p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.095
P-Index
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Metodologi Penunjukan Makna Ushul Fikih Dalam Menjawab Problematika Keumatan Hesti Rahma; Fatmawati; zainal abidin
Dirosah Islamiyah Vol 1 No 3 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Dirosah Islamiyah: Jurnal Studi Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dalālah is an important concept in ushul fiqh that explains the relationship between wording and meaning as the basis for the process of istinbāṭ al-ahkām. This study aims to examine the concept of dalālah, the forms of indicating meaning according to the Hanafi school of thought, and its relevance in addressing contemporary community issues. This study uses a library research method with a descriptive-analytical approach through a study of ushul fiqh literature and related scientific sources. The results show that dalālah al-nash is divided into four forms, namely ibārat al-nash, isyārat al-nash, dilālat al-nash, and iqtidhā' al-nash, each of which has its own characteristics in understanding the legal content of the Qur'an and hadith. These four methods remain relevant in addressing various contemporary issues, such as sharia economics, digital transactions, health, and personal data protection. Thus, the concept of dalālah shows that Islamic law is dynamic, adaptive, and remains based on the Qur'an and Sunnah.
Sadd Al- Dzari‘ah Sebagai Instrumen Peninjauan Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘ah Terhadap Putusan Percobaan Pembunuhan Sebagai Penghalang Kewarisan dalam KHI Muh. Fadliansyah. M; Abd. Rauf Muhammad Amin; Fatmawati
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 3 Juli 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i3.1155

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) menganalisis latar belakang penetapan Pasal 173 huruf (a) Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) yang menyatakan bahwa percobaan pembunuhan menjadi penghalang dalam kewarisan, dan (2) menelaah pasal tersebut dalam perspektif maqāṣid al-syari’ah. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dengan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif. Sumber data diperoleh dari literatur primer dan sekunder berupa kitab klasik, jurnal ilmiah, buku akademik, dan sumber digital yang relevan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan percobaan pembunuhan sebagai penghalang waris dalam Pasal 173 huruf (a) KHI didasarkan pada adopsi Pasal 838 angka 1 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata). Secara substantif, perumusan KHI mengacu pada sumber hukum Islam, yaitu al-Qur’an dan Sunnah, serta memperhatikan sistem hukum nasional yang telah berlaku sebelumnya, termasuk KUH Perdata yang diberlakukan sejak 1 Mei 1848, jauh sebelum diresmikannya KHI pada tahun 1991. Dalam perspektif maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, ketentuan tersebut mencerminkan penerapan prinsip sadd al-dzarī‘ah yang bertujuan mencegah kemudaratan. Larangan tersebut dikategorikan sebagai bentuk penjagaan terhadap jiwa (ḥifẓ al-nafs), yang merupakan salah satu dari lima tujuan utama syariat (al-ḍarūriyyāt al-khams). Implikasi penelitian ini meliputi pentingnya fleksibilitas dalam merespons dinamika hukum, serta perlunya perhatian pemerintah terhadap prinsip maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah dalam perumusan dan evaluasi kebijakan hukum nasional.
Al-Ijtihād Al-Maqāṣidī Dalam Perspektif: Ontologi, Epistemologi, Dan Aksiologi Baso Muhammad Nibras Abiyyu; Fatmawati; Abd Rauf Muhammad Amin
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 3 Juli 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i3.1168

Abstract

The development of modern society characterized by technological advances, globalization, and the emergence of various new problems in the economic, social, political, health, and environmental fields demands renewal in the development of Islamic law. In this context, al-ijtihād al-maqāṣidī is present as a relevant approach to answer contemporary legal challenges while remaining based on sharia principles. This study aims to analyze the concept, position, and role of al-ijtihād al-maqāṣidī in the development of contemporary Islamic law. The research method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach and library research. Data were obtained from primary and secondary sources related to maqāṣid al-shari'ah, ushul fiqh, and contemporary ijtihad studies. The research results show that al-ijtihād al-maqāṣidī is a method of establishing law oriented towards the realization of the objectives of sharia through consideration of the benefit (jalb al-maṣāliḥ) and the prevention of harm (dar’ al-mafāsid). This approach not only emphasizes textual understanding of the texts, but also considers wisdom, the value of justice, and evolving social realities. Thus, al-ijtihād al-maqāṣidī is able to become a methodological instrument that bridges religious texts and the needs of modern society so that Islamic law remains adaptive, relevant, and oriented towards the benefit of the community.
Harmonisasi Muṭlaq dan Muqayyad dalam Istinbat Hukum: Studi Aplikatif pada Regulasi Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia Nur Afifa Maharani; Tasliyah Erlina Ramli; Zaenal Abidin; Fatmawati
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 3 Juli 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i3.1208

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji harmonisasi muṭlaq dan muqayyad dalam regulasi hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia melalui perspektif uṣūl al-fiqh dan maqāṣid al-syarīʻah. Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis konsep harmonisasi muṭlaq dan muqayyad, menjelaskan peran negara sebagai otoritas taqyīd, serta menilai legitimasi metodologis pembatasan hukum dalam regulasi hukum keluarga Islam. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, dan historis. Bahan hukum dianalisis secara deskriptif-analitis melalui teknik harmonisasi norma. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembatasan terhadap poligami, batas usia perkawinan, pencatatan nikah, dan perceraian melalui pengadilan merupakan bentuk taqyīd munfaṣil, yaitu pembatasan yang lahir melalui ijtihad kelembagaan negara tanpa mengubah substansi nash. Pembatasan tersebut merupakan bentuk ijtihad kontekstual negara yang berorientasi pada perlindungan hak, ketertiban sosial, dan realisasi maqāṣid al-syarīʻah.
Hierarki Kejelasan Makna dalam Uṣūl al-Fiqh: Reinterpretasi Ẓāhir hingga Muḥkam dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam Muhammad Didit Dermawan Rola; Amrudin Amrudin; Fatmawati Fatmawati; Zainal Abidin
Al-Faruq: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Hukum Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Al-Faruq : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58518/al-faruq.v5i2.5340

Abstract

This article discusses the hierarchy of semantic clarity in Islamic legal theory (uṣūl al-fiqh), which consists of ẓāhir, naṣṣ, mufassar and muḥkam, and its implications for Islamic legal reasoning (istinbāṭ al-ḥukm). The aim of this study is to explain the concept of ẓāhir al-dalālah as the initial level of meaning that still allows for interpretation (ta’wīl), as well as the relationship between the levels of clarity in determining the strength of legal evidence. This research uses a library-based approach by examining classical and contemporary works in uṣūl al-fiqh. The findings show that each level has different characteristics and legal authority. Ẓāhir refers to a meaning that is directly understood but still open to interpretation (ta’wīl). Naṣṣ is stronger because it reflects the primary intent of the text, while mufassar provides more detailed and explicit clarification. Muḥkam represents the highest level of clarity, as it is definitive and does not allow interpretation (ta’wīl) or abrogation (naskh). In conclusion, the hierarchy of semantic clarity serves as an essential methodological framework in Islamic legal reasoning, particularly in resolving textual differences. It ensures consistency, precision, and objectivity in interpreting the Qur’an and Sunnah.
BETWEEN EMOTION AND LEGAL CERTAINTY: AN ANALYSIS OF EXPLICIT (SHARIH) AND IMPLICIT (KINAYAH) EXPRESSIONS IN DIVORCE FROM AN ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW PERSPECTIVE Arwinni Eka Putri Ahmad; Abdul Syatar; Fatmawati
MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Maddika: Journal Of Islamic Family Law
Publisher : UIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/maddika.v7i1.11517

Abstract

Domestic conflicts triggered by emotional outbursts often lead to the utterance of statements that may have legal consequences for the continuity and stability of marriage. In Islamic law, divorce pronouncements (talaq) are classified into ṣarīḥ (explicit) and kināyah (implicit) expressions, each carrying distinct legal implications. A ṣarīḥ expression is understood as an explicit declaration that unequivocally indicates divorce and therefore does not require the presence of intention (niyyah) for its legal validity. In contrast, a kināyah expression consists of indirect or ambiguous wording whose legal effect depends on the existence of the speaker's intention to divorce. The legal issue arises when such expressions are uttered in a state of anger or emotional distress, raising questions regarding their validity and legal force. This study aims to analyze the concepts of ṣarīḥ and kināyah expressions in Islamic family law, examine the role of intention in determining the validity of divorce, and explore their relevance in contemporary family practices. This research employs a normative legal approach using jurisprudential, juridical, and conceptual perspectives. The data are analyzed descriptively and qualitatively based on the sources of Islamic law, statutory regulations, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings demonstrate that the distinction between ṣarīḥ and kināyah expressions serves as an important instrument in maintaining a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice in divorce cases. Furthermore, an emotional state does not automatically invalidate the legal consequences of a divorce pronouncement; rather, its legal effect should be assessed based on the level of awareness, the surrounding context, and the speaker's intention. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of divorce expressions is essential to ensure that the determination of marital status is not based solely on the formal wording of the pronouncement but also takes into account psychological, social, and family welfare considerations.
Kajian Lafaz ditinjau dari Indikasi Maknanya: Dalālah al-mafhūm al-Mukhālafa (Ḥaṣr, Ṣifah, Syarṭ, Laqab, Ġāyah, dan ‘Adad) Muhammad Fitrah Waila Zamzani; Muh Farid Wadjedy; Fatmawati; Abd. Rauf Muhammad
Muwafaqat: Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Muwafaqat: Journal of Islamic Law
Publisher : Cv. Kayaswara, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the concept of mafhūm al-mukhālafah in the discipline of uṣūl al-fiqh as one of the methods of legal derivation (istinbāṭ al-ḥukm) from the Qur’an and Hadith. Conducted through library research, the data were collected from classical and contemporary works of Islamic jurisprudence, along with supporting academic literature. The findings indicate that mafhūm al-mukhālafah is understood as a meaning derived not directly from the text, but from its opposite implication. Scholars classify mafhūm al-mukhālafah into several types, including mafhūm al-ḥaṣr, al-ṣifah, al-sharṭ, al-ghāyah, al-‘adad, and al-laqab. Each type has its own distinctive rules of application, yet all share the same principle that legal rulings may be derived from implied meanings. This study highlights the significance of mafhūm al-mukhālafah as an important tool of legal reasoning in Islamic law and reflects the dynamic scholarly discourse surrounding its application.
Hakikat dan Tujuan Filsafat Hukum Islam serta Relevansinya dalam Konteks Sosial Kontemporer Muhammad Yasin; Achmad Musyahid; Fatmawati
Aksioreligia Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Aksioreligia : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : CV Global Research Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59996/aksioreligia.v4i1.944

Abstract

This study aims to analyze islamic legal philosophy as a conceptual framework that explains the nature, objectives, and relevance of islamic law in addressing the challenges of modern society. The research employs a library research method with a qualitative-descriptive and analytical approach through the examination of classical and contemporary literature on islamic law, legal theory (uṣūl al-fiqh), and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The findings reveal that islamic legal philosophy is a reflective discipline integrating the ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions of islamic law. Its primary objectives are embodied in the concept of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which seeks to protect religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property, while promoting public welfare and justice. The study further demonstrates that islamic legal philosophy remains highly relevant in responding to contemporary issues such as human rights, democracy, and digital technological development through adaptive and contextual ijtihād. Therefore, islamic legal philosophy may be positioned as a dynamic, rational, and future-oriented paradigm for legal development.
THE DYNAMICS OF THE MEANING OF THE TERM AL AMR IN ITS DESIGNATION AND APPLICATION IN NASH AND ITS LEGAL IMPLICATIONS Kaisar Rahul; Fatmawati; Abd. Rauf Muhammad Amin
Jurnal Ar-Risalah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/arrisalah.v5i2.5959

Abstract

This study analyzes the semantic dynamics of lafaz al-amr (imperative form) in the context of its designation and application in Islamic scriptural texts (nash) and its implications for legal determination. Despite numerous studies on al-amr, in-depth research on meaning variations based on linguistic, historical, and socio-cultural contexts, as well as their legal implications, remains limited. The research problems are: how does the semantic dynamics of al-amr function in various contexts of nash, and what are the legal implications of different interpretations of al-amr. This research employs a qualitative method with a normative-juridical approach through textual analysis of Quranic verses and hadiths containing the shighat al-amr (imperative formula). The findings indicate that the meaning of al-amr is contextual and variable, depending on the form of shighat, qarinah (contextual indicators), and socio-historical context. Its legal implications encompass obligatory (wajib), recommended (sunnah), permissible (mubah), or advisory (irsyad), which require comprehensive interpretation to maintain the relevance and justice of Islamic law application in contemporary contexts.
DILĀLAH MANṬŪQ DAN MAFHŪM DALAM USHUL FIKIH: (KAJIAN KOMPARATIF MAZHAB DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP ISTINBATH HUKUM ISLAM) Rahmatul Qadri; Fatmawati; Rauf Amin
Jurnal Al-Wasith : Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Al-Wasith: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam
Publisher : Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali Cilacap

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52802/wst.v11i1.2133

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the concepts of manṭūq and mafhūm from the perspective of Islamic legal theorists and to examine their implications for Islamic legal reasoning. This study employs a library research method with a descriptive-analytical approach, drawing upon classical and contemporary works on Islamic legal theory. The findings reveal that manṭūq and mafhūm function not only as linguistic tools for understanding legal texts but also as epistemological instruments that shape legal interpretation and reasoning. The analysis of scholarly perspectives indicates a consensus regarding the authoritative status of manṭūq, while discussions on mafhūm have generated diverse approaches in its application and development. These differences have implications for methods of legal inference and contribute to the diversity of juristic opinions. This study demonstrates that the discourse on manṭūq and mafhūm occupies a significant position in bridging the relationship between text, methodology, and the formulation of Islamic law.
Co-Authors A, Ansori A, Merdekawaty Abd Rauf Muhammad Amin Abd. Rauf Muhammad Abdul Rauf Muhammad Amin Abdul Wahid Haddade Achmad Musyahid Idrus Achmad Nasyori Ade Ihwana Ilham Ahmad Izzuddin Ainun Mardiah, Nur Akhyar, Andi Muh. Ami, Abd. Rauf Muhammad Amin, Abd. Rauf Amrudin Amrudin Andi Halimah Andi Muhammad Akmal Andy Muhammad Ruknanto Andy Anieq Mumthi’ah Al Kautzar Annisa Y Febrianti Arijati, Disty Gusvalinda Arwinni Eka Putri Ahmad Asfira Yuniar ASNI Ativa Nurhadi Audah Mannan Ayu Andira Baso Muhammad Nibras Abiyyu Dinul Fitrah Mubaraq Eka Syahriani Eri Sarmila Eriza, Echa F, Faisal Faisal Akib Fathoni, Wildan Fathur Rahman Basir Fitri Ningsih, Fitri Fitriani Kadir Fitrya Ninggi Gazali, Muh. Rakasiwi A. Gurfatil Amin Halim Talli Hamzah Hasan Haq, Fitri Maylan Hesti Rahma Hidayat, Herdi Husnul Khatimah Ikram, Muhammad Furqanul Ismail Alibas Iwan Aprianto J, Jamrizal Juhari, Andi Rezal Kadir, Muh.Awaluddin Kaisar Rahul Kartono, Arsy Fathir Karunia, Khaerunnisa Kasful Anwar Kurniati Lisa Anriani Lizri, Kurniati Ramadhani Lomba Sultan Madina, Siti Marni Marni Marwah, Andi Mirna Yunita Misbahuddin Misbahuddin Muammar Bakri Mubarak, Muhammad Hilal Muh Farid Wadjedy Muh. Fadliansyah. M Muh. Irwan Muh. Nur Muh. Soleh Ridwan Muhammad Didit Dermawan Rola Muhammad Fadhil Muhammad Fitrah Muhammad Qadaruddin Muhammad Shuhufi Muhammad Yahdi Muhammad Yasin N, Nikmah nanaridwan, Mau'idhatul Hasanah Ridwan Novita, Yulia Nur Afifa Maharani Nur Amalia Nurfaizah Alza Nurlina Nurlina Nurmilasari Nurul Fatimah Perkasah Pandji Palantei Rahma Amir Rahma Amir Rahmat Farham Rahmatul Qadri Rauf Amin Rian Hidayat Rohim, M. Yusuf Nur Saiyed Amar Achmad Saiyed Amar Ahmad Sanusi, Muh. Nur Taufik Sanusi, Nur Taufiq Saputri, Chandra Ariani Shabrina Syifa Salsabila Sippah Chotban Sitti Aisyah Kara Sri Ujiana Putri Sri Wahyuni Kasim Sultan, Loma Sunusi, Muh. Nur Taufiq Supardin Syatar, Abdul Taher, Muhammad Rafli HI Tantri, Tantri Indar Pratiwi Tasliyah Erlina Ramli Usman Usman Jafar W, Wawan Wahyuni, Tuti Windi Rezani Anas Wulandari, Ulfah Yunita Yuwantika, Diva ZAENAL ABIDIN Zainal Abidin Zainal Abidin Zulfahmi