Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.635
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Lentera Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Veritas et Justitia Multidiciplinary Journal YUSTISI TAHKIM Unes Law Review Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Supremasi Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Journal of Judicial Review RIO LAW JURNAL Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum BHIRAWA LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Hukum Legalita Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities PATTIMURA Legal Journal Journal of Social And Economics Research Jurnal El-Thawalib Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia International Journal of Economics (IJEC) JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Nusantara Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Referendum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi IPSSJ Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Jurnal Jurisprudence Jurnal El-Thawalib Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL) Fairness and Justice Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Rechtenstudent Journal
Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y. A. Triana
Faculty Of Law Jember University
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 83 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 83 Documents
Search

 4   5   6   7   8 
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PUTUSAN YANG MELANGGAR SPECIAL STRAF MAXIMA Widowati, Widowati; Ohoiwutun, Y. A. Triana
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021): OPINIO JURIS SIVE NECESSITATIS
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v14i1.413

Abstract

ABSTRAKTindak pidana penipuan atau penggelapan merupakan dakwaan alternatif yang dibuat oleh penuntut umum dalam Putusan Nomor 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd. Dalam pertimbangannya hakim membuktikan unsur-unsur tindak pidana penipuan; namun demikian dalam amar putusannya menyatakan bahwa terdakwa bersalah melakukan tindak pidana penggelapan. Sanksi pidana penjara 10 tahun yang dijatuhkan terhadap terdakwa menyimpangi special straf maxima. Rumusan masalah dalam tulisan ini, apakah amar Putusan Nomor 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd yang melanggar “asas” special straf maxima telah memenuhi asas kepastian hukum yang adil? Metode yuridis normatif digunakan dalam penulisan ini. Sumber data diperoleh dari data sekunder yang meliputi bahan hukum primer, dan bahan hukum sekunder. Putusan Nomor 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd seharusnya batal demi hukum, karena tidak terpenuhinya syarat formalitas putusan sebagaimana ditentukan Pasal 197 ayat (1) KUHAP. Di samping itu, penjatuhan sanksi pidana penjara selama 10 tahun melanggar ketentuan special straf maxima, dan melanggar kepastian hukum yang adil. Namun, berdasarkan asas res judicata pro veritate habetur, apapun putusan hakim harus dianggap benar sampai ada putusan hakim yang lebih tinggi yang menyatakan sebaliknya. Kata kunci: special straf maxima; tindak pidana penipuan; tindak pidana penggelapan. ABSTRACTFraud or embezzlement is an alternative indictment made by the public prosecutor in Decision Number 306/ Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd. In the judge’s consideration, all elements of the criminal act of fraud have been successfully proven; however, in the conviction it was stated that the defendant was guilty of the crime of embezzlement. The 10 years imprisonment imposed on the defendant violated the special straf maxima “principle”. The formulation of the problem to analyze is whether the sentencing in the Decision Number 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd violating principle has met the principle of fair-legal certainty. This paper uses normative juridical method and obtain data sources from secondary data including primary and secondary legal material. Decision Number 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd should be null and void, because it did not meet the formal requirements of the decision as stipulated in Article 197 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. In addition, the imposition of imprisonment for 10 years violates the principle of the special straf maxima and fair legal certainty. However, based on the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, the judge’s decision whatsoever must be deliberated truthful until there is a decision of a superior judge which states otherwise. Keywords: special straf maxima; fraud; embezzlement. 
Peran Badan Pemulihan Aset di Kejaksaan Negeri Donggala Andika Maulana Syah Putra; Ronny Max Hendra; Rato, Dominikus; Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i4.5623

Abstract

This research explains the role of the Asset Recovery Agency (formerly known as the "Asset Recovery Center") at the Donggala District Attorney's Office. In Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia jo. Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 2 paragraph (1) essentially states that the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia is a government institution that exercises state power in the field of prosecution and other authorities based on the law. The research results show that the purpose of the establishment of the Asset Recovery Agency (formerly known as the "Asset Recovery Center") at the Donggala District Attorney's Office is based on the principles of social justice and legal certainty as stipulated by the Prosecutor's Law, whereby the return of assets to the rightful owners or to the State is carried out to achieve this goal, thereby providing a deterrent effect on criminal offenders. Because the illegal acquisition of something or an asset, the asset recovery handling procedure at the Donggala District Attorney's Office is carried out in accordance with the laws and regulations but lacks transparency, as evidenced by the absence of socialization of the Asset Recovery Center (PPA) or Asset Recovery Agency (BPA) to the general public both online and offline. As a result, the general public will have difficulty accessing information regarding the clarity of the status of confiscated goods or assets related to criminal offenses managed by the prosecutor's office. The author believes this because, based on a comparison with the Asset Recovery Center (PPA) and the Asset Recovery Agency (BPA) of the Donggala District Attorney's Office and the Palu District Attorney's Office, information regarding the Asset Recovery Center (PPA) and the Asset Recovery Agency (BPA) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) is easily accessible online. To achieve this goal, the PPA and BPA should innovate so that the public can easily access the information provided by the prosecutor's office.
Perbandingan Hukum Legalitas Aborsi Menurut KUHP Indonesia dan Japan Penal Code 2023 Putra, Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila; Setyawan, Ady Nur; Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana; Suarda, I Gede Widhiana
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 5 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i5.2389

Abstract

Aborsi merupakan isu kompleks yang melibatkan dimensi moral, medis, dan hukum serta menjadi topik diskusi yang terus berkembang di ruang akademik dan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan pengaturan hukum mengenai legalitas aborsi berdasarkan KUHP Indonesia 2023 dan Japan Penal Code 2023 beserta regulasi kesehatannya. Metode yang digunakan ialah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif yang dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui kajian pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua negara sama-sama mengkategorikan aborsi sebagai tindak pidana, namun memberikan pengecualian terhadap kondisi medis darurat serta kehamilan akibat pemerkosaan. Perbedaan mendasar tampak pada alasan pembenar dan batas usia kehamilan, di mana Indonesia menetapkan batas 14 minggu dengan persyaratan administratif ketat, sedangkan Jepang melalui Maternal Protection Act memperbolehkan hingga 22 minggu dengan mempertimbangkan faktor sosial-ekonomi. Terdapat pula variasi dalam sanksi pidana, di mana Indonesia memberikan hukuman yang lebih berat terutama bagi tenaga medis yang terlibat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya reformulasi kebijakan hukum Indonesia agar lebih seimbang dalam melindungi hak hidup janin sekaligus menjamin keselamatan dan otonomi reproduksi perempuan
URGENSI PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Moch. Hasan Hafani; Dominikus Rato; Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi November 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i11.1200

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan merupakan kerangka hukum utama dalam sistem legislasi nasional. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya, ditemukan berbagai kelemahan mendasar yang menghambat efektivitas pembentukan regulasi di Indonesia. Beberapa kelemahan tersebut antara lain ketidakjelasan posisi hierarki norma hukum, lemahnya harmonisasi antar peraturan, keterbatasan partisipasi publik, serta belum optimalnya pengaturan mengenai kewenangan pengundangan. Kelemahan-kelemahan ini menyebabkan inkonsistensi regulasi, konflik antar jenis peraturan, dan rendahnya legitimasi hukum di mata masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, perubahan terhadap UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 dianggap mendesak untuk meningkatkan efektivitas legislasi nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen resmi, serta jurnal-jurnal akademik yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa urgensi perubahan UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 tidak hanya menyangkut aspek teknis administratif, tetapi juga mencakup kebutuhan untuk membentuk sistem legislasi yang lebih terintegrasi, transparan, dan partisipatif. Dengan adanya perubahan tersebut, proses pembentukan regulasi diharapkan menjadi lebih efisien, mampu merespons dinamika sosial secara tepat, serta memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum yang lebih baik kepada masyarakat.
Kriminalisasi Deepfake Pornography Berbasis AI dalam Perspektif Perlindungan HAM Di Era Digital Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum; Moh. Muhlisin; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi November 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i11.1246

Abstract

The advancement of artificial intelligence technology in the digital era had a significant impact on human life, including emergence of abuse in the form of deepfake pornography.  Phenomenon involves the manipulation of a person's face or voice into pornographic content without consent, which clearly violates the rights to privacy, honor, and human dignity. In Indonesia, although there are regulations such as the ITE Law, the TPKS Law, the PDP Law, and the national Criminal Code, there is no regulation that explicitly ensnares the crime of deepfake pornography. This creates a legal vacuum and serious challenges in human rights protection. This study uses a normative juridical method with legislative and conceptual approach to analyze the urgency of criminalizing AI-based deepfake pornography and formulate an ideal policy model within the Indonesian criminal law system. The results of the study suggest that criminalization is a necessary form of human rights protection that can adapt to technological developments. The ideal criminalization policy model must be comprehensive and integrative, encompassing specific criminal regulations, strengthening digital forensics, victim protection and recovery, international cooperation, and a cultural approach. Criminal law can function effectively as an instrument for protecting human rights and promoting social justice in digital era.
STANDAR SANITASI DAN FITOSANITASI WTO DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEAMANAN DAN DAYA SAING PRODUK INDONESIA DI PASAR INTERNASIONAL Ramadhani Hidayat Priyono Putra; Dominikus Rato; Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 06 November (2025): Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal
Publisher : PT Wahana Global Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Standar Sanitasi dan Fitosanitasi (Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards/SPS) menjadi elemen penting dalam meningkatkan keamanan serta daya saing produk Indonesia di pasar internasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi standar SPS dalam peraturan internasional, khususnya di bawah kerangka Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia (WTO), serta dampaknya terhadap produk Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, kajian ini mengacu pada pendekatan perundang-undangan untuk mengevaluasi regulasi terkait SPS, baik di tingkat internasional maupun nasional, serta pendekatan konseptual untuk memahami relevansi SPS dalam strategi perdagangan internasional Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa harmonisasi standar SPS dengan regulasi internasional dapat memperkuat akses pasar, namun pelaku usaha masih menghadapi tantangan dalam pemenuhan standar tersebut, terutama terkait infrastruktur dan kapasitas teknis. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan regulasi domestik, peningkatan pengawasan, dan kerja sama internasional untuk memastikan implementasi SPS secara efektif, demi mendukung daya saing produk Indonesia di pasar global.
Hakikat Keilmuan Hukum Sistem Civil Law dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Murni Nabillah, Tahsya; Prasetiyo, Rio Wibowo Agung; Ohoiwutun, Y.A Triana; Rato, Dominikus
Legalita Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Legalita
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47637/legalita.v7i2.2003

Abstract

In the development of modern legal science, understanding the essence of legal science has become increasingly important in explaining the position of law as an autonomous discipline amid social, moral, and political influences. This study aims to examine the essence of legal science based on Hans Kelsen's pure theory of law and its relevance to the development of legal science in civil law and common law systems. The research method used is normative jurisprudence with three approaches, namely the legislative approach to examine the hierarchy of norms in the legal system, the conceptual approach to examine the Grundnorm and Stufenbau des Recht theories, and the comparative approach to compare the application of these theories in the two legal traditions. The results of the study show that Kelsen's concept of the hierarchy of norms is in line with the codification system in civil law, because each norm derives its validity from a higher norm, culminating in the basic norm. Meanwhile, in common law, Kelsen's thinking remains relevant because judicial decisions can be understood as legal norms that are valid and binding within the hierarchy of norms. Thus, Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law provides a universal conceptual foundation for the development of legal science as a rational, systematic, and autonomous discipline.
A Comprehensive Analysis of Modern Investment Principles: Trends, Challenges, and Investment Implications in the Digital Age Erlita, Ita; Majid, Nurholis; Ohoiwutun, Y. A. Triana
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 7, No 4 (2025): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v7i4.9530

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze recent developments in investment practices and outcomes in the digital era. The main focus includes the impact of financial technology (FinTech) adoption on corporate investment efficiency and allocation, the behavior of retail investors increasingly influenced by social media and online trading platforms, as well as the dynamics of sustainable investment (ESG) and its implications for financial performance. In addition, this study highlights policy aspects and managerial practices that are relevant to the changing landscape of modern investment. Based on a synthesis of literature from the past five years, the findings indicate that digitalization—through the use of FinTech and online platforms—has transformed capital allocation mechanisms while also affecting investor decision-making patterns. Meanwhile, empirical evidence regarding the impact of ESG-based investments on corporate performance remains heterogeneous, indicating the need for more comprehensive data and consistent reporting standards. Thus, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the trends, challenges, and implications of investment in the digital era.
Penerapan Hukum Kewenangan Audit Hukum Jaksa Pengacara Negara (JPN) Terkait Kesalahan Administrasi yang Berpotensi Merugikan Keuangan Negara Saka Andriyansa; Moh. Muhlisin; Dominikus Rato; Y.A.Triana Ohoiwutun
Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publ
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1288

Abstract

Law enforcement in the context of recovering state finances does not solely focus on corruption offenses, but also on administrative errors that may potentially cause losses to the state. The State Attorney (Jaksa Pengacara Negara/JPN) holds strategic authority through legal audits to identify, assess, and provide recommendations regarding potential state financial losses arising from administrative actions inconsistent with applicable regulations. This research formulates two main issues: first, how the legal authority of JPN is applied in conducting legal audits on administrative errors potentially causing state financial losses; second, what legal mechanisms are employed by JPN in conducting legal audits on such administrative errors. The findings of this study indicate that the implementation of legal authority by JPN through legal audits aims to ensure that every aspect of authority, procedure, and substance in governmental decision-making, as well as in the procurement of goods and services, complies with legal provisions, starting from the needs identification stage up to the final handover of work results. This is essential for JPN to accurately determine administrative errors that may potentially cause state financial losses and to formulate them in a legal audit report. The mechanism for resolving legal audit findings is carried out through coordination between JPN and the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) to determine the amount of potential losses. Subsequently, JPN provides recommendations to the applicant to return the potential losses to the state or regional treasury.
Threats to Indonesia’s Economic Sovereignty in the Appointment of Foreign Executives in State-Owned Enterprises Elizatul Mufidah Indana; Ibnu Alwaton Surya Waliden; Abdelmajid Idris Mohammed Khalil; Dominikus Rato; Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Jember: Sharia Faculty State Islamic University of Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/ijlil.v7i2.469

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional implications of the government policy that allows foreign nationals to occupy executive positions in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) concerning the principle of national economic sovereignty, as stipulated in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The background of this research lies in the growing practice of economic globalization, which demands efficiency and professionalism in SOE management but potentially shifts the meaning of state control over vital sectors of production. This study employs a normative juridical method with conceptual and comparative approaches to national regulations and international practices. The findings indicate that the involvement of foreign nationals in SOE management can be acceptable insofar as it is limited by constitutional principles, the nationality principle, and strict public oversight. The novelty of this research lies in proposing a constitutional policy model that integrates corporate efficiency with state economic sovereignty. This model has practical implications for the international community: positively, it provides a clear legal framework for global investors and professionals, thereby enhancing the predictability of the investment climate and offering an adaptive model for other developing countries to align world-class corporate governance with national sovereignty; however, potentially negatively, strict limitations might be perceived by the global business community as a barrier or discrimination against the transfer of expertise and international capital flows. This integrative approach remains rarely discussed in the field of constitutional economic law in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Aan Efendi Abdelmajid Idris Mohammed Khalil Abid Uais Al-qarni ACHMAD JAELANI RUSDI Ade Irma Suryani Adiatma, Achmad Fahmi Affiani, Rifrinda Nur Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra Ahmad Halim Ainul Azizah Al Khanif Aleya Zeneizha Ancah Caesarina Novi Marchianti Andika Maulana Syah Putra Andreas, Tonny Annisa Zerlina Cindy Gayatri Aries Harianto Ayudyana Suyudi, Godeliva Badrul Huda Chatterjee, Pyali Chosya Sheila Aprilliana Arimbhi Danny Surachman Dewanto, Ari Dodik Prihatin A.N. Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Domonikus Rato Dwi Novantoro Edi Susanto Eko Surya Prasetyo Elen, Madelleina Anindita Eriesta Elizatul Mufidah Indana Emaniar, Melly Yunandita Endah Dwi Nurhayati Erlita, Ita Fachrizal Fachrizal, Fachrizal Fadillah, Yohana Alfine Fajrin, Nabila Fanny Tanuwijaya Fanny Tanuwijaya Fathur Rozzi Firda Yunita Dewi Firman Floranta Adonara Firosyiah, Nur Fiska Maulidian Nugroho Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi Halif, Halif Hanny Hilmia Fairuza Haromain, Rozy Heru Iskandar I Gede Widhiana Suarda Ibnu Alwaton Surya Waliden Ifani, Titania Nur Islamy, Anisyia Nurul Jadmiko, Widhi Jimmy Z. Usfunan Khanif, Al Laksana, Trio Angga Laksmanajati, Teofilus Dendro Lely Lestari Lutfi Nur Aida Lutfian, Lutfian M. Arief Amrullah Madelleina Anindita Eriesta Elen Maia Kapanadze Manab, Abd. Moch. Hasan Hafani Moh. Muhlisin Muhammad Abi Aufa Muhammad Abi Aufa Muhammad Syauqun Adhim Muhammad Syauqun Adhim Mushafi Mustikasari, Dyah Ayu Nabila Fajrin Nabillah, Tahsya Nani Agustina Nelsa Jehni Asih R. Nikmatul Keumala Nofa Yuwono Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Suwandi Nur Firosyiah Nurholis Majid, Nurholis Nurul Hasanah Okta, Enggita Anggraeni Oktaviyani, Evin Prabhata, Evoryo Carel Pradayani, Santi Pramana, Mario Adiluz Prasetiyo, Rio Wibowo Agung Prihatmini, Sapti Putra, Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putri, Natasya Aulia Qoyyima, Azrotul Rachim, Kania Venisa Rahayu Dianasari Rahayu, Yenny Rahmadiyanti Ramadani, Firda Farikhah Ramadhana Putra Pratama Ramadhani Hidayat Priyono Putra Ronny Max Hendra Saka Andriyansa Samsudi . Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samuel Saut Martua Samosir Sapti Prihatmini Satriya Aldi Putrazta Selly Ismi Qomariyah Setiawan, Ady Nur Setiyoargo, Arief Setyawan, Ady Nur Sieldy Aprilia Utami Silaban, Rendy Tridolok Sofia Herliana Fatmarani Sonia Wijaya Putra Surjanti, Surjanti Suyudi, Godeliva Ayudyana Taniady, Vicko Uun Ulfiana Vicko Taniady Vicko Taniady Wahyudi, Yudha Ilham widowati widowati Widowati, Widowati Windy Puri Astuti Wulan Candrakirana, Wulan Yenny Rahmadiyanti Rahayu Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum Zaini, Maghfirotuz