Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
13.615
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Wacana Hukum DE JURE Bestuur Lentera Hukum Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Cita Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Diponegoro Law Review El-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Akta Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM AKSIOLOGIYA : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Varia Justicia Jurnal HAM Lex Scientia Law Review Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI International Journal of Supply Chain Management Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Jurnal Yudisial Asia Pacific Fraud Journal Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Mulawarman Law Review JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Law Research Review Quarterly Journal of Community Service and Empowerment LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Journal of Morality and Legal Culture Journal of Judicial Review Indonesian Journal of Law and Society JHCLS Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Jurnal Konstitusi Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Hang Tuah Law Journal Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues International Journal of Law and Society Journal of Law and Legal Reform Domus Legalis Cogitatio Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Jurnal Jurisprudence Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Contrarius
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 146 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 146 Documents
Search

 7   8   9   10   11 
Does the Constitutional Court on Local Election Responsive Decisions ? Sholahuddin Al-Fatih; Asrul Ibrahim Nur
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 3, No 3 (2023): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v3i3.74

Abstract

This article aimed to explain about legal politics of the constitutional court decision on Pilkada, before and after the amendments of Pilkada Act. Using normative legal research, this article focussed on analyzing some Constitutional Court Decisions on Pilkada. This article finds that the legal politics of the Constitutional Court decision on Pilkada case have a similar character, a responsive legal product. It indicates that democracy in Indonesia was built on fulfilling human dignity, fairness, and justice.
Assessing the Merger of Online Platform Companies: Does it Lead to Monopoly or just Business Expansion? (Analysis of The Merged Company of GoTo) Sukarmi Sukarmi; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih; Kukuh Tejomurti; Moch. Zairul Alam
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 9, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v9i3.21667

Abstract

Two large digital platform companies, Gojek and Tokopedia, officially merged to form a holding company called the GoTo Group that is considered to have anti-competitive behavior and potentially data monopoly. This article aimed to analyze the adequate response to potential violations of the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition Regulation and legal issues related to consumer data monopoly issues. This article uses normative legal research with the conceptual research and statute approach. The result shows that it is necessary to define “relevant markets” and the “substituted products” to determine the existence of unfair business competition in the Gojek-Tokopedia merger. It requires analyzing the consumer behavior in other marketplaces other than Tokopedia; when consumers do not "run" to Gojek, it means they are not in the same market. To prevent privacy protection failures in post-merger data integration, companies need to assess data sharing that may be carried out as part of a risk assessment. Regarding the rights of data subjects, The company needs to provide notification to the data subject regarding the Merger and Acquisition (M & A) given the data subject's right to refuse and guarantee that the M & A process will not violate the right to privacy of the customer's dataKeywords: Competition Law; Digital Platform; Merger Menilai Penggabungan Perusahaan Platform Online: Apakah Mengakibatkan Monopoli atau Hanya Ekspansi Bisnis? (Analisis Penggabungan GoTo)AbstrakDua perusahaan platform digital besar, Gojek dan Tokopedia, resmi bergabung membentuk holding company bernama GoTo Group yang dinilai memiliki perilaku anti persaingan dan berpotensi monopoli data. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis respon yang memadai terhadap potensi pelanggaran Peraturan Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat serta masalah hukum terkait masalah monopoli data konsumen. Artikel ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian konseptual dan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perlunya mendefinisikan “pasar relevan” dan “produk substitusi” untuk mengetahui adanya persaingan usaha tidak sehat dalam merger Gojek-Tokopedia. Hal ini membutuhkan analisis perilaku konsumen di pasar lain selain Tokopedia; ketika konsumen tidak “lari” ke Gojek, berarti mereka tidak berada di pasar yang sama. Untuk mencegah kegagalan perlindungan privasi dalam integrasi data pasca-merger, perusahaan perlu menilai pembagian data yang mungkin dilakukan sebagai bagian dari penilaian risiko. Mengenai hak subjek data, Perusahaan perlu memberikan pemberitahuan kepada subjek data mengenai Merger dan Akuisisi (M&A) mengingat hak subjek data untuk menolak dan menjamin bahwa proses M&A tidak akan melanggar hak privasi data pelangganKata Kunci: Hukum Persaingan Usaha; Platform Digital; PenggabunganОценка слияний компаний онлайн-платформ: приведет ли это к монополии или просто к расширению бизнеса? (Анализ слияний GoTo (Gojek и Tokopedia)  АннотацияДве крупные компании, занимающиеся цифровыми платформами, Gojek и Tokopedia, официально объединили свои усилия, чтобы сформировать холдинговую компанию GoTo Group, которая, как считается, ведет антиконкурентную политику и может монополизировать данные. Данная статья направлена на анализ адекватного реагирования на возможные нарушения Положения о запрещении монополистической практики и недобросовестной конкуренции, а также на правовые вопросы, связанные с проблемой монополии на данные потребителей. В данной статье используется нормативно-правовое исследование с концептуальным и правовым исследовательским подходом. Результаты исследования указывают на необходимость определить «соответствующие рынки» и «продукты-заменители», чтобы определить наличие недобросовестной деловой конкуренции в слиянии Gojek-Tokopedia. Это требует анализа поведения потребителей на рынках, отличных от Tokopedia; когда потребители не «бегут» в Gojek, это означает, что они не находятся на одинаковом рынке. Чтобы предотвратить сбои в защите конфиденциальности при интеграции данных после слияния, компаниям необходимо оценить возможное совместное использование данных в рамках оценки рисков. Что касается прав субъекта данных, Компания должна уведомить субъект данных о слиянии и поглощении (M&A), учитывая право субъекта данных отказаться и гарантировать, что процесс M&A не нарушит права на конфиденциальность данных клиента.Ключевые слова: Закон о деловой конкуренции; цифровые платформы; слияние
Academic Freedom of Expression in Indonesia: A Maqashid Sharia Notes Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Aditya, Zaka Firma; Fuadi, Abdul Basid; Nur, Muhammad
El-Mashlahah Vol 13 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/el-mashlahah.v13i2.7573

Abstract

This article intended to examine academic freedom in Indonesia, especially in the last decade (2014-2022). As a country that upholds human rights and Islamic values, academic freedom in Indonesia is in chaos, especially on hifz al-nafs and hifz al-‘aql fulfillment. Many forms of thought expression and criticism conveyed by scholars to the government in academic forums are responded to with various terror, threats, and criminalization on the grounds of state stability. Scholars who are critical of government policies fall victim to criminalization, go to prison, and are dismissed from college due to being considered to violate college ethics. The many cases of academic freedom infringement indicate a severe problem where the thought of scientists in an academic forum is being ‘undermined
The legal protection system of indigenous peoples in Southeast Asia Aditya, Zaka Firma; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 31 No. 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v31i2.27619

Abstract

Globalization has a bad impact on the indigenous peoples in Southeast Asia countries. The demands of globalization have led the governments in Southeast Asia countries to exploit and industrialize indigenous regions excessively, resulting in marginalized indigenous peoples and the threat of extinction. Not intended for the benefit and welfare of indigenous peoples, the policy made by the government in several Southeast Asia countries did much to reduce the value of humanity and the rights of indigenous peoples. Even with rapid industrialization in Southeast Asia countries, many indigenous peoples are poor, left far behind, and illiterate due to isolation from the outside world. This paper aims to analyze the legal protection of indigenous people in Southeast Asia, especially in facing digital age. By normative juridical method, this paper found that the government and developers' exploitation of indigenous peoples in the region has always been laden with conflicts between the government, the developers (economic motive), and indigenous peoples, and such conflicts of interest are usually won by the interests of the government and/or developers. Indigenous peoples' right to sue for damages caused is sometimes hampered with difficulty simply because the government holds powerful and dominant standing in courts. Moreover, most countries in the Southeast Asia region does not have customary courts in their judicial institution.
Green Tourism Regulation on Sustainable Development: Droning from Indonesia and China Jaelani, Abdul Kadir; Hayat, Muhammad Jihadul; Luthviati, Resti Dian; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Mujib, M. Misbahul
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Contemporary Issues on Law, Development, and Justice: Indonesian Context and Beyo
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v8i2.72210

Abstract

For more than five decades (since 1972), the world has increasingly directed its attention toward sustainable development, one of which encompasses the domain of green tourism. Indonesia and China stand as two nations committed to the Sustainable Development Goals and green tourism. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether the legal framework on green tourism in both countries has achieved comprehensiveness and the extent of its implementation's effectiveness. This article aims to explore the regulations on green tourism in Indonesia and China, along with their respective impacts. Drawing on a statute approach, this article argues that Indonesia has established multiple levels of regulations concerning green tourism as a part of its commitment to sustainable development and China. In practice, both Indonesia and China have implemented these regulations, leading to discernible positive effects on societal welfare. However, conventional regulatory overlap persists in Indonesia, and the implementation appears less than optimal. In another context, China adopts a streamlined regulatory framework and appears to have achieved greater effectiveness in the implementation of green tourism.
The Influence of TAP MPR's Position on The Hierarchy System of Indonesian Laws and Regulations Gustama, Briliant; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Sarita
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Maret, 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (182.409 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.19442

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of TAP MPR in Indonesia. Placement of MPR Provisions in Law No. 12 of 2011 on the hierarchy of Legislation in Indonesia becomes one of the problematics that needs to be discussed, on the grounds of the position of MPR provisions that are under exactly the Constitution of 1945. This is based on the position of the MPR Decree itself which will automatically become a reference to the rules under it, in accordance with the theory of stairs put forward by Hans Kelsen. Although from the point of view of the position of MPR determination is still understandable if Hans Nawiasky theory is used as the basis. But in terms of testing itself of course this will raise a big question mark for all of us because in the Constitution of 1945 institutions or institutions that have the right to conduct a test of the Law is the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, but within its own scope the Provision of MPR is outside the juridical territory of the two Institutions themselves. Therefore, there needs to be a solution if at any time the MPR Decree is not in accordance with the basis of the 1945 Constitution so that there will be no defects in one of the legal sources of the State of Indonesia. Abstrak Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh TAP MPR di Indonesia. Penempatan Ketentuan MPR dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia menjadi salah satu problematika yang perlu dibahas, dengan alasan kedudukan ketetapan MPR yang berada di bawah UUD 1945. Hal ini berdasarkan posisi Ketetapan MPR sendiri yang secara otomatis akan menjadi acuan aturan di bawahnya, sesuai dengan teori tangga yang dikemukakan oleh Hans Kelsen. Meski dari sudut pandang posisi penentuan MPR masih bisa dimaklumi jika teori Hans Nawiasky dijadikan dasar. Namun dalam hal pengujian sendiri tentunya hal ini akan menimbulkan tanda tanya besar bagi kita semua karena dalam UUD 1945 lembaga atau lembaga yang berhak melakukan uji materi UU adalah Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung, namun dalam lingkupnya sendiri Ketentuan MPR berada di luar wilayah yuridis kedua Lembaga itu sendiri. Oleh karena itu, perlu ada solusi jika sewaktu-waktu Ketetapan MPR tidak sesuai dengan dasar UUD 1945 sehingga tidak akan terjadi cacat pada salah satu sumber hukum Negara Indonesia.
Capturing Law Reform in The Digital Age: Indonesian and Estonian Perspectives Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Sinha, Sara
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.31970

Abstract

This article examines how law reform in the digital age happens in Indonesia and Estonia. Indonesia and Estonia are located in different cultures and also areas. While law reform in the digital age happens, the two countries above will also demonstrate differences. This article uses normative legal studies to capture which legal instrument is better in both countries. This article found that Estonia is leading in providing legal instruments to face the digital age, while Indonesia needs to catch up. Some legal instruments in Indonesia such as AI law, Digital ID law, and e-government law should be drafted and implemented. Abstrak Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana reformasi hukum di era digital terjadi di Indonesia dan Estonia. Indonesia dan Estonia terletak dalam budaya dan wilayah yang berbeda. Meskipun reformasi hukum di era digital terjadi, kedua negara di atas pasti akan menunjukkan perbedaan dalam menghadapinya. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif untuk menemukan instrumen hukum mana yang lebih baik di kedua negara. Hasilnya, artikel ini menemukan bahwa Estonia lebih unggul dalam menyediakan instrumen hukum untuk menghadapi era digital, sementara Indonesia tertinggal dalam hal tersebut. Beberapa instrumen hukum di Indonesia harus dirancang dan diterapkan, seperti Rancangan Undang-Undang AI, Rancangan Undang-Undang Identitas Kependudukan Digital, dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Digital.
Islam and Maritime Security Cooperation Zone for Combating Terrorism: An Overview of Islamic Legal Thought Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Bachtiar, Hasnan
Mazahib Vol 22 No 1 (2023): VOLUME 22, ISSUE 1, 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UINSI Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/mj.v22i1.6134

Abstract

This article aims to examine the phenomenon of cooperation among Southeast Asian countries in dealing with the case of maritime security and counter-terrorism. The study uses the legal approach covering both international law and Islamic law perspectives. The finding of this article reveals that the implementation of the ASEAN Convention on Counter-Terrorism (ACCT) plays a crucial role in combating terrorism in the context of maritime security. Furthermore, relevant ASEAN member state authorities need follow-up support to enhance cooperation. The supports are important to counter, prevent, and suppress terrorism, terrorist organizations, associations, and networks' plans of the act. Yet, the implementation of ASEAN cooperation has faced the challenging reality of the paradox of maritime sovereignty among states in the region. The problem is likely encouraged by the factor of the internal political dynamics within each state involving the instrumentalization of the issue of national security. Instead of remaining as the problem on the surface, the conceptual initiation of the cooperation forged by religious doctrine such as ta'awun may be considered.
The Hierarchical Model of Delegated Legislation in Indonesia Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Safaat, Muchamad Ali; Widiarto, Aan Eko; Al Uyun, Dhia; Nur, Muhammad
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Justice in Broader Context: Contemporary and Controversial Issues in Indonesia an
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.74651

Abstract

In a democratic rule of law like Indonesia, delegated legislation emerges as a necessity. Unfortunately, Article 8, paragraph (1) of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Laws and Regulations, in conjunction with Law Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011, fails to articulate a clear hierarchy of delegated regulations. Employing a juridical-normative research approach encompassing statutory, historical, and conceptual dimensions, this study sheds light on the prevailing legal vacuum. The research reveals that a staggering 24,052 regulations at the level of Ministries, Agencies, and State Institutions run the risk of overlapping and becoming subject to judicial review in the Supreme Court. The definition of Delegated Legislations in Indonesia, as interpreted herein, is confined to regulations whose legal construction is executed by the executive, as long as formal legal norms continue to confer the authority of delegation in the legislative domain to implement superior regulations. This paper identifies three distinct models governing the structuring of Delegated Legislations within the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia. These models include the Hierarchical model based on the legal foundation of institution formation, the Hierarchical model based on the position of the institution, and the Hierarchical model based on the source of delegated authority in forming rules. This nuanced exploration seeks to address the complexities surrounding delegated legislation, aiming to provide clarity and coherence within the Indonesian legal framework.
Application of Supply Chain Strategy of Business Competition in Business Competition Commission Decision Haris, Haris; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Jaelani, Abdul Kadir
International Journal of Supply Chain Management Vol 9, No 5 (2020): International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM)
Publisher : ExcelingTech

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59160/ijscm.v9i5.5596

Abstract

Abstract— This paper analyzes the application of norms concerning supply chain of business competition in commission for business competition decisions. The case study in this paper is in the case of supply chain of business competition conducted by PT Forisa Nusapersada in Case Decision Number 14/ KPPU-L/2015. As a comparison, this study also compares the application of SCM in cases that are almost similar, namely the Decision of the Case KPPU Number 14/KPPU-L / 2015 with the Decision of the Case KPPU Number: 06 / KPPU-L / 2004. Differentiation strategy and agile supply chain strategy had a significant impact on the firm performance under the low uncertainty. In conclusion, the companies are supposed to use environmental uncertainty as a determinant of the perceptions in setting their strategies.
Co-Authors A Salman Maggalatung, A Salman Aan Eko Widiarto Abdul Chalim Abdul Kadir Abdullah, Umar Abdurrahman Raden Aji Haqqi Abdurrahman Raden Aji Haqqi Adzimi, Muhammad Wildan Ramadhan Afrizal Mukti Wibowo Ahmad Faiz Alamsyah Ahmad Murtadho Ahmad Siboy Aisya Sanghra Devi Nugraha Akmal Maulana N. M. Alam, Moch. Zairul Ali Roziqin AllahRakha, Naeem Aminuddin Mustaffa Amiruddin, Denie Andre Purnairawan Angelina Lucky Rahmawati Anwar, Gamitra Aristo Arie Notoprojo Asep Syarifuddin Hidayat, Asep Syarifuddin Asrul Ibrahim Nur Asrul Ibrahim Nur Asrul Ibrahim Nur Asyari, Muhammad Dahlan Aulia, Farihan Bayu Aji Satria Bernieka Nur Annisa Borsa, Merve Ozkan Brillian Gustama Catur Wido Haruni Clarizze Yvoine Mirielle Cony Dehas Ratna Devi David Pradhan Deniar , Shannaz Mutiara Devi Triasari Dhia Al Uyun, Dhia Disemadi, Hari Sutra Eliza Putri Sanggarwati Emi Puasa Handayani Enas Qutieshat Ezzerouali, Souad Fachry Ahsany Fadli, Moh. Fadloli Falah Parama, Jovial Farihan Aulia Fatha Khaira Annajid Elfauzi Febriyani, Emiliya Felinda Istighfararisna Aulia Firyal Azelia Nasera Fitria Esfandiari Fuadi, Abdul Basid Gustama, Briliant Hany Krisna Priratna Haris Haris Haris Haris, Haris Hasnan Bachtiar Hayat, Muhammad Jihadul Hendra Saputra Jaya Hilaire Tegnan Himawan Estu Bagijo . Hirmo, Meelika Isdian Anggraeny Isma Novalia Firdha Susanto Jade, Adinda Putri Jamil Jamil Jamil Jamil Jauhar Nashrullah Jovial Falah Parama Juli Astutik Khoshim ugli, Madiev Fakhriddin Kukuh Tejomurti Kukuh Tejomurti, Kukuh Kurniawan, Kukuh Dwi Ladiqi, Suyatno Luthfillah Arrizqi Zainsyah Mabarroh Azizah Makmun, Fatimatuz Zakiya Marwa, Muhammad Habibi Miftakhul Maynanda Shadrina Meilana Rifqi, Achmad Daffa Merve Ozkan Borsa Moch. Zairul Alam Moh. Iqra Syabani Korompot Mohammad Affan Mohammad Affan Mohammad Al An'imat Mohammad Azam Hussain Mohammad Fadli Mohammad Syahrul RA Mohd Ali, Adi Syahid Muchamad Ali Safaat Muhammad Ayman al-Akiti Muhammad Jihadi Muhammad Nur Mujib, M Misbahul Mujibur Rahman Khairul Muluk Najella Zubaidi Narzullaev Olim Kholmamatovich Nik Nur Nasyuha Nik Ahmad Rizal Niken Nendy Istaqnaligh Sanda Nilasari, Nilasari Nor Aida Ab. Kadir Norhasliza binti Ghapa Norhasliza Ghapac Nur Putri Hidayah Nur, Asrul Ibrahim Nursyah, Yufani Julia Nursyah Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana Putra, Marsudi Dedi Putri Shafarina Thahir Putri, Diah Nadia Rahmat, Al Fauzi Rama Thimoty Sanjaya Ranendra, Bagas Raras Verawati Ratri Novita Erdianti Ratri Novita Erdianti Regy Gusti Pratama Resti Dian Luthviati Rety Bella Octavya Zain Rifan T, Vicko Wahyu Risky, Saiful Rusdiana, Shelvi Rustamovich, Bekov Ikhtiyor Saiful Risky Salsabila, Mutiara Shaquila Samira, Echaib Sarita Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa Sayed Khalid Shahzad Shahzad, Sayed Khalid Shinta Ayu Purnamawati Shohib Muslim Sidik Sunaryo Silviani, Ninne Zahara Sinha, Sara Sirajuddin Sofyan Arief Sukarmi Sukarmi, Sukarmi Sukarmi, Sukarmi Surya Anoraga Syahra Ramadhani Syariful Alam Tajrim, Muhammad Ikhsan Taufiqur Rahman Shaleh Thahir, Putri Shafarina Tinuk Dwi Cahyani Tongat Tongat Triya Indra Rahmawan Tuan Sembok, Tuan Muhammad Zukri Ulfa Arinta Uyun, Dhia Al Uzoho Kelechi Virga Dwi Efendi Vita Mahardhika Wahyudi Kurniawan Wasis Suprayitna Wasis Suprayitno Wasis Suprayitno Wasis Wasis Wimbi Vania Riezqa Salshadilla Yaris Adhial Fajrin Yunus, Nur Rohim Yusro, Mochammad Abizar Yusuf Hamdika Zaenal Abidin Zainal Arifin Zaka Firma Aditya Zaka Firma Aditya Zaka Firma Aditya Zaka Firma Aditya zaka firma aditya, zaka firma Zakaria Saxon