of free groceries in the Sidoarjo regency during the Covid-19 pandemic. Free groceries program for citizens in almost every year by the local government. But it is slightly different in pandemic times like today, where the free Groceries program is more often done and on a large scale. One of them is carried out by the Sidoarjo Regency Government, East Java. Keep in mind that the thing that is affected by the outbreak of the Covid-19 Virus is an economic factor, which makes most people lose their eyes that make the weakening of the economic system in Indonesia no exception in Sidoarjo Regency itself. This paper takes socio-legal research to find out the problem of the distribution of free groceries in the Sidoarjo regency. The results of this study look at the extent of the accountability of the Sidoarjo Regency government with the Covid-19 outbreak in the community, namely from the start of the distribution of free food so that it is expected to provide more concrete results. Sidoarjo Regency government program is expected to be applied in the early stages of formulation, implementation, and evaluation of public policy.