Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Measuring Indigenous Well-Being: Psychometric Validation of the Pancawaluya Scale Kulsum, Siti; Solehuddin, M; Yudha, Eka Sakti; Koswara, Dedi; Syakina, Bella; Zaelani, Abdul Qodir; Armanto, M Edi
Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung in collaboration with Asosiasi Bimbingan dan Konseling Indonesia (ABKIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/0020269762500

Abstract

Psychological well-being is understood differently across cultural contexts, yet many culturally grounded frameworks remain conceptually described rather than empirically tested. One such framework is Pancawaluya, a Sundanese indigenous model that defines well-being through five core values: Cageur (physical and mental health), Bageur (kindness and prosocial conduct), Bener (moral integrity), Pinter (knowledge and wisdom), and Singer (creativity and adaptability). Although these values are widely recognized in Sundanese philosophy and practice, their structure as a measurable psychological construct has not been systematically validated. This study examined the factor structure and internal consistency of the Pancawaluya Scale using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Data were collected from 305 respondents and analyzed using LISREL. The results supported a five-factor model with satisfactory model fit indices (RMSEA = 0.031; CFI = 0.985; GFI = 0.958). Composite reliability indicated strong internal consistency, while AVE values suggested acceptable convergent validity for an indigenous construct in an early validation stage. The findings indicate that Pancawaluya can be operationalized as a coherent indigenous well-being construct. Its dimensions are theoretically discussed in relation to Islamic counseling principles, suggesting conceptual alignment in moral and spiritual values. This study provides an initial empirical foundation for future culturally grounded counseling research.
Teknologi Three-Parent Baby dan Implikasinya terhadap Nasab Perspektif Sadd adz-Dzari’ah Nida Rafiqa Izzati; N. Nurnazli; Abdul Qodir Zaelani; M. Natsir Asnawi; Rezkia Zahara Lubis
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.6.1.11831.97-107

Abstract

The Three-Parent Baby Technology (TPBT) is a medical innovation aimed at preventing the hereditary transmission of mitochondrial disorders by combining genetic material from two women and one man. While offering a health solution, this technology raises significant issues in Islamic law, particularly regarding lineage clarity (nasab). This study addresses three main focuses: first, the concept and development of TPBT in medical science; second, the principle of sadd adz-dzari’ah as a method of legal determination in Islam; and third, the analysis of TPBT from the sadd adz-dzari’ah perspective and its implications for lineage in Islamic family law. Employing a qualitative approach through library research, this study draws from primary and secondary sources in Islamic legal discourse. The findings indicate that while TPBT is clinically effective, it remains uncertain in terms of long-term safety. In Islamic law, sadd adz-dzari’ah functions as a legal method that prevents harm by closing avenues leading to potential damage (mafsadat). From this perspective, TPBT risks obscuring lineage, violating Sharia principles of reproduction, posing long-term health risks (for both the woman undergoing the procedure and the resulting child), exploiting women, enabling genetic engineering abuse, and conflicting with the concept of qadha and qadar. Based on its inherent potential for harm, TPBT falls into the category of acts that are intrinsically prohibited due to their destructive nature. Scholars agree that such actions must be prevented. Therefore, through the lens of sadd adz-dzari’ah, TPBT is assessed as causing more harm than benefit and is deemed inappropriate for implementation in Islamic family law.
bahasa inggris Muhammad Samson Fajar; Enizar; Abdul Qodir Zaelani; Sofyan Munawar
Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities
Publisher : Universitas Darunnajah Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61159/sahaja.v4i1.395

Abstract

The increasing phenomenon of individuals choosing to be single in the modern era is a significant social change. Various factors such as career busyness, individual freedom, and changes in social values ​​have influenced people's mindsets towards the institution of marriage. This study analyzes how the critical reasoning of the Qur'an responds to the phenomenon of being single with a multidisciplinary approach that combines the historical reasoning of Muhammad Arkoun, the epistemology of Al-Ghazali, and the fiqh of ikhtilaf of Ibn Rushd. The research method used is library research, by making the Qur'an as the main source in responding to the law of celibacy (rahbaniyah). Secondary data was obtained from relevant books of interpretation, history, sociology, and psychology. The results of the study show that although Islam does not absolutely prohibit individuals from being single, marriage remains an institution recommended in Islam to maintain social stability and the sustainability of civilization. In the dialectical analysis, it was found that Arkoun emphasized the historical and social context in understanding Islamic teachings, while Al-Ghazali saw the spiritual and moral aspects of the individual in the decision to be single. Ibn Rushd, with his ikhtilaf fiqh approach, emphasized that marriage has flexible laws depending on the individual and social conditions. Therefore, this study concludes that marriage is more recommended than being single because it has broader benefits in social, economic, and psychological aspects, although it still provides space for individuals to consider their personal conditions.
Co-Authors Abdul Hanif Abdul Hanif Abdul Hanif Adawiyah, Robiatin Agus Hermanto Agus Hermanto Amin Rais Andi Armi Ardi, Muh Zaitun Armanto, M Edi Azizah, Asyifa Nur Azizah, Khana Azzam Arfa, M Fadhil A’dawiyah , Robi’atin Burhan, Rusli Bustomi Chaidir Nasution Dedi Koswara Desrianto Dewi Setia Wati Eka Sakti Yudha Enizar Enizar Enizar Etika Pujianti Eva Fitriyanah Faisal Faisal Faisal, Agus Fajar, Mokhamad Samson Fajar, Mokhammad Samson Fathurrahman Fathurrahman Fauzan Febrian Maulana Putra Gegana, Tomi Adam Ghummiah, Shivi Mala Gusher, Agus Hermanto Hadi , Bagus Kusumo Hadi, Bagus Kusumo Hadi, Dino Gautman Raharjo Hanif Hanif Al-fauzi Nur Hanif, Abdul Imam Syafi'i Indra, Gandi Liyorba Irwantoni Irwantoni Irwantoni Irwantoni Irwantoni Irwantoni Is Susanto Iskandar Syukur Issusanto, Issusanto Ja’far, Ahmad Khumedi Khairudin Khairudin Kusuma, Kurniawan Putra Liky Faizal Linda Firdawati Linda Firdawaty Luqman Hafiz M. Natsir Asnawi M. Yasin Al Arif Madnasir Madnasir Maimun Maimun Maimun Maimun Maliki, Ibnu Akbar Millah, Nadiya Ihda Mubasit Mubasit Mubasit Mubasit, Mubasit Muhammad Akmansyah Muhammad Alvin Saputra Muhammad Iqbal Fasa MUHAMMAD REZA FAHLEVY Muhammad Samson Fajar Mujahid, Amin Muzakki, M Harir Mu’in, Fathul N. Nurnazli Na'im, Arroyan Nida Rafiqa Izzati Nida Rafiqa Izzati Nur, Hanif Al-fauzi Nurnazli Nurnazli Pranika, Ranita Putri, Mutiara Eka Rais, Amin Relit Nur Edi Rezkia Zahara Lubis Rinaldo, Edward Robi'atin A'dawiyah Ronaldo, Reza Rosidi Rosidi Rudi Santoso, Rudi Ruslan Abdul Ghofur Siti Kulsum SITI MAHMUDAH Sofyan Munawar Solehuddin, M Supriyadi Supriyadi Sutiawan, Ayub Syakina, Bella Syamsul Hilal Syamsul Hilal Teresa, Teresa Tomi Adam Gegana Wati, Dewi Setio Yusuf Baihaqi Zuhraini