p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.635
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Lentera Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Veritas et Justitia Multidiciplinary Journal YUSTISI TAHKIM Unes Law Review Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Supremasi Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Journal of Judicial Review RIO LAW JURNAL Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum BHIRAWA LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Hukum Legalita Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities PATTIMURA Legal Journal Journal of Social And Economics Research Jurnal El-Thawalib Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia International Journal of Economics (IJEC) JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Nusantara Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Referendum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi IPSSJ Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Jurnal Jurisprudence Jurnal El-Thawalib Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL) Fairness and Justice Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Rechtenstudent Journal
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Legal Certainty in the Criminalization of Directors Misusing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Funds Ade Irma Suryani; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Y. A Triana Ohoiwutun
Rechtenstudent Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Rechtenstudent December 2025
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v6i3.374

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a legal obligation for companies as regulated in Article 74 of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (PT Law). However, in practice, misuse of CSR funds remains common in both private companies and State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN), creating adverse impacts on society and the government. This study aims to examine the legal framework governing the criminal liability of directors for the misuse of CSR funds within the Indonesian criminal law system and to analyze the application of the principle of legal certainty. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study finds that directors may be held criminally liable under Article 488 of the Criminal Code when CSR funds are misused in private companies, while similar acts in BUMN may be categorized as corruption under Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Law. Nonetheless, ambiguity within Article 74 of the PT Law continues to generate multiple interpretations, potentially hindering legal enforcement and conflicting with the principles of legality and legal certainty. Therefore, a specific regulation (lex specialis) addressing directors’ criminal liability in CSR fund management is required to enhance legal certainty and strengthen accountable and transparent corporate governance.
Criminal Law Politics and Punishment Theories: A Comparative Study of Retributive vs. Restorative Justice in Indonesia and Georgia Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Suwandi; Lutfi Nur Aida; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Y A Triana Ohoiwutun; Maia Kapanadze
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Volume 4 Issue 3 December (2025): PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v4i3.21767

Abstract

Introduction: The debate between retributive and restorative justice remains a central issue in the politics of criminal law across jurisdictions. Indonesia and Georgia represent two countries undergoing legal transitions with distinct historical and socio-political contexts, yet both face similar challenges in determining the orientation of their penal policies. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the differences in the application of retributive and restorative penal theories within the criminal law policies of Indonesia and Georgia, as well as to identify the factors influencing these orientations. Methods of the Research: The research adopts a normative legal method with a comparative approach, examining statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and relevant judicial decisions. Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Indonesia continues to rely on its colonial legacy through the Criminal Code, which predominantly reflects a retributive paradigm, while gradually incorporating restorative principles in specific legislation such as the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. Conversely, Georgia, which previously enforced an extreme zero tolerance policy rooted in a retributive approach, has shifted toward restorative justice within its juvenile justice system through the enactment of the Juvenile Justice Code of 2015. The novelty of this research lies in its comparative analysis, which uncovers how historical, cultural, political, socio-economic, and legal factors shape each country’s penal orientation. These findings contribute to the development of comparative criminal law scholarship and provide valuable insights for promoting more balanced penal policies that integrate both retributive and restorative justice.
Legal Certainty of Criminal Responsibility for Artificial Intelligence Scam through Electronic Communications in Indonesia Nabila Fajrin; Ade Irma Suryani; Dominikus Rato; Y. A Triana Ohoiwutun
Rechtenstudent Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Rechtenstudent August 2026
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v7i2.413

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has achieved significant progress across various sectors but has also created new challenges in the field of law, particularly regarding the emergence of new methods of fraud (scam) through electronic communication. AI-based scams, such as the use of deepfake technology to mimic the faces and voices of public figures, have opened opportunities for technological misuse that harms society. This study aims to analyze Indonesia’s legal regulations concerning AI-based scam offenses conducted through electronic communication and to examine the legal certainty in determining the criminal liability of perpetrators. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the regulation of such crimes is already established in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP). Article 492 of the KUHP remains relevant since the elements of fraud are fulfilled even when committed digitally, while Articles 28 and 35 of the UU ITE regulate the dissemination of false information and electronic data manipulation, and Articles 65–68 of the UU PDP provide protection for victims’ personal data. Based on the legal principle of geen straf zonder schuld (“no punishment without fault”), the use of AI does not eliminate human culpability, as AI merely serves as a tool controlled by the perpetrator. Therefore, Indonesian law has provided a clear foundation of legal certainty in determining criminal liability for perpetrators of AI-based scams conducted through electronic communication.
LOGIKA HUKUM FRASA “ALASAN SANGAT MENDESAK” DALAM DISPENSASI KAWIN MELALUI HARMONISASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2019 DAN PERMA NOMOR TAHUN 2019 Nurul Hasanah; Ramadhana Putra Pratama; Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun; Dominikus Rato
TAHKIM Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): TAHKIM
Publisher : IAIN Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33477/thk.v22i1.11956

Abstract

This study examines the normative meaning of the phrase “urgent reasons” (alasan sangat mendesak) in marriage dispensation cases, emphasizing the need for harmonization between Law Number 16 of 2019 on Marriage and Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 5 of 2019 on Guidelines for Adjudicating Marriage Dispensation Applications. The main issue addressed in this research concerns the ambiguity (vague norm) of the phrase, which leads to varied interpretations among religious court judges, resulting in inconsistent decisions and a weakened principle of legal certainty. Employing a normative juridical approach with a qualitative analysis method, this study draws upon primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research. The findings reveal that the absence of clear normative indicators in PERMA No. 5 of 2019 causes judges to rely more on social and moral considerations rather than assessing the child’s psychological readiness, indicating that the principle of the best interest of the child has not been fully realized. Therefore, a normative reconstruction is needed by establishing objective criteria, utilizing psychosocial assessment tools, and strengthening judges’ capacity through child protection–oriented training. This research contributes conceptually to the development of Indonesia’s family law system by proposing a model of legal harmonization that integrates legal certainty, substantive justice, and child protection, thereby promoting a more consistent, fair, and human rights–based practice of marriage dispensation. Keywords: Marriage Dispensation, Urgent Reasons, Legal Harmonization
Kewenangan Notaris Mengesahkan Perjanjian Kawin Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi Ahmad Halim; Dominikus Rato; Triana Ohoiwutun
Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2026): Fairness And Justice
Publisher : ‎Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32528/fairness.v24i1.4862

Abstract

Ketentuan Pasal 29 ayat (1) UU Perkawinan pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU/XII/2015 memberikan perubahan dalam pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dimana sebelumnya perjanjian perkawinan hanya dapat dibuat sebelum perkawinan berlangsung menjadi dapat dibuat sebelum, pada saat dan selama perkawinan berlangsung. Selain itu Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU/XII/2015 memberikan kewenangan baru kepada Notaris untuk mengesahkan perjanjian perkawinan. Pasal 29 ayat (1) UU Perkawinan pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU/XII/2015 terkait bentuk perjanjian perkawinan dalam bentuk perjanjian tertulis dan disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan seringkali salah dimaknai sebagai akta autentik, sehingga terjadi ketidaharminisan peraturan pelaksanaan terkait dengan bentuk dari perjanjian perkawinan. Kata Kunci : Kewenangan baru Notaris, perjanjian perkawinan, pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan. Tujuan Penelitian untuk menganalisis dasar dan sifat kewenangan baru Notaris dalam mengesahkan perjanjian perkawinan pasca Putusan MK No. 69/PUU/XII/2015  metode penelitian yang dipakai yaitu hukum normatif karena fokus kajian berangkat dari kekaburan norma, menggunakan pendekatan: statute approach, conceptual approach, serta analytical approach. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan Notaris diperoleh secara atributif langsung dari Pasal 29 ayat (1) UU Perkawinan, dan bentuk perjanjian perkawinan pasca putusan MK adalah akta di bawah tangan yang dilegalisasi, bukan akta autentik notariil.
Kedudukan Amnesti dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia Dwi Novantoro; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/jq.v4i3.7922

Abstract

Ketentuan amnesti merupakan salah satu dari 4 (empat) bentuk pengampunan yang merupakan hak prerogatif Presiden berdasarkan Pasal 14 UUD NRI 1945. Selain tersurat dalam Pasal 14 ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 dan Pasal 1 dan Pasal 4 UU Darurat RI Nomor 11 Tahun 1954 tentang Amnesti dan Abolisi, sebagai pembaharuan hukum pidana, amnesti merupakan salah satu aspek yang membuat gugurnya kewenangan penuntutan sebagaimana tersurat dalam Pasal 132 ayat (1) huruf h UU 1/2023 tentang KUHP dan  Pasal 71 ayat (2) huruf h UU 20/2025 tentang KUHAP serta Pasal 132 ayat (1) huruf h UU 1/2026 tentang Penyesuaian Pidana. Amnesti juga merupakan salah satu aspek yang membuat gugurnya kewenangan pelaksanaan pidana sebagaimana tersurat dalam Pasal 140 huruf c UU 1/2023 tentang KUHP. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui kedudukan amnesti dalam sistem peradilan pidana demi terwujudnya supremasi hukum yang berkepastian dan berkeadilan.
Measuring the Boundaries of Criminal Liability for Obscene Acts in Medical Treatments (Case Study of Decision Number 114/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Idi) Y.A. Triana ohoiwutun; Sapti Prihatmini; Windy Puri Astuti; Aleya Zeneizha
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 13, No. 1, June 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i1.1858

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Objectives of the study: This study examined the boundaries of criminal liability for the obscene act of doctors in providing medical treatments to patients beyond their authority. In addition, this study further investigated the panel of judge ratio decidendi towards the case. Methodology: This study employed a doctrinal method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a qualitative analysis. Results: The defendant's actions in Decision Number 114/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Idi is categorized as malpractice or obscene acts, in which determining parameters are related to acts of violation of medical ethics, medical discipline and/or violations of criminal law. The assessment of the boundaries of criminal liability of doctors in the process of proving a case in court requires information from examination sessions by the MKEK and/or MKDI institutions. The role of MKEK and/or MKDI is urgent; however, their authorities are dissimilar, and the results of their examinations do not bind the criminal court decision. Applications of this study: This study evaluated the liability of doctors in both criminal and ethical liability. In addition, this study serves as an evaluation tool for judges' logical approach. Novelty/ Originality of this study: This study examined the criminal and ethical liability of doctors in a case study. Keywords: Malpractice, Standard Operating Procedure, Competency Standard ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Penelitian ini mengkaji batas-batas pertanggungjawaban pidana atas perbuatan cabul dokter dalam memberikan perawatan medis kepada pasien di luar kewenangannya. Selain itu, penelitian ini menyelidiki lebih lanjut tentang pertimbangan majelis hakim (rasio decidendi) terhadap kasus tersebut. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode doktrinal dengan pendekatan statute (perundang-undangan), pendekatan konseptual, dan analisis kualitatif. Temuan: Tindakan tergugat dalam Putusan Nomor 114/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Idi dikategorikan sebagai malpraktik atau perbuatan cabul, dimana parameternya mengacu pada tindak pelanggaran etika kedokteran, disiplin kedokteran, dan/atau pelanggaran hukum pidana. Penilaian batas-batas pertanggungjawaban pidana dokter dalam proses pembuktian suatu perkara di pengadilan memerlukan keterangan dari sesi pemeriksaan yang dilakukan oleh lembaga MKEK dan/atau MKDI. Peran MKEK dan/atau MKDI sangat penting, namun kewenangan dua lembaga tersebut berbeda, dan hasil pemeriksaan dua lembaga ini tidak mengikat pada putusan MK. Kegunaan: Penelitian ini mengevaluasi tanggung jawab dokter dalam pertanggungjawaban pidana dan etika. Selain itu, penelitian ini berfungsi sebagai alat evaluasi untuk pendekatan logis para hakim. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Penelitian ini mengkaji tanggung jawab pidana dan etika para dokter dalam sebuah studi kasus. Kata kunci: Malpraktik, Standar Operasional Prosedur, Standar Kompetensi
MENGURAI KONSEP HUKUM SEBAGAI ALAT UNTUK MEREKAYASA MASYARAKAT (LAW AS A TOOL OF SOCIAL ENGINEERING) Danny Surachman; Dominikus Rato; Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Supremasi Vol 16 No 1 (2026): Volume 16 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/supremasi.v16i1.5235

Abstract

Tulisan ini menguraikan bahwa dalam suatu Masyarakat hukum mempunyai peran penting sebagai sarana untuk mengubah Masyarakat. Terkait dengan tujuan tersebut maka hukum merupakan alat untuk merekayasa masyarakat agar masyarakat bertindak sesuai tujuan hukum dan dapat tercipta ketertiban. Roscoe Pound adalah salah satu tokoh yang menguraikan bahwa Law as a tool of sosial engineering, yang berarti hukum sebagai alat pembaharuan dalam Masyarakat. Di Indonesia konsep tersebut dikembangkan oleh Mochtar Kusumaatmaja yang lebih “suka” menggunakan istilah “sarana” daripada “alat” (tool) hal ini disesuaikan dengan kondisi di Indonesia. Pada kondisi demikian, hukum sebagai alat pembaharuan dalam masyarakat, dalam istilah ini hukum diharapkan dapat berperan merubah nilai-nilai sosial dalam Masyarakat.
Legal Certainty in the Criminalization of Directors Misusing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Funds Ade Irma Suryani; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Y. A Triana Ohoiwutun
Rechtenstudent Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Rechtenstudent December 2025
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v6i3.374

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a legal obligation for companies as regulated in Article 74 of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (PT Law). However, in practice, misuse of CSR funds remains common in both private companies and State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN), creating adverse impacts on society and the government. This study aims to examine the legal framework governing the criminal liability of directors for the misuse of CSR funds within the Indonesian criminal law system and to analyze the application of the principle of legal certainty. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study finds that directors may be held criminally liable under Article 488 of the Criminal Code when CSR funds are misused in private companies, while similar acts in BUMN may be categorized as corruption under Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Law. Nonetheless, ambiguity within Article 74 of the PT Law continues to generate multiple interpretations, potentially hindering legal enforcement and conflicting with the principles of legality and legal certainty. Therefore, a specific regulation (lex specialis) addressing directors’ criminal liability in CSR fund management is required to enhance legal certainty and strengthen accountable and transparent corporate governance.
Kekosongan Aturan Mengenai Perwalian Bagi Calon Prajurit TNI yang Telah Dewasa Ditinjau dari Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Sofia Herliana Fatmarani; Dominikus Rato; Y A Triana Ohoiwutun
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7459

Abstract

Penelitian ini mempunyai dua tujuan. Tujuan pertama agar memahami dan menganalisis kekosongan aturan mengenai Perwalian calon Prajurit TNI yang telah dewasa. Tujuan kedua adalah meneliti urgensi adanya aturan yang mengatur mengenai hal tersebut dari perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Sifat penelitian adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Jenis penelitian ialahpeneilitian kepustakaan. Bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini ialah data sekunder yang meliputi bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Alat pengumpulan data pada riset ini ialah studi kepustakaan. Analisa yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis kualitatif. Perolehan riset dan pembahasan memperlihatkan bahwasannya terdapat kekosongan aturan mengenai Perwalian bagi anak yang telah dewasa. Permintaan Penetapan Perwalian ini jadi suatu persyaratan yang wajib terpenuhi pada pendaftaran calon Prajurit TNI sesuai SKEP Panglima TNI nomor 57/II/2003. Aturan yang mengatur mengenai perwalian diperuntukkan untuk perwalian anak, bukan perwalian bagi orang dewasa. Kesimpulan penelitian adalah kekosongan aturan ini mengakibatkan adanya 2 kewenangan absolut yaitu antara Pengadilan Agama dan Pengadilan Negeri karena pada prakteknya Perwalian untuk pendaftaran calon Prajurit TNI tetap dapat diajukan melalui Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama. Mahkamah Agung perlu diluncurkannya SEMA (Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung) tentang Perwalian bagi orang dewasaa agar tidak terjadi kekosongan hukum dan menciptakan keseragaman dalam proses penyelesaian perkara.
Co-Authors Aan Efendi Abdelmajid Idris Mohammed Khalil Abid Uais Al-qarni ACHMAD JAELANI RUSDI Ade Irma Suryani Adiatma, Achmad Fahmi Affiani, Rifrinda Nur Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putra Ahmad Halim Ainul Azizah Al Khanif Aleya Zeneizha Ancah Caesarina Novi Marchianti Andika Maulana Syah Putra Andreas, Tonny Annisa Zerlina Cindy Gayatri Aries Harianto Ayudyana Suyudi, Godeliva Badrul Huda Chatterjee, Pyali Chosya Sheila Aprilliana Arimbhi Danny Surachman Dewanto, Ari Dodik Prihatin A.N. Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Dominikus Rato Domonikus Rato Dwi Novantoro Edi Susanto Eko Surya Prasetyo Elen, Madelleina Anindita Eriesta Elizatul Mufidah Indana Emaniar, Melly Yunandita Endah Dwi Nurhayati Erlita, Ita Fachrizal Fachrizal, Fachrizal Fadillah, Yohana Alfine Fajrin, Nabila Fanny Tanuwijaya Fanny Tanuwijaya Fathur Rozzi Firda Yunita Dewi Firman Floranta Adonara Firosyiah, Nur Fiska Maulidian Nugroho Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi Halif, Halif Hanny Hilmia Fairuza Haromain, Rozy Heru Iskandar I Gede Widhiana Suarda Ibnu Alwaton Surya Waliden Ifani, Titania Nur Islamy, Anisyia Nurul Jadmiko, Widhi Jimmy Z. Usfunan Khanif, Al Laksana, Trio Angga Laksmanajati, Teofilus Dendro Lely Lestari Lutfi Nur Aida Lutfian, Lutfian M. Arief Amrullah Madelleina Anindita Eriesta Elen Maia Kapanadze Manab, Abd. Moch. Hasan Hafani Moh. Muhlisin Muhammad Abi Aufa Muhammad Abi Aufa Muhammad Syauqun Adhim Muhammad Syauqun Adhim Mushafi Mustikasari, Dyah Ayu Nabila Fajrin Nabillah, Tahsya Nani Agustina Nelsa Jehni Asih R. Nikmatul Keumala Nofa Yuwono Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Suwandi Nur Firosyiah Nurholis Majid, Nurholis Nurul Hasanah Okta, Enggita Anggraeni Oktaviyani, Evin Prabhata, Evoryo Carel Pradayani, Santi Pramana, Mario Adiluz Prasetiyo, Rio Wibowo Agung Prihatmini, Sapti Putra, Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Putri, Natasya Aulia Qoyyima, Azrotul Rachim, Kania Venisa Rahayu Dianasari Rahayu, Yenny Rahmadiyanti Ramadani, Firda Farikhah Ramadhana Putra Pratama Ramadhani Hidayat Priyono Putra Ronny Max Hendra Saka Andriyansa Samsudi . Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samuel Saut Martua Samosir Sapti Prihatmini Satriya Aldi Putrazta Selly Ismi Qomariyah Setiawan, Ady Nur Setiyoargo, Arief Setyawan, Ady Nur Sieldy Aprilia Utami Silaban, Rendy Tridolok Sofia Herliana Fatmarani Sonia Wijaya Putra Surjanti, Surjanti Suyudi, Godeliva Ayudyana Taniady, Vicko Uun Ulfiana Vicko Taniady Vicko Taniady Wahyudi, Yudha Ilham widowati widowati Widowati, Widowati Windy Puri Astuti Wulan Candrakirana, Wulan Yenny Rahmadiyanti Rahayu Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum Zaini, Maghfirotuz